FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Pilot randomised controlled trial of the self-help plus stress management intervention among patients with breast and gynaecological cancer in Viet Nam: a study protocol

Por: Le · P. D. · Nguyen · N. B. · Dang · A. T. T. · Tran · L. T. K. · Pham · H. N. · Le · T. A. · Vo · K. V. · Nguyen · H. T. · Hoang · D.-T. T. · Phan · D. C. · Nguyen · C. B. T. · Nguyen · M. H. T. · Nguyen · Q. H. · Phan · H. N. T. · Dang · T. Q. · Nguyen · H. T. · Le · D. D. · Phan · T. H
Introduction

Implementation of low-intensity, evidence-based psychological interventions can help meet the mental health and psychosocial needs of people with cancer, especially in low-resource settings where there is a dearth of mental health specialists. In this study, we will conduct a feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT) of the stress management intervention Self-Help Plus, which has been translated and adapted to Vietnamese, vSH+, among people newly diagnosed with breast or gynaecological cancer in Viet Nam.

Methods and analysis

At six participating hospitals, individuals diagnosed with breast or gynaecologic cancer within the past year will be recruited, consented and randomised into either enhanced usual care (EUC) or EUC plus the vSH+ intervention, which consists of four sessions each lasting approximately 75 min. Quantitative surveys will be administered at three time points: enrolment/baseline (T0), after 6 weeks (T1) and after 4 months (T2). A qualitative evaluation component, which will include in-depth interviews with patients, implementers and healthcare staff and managers, as well as focus group discussions with caregivers, will assess the acceptability and feasibility of the vSH+ intervention.

Ethics and dissemination

Ethical reviews for the study were obtained from Boston University, Hanoi University of Public Health (HUPH) and all the participating hospital sites. On completion of data collection and analyses, the research team will prepare and submit abstracts to scientific conferences as well as manuscripts to peer-reviewed journals. We will also conduct dissemination events to report the trial results to relevant stakeholders.

Trial registration number

NCT06398067.

Impostor syndrome, associated factors and impact on well-being across medical undergraduates and postgraduate medical professionals: a scoping review

Por: Chua · S. M. · Tan · I. Y. K. · Thummachai · M. E. · Chew · Q. H. · Sim · K.
Objectives

Impostor syndrome (IS) is a psychological state whereby individuals doubt their abilities despite evidence of competence. Though IS has been studied in specific medical groups, no review to date compares findings across groups. This study aimed to: (1) determine the range of IS rates among medical undergraduates versus postgraduates and (2) examine associated factors across both groups.

Design

This scoping review used the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews, using a five-step framework.

Data sources

PubMed, Scopus and PsycINFO databases were searched from inception until September 2024.

Eligibility criteria

Studies were included if they were (1) empirical studies with a defined IS rating scale, (2) involving medical undergraduates, residents or clinicians and (3) published in English.

Data extraction and synthesis

Three independent reviewers used standardised methods to screen and review selected studies, and extract key variables.

Results

54 studies (77.8% from the West) were included. There was equal study distribution between undergraduates (46.3%, 25 studies) and postgraduates (46.3%, 25 studies), with the rest covering both groups. IS prevalence was substantial across all groups when assessed using the Clance Impostor Phenomenon Scale, ranging from 30.6% to 75.9% among undergraduates, 33.0% to 75.0% among residents and 23.5% to 50.0% among faculty and clinicians. In undergraduates, IS was associated with learning breaks, transition periods and poor academic performance. Among postgraduates, IS was correlated with younger age, junior ranking, fewer work years, inadequate faculty support or self-perceived poor clinical and teaching skills. Additionally, IS affected physical and psychological well-being (stress, anxiety, depression, burnout) and was associated with sociodemographic factors (single status, females), personality (neuroticism, perfectionistic traits, with conscientiousness, agreeableness and extraversion as protective) and interpersonal issues (conflicts, poor sense of belonging).

Conclusions

Given the high IS prevalence and associations with specific factors, practical measures are recommended to address IS and optimise learning and care for medical undergraduates and professionals.

❌