Conectar
To analyse the content of the nursing diagnosis ineffective peripheral tissue perfusion in patients with diabetic foot.
A methodological study with a quantitative approach was performed.
The analysis was performed between January and May 2021 by 34 nurses with clinical/theoretical/research experience with diabetes or nursing diagnoses. These nurses evaluated the relevance, clarity and precision of 12 diagnosis-specific etiological factors, 22 clinical indicators and their conceptual and operational definitions.
All 12 etiological factors analysed were considered relevant to diagnostic identification. However, five showed inconsistencies regarding the clarity or precision of the operational definitions, requiring adjustments. Regarding the 22 clinical indicators evaluated, all of them presented a Content Validity Index (CVI) that was statistically significant. However, in the indicators, the colour does not return to lowered limb after 1 min of leg elevation, and cold foot had Content Validity Index (CVI) <0.9 regarding relevance and accuracy of operational definitions.
Twelve etiological factors and 22 clinical indicators were validated. Thus, this study revealed new and relevant aspects characterising peripheral perfusion in patients with diabetic foot that have not yet been clinically validated.
This study contributes to support the professional practice of nurses through the early identification of etiological factors and clinical indicators in persons with diabetic foot. As a proposal, we suggest the inclusion of new defining characteristics and related factors for the nursing diagnosis ineffective peripheral tissue perfusion in the NANDA-I taxonomy.
The research highlights new and relevant aspects such as etiological factors and clinical indicators to characterise peripheral perfusion in patients with diabetic foot. Based on these findings, clinical validation is recommended to confirm the relevance of the proposed elements in the population studied for greater reliability and improved diagnostic assessment for the professional practice of nurses.
EQUATOR guidelines were adhered to using the GRRAS checklist for reporting reliability and agreement studies.
No patient or public contribution.
Individual cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) with exposure and response prevention is an effective treatment for obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD). However, individual CBT is costly and time-consuming, requiring weekly therapy sessions for 3–4 months. A 4-day intensive version of CBT for OCD delivered in group format has been recently developed in Norway (Bergen 4-day treatment, B4DT). B4DT has shown promising results in several uncontrolled and one small, randomised trial, but its non-inferiority to the gold standard treatment has not been established.
This single-blind, randomised controlled trial including 120 patients (60 per arm) will compare B4DT to individual CBT. The primary outcome is the blind assessor-rated Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS). We hypothesise that B4DT will be non-inferior to gold standard CBT 15 weeks after treatment start. The non-inferiority margin is set at four points on the Y-BOCS. Secondary outcomes include time to treatment response, cost-effectiveness, response and remission rates, drop-out rates and adverse events.
This study has been approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority. Hypotheses were specified and analysis code published before data collection started. Results from all analyses will be reported in accordance with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement for non-pharmacological trials and Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards irrespective of outcome.
FreshRSS 