Conectar
Hospital falls and associated injuries are a global issue associated with harm and significant costs to individuals and society, especially for older adults. Hospital standards specify the minimum level of care required to optimise patient safety, quality and outcomes. Standards are often used during hospital accreditation. This investigation analysed the content and quality of hospital falls standards across the globe.
Hospital standards were located by searching online databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Google Scholar, MEDLINE), ChatGPT, the grey literature via internet search engines, and websites of accreditation agencies, government agencies, and other relevant organisations. We searched for standards from the 60 largest countries by population plus the 60 countries with the highest gross domestic product (n = 82 after accounting for duplicates). For inclusion, hospital standards had to mention ‘fall/s’. Data were analysed using a deductive framework synthesis and content analysis to identify emergent themes.
Forty-one standards used by at least 72 countries were identified from our search. Sixteen were excluded from detailed analysis because they did not mention falls and 3 could not be retrieved. A total of 22 standards were included in the final detailed analysis. Included standards showed wide variations in content and quality. Seven were assessed as high quality, 12 medium quality, and 3 were deemed to be of low quality. Some lacked details on hospital falls screening, assessment, prevention, and management. Consumer engagement in development, implementation, or evaluation was not mentioned in all standards. Procedures for falls data collection and reporting were seldom documented. Hospital standards infrequently referred readers to contemporary research or clinical practice guidelines.
There are variations in the quality and content of standards on hospital falls. International collaboration is recommended to increase the consistency and validity of hospital falls standards across nations, in order to optimise healthcare outcomes.
The findings of this global analysis of hospital falls standards have the potential to impact falls rates and fall-related injuries in hospital patients by providing data to inform the content, evidence base and use of hospital standards to optimise the safety and quality of care delivery. The findings inform the review, design and implementation of hospital accreditation procedures to improve patient outcomes, patient experiences, and service quality.
Continuous pulse oximetry monitoring has been used in patient deterioration recognition systems for decades. For patients on supplemental O2, questions related to the effectiveness of this approach have been raised due to elevation of SpO2 from O2 therapy. We examine this issue in the context of a stable inpatient continuous pulse oximetry-based rescue system with the aim of ascertaining if patients receiving supplemental oxygen are at risk of experiencing clinically meaningful delays in deterioration recognition as compared to patients on room air.
Retrospective observational analysis.
Clinical markers of deterioration recognition timeliness and impact were compared for patients receiving various levels of supplemental oxygen and those on room air over 6 years. Chart review was conducted to assess cause and likelihood of preventability and improvement in detection with other monitoring modalities for emergent cases.
Analysis adjusted for patient characteristics, and population level supplemental oxygen use showed no difference between patients on supplemental oxygen vs. room air for transfer rate, emergent transfer rate, or death after rescue or transfer. Analysis excluding population supplemental oxygen modeling showed limited increases in event likelihood, but not for emergent transfers. Chart review of emergent transfers revealed no pattern of delay in recognition of deterioration for patients on supplemental oxygen.
This study found no evidence that pulse oximetry-based continuous monitoring significantly degrades or delays detection of severe deterioration episodes for patients receiving supplemental oxygen. These findings challenge arguments suggesting pulse oximetry is not an appropriate continuous monitoring modality for general care patients receiving oxygen.
This study provides clinical nurses with information about using continuous monitoring when caring for patients who are receiving supplemental oxygen in the general care setting. The study also assesses patient safety of the practice of using pulse oximetry for monitoring in this patient population.
This study addresses concerns related to using continuous pulse oximetry monitoring for deterioration detection when patients are receiving supplemental oxygen. This study found no evidence that pulse oximetry-based continuous monitoring significantly degrades or delays detection of severe deterioration episodes for patients receiving supplemental oxygen. The results can be used by the inpatient nursing community to ensure safe practices are in place for patient care.
This study adheres to the STROBE reporting method.
Patient and/or public contribution was not deemed applicable for the rigorous design and execution of this study.
This project team aims to (1) evaluate the effectiveness of the Workforce Engagement for Compassionate Advocacy, Resilience, and Empowerment (WE CARE) program in improving the work environment, workplace mental health, and nurse outcomes, and (2) examine underlying factors influencing job satisfaction and intent to leave among staff nurses.
Quasi-experimental designs with one-group pre–post program design using online surveys.
Pre-program data were collected in June 2022 (n = 706), followed by the implementation of multifaceted, evidence-based interventions delivered by the WE CARE team, such as wellness rounding and resilience education. Post-program data were collected in November 2024 (n = 417). Mixed-effects regression models were utilised for analysis.
The WE CARE program was associated with statistically significant improvements in the overall work environment, workplace mental health (excluding resilience), and nurse outcomes, including job satisfaction and intent to leave. Job satisfaction positively correlated with a supportive work environment, recognition, and trust in supervisors, and negatively correlated with burnout, compassion fatigue, and distress. Higher levels of burnout and distress significantly increased the likelihood of nurses intending to leave their jobs, while greater trust in leadership and perceived organisational support were protective factors against leaving the job.
The project supports the effectiveness of evidence-based workforce engagement interventions in real-world healthcare settings to enhance the work environment, workplace mental health, and nurse outcomes. Interventions targeting emotional well-being, recognition, burnout reduction, and leadership trust may improve job satisfaction and reduce nurses' turnover intentions.
The program directly resulted in nurse leaders recognising the value of the WE CARE initiative and sustaining the team beyond the funding period. This project addresses a significant gap in the nurse well-being literature by demonstrating the effectiveness of a nurse-led, multifaceted wellness program designed specifically for nurses.
No patient or public contribution.
To test the feasibility and acceptability of a newly developed model of neonatal nurse-controlled analgesia to manage pain in the post-operative infant.
The study utilised a single-centre two-arm parallel, unblinded randomised controlled external pilot trial design.
The pilot trial was conducted in a surgical neonatal tertiary intensive care unit in Brisbane, Australia. Eligible infants were randomised to receive either post-operative pain management care via a model of neonatal nurse-controlled analgesia or standard care. Feasibility and acceptability were the primary outcomes. Seven feasibility outcomes were assessed by a traffic light system to delineate progression to a larger trial. Acceptability and clinical utility of the model of care by staff were assessed by feedback from an anonymous questionnaire that was administered at the completion of the trial period. Secondary outcomes included parental attitudes and perceptions of post-operative pain management to help establish primary outcomes for a larger randomised controlled trial.
Overall staff found the formalised model beneficial for managing post-operative pain but found the complexity of the model and ability to titrate analgesia based only on documented pain scores barriers requiring further consideration. Three of the seven feasibility outcomes failed to reach ‘greenlight’ targets to progress to a larger trial with adherence to the model, and the proportion of eligible infants not recruited was allocated a ‘redlight’. Secondary outcomes were comparable and support future study.
This pilot feasibility study has shown that a model of neonatal nurse-controlled analgesia can be safely implemented and utilised in the post-operative care of the surgical neonate. Further exploration of the barriers to model adherence and recruitment is warranted before a future larger trial is undertaken.
Though not all primary outcomes reached an acceptable range for further progression, this pilot feasibility study provided invaluable learning and has provided direction for future research into the provision of a family integrated and responsive model of analgesia.
This study is reported in line with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT): Extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trial and the TIDieR Checklist (Template for Intervention, Description and Replication).
No patient or public contribution was utilised for this study.
Trial Registration: ACTRN12623000643673—the trial was prospectively registered
Analyse the concept of expertise among practicing clinical nurses in hospital settings.
The generational loss of expert clinical nurses was exacerbated globally by the novel coronavirus. This ongoing loss combined with the increased complexity of hospitalised patients has prompted an urgent need to understand expertise among clinical nurses who practice in hospital settings.
Walker and Avant's concept analysis method was used. PubMed, Medline, CINAHL and Access Medicine were searched (1982–2025) for research studies and literature reviews published in English that addressed clinical nursing expertise in hospitals.
Expertise is the knowledge and skills that are enculturated from immersion in a domain. Common attributes include obtaining salient information from different sources, interpreting patient situations rapidly and holistically, and performing actions that are individualised, immediate and appear instinctive. Common antecedents include deliberate accumulation of relevant experience and contextual connections within the hospital. Facilitating improved outcomes and facilitating improved outcomes are common consequences.
The attributes, antecedents and consequences of clinical nursing expertise are complementary and cross specialties. Experts' apparently instinctive actions are not intuitive but rather related to relevant past experiences, pattern recognition and skilled know-how. The requirements to develop expertise have evolved with the increased volume of available knowledge.
Expertise requires cultivating relevant experiences through active engagement with patients and creating contextual connections with others regarding hospital systems and processes. Experts should be formally included when developing processes and guidelines. Low-fidelity proxy measures like years of experience should be replaced with psychometrically validated instruments to measure expertise.
This concept analysis addresses the ambiguity of clinical nursing expertise by synthesising over 40 years of literature and provides insights for clinical nurses and researchers regarding the importance of context and the growing complexity of care delivery.
No patient or public involvement.
To locate and synthesise clinical guidelines for nurses and other health professionals undertaking routine virtual health (telehealth) assessment, triage and follow-up care. To locate practice guidelines where clinician and client are not in the same physical location and health assessments are undertaken ‘virtually’.
This review used JBI methodology for scoping reviews and adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Scoping Review extension (PRISMA-ScR).
Search considered primary research, practice guidelines, case reports, expert opinions, professional organisation web-based resources and grey literature. Medline (Ovid), Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health (CINAHL) and Scopus databases were searched in relation to all health professions. Grey literature search included guideline databases, literature databases, customised Google search engines, targeted websites and consultation with content experts. Citation searching was included.
Search identified 2359 peer-reviewed articles and 31 sources of grey literature (1997–2024). After screening, 22 peer-reviewed and 9 grey literature sources met the eligibility criteria for inclusion. Studies were spread across diverse practice settings. Chronological sequencing provided visibility to innovations in telehealth practice over time from telephone-based practice to the introduction of video conferencing and the use of wearable devices for the transmission of remotely recorded clinical information.
Standardised guidelines to safe practice for virtual health assessment are not well documented. The paucity of clinically orientated guidelines may be due to complexity and the resourcing needed to maintain clinically current guidelines across the full breadth of clinical specialisations, practice settings and telehealth modalities. Further research and development are needed in this growing area of care.
The review highlights that clinically relevant guidelines are critical to safety and quality in virtual health contexts. Findings will inform future design and development of clinical practice guidelines for nurses engaged in virtual health assessment, triage and follow-up care.
Not applicable.
To explain how government policies affected decision-making on Nurse Practitioner and Physician Assistant employment and training within Dutch healthcare organisations, and how organisational and sectoral circumstances were influential.
An online, cross-sectional survey study.
A literature- and interview-based program theory was tested using surveys. Respondents from hospital care, (nursing) home care, primary care, and intellectual disability services were recruited using convenience sampling. Data analysis used descriptive statistics and inferential tests. Open-ended responses were analysed using thematic synthesis techniques. Survey results were clustered to assess verification, falsification, or refinement of program theory elements.
A total of 568 experts in hiring and training healthcare professionals participated. Respondents indicated that most government policies promoted employment and training. Organisational and sectoral circumstances caused significant variations in Nurse Practitioner and Physician Assistant deployment across healthcare sectors, shaping how decision-makers interpreted and acted on government policies. Specific circumstances within primary care hampered deployment.
Government policies stimulated training and employment by: (1) removing practice restrictions (scope of practice expansion, legal acknowledgment), (2) facilitating cost-effective training and deployment (training grants, billing options), (3) providing sectoral knowledge on deployment, training, and healthcare outcomes (funding research and a sectoral knowledge center), and (4) establishing sectoral agreements (on apprenticeships). Organisational and sectoral circumstances significantly influenced outcomes. Key circumstances included flanking policies, stakeholder support, labor market capacity, healthcare demand, organisational resources and aims, and type of decision-makers (medical doctor or manager/director). Familiarity with the professions stimulated deployment.
The refined and verified program theory supports designing effective skill-mix policies and facilitating Nurse Practitioner and Physician Assistant employment and training. Tailoring skill-mix policies can optimise outcomes. This offers opportunities for governments, healthcare funders, organisations, and professionals to contribute to healthcare quality, cost efficiency, and patient satisfaction.
Healthcare professionals were part of the study population.
Commentary on: Lou J, Li J, Fan Y, et al. Effects of virtual reality on analgesia in wound care and physical therapy for burn patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain Manag Nursing. 2024; 25(4):377–388.
Implications for practice and research Virtual reality (VR) is a promising distraction intervention for pain and anxiety. Which type of VR and most effective length of exposure to reduce symptom burden is unknown. Future research must address this gap to discover best practices for the frequency, intensity and duration of VR therapy for analgesia.
Over the past 20 years, virtual reality (VR) has emerged in culture and healthcare providing a virtual world with audio and visual stimuli that can be immersive or non-immersive. Immersive VR has headsets with motion detectors that enable a multidimensional environmental experience with sensory feedback. Non-immersive VR provides a one-dimensional digital environment observed...
Commentary on: Alanazi N, Gu F, Li CS, et al.Lorenz RA, Hong CC. Sleep Quality and Associated Factors Among Survivors of Breast Cancer: From Diagnosis to One Year Postdiagnosis. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2024 Feb 19;51(2):163-–174. doi: 10.1188/24.ONF.163-–174. PMID: 38442284.
Implications for practice and research Sleeping disorders are common in breast cancer patients and increase in the first year after diagnosis. Nurses should be aware of the high frequency of these disturbances, which persist after the conclusion of most therapies. The determinants of worsening sleeping quality in breast cancer survivors need to be understood, including the role of treatments, the type of surgery and psycho-social or contextual factors.
Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide. While research in recent decades has focused on minimising treatment, the disease still impacts women’s lives in many ways. Because increased sleep disturbances affect approximately...
Commentary on: Effectiveness of educational interventions in reducing stigma of healthcare professionals and healthcare students towards mental illness: A systematic review and meta- analysis—Wong et al.
Implications for practice and research Training programmes for all healthcare professionals should incorporate appropriate and early education on mental illness and its common societal implications to ensure that care is inclusive and non-judgmental. Education must be tailored, multimodal (in-person/online; contact-no-contact) and repeated. Further research looking at why, when and how stigma develops is necessary.
Stigma exists in society towards mental health and is also demonstrated by healthcare professionals. It develops early on in careers and impacts the delivery of care which further stigmatises this already disadvantaged population. Up to 75% of individuals with mental illness refuse treatment because of stigma leading to negative outcomes.
Commentary to: Woodward A, Nimmons D, Davies N, et al. A qualitative exploration of the barriers and facilitators to self-managing multiple long-term conditions amongst people experiencing socioeconomic deprivation. Health Expect 2024;27(2):e14046. doi: 10.1111/hex.14046.
Implications for practice and research Addressing socioeconomic barriers is crucial to develop patient-centred care models to help self-managing multiple long-term conditions (MLTCs). Managing MLTCs is not solely an individual responsibility, and community-based interventions should aim to strengthen social support networks and reduce social isolation. The extent of the beneficial effects of social support networks on health outcomes and MLTCs self-management should also be addressed in research.
Worldwide, one in three adults lives with multiple long-term conditions (MLTCs) and requires ongoing management and self-management. Socioeconomic deprivation exacerbates health inequalities due to limited resources and opportunities. In England, people living in deprived areas tend to develop MLTCs earlier and have a...
To pilot and evaluate the implementation of a structured Evidence-Based Rounds (EBR) education model in critical care.
A mixed data type design was used to evaluate Evidence-Based Rounds in a critical care setting. Structured observational data were captured and open-ended survey responses were submitted by attendees. Content analysis and descriptive statistics were used to analyse survey findings.
Seventeen rounds were completed between March 2023 and January 2024 with a total of n = 83 clinical staff members. From these, n = 55 staff completed and submitted evaluation surveys. Rounds were most frequently attended by nurses of all bandings including senior clinical nurses, support workers and student nurses. Evidence-Based Rounds were globally perceived as a positive and useful education strategy and staff were very willing to attend future sessions. Patient outcomes were not directly assessed and rounds specifically facilitated three outcomes: (1) helping staff apply evidence to practice, (2) building staff confidence in presenting clinical information and (3) supporting staff in identifying local improvements to patient care.
Evidence-Based Rounds are an adaptable effective model of bedside education within critical care. In our setting, staff perceived that this model facilitated the application of evidence in clinical practice and positively influenced feelings of confidence. Importantly, this education strategy empowered nurses to explore and identify improvements locally to patient care. Whilst this model offers a practical education approach to address some of the key critical care workforce issues, such as an expanding curriculum and loss of senior staff, it could also be widely adopted to other clinical areas.
Evidence-Based Rounds are perceived by staff as a successful bedside education model that facilitates nurses to apply evidence in practice. It is feasible that this strategy is a potentially sustainable, low-cost model for continuing professional development centred around routine clinical work.
No patient or public contribution.
To evaluate the implementation of the Transitional Care Model (TCM), an evidence-based, advanced practice registered nurse-led multi-component intervention, as part of a randomised controlled trial during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Parallel convergent mixed-methods approach.
Data for this study were collected between June 2020 and February 2021. Data from 78 patients who received the intervention and 68 recorded meetings with system leaders and clinical teams were analysed using descriptive statistics, directed content analysis, and joint display.
Fidelity to delivery of elements of the TCM components was variable, with the Hospital-to-Home visit elements having the widest range (14.3%–100%) and Maintaining Relationships elements having the highest range (97.3%–98.6%). There were 27 identified challenges and 15 strategies for implementing the TCM with fidelity during the pandemic.
The COVID-19 pandemic impacted all aspects of the delivery of the TCM across all sites. This historical event highlighted the need for services and support for patients and caregivers transitioning from the hospital to home.
Evidence-based solutions are needed to enhance healthcare delivery and patient outcomes. Findings will guide nurses in implementing proven transitional care interventions.
Findings will inform the implementation and scaling of transitional care and other evidence-based interventions across diverse healthcare settings.
GRAMMS reporting guidelines.
No patient or public contribution.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04212962. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04212962?titles=NCT04212962&rank=1
To combine, synthesise, and interpret qualitative evidence from studies exploring the causes, immediate responses, and preventive measures of needle stick injuries from the perspective of healthcare workers.
In this qualitative evidence synthesis, the qualitative data from the included studies were synthesised to identify overarching themes. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis flowchart, Joanna Briggs Institute tool, and Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research checklist were used in the meta-synthesis process.
The MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science, ProQuest, ClinicalKey and Scopus databases were searched between December 14 and December 31, 2024 for studies published between January 2000 and December 2024.
Nine primary research studies were included and the following themes were identified: unpredicted patient movement, casual attitude, recapping, excessive workload, scarcity of article or safety equipment, inadequate training or experience, vigilance, ongoing training, nurturing workplace culture, emotional response, re-living the injury and fear of reprimand.
Needle stick injuries result from a complex interplay of individual, administrative, engineering, and environmental factors, but there are potential solutions to address these issues.
Policymakers in healthcare settings would benefit greatly from an understanding of the causes, immediate responses, and preventive aspects of needle stick injuries. These findings can direct the creation of focused interventions and safety procedures by identifying important risk variables and useful coping mechanisms.
The causes, immediate responses, and preventive measures of needle stick injuries were explored. Findings can help develop protocols to lower needle stick injury rates and increase worker safety.
ENTREQ guidelines.
This research is a systematic review of published peer-reviewed studies.
PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024620673.
Commentary on: Impact of Crisis Care on Psychiatric Admission in Adults with Intellectual Disability and Mental Illness and/or Challenging Behavior: A Systematic Review—Tai et al.
Implications for practice and research Crisis care should be integrated into community care for this vulnerable and difficult-to-treat population to improve community tenure and reduce healthcare costs. Crisis care versus intensive community care needs to be defined, and standardised models compared, to optimise outcomes in different healthcare jurisdictions.
There is a high prevalence of psychiatric disorders among individuals with intellectual disability. In keeping with deinstitutionalisation, this population has also been moved from hospital to community but not necessarily accompanied by the specialised resources required. Consequently, there are high admission rates, however, this has been associated with traumatic experience (for patients and caregivers), potential neglect and abuse. Community crisis care has been studied for other patient groups but...
Commentary on: Previdoli G, Alldred DP, Silcock J, et al. ‘It’s a job to be done’. Managing polypharmacy at home: a qualitative interview study exploring the experiences of older people living with frailty. Health Expectations 2024;27:e13952.
Implications for practice and research Chronic illness in ageing requires complex medication regimes linked to adverse drug events, hospitalisation and mortality. The impact of age-related frailty with polypharmacy is less known.
Causality exists between frailty and polypharmacy, and the risks associated with polypharmacy among frail older persons are high.
Commentary on: Kung PC, Huang HL, Hsu WC, et al. Coexisting with anomie: Experiences of persons living with early-stage dementia: A grounded theory study. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2024;33(2):452-462.
Implications for practice and research Adopting a holistic care approach for individuals living with early-stage dementia is crucial, addressing not only their physical symptoms but also psychosocial and emotional needs. There is need for further exploration of anomie in the context of dementia, as well as longitudinal and comparative studies to expand the understanding of its implications towards developing effective intervention strategies.
Dementia, recently renamed as ‘major neurocognitive disorder’, manifests with a multitude of symptoms leading to varying disease progression and expression
To map existing sexual and gender minority (SGM) health research in Ireland, identify gaps in literature and outline priorities for future research and healthcare. SGM is an umbrella term that includes people who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or intersex and is sometimes abbreviated as LGBTQI+.
A scoping review of peer-reviewed studies published between 2014 and 2024.
The review followed Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines and PRISMA-ScR framework for scoping reviews. Articles were identified through systematic database searches and screened independently by reviewers.
PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Embase were searched for articles published between January 2014 and April 2024. Sixty studies met inclusion criteria.
The review highlighted a disproportionate focus on gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (gbMSM), particularly regarding HIV and sexual health. Mental health research revealed high levels of anxiety, depression and suicidality, largely attributed to minority stress and systemic discrimination. Transgender health studies documented barriers to accessing gender-affirming care and mental health services. Few studies explored experiences of sexual minority women, older SGM individuals or intersex people. Intersectional perspectives on race, disability and socio-economic status were notably absent.
SGM health research in Ireland reflects significant progress in documenting disparities in mental and sexual health. However, there is a lack of representation for some groups. There is also limited attention to intersectionality. Systematic gaps in sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data impede targeted policymaking and service delivery.
Findings underscore the need for inclusive, culturally competent healthcare services, better integration of SGM health topics into nursing education, and community-centred interventions. Addressing structural barriers and improving provider competence can enhance equitable healthcare access for SGM populations.
This review addresses the fragmented state of SGM health research in Ireland, highlighting gaps in representation and systemic issues.
Authorship includes individuals from various sexual and gender minority communities.
FreshRSS 