Conectar
This research aimed to explore student paramedics’ experiences of participating in group-based simulation activities used as part of their summative assessment. It sought to understand their perceptions of the effectiveness of group-based simulation in fostering learning and informing future assessment design.
A qualitative questionnaire-based study.
A UK higher education institution.
A total of 34 first-year (level 4) student paramedics from the September 2022 to September 2023 cohorts.
Following the completion of a summative assessment for the introduction to non-technical skills and simulation module, students were invited to reflect on their experiences of group-based simulation through an online questionnaire. The assessment incorporated team-based simulation scenarios intended to evaluate non-technical competencies within a realistic and supportive environment.
Four key themes emerged through thematic analysis of the responses: experiential learning; autonomous learning; reflective learning; and support and learning. These themes provide insights into the pedagogical value of group-based simulation, with students identifying both individual and collective benefits in developing non-technical skills within a group assessment framework.
Group-based simulation assessments enhance student engagement and promote collaborative decision-making in a context that mimics real paramedic practice. While students often associate realism with increased confidence, their experiences highlight complex interactions between perceived fidelity, assessment pressure and learning. This underscores the need to further investigate how group dynamics and authenticity influence learning outcomes in assessment-focused simulations.
To describe patient outcomes for patients at high risk of mortality (with a prognosis of three months or less to live) where a Palliative Care Nurse Consultant (PCNC) was embedded in a General Medicine team. To explore patients and/or their carers feedback and allied health, nursing professionals' perspectives on integrating a palliative care approach in the General Medicine ward.
Prospective exploratory study.
SQUIRE reporting guidelines was adopted for the study reporting. This study was conducted over six weeks in a general medicine ward at Monash Medical Centre in Melbourne, Australia. Participants were 20 patients aged > 65 years with non-malignant, chronic conditions at high risk of mortality within three months and had 18 nursing and allied health professionals involved in their care. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively and qualitative survey data were analysed thematically.
Twenty patients participated, with an average age of 87 years. 55% spoke a language other than English. PCNC interventions, focused on care coordination and family liaison, were found to facilitate timely referrals to other support services, improve communication and better address end-of-life care needs. Healthcare professionals recognised the benefits of PCNC involvement; however, a key qualitative theme was staff reluctance to raise palliative care needs due to perceived role boundaries and limited confidence. While PCNC presence improved communication and advocacy, barriers included time constraints and patient/family resistance.
Embedding a PCNC in a general medicine team appears to enhance care coordination and support timely palliative care integration. Addressing barriers and optimising workflow can improve patient, carer and clinician experience as well as improve resource utilisation.
The model has the potential to enhance patient-centred care and clinician support in acute general medicine settings.
The research will have an impact on acute care settings, particularly general medicine units, by informing models of integrated palliative care for patients with complex needs and enhancing staff capability and confidence in providing timely, person-centred care.
Patients or members of the public were not involved in the design, conduct, analysis or manuscript preparation of this study. The project was a prospective observational study with limited scope and resources, which did not include a formal patient or public involvement component.
FreshRSS 