Conectar
Many rural communities bear a disproportionate share of drug-related harms. Innovative harm reduction service models, such as vending machines or kiosks, can expand access to services that reduce drug-related harms. However, few kiosks operate in the USA, and their implementation, impact and cost-effectiveness have not been adequately evaluated in rural settings. This paper describes the Kentucky Outreach Service Kiosk (KyOSK) Study protocol to test the effectiveness, implementation outcomes and cost-effectiveness of a community-tailored, harm reduction kiosk in reducing HIV, hepatitis C and overdose risk in rural Appalachia.
KyOSK is a community-level, controlled quasi-experimental, non-randomised trial. KyOSK involves two cohorts of people who use drugs, one in an intervention county (n=425) and one in a control county (n=325). People who are 18 years or older, are community-dwelling residents in the target counties and have used drugs to get high in the past 6 months are eligible. The trial compares the effectiveness of a fixed-site, staffed syringe service programme (standard of care) with the standard of care supplemented with a kiosk. The kiosk will contain various harm reduction supplies accessible to participants upon valid code entry, allowing dispensing data to be linked to participant survey data. The kiosk will include a call-back feature that allows participants to select needed services and receive linkage-to-care services from a peer recovery coach. The cohorts complete follow-up surveys every 6 months for 36 months (three preceding kiosk implementation and four post-implementation). The study will test the effectiveness of the kiosk on reducing risk behaviours associated with overdose, HIV and hepatitis C, as well as implementation outcomes and cost-effectiveness.
The University of Kentucky Institutional Review Board approved the protocol. Results will be disseminated in academic conferences and peer-reviewed journals, online and print media, and community meetings.
Social exclusion (such as that experienced by people who are homeless, incarcerated or use drugs) increases morbidity across a range of diseases but is poorly captured in routine data sets. The aim of this study was to use a novel composite variable in a national-level hospital usage dataset to identify social exclusion and to determine whether social exclusion is associated with concurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in hospitalised patients in Ireland. Identifying and characterising this association in people who are socially excluded will inform VTE prevention and treatment strategies.
Retrospective cross-sectional study.
Irish Hospital Inpatient Enquiry (HIPE) system, which collects diagnostic information by International Classification of Diseases Tenth Revision code on all hospital admission episodes in the Ireland.
All hospital admission episodes involving a VTE diagnosis (in a primary ‘Dx 1’ or secondary ‘Dx 2–30’ coding position) during a 12-month period in the Ireland were identified from consolidated, national-level datasets derived from the Irish HIPE system. Social exclusion was defined as the presence of one or more indicators of homelessness, drug use, incarceration, health hazards due to socioeconomic status or episodes of healthcare terminated prematurely.
Of 5701 admission episodes involving a VTE diagnosis (in a primary or secondary position) during the study period, 271 (4.8%) related to an individual affected by social exclusion. Among hospitalised individuals identified as being socially excluded based on the novel composite variable, the likelihood of having a concurrent VTE diagnosis was over twofold greater than that observed in the general population (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.79 to 2.26; p
These data suggest that VTE (primary and secondary) is over-represented in hospitalised socially excluded persons in Ireland and that the development of strategies to address this potentially life-threatening accompanying condition in this vulnerable patient group must be prioritised.
Multisectoral collaboration highlighted as key in delivering on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), but still little is known on how to move from rhetoric to action. Cambodia has made remarkable progress on child health over the last decades with multisectoral collaborations being a key success factor. However, it is not known how country stakeholders perceive child health in the context of the SDGs or multisectoral collaborations for child health in Cambodia.
Through purposive sampling, we conducted semistructured interviews with 29 key child health stakeholders from a range of government and non-governmental organisations in Cambodia. Guided by framework analysis, themes, subthemes and categories were derived.
We found that the adoption of the SDGs led to increased possibility for action and higher ambitions for child health in Cambodia, while simultaneously establishing child health as a multisectoral issue among key child stakeholders. There seems to be a discrepancy between the desired step-by-step theory of conducting multisectoral collaboration and the real-world complexities including funding and power dynamics that heavily influence the process of collaboration. Identified success factors for multisectoral collaborations included having clear responsibilities, leadership from all and trust among stakeholders while the major obstacle found was lack of sustainable funding.
The findings from this in-depth multistakeholder study can inform policy-makers and practitioners in other countries on the theoretical and practical process as well as influencing aspects that shape multisectoral collaborations in general and for child health specifically. This is vital if multisectoral collaborations are to be successfully leveraged to accelerate the work towards achieving better child health in the era of the SDGs.
The exploration of conceptual equivalence within the process of the cross-cultural adaptation of tools is usually neglected as it generally assumed that the theoretical construct of a tool is conceptualized in the same way in both the original and target culture. This article attempts to throw light on the contribution of the evaluation of conceptual equivalence to the process of adaptation, and for tool development. To illustrate this premise, the example of the cross-cultural adaptation of the Patients' Perception of Feeling Known by their Nurses (PPFKN) Scale is presented.
An adapted version of the Sousa and Rojjanasrirat (Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2011, 17(2), 268–274) guidelines was used to translate and culturally adapt the PPFKN Scale to Spanish language and culture. A qualitative descriptive study was added to the traditional process of translation and pilot study to explore the concept in the target culture and recognize conceptual equivalence.
Experts in the tool concept, bilingual translators and the author of the tool participated in the translation of the original tool into Spanish. A pilot study of the Spanish version with a sample of 44 patients and a panel of six experts from different fields evaluated its clarity and relevance. In addition, seven patients participated in a descriptive qualitative study using semi-structured individual interviews to explore the phenomenon in the new culture. A content analysis following the Miles, Huberman & Saldaña (Qualitative data analysis, a methods sourcebook, 2014) approach was used to analyze qualitative data.
The cross-cultural translation and adaptation of the PPFKN scale into Spanish required a thorough revision. More than half of the items needed discussions to reach consensus regarding the most appropriate Spanish term. In addition, the study confirmed the four attributes of the concept identified in the American context and allowed for new insights within those attributes to appear. Those aspects reflected characteristics of the phenomenon of being known in the Spanish context and were added to the tool in the format of 10 new items.
A comprehensive cross-cultural adaptation of tools should incorporate, together with the study of linguistic and semantic equivalence, the analysis of the conceptual equivalence of the phenomenon in both contexts. The identification, acknowledgment and study of the conceptual differences between two cultures in relation to a phenomenon becomes an opportunity for deeper study of the phenomenon in both cultures, for understanding of their richness and depth, and for the proposal of changes that may enhance the content validity of the tool.
The evaluation of conceptual equivalence of tools within the process of cross-cultural adaptation will make it possible for target cultures to rely on tools both theoretically sound and significant. Specifically, the cross-cultural adaptation of the PPFKN scale has facilitated the design of a Spanish version of the tool that is linguistically, semantically and theoretically congruent with Spanish culture. The PPFKN Scale is a powerful indicator that evidences nursing care contribution to the patient's experience.
Objetivo. Analizar factores relacionados con la conducta suicida en pacientes con enfermedad mental para orientar la prevención y cuidados de salud mental especializados. Material y métodos. Estudio descriptivo transversal de una muestra de 44 pacientes hospitalizados por conducta suicida en psiquiatría. Durante 12 meses se registraron variables sociodemográficas y clínicas, se aplicaron la escala Columbia de cribado del riesgo suicida, la de Desesperanza de Beck, la de Impulsividad de Plutchik y el Inventario de Razones para Vivir. Se usó estadística descriptiva e inferencial para una significación estadística de p<0,05. Resultados. El 84% (n=37) presentó ideación suicida, el 63,3% (n=28) tentativa y el 2,3% (n=1) suicidio consumado. Realizaron más intentos previos las mujeres (60%/n=15) que los hombres (38%/n=7). La intoxicación medicamentosa fue el método más utilizado por ambos sexos seguido de autolesiones por mujeres (p<0,05) y precipitación por hombres (p<0,05). La depresión, trastorno más prevalente, se asoció a la edad y al medio rural (p<0,05). El trastorno de ansiedad fue el más predictivo para la intención/plan y tentativas suicidas (p<0,05). El 80% (n=16) de los intentos padecía enfermedad médica (p<0,05). Se evidenció la relación inversa entre las creencias de supervivencia/afrontamiento y la conducta suicida. Discusión. La conducta suicida supone más del 20% de los ingresos de una unidad psiquiátrica. No es posible determinar un perfil único de riesgo, se han evidenciado diferencias según el espectro suicida. Todos los factores relacionados deben ser valorados.
ABSTRACT
Objective. To analyze factors related to suicidal behavior in patients with mental illness to guide prevention and specialized mental health care. Methodology. A descriptive cross-sectional study carried out in a sample of 44 inpatients at a psychiatric unit who attempted suicide. Sociodemographic and clinical variables were registered during 12 months. The scales applied were the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS), Beck Hopelessness Scale, Plutchik’s Impulsivity Scale and the Reasons for Living Inventory. A descriptive and inferential statistic has been applied for a statistical significance of p<0,05. Results. 84% (n=37) had suicidal thinking, 63,3% (n=28) attempted suicide and 2,3% (n=1) committed suicide. More women (60%; n=15) than men (38%; n=7) attempted suicide. Medication overdose was the main suicidal approach by both sexes followed by self-harm by women (p<0,05) and deliberate fall by men (p<0,05). Depression, the most prevalent disorder, was associated with age and rural environment (p<0,05). Anxiety had the highest predictive value of suicidal attempt (p<0,05). 80% (n=16) of those who attempted suicide suffered from a medical illness (p<0,05). There is evidence of inverse relationship between the survival and coping beliefs and the suicidal behaviour. Discussion. Suicidal behaviour surpasses 20% of the admissions at a psychiatric unit. It is not possible to determine a specific risk profile as differences according to the suicidal spectrum have been acknowledged. Every possible cause must be evaluated.
FreshRSS 