Conectar
by Sobia Siddiq, Saryia Adra, Kamel A. Samara, Batool Aldaher, Mohamad Emad Aldeen Mahfouz, Nour Sakan, Fathima Musfira, Roomiyah Riyaz Assadi, Ahlam Mohamed Almarzooqi, Hiba Jawdat Barqawi, Eman Abu-Gharbieh
BackgroundYoung-onset stroke represents a growing public health concern, yet data from the United Arab Emirates (UAE) remain limited. This study aimed to examine the risk factors and clinical outcomes associated with young-onset stroke in the UAE.
MethodsA retrospective chart review was conducted on 419 patients aged below 50 years who were admitted at Al Qassimi Hospital, Sharjah, UAE, with a diagnosis of stroke between 2016 and 2022. Data on demographics, comorbidities, stroke subtype, management, and outcomes were collected and analyzed using Python-based statistical libraries.
ResultsThe study population comprised predominantly of male individuals (78.28%), with most patients originating from South Asia (63.96%) and the Middle East and North Africa region (19.33%). Ischemic stroke was the most common subtype (50.12%), followed by intracerebral hemorrhage (27.21%) and non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (22.67%). Hypertension (45.45%) and diabetes mellitus (24.42%) were the most prevalent comorbidities. Only 0.24% of patients underwent mechanical thrombectomy, and 9.41% received intravenous thrombolysis. The overall mortality rate was 12.68%, with coronary artery disease significantly associated with death (p Conclusions
Young-onset stroke in the UAE is characterized by a high burden of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors, particularly hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Targeted preventive strategies and region-specific research are essential to reduce disease burden and improve patient outcomes.
Irrational prescribing is a major global health concern, contributing significantly to increased morbidity, mortality and antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Despite existing knowledge and awareness, irrational antibiotic use remains prevalent among healthcare professionals.
This qualitative study aimed to explore the contributing factors to irrational antibiotic prescribing, understand healthcare professionals’ perceptions, identify barriers to rational use and gather suggestions for improving rational antibiotic use.
A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews was conducted with participants. A total of 60 healthcare professionals (20 physicians, 20 pharmacists and 20 nurses) participated after providing verbal consent.
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with healthcare professionals across various clinical settings in Pakistan until data saturation was reached. The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist was used to ensure transparent reporting. An inductive thematic analysis approach was employed and themes and subthemes were developed from the data.
The findings revealed a generally good understanding of irrational prescribing. Contributing factors included prescriber-related issues, patient expectations, weak regulatory oversight and underutilisation of pharmacists. Key barriers identified were financial constraints, lack of awareness and insufficient resources. Suggestions for improvement included regular audits, public awareness campaigns, an integrated healthcare system, interprofessional collaboration, drug utilisation reviews, adverse drug reaction reporting, standardising hospital policies and strengthening regulatory frameworks.
This study highlights critical factors and barriers contributing to irrational antibiotic prescribing and presents practical suggestions to improve rational use. Implementing evidence-based approaches, updating clinical guidelines, and promoting awareness among healthcare professionals are essential steps toward improving prescribing practices and combating AMR.
FreshRSS 