Adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder) is a common condition characterised by pain, stiffness and reduced function. While conventional physiotherapy (typically comprising joint mobilisation, stretching, strengthening and electrotherapy) is widely used, there is limited evidence for the effectiveness of advanced neuromuscular techniques such as the reciprocal inhibition technique (RIT). This study aims to evaluate the impact of incorporating RIT into standard physiotherapy compared with standard physiotherapy alone in individuals with adhesive capsulitis.

This is a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. 30 adults aged 30–70 years with clinically confirmed adhesive capsulitis will be recruited from a tertiary rehabilitation centre in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Participants will be randomly allocated to receive either RIT combined with conventional physiotherapy or conventional physiotherapy alone, with both groups undergoing 12 treatment sessions over 4 weeks. The primary outcome is pain intensity at 4 weeks post-randomisation, measured by the Numeric Pain Rating Scale. Secondary outcomes include shoulder range of motion (abduction, internal and external rotation, assessed with a universal goniometer), functional ability (Shoulder Pain and Disability Index) and muscle strength (abduction, internal and external rotation, measured by hand-held dynamometry). Blinded assessors will conduct evaluations at baseline and after the intervention. Data will be analysed using intention-to-treat principles. Between-group comparisons will be made using linear mixed models with fixed effects for group, time and group-by-time interaction, and a random intercept for participants to account for repeated measurements. Within-group changes will be estimated from the models.

This trial has received ethical clearance from the Institutional Review Board of the Institute of Physiotherapy, Rehabilitation & Research (approval number BPA-IPRR/IRB/18/02/2025/32). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and international conferences in accordance with Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) guidelines. By addressing a significant evidence gap, this study may establish RIT as an effective and affordable adjunct to standard physiotherapy for managing adhesive capsulitis.

CTRI/2025/06/089288 [Registered on: 23/06/2025]

Social accountability is a key value and aspirational goal of many medical institutions. While much has been studied on social accountability in the context of medical education and institutions, less research has examined how social accountability influences research. In light of this absence, the objective of our scoping review is to research the following questions: (1) What characterises socially accountable research (SAR), and how is it expressed and experienced? (2) How do language, positionality, and worldview influence SAR?, and (3) What structures and considerations are necessary to support successful SAR in local and global contexts?

To answer the above research questions, the Arksey and O’Malley, Levac et al, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines will be followed. The search strategy was adapted and applied to MEDLINE, Embase, ERIC, and CINAHL databases. A total of n=5289 eligible articles were identified. Articles were excluded if they were published before 1995, were in a language other than English, or were duplicates, leaving n=2840 articles for title/abstract screening.

Ethical approval is not required to complete this study. We will take an integrated knowledge translation approach. Throughout the project, results will be disseminated to knowledge users (ie, consultations, following Arksey and O’Malley). Our findings will be presented to the larger academic community, policymakers, and healthcare practitioners through presentations, reports, newsletters, and an online repository.

Open Science Framework 16 July 2024. osf.io/mvhnu.