FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Preventive interventions for preschool children at risk for emotional and behavioural problems: a scoping review protocol

Por: Anggeriyane · E. · Fitri · S. Y. R. · Dhamayanti · M. · Rakhmawati · W. · Mardya · B.
Introduction

Emotional and behavioural problems (EBPs) are receiving increasing attention at the global level, and preschool children are no exception. These issues have a significant impact on future development. Preventive interventions in preschool age are effective in preventing more serious disorders by improving social skills, emotional regulation and resilience in children. Although various preventive interventions have been developed and their effectiveness demonstrated, the evidence remains fragmented. At present, there has been no comprehensive study mapping EBPs prevention interventions at the preschool age level using the Neuman Systems Model approach.

Methods and analysis

This scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews.The completed scoping review will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). A systematic search will be conducted in four major databases, namely Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and online searches using Google Scholar, without language and publication year restrictions. Two reviewers will independently screen the literature according to the inclusion criteria and then extract the data. Any differences between the two reviewers will be resolved through discussion with a third reviewer. We will compile, summarise and analyse the extracted data and present the results in figures, tables and descriptive narratives to ensure clarity and facilitate comparison across studies.

Ethics and dissemination

Ethical approval is not required, as the review will use only published literature. Findings will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed international journal and may inform policy and practice in early childhood preventive interventions.

Registration

Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/zg6ty).

Long‐Term Effectiveness of Tobacco Smoking Cessation Interventions in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

ABSTRACT

Background

Smoking is a major global health problem. It kills more than half of the users. At least 1.18 billion people smoked cigarettes every day as of 2020. Although many interventions for tobacco smoking cessation have been implemented, their effectiveness remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the long-term effectiveness of various smoking cessation interventions in adults.

Design

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials reporting long-term outcomes.

Methods

Evidence searches were conducted in the Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline-OVID, PubMed, Web of Science, and Clinicaltrials.gov. Two researchers searched until August 2023 without restrictions on country, language, or year of publication. The risk ratio (RR) for continuous abstinence was obtained through biochemical verification at measurements ≥ 6 months post-intervention. Data were extracted and assessed for quality using Risk of Bias 2. Meta-analysis was carried out using a random effects model. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed to explore moderator variables. Sensitivity and publication bias analyses were also performed.

Results

Twenty-two effect sizes from 13 studies showed that tobacco smoking cessation interventions increased continuous abstinence by 2.5 times (RR 3.52; 95% CI; 2.19–5.65). The highest ratio was in the behavioral intervention (RR 7.83) with more than 6 months of therapy (RR 10.57). The tobacco smoking cessation intervention worked better in 55–64 years (RR 7.29), especially in Asia (RR 10.08). The intervention was more effective for female respondents (RR 4.21) and combination therapy format (RR 3.82). However, meta-regression showed that differences in gender and therapy format did not significantly influence the effectiveness of tobacco smoking cessation interventions in adults (p values 0.2748 and 0.8769). Sensitivity analysis (p-value 0.0025) further strengthens the evidence of the conclusions and credibility of the findings.

Conclusion

Behavioral therapy lasting more than 6 months was the most successful tobacco smoking cessation intervention in respondents aged 55–64 years, especially when implemented in Asia. Although not significant, therapies delivered in combination formats, especially in women, have the potential to increase continuous abstinence for adults. These findings provide important evidence for developing effective prevention and treatment strategies for long-term smoking cessation concerning the type, format, and total of therapy.

❌