FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Comprehensive Cancer Networks in the Netherlands: how do they affect quality and costs of care for colon or pancreatic cancer? A retrospective cohort study

Por: Vrinzen · C. E. J. · Stadhouders · N. · Bloemendal · H. J. · Hayen · A. · Reitsma · J. · ten Hove · M. · Jeurissen · P. P. T. · Merkx · M. A. W. · Hermens · R. P. M. G.
Objective

Concentration of care and collaborations between hospitals increasingly reorganise oncological care into Comprehensive Cancer Networks (CCNs), aiming to improve care outcomes and reduce costs. This study aims to evaluate the effect of four CCNs on healthcare cost and outcomes for patients with colon or pancreatic cancer.

Design

We performed a retrospective cohort study based on claims data in the Netherlands. Data included patient characteristics, health insurance claims and healthcare activities. All costs were indexed to Euro 2023. We performed propensity score matching per CCN and applied regression models with a difference-in-difference design, adjusting for non-linear trends before the start of a CCN.

Setting

The study was conducted within the Dutch healthcare system, analysing claims data representative of hospital-based cancer care.

Participants

A total of 92 309 patients with colon cancer and 25 630 patients with pancreatic cancer were included. Patients were identified through health insurance claims between January 2013 and June 2021.

Intervention

Implementation of four CCNs, which included structured collaboration between healthcare organisations. Follow-up duration was 2 years post-diagnosis.

Outcome measures

Primary outcomes included 2-year oncological healthcare costs and 2-year mortality rate. Secondary outcomes involved care process indicators: referral rates and double diagnostics (an identical diagnostic activity performed within 4 weeks after referral to a secondary hospital).

Results

For colon cancer, one CCN showed a significant decrease in 2-year oncological costs (–1899). One CCN showed a significant decrease in referrals (–3.6%) and one a significant increase (+4.4%). No significant effect on 2-year mortality and double diagnostic activities was found. For pancreatic cancer, one CCN showed a significant decrease in 2-year oncological costs (–3747) and one CCN showed a significant increase in double diagnostic activities (+8.6%). No significant effect on referrals and 2-year mortality was found.

Conclusion

CCNs do not consistently reduce costs or affect referral patterns or redundant diagnostics. No impact on mortality was found. Additional insights into determinants of CCN success are required before broad implementation is warranted.

How Government Policies and Organisational and Sectoral Circumstances Influence Nurse Practitioner and Physician Assistant Employment and Training: A Realist Analysis Using Surveys

ABSTRACT

Aims

To explain how government policies affected decision-making on Nurse Practitioner and Physician Assistant employment and training within Dutch healthcare organisations, and how organisational and sectoral circumstances were influential.

Design

An online, cross-sectional survey study.

Methods

A literature- and interview-based program theory was tested using surveys. Respondents from hospital care, (nursing) home care, primary care, and intellectual disability services were recruited using convenience sampling. Data analysis used descriptive statistics and inferential tests. Open-ended responses were analysed using thematic synthesis techniques. Survey results were clustered to assess verification, falsification, or refinement of program theory elements.

Results

A total of 568 experts in hiring and training healthcare professionals participated. Respondents indicated that most government policies promoted employment and training. Organisational and sectoral circumstances caused significant variations in Nurse Practitioner and Physician Assistant deployment across healthcare sectors, shaping how decision-makers interpreted and acted on government policies. Specific circumstances within primary care hampered deployment.

Conclusion

Government policies stimulated training and employment by: (1) removing practice restrictions (scope of practice expansion, legal acknowledgment), (2) facilitating cost-effective training and deployment (training grants, billing options), (3) providing sectoral knowledge on deployment, training, and healthcare outcomes (funding research and a sectoral knowledge center), and (4) establishing sectoral agreements (on apprenticeships). Organisational and sectoral circumstances significantly influenced outcomes. Key circumstances included flanking policies, stakeholder support, labor market capacity, healthcare demand, organisational resources and aims, and type of decision-makers (medical doctor or manager/director). Familiarity with the professions stimulated deployment.

Impact and Implications

The refined and verified program theory supports designing effective skill-mix policies and facilitating Nurse Practitioner and Physician Assistant employment and training. Tailoring skill-mix policies can optimise outcomes. This offers opportunities for governments, healthcare funders, organisations, and professionals to contribute to healthcare quality, cost efficiency, and patient satisfaction.

Patient or Public Contribution

Healthcare professionals were part of the study population.

❌