Timely diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in Alzheimer’s disease is crucial for early interventions, but its implementation is often challenging due to the complexity and time burden of required cognitive assessments. To address these challenges, the usability of new unsupervised digital remote assessment tools needs to be validated in a care context.

This multicentric healthcare research evaluation survey, re.cogni.ze, aims to evaluate physician satisfaction with a remote digital assessment solution (neotivCare) in primary and specialised routine care in Germany. Over a period of 22 months, physicians in different regions of Germany will recommend the application (app) to approximately 1000 patients for a 12-week self-assessment of cognition. The primary endpoint is the evaluation of physicians’ and patients’ overall satisfaction with neotivCare and with neuropsychological questionnaires/standard procedures using a Likert scale, while secondary endpoints include user-friendliness, qualitative assessment of acceptance and potential improvements on medical routine services. The study also aims to evaluate the proportion of physicians or patients attributing added value to neotivCare compared with standard paper–pencil tests. The study results will provide insights into the feasibility, efficiency and acceptance of new digital tools for MCI diagnosis in routine care. The re.cogni.ze survey will thus provide proof-of-concept information for the implementation of remote digital cognitive assessment apps for MCI into medical routine care.

This study was approved by the ethics committee of the State Medical Association (Landesärztekammer) Baden-Württemberg, (F-2021-161) as the leading committee and nine ethics committees local to the participating healthcare professionals (Lower Saxony, North Rhine, Westphalia-Lippe, Hesse, Bremen, Berlin, University of Göttingen, Charite, University of Rostock). The results can be shared (upon reasonable quest) to improve routine clinical processes and holistic approaches.

Perioperative mobilisation and physical activity are critical components of postoperative rehabilitation. Physical inactivity is a significant risk factor for complications and prolonged hospitalisation. However, specific recommendations for preoperative and postoperative physical activity levels are currently lacking. Evidence suggests that daily step count before and after surgery may impact the length of hospital stay and complication rate.

The goal of this study is to determine the effectiveness of perioperative step volume recommendations, measured by pedometers, in reducing the length of hospital stay and complication rate for patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery.

This study is a single-centre randomised controlled trial with two arms, allocated at a 1:1 ratio. The trial includes individuals undergoing colorectal surgery for either suspected or confirmed colorectal malignancy. A total of 222 patients will be randomly assigned to either an intervention or a control group. Step counts will be measured using a pedometer. Patients assigned to the intervention group will be given a predetermined preoperative and postoperative step count goal. The analysis will be conducted on preoperative and postoperative physical activity, quality of life, health, duration of hospitalisation, complication rate and bowel function, among other factors.

The trial was approved by the ethics committee of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Germany (reference number: 22-0758, protocol version 2022.02). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and shared at academic conferences. After the publication of the results, a fully anonymised data set and the statistical code can be made available on justified scientific request and after ethical approval has been granted.

DRKS00030017.