Conectar
To reflect on ethnography as a qualitative research methodology in nursing, examining its conceptual, theoretical and practical applications. It offers insights into its effective adoption in nursing research, particularly in culturally diverse healthcare settings, emphasising the integration of ethnonursing and critical ethnography.
This methodological reflection draws on the author's research experience and extensive review of ethnography's principles and practices.
This paper examines key components of ethnography, including participant observation, semi-structured interviews and field notes. Ethical considerations, data analysis processes and strategies to ensure trustworthiness and reflexivity are discussed. Special attention is given to the application of ethnonursing in culturally specific care and the use of critical ethnography to analyse power dynamics and institutional structures.
Ethnography, particularly ethnonursing and critical ethnography, provides an invaluable framework for understanding healthcare's cultural and social dynamics. The paper presents reflections on methodological challenges encountered during an ethnographic study of neonatal intensive care units in Jordan, offering practical insights for nursing researchers.
Ethnography enables nursing researchers to explore the complexities of human experiences within cultural contexts, contributing to the advancement of culturally informed and evidence-based nursing practices. The combination of ethnonursing and critical ethnography enhances the ability to uncover both cultural influences on care and the structural factors shaping healthcare experiences.
This paper provides methodological insights that can guide nursing researchers to adopt ethnography effectively, promote culturally sensitive care that aligns with patients' social and cultural needs, and contribute to healthcare equity and improved patient outcomes.
This paper follows the COREQ (Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research) guidelines.
No patient or public contribution.
Geographical isolation compounds limited access to healthcare services and skilled workforce for the provision of rural aged care. Residents have complex chronic disease management and end-of-life care needs. An undersupply of general medical practitioners due to retirement, attrition or unfilled training places in Australia has impacted recruitment to rural areas. Nurse practitioners have been identified as a potential solution.
To describe and explore the inner (local and organisational) and outer (wider health system) contexts of healthcare, from the perspective of care staff and residents' families. This, in turn, aims to inform the planned implementation of a nurse practitioner model, in several aged care facilities, operating within rural and remote settings, in Queensland Australia.
A convergent mixed methods design.
Qualitative data were collected, in 2022–2023, using semistructured interviews with staff focusing on role, knowledge development, workplace culture and care relationships with local community. Resident's family's perspectives were obtained as a secondary analysis of organisational feedback data. Quantitative data were collected from direct care workers using the Alberta Context Tool for Long-Term Care. Data were analysed according to type and integrated.
Relational care for residents and families is highly valued but provision of quality is challenging where time-poor staff are perceived to be doing the best they can. Scarce local healthcare services make it difficult to meet resident healthcare needs. Despite the supportive organisational culture, evolving policy requirements have impacted already difficult staff recruitment in rural settings.
Identifying contextual needs of organisations in readiness for change highlights geographical and sectoral nuances influencing any future implementation. As government policy changes to improve the older adult care sector, rural and remote facilities are forced to increasingly adapt.
Context-specific needs extend far beyond a nurse practitioner providing additional expertise in care provision.
What problem did the study address? Nurse practitioners have been successfully implemented into residential aged care facilities in metropolitan and major regional centres but translating this role into rural and remote Australia requires being cognisant of the needs, unique challenges and context of this setting.
What were the main findings? In an organisational culture of support, the importance of staff providing relational care and having connection with older adult residents and families was a central driver. It was challenging for staff to meet complex care requirements in the absence of local healthcare options and support. Time pressures, from inadequate staffing and changing structural aged care sector, force the prioritising of care requirements.
Where and on whom will the research have an impact? Older adults, policy makers and aged care providers will benefit from understanding the context of rural and remote settings, particularly in identifying potential solutions when there are gaps in primary and secondary healthcare.
The GRAMMS checklist was followed in reporting of this study.
Two lived experience consumers were involved as research team members. One was involved during the development and submission of the funding application and another during project activities including data collection and analysis and the development of publications.
Current guideline-recommended antibiotic treatment durations for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) are largely standardised, with limited consideration of individual patient characteristics, pathogens or clinical context. This one-size-fits-all approach risks both overtreatment—promoting antimicrobial resistance and adverse drug events—as well as undertreatment, increasing the likelihood of pneumonia recurrence and sepsis-related complications. There is a critical need for VAP-specific biomarkers to enable individualised treatment strategies. The Ventilator-associated pneumonia Biomarker Evaluation (VIBE) study aims to identify a dynamic alveolar biomarker signature associated with treatment response, with the goal of informing personalised antibiotic duration in future clinical trials.
VIBE is a prospective, observational, case-cohort study of 125 adult patients with VAP in Michigan Medicine University Hospital intensive care units. Study subjects will undergo non-bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage on the day of VAP diagnosis (Day 1) and then on Days 3 and 5. Alveolar biomarkers (quantitative respiratory culture bioburden, alveolar neutrophil percentage and pathogen genomic load assessed via BioFire FilmArray polymerase chain reaction) will be assessed. An expert panel of intensivists, blinded to biomarker data, will adjudicate each patient’s Day 10 outcome as VAP clinical cure (control) or treatment failure (case). Absolute biomarker levels and mean-fold changes in biomarker levels will be compared between groups. Data will be used to derive a composite temporal alveolar biomarker signature predictive of VAP treatment failure.
Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Michigan Institutional Review Board (IRB #HUM00251780). Informed consent will be obtained from all study participants or their legally authorised representatives. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conferences and feedback into clinical guidelines committees.
FreshRSS 