Conectar
by Elisabeth G. van der Hulst, Kenneth Meijer, Pieter Meyns, Christopher McCrum
Training fall-resisting skills can prevent falls in older adults. These fall-resisting skills include proactive gait adaptability, gait robustness, and reactive gait recovery, which allow people to effectively avoid, resist, and recover from balance threats, respectively. This pilot study guided the design of an RCT of fall-resisting skills training by investigating key design factors, such as the design of a placebo-control group, obstacle difficulty settings, exploring evaluation methods for gait robustness, testing the effect of task unpredictability on anxiety, and the general feasibility. Eleven healthy older adults performed non-task-specific “placebo” balance tasks and assessment and training tasks for each fall-resisting skill. Placebo tasks included static weight-shifting exercises and dual-task walking. For the fall-resisting skill tasks, participants walked on a treadmill under different conditions. For proactive gait adaptability, participants avoided projected obstacles varying in size, approach speed, and available response time. Gait robustness was assessed using perturbations of increasing magnitude, where the margin of stability following each perturbation was compared with participants’ perceived balance loss and researchers’ observations. For reactive gait recovery, perturbations with increasing unpredictability were applied, after which participants reported their anxiety scores. Weight-shifting tasks were perceived as balance training by most participants, indicating their potential as placebo tasks. Obstacle avoidance difficulty increased most with fast approach speed and large obstacle sizes. A margin of stability-based threshold did not consistently align with perceived balance loss or observer judgement. Anxiety did not increase with more unpredictable perturbation tasks when introduced gradually. Fall-resisting skill tasks generally were feasible for older adults.To identify the available records surrounding the deployment of perioperative nurses into differing clinical settings during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Integrative review methodology.
Quality appraisal of each record was conducted using a modified Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist. Data were extracted and presented based on outlined research objectives.
Six electronic databases (CINAHL Plus, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of Science) were searched, with relevant peer-reviewed records published after 2019 until February 2025 included to differentiate from other respiratory pandemics.
Ten records were included in the review. Opposing discourse exists between perioperative decision makers and those perioperative nurses who underwent deployment to differing clinical areas surrounding perceptions and experiences of deployment during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Few studies exist exploring experiences of perioperative nurse deployment to a different clinical area during the COVID-19 pandemic. Further research is vital to develop strategies that enhance the deployment process and ensure effective patient care across various clinical settings when cared for by deployed perioperative nurses.
Further research exploring transferable perioperative nursing skills and its subsequent influence on safe patient care may enhance and inform nurse deployment practices, enriching future staffing protocols in the event of a future pandemic.
PRISMA guidelines for reporting systematic reviews guided this review.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
Self-harm represents a significant public health concern and is a common reason for contact with urgent and emergency care (UEC) services among young people. Although young people frequently interact with multiple components of the urgent care system following self-harm, there is limited system-level evidence describing patterns of service use, transitions between services and repeat emergency department (ED) attendance. An improved understanding of how young people use UEC services after self-harm is needed to inform the design of more effective and appropriate care pathways.
This protocol describes a prospective cohort study using an extract from the Centre for URgent and Emergency care research database (CUREd+) research database, which comprises routinely collected, linked healthcare data from the National Health Service 111 (NHS 111), ambulance services, urgent care centres, walk-in centres and EDs across Yorkshire and the Humber, England. The study population will include young people aged ≤25 years presenting to UEC services between April 2019 and March 2022 with self-harm coded as the reason for attendance. Analyses will describe the prevalence of self-harm presentations across UEC settings, quantify the proportion of NHS 111 and ambulance contacts resulting in ED attendance within 24 hours and examine factors associated with ED reattendance at 3 and 12 months. Mixed-effects logistic regression models will be used to account for repeated attendances, confounding variables and temporal variation, including changes related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Anticipated analysis period: January 2026–January 2027.
Ethical approval has been granted by the University of Leeds (MREC 22-079 Amd1) and the University of Sheffield (Ref 068194). The CUREd+ research database operates under Research Ethics Committee approval (23/YH/0079) and Confidentiality Advisory Group approval (18/CAG/0126). Individual consent is not required as all data are pseudonymised at source. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and public-facing outputs coproduced with patient and public involvement groups.
FreshRSS 