Conectar
To evaluate whether information about patients' poor sense of security in hypothetical vignette scenarios increases nurses' projected intent to report safety events.
Quantitative, cross-sectional factorial survey vignette experiment administered online.
A convenience sample of 60 nurses from adult inpatient hospital units at a Midwest academic medical center participated in February 2025. Participants responded to demographic questions and eight factorial vignettes, each describing a patient-reported safety breach and incorporating four patient-related factors. Four vignettes included information that the patient had a poor sense of security, and four did not, presented in random order. Following each vignette, participants rated their level of concern about the patient's report, perceived harm to the patient, and likelihood of reporting the patient's concern. A linear mixed-effects modelling approach, accounting for clustering within participants, was used to estimate the effects of the sense of security information factor on nurses' responses.
The sense of security information was associated with higher ratings of (a) degree of concern, (b) perceived harm to the patient, and (c) intent to report the patient's concern, after adjusting for vignette- and participant-level covariates. The vignette patient's perception of physical harm was positively associated with all three ratings. Nurses' greater hospital experience was associated with lower ratings across outcomes.
Obtaining information that the patient felt insecure was associated with heightened concern about the safety event, greater perceived harm, and increased intent to report the concern.
Sense of security assessment may be a risk-agnostic, patient-centered intervention that nurses can routinely perform, regardless of the safety event circumstances.
Although a system of evidence-based practices within a safety culture is essential to hospital safety efforts, nurses' judgements of and responses to patient safety concerns play a critical role and should not be overlooked.
STROBE guidelines.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
To explore the lived experience of young people aged 16–24 years diagnosed with melanoma and that of their significant other in England.
Interpretive phenomenological analysis.
Data were collected between August 2023 and January 2024 from one specialist cancer centre in England. Thirteen young people were approached, and 10 took part. Each young person was asked to nominate a significant other. Five nominated a significant other, and five nominated no one. Although interviews were offered face-to-face, virtual was the preferred method. In-depth semi-structured interviews were audio-recorded with the participant's consent. Interview data were transcribed verbatim and analysed.
The core conceptual thread woven throughout the findings was ‘It's like being on a rollercoaster,’ which is representative of the ups and downs of the treatment trajectory, often without the support of age-appropriate specialist care. Four superordinate themes were identified: ‘Is something wrong?’, ‘Suddenly it's serious’, ‘Out on a limb’ and ‘Finding our place’.
Although most young people were treated in a primary treatment centre for adults with cancer, their experience was challenging from route to diagnosis through their treatment and beyond. Few received age-appropriate care to support their physical, emotional, and social wellbeing to help them navigate the experience.
There is limited evidence exploring the experiences of teenagers and young adults living with melanoma or that of their significant other. This enriched understanding supports improvement of the care pathway and service delivery for these young people and their families.
One young person with lived experience was paid as a consultant to be part of the research team. He helped develop the grant application and research questions, data analysis, and writing this paper.
To locate and synthesise clinical guidelines for nurses and other health professionals undertaking routine virtual health (telehealth) assessment, triage and follow-up care. To locate practice guidelines where clinician and client are not in the same physical location and health assessments are undertaken ‘virtually’.
This review used JBI methodology for scoping reviews and adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Scoping Review extension (PRISMA-ScR).
Search considered primary research, practice guidelines, case reports, expert opinions, professional organisation web-based resources and grey literature. Medline (Ovid), Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health (CINAHL) and Scopus databases were searched in relation to all health professions. Grey literature search included guideline databases, literature databases, customised Google search engines, targeted websites and consultation with content experts. Citation searching was included.
Search identified 2359 peer-reviewed articles and 31 sources of grey literature (1997–2024). After screening, 22 peer-reviewed and 9 grey literature sources met the eligibility criteria for inclusion. Studies were spread across diverse practice settings. Chronological sequencing provided visibility to innovations in telehealth practice over time from telephone-based practice to the introduction of video conferencing and the use of wearable devices for the transmission of remotely recorded clinical information.
Standardised guidelines to safe practice for virtual health assessment are not well documented. The paucity of clinically orientated guidelines may be due to complexity and the resourcing needed to maintain clinically current guidelines across the full breadth of clinical specialisations, practice settings and telehealth modalities. Further research and development are needed in this growing area of care.
The review highlights that clinically relevant guidelines are critical to safety and quality in virtual health contexts. Findings will inform future design and development of clinical practice guidelines for nurses engaged in virtual health assessment, triage and follow-up care.
Not applicable.
To pilot and evaluate the implementation of a structured Evidence-Based Rounds (EBR) education model in critical care.
A mixed data type design was used to evaluate Evidence-Based Rounds in a critical care setting. Structured observational data were captured and open-ended survey responses were submitted by attendees. Content analysis and descriptive statistics were used to analyse survey findings.
Seventeen rounds were completed between March 2023 and January 2024 with a total of n = 83 clinical staff members. From these, n = 55 staff completed and submitted evaluation surveys. Rounds were most frequently attended by nurses of all bandings including senior clinical nurses, support workers and student nurses. Evidence-Based Rounds were globally perceived as a positive and useful education strategy and staff were very willing to attend future sessions. Patient outcomes were not directly assessed and rounds specifically facilitated three outcomes: (1) helping staff apply evidence to practice, (2) building staff confidence in presenting clinical information and (3) supporting staff in identifying local improvements to patient care.
Evidence-Based Rounds are an adaptable effective model of bedside education within critical care. In our setting, staff perceived that this model facilitated the application of evidence in clinical practice and positively influenced feelings of confidence. Importantly, this education strategy empowered nurses to explore and identify improvements locally to patient care. Whilst this model offers a practical education approach to address some of the key critical care workforce issues, such as an expanding curriculum and loss of senior staff, it could also be widely adopted to other clinical areas.
Evidence-Based Rounds are perceived by staff as a successful bedside education model that facilitates nurses to apply evidence in practice. It is feasible that this strategy is a potentially sustainable, low-cost model for continuing professional development centred around routine clinical work.
No patient or public contribution.
To examine older persons' experiences and participation in life-enhancement activities in a long-term care facility.
Convergent mixed-methods design.
Naturalistic observations of 20 life-enhancement activity sessions were conducted in a single long-term care facility that includes 111 older persons in September 2024. Data were collected through guiding questions and fieldnotes for systematic observation. We used Kruskal-Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests for quantitative analysis. Fieldnotes were analyzed using a six-phase reflexive thematic analysis approach.
Engagement levels (self-initiative, assistance-seeking frequency, and social interaction frequency) significantly differed across 16 different life-enhancement activities. Social interaction frequency also varied by mobility status (wheelchair, walker, independent). Participants displayed significantly more distractions in the TV Room than in the Activity Room. Four themes emerged from thematic analysis: (1) participation barriers, (2) activity contextual factors, (3) facilitator support strategies, and (4) social interactions and emotional well-being.
Structural elements (purposefully designed rooms, activity design and complexity, and the resident-preferred music), relational elements (facilitators' hands-on support, conflict resolution, and positive reinforcement), and individual factors (mobility status) influence older persons' participation in life-enhancement activities. Life-enhancement activities benefit older persons when they are provided with choices and adaptive equipment.
Findings support allocating distraction-free spaces for life-enhancement activities, incorporating resident-preferred music and game-layered physical exercises, and providing facilitator training in adaptive coaching, hands-on support, and conflict resolution.
Life-enhancement programs can promote psychosocial well-being among older persons in long-term care facilities by transforming routine recreational activities into personalized and socially engaging experiences that may reduce feelings of loneliness.
Journal Article Reporting Standards for Mixed Methods Research.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
To systematically examine how structural vulnerability has been defined and operationalised in United States-based health research, identify conceptual consistencies and methodological gaps, and propose core dimensions of structural vulnerability along with implications for future application in health research.
A systematic mixed-studies review using a parallel-results convergent synthesis design.
PubMed, Embase, Scopus and CINAHL were searched from first publication through 2024 using the terms ‘structural* vulnerab*’ AND health.
Peer-reviewed English-language empirical studies conducted in the United States that applied the concept of structural vulnerability were identified. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to assess study quality. Study content was analysed to identify how structural vulnerability was defined and operationalised.
Thirty-seven predominantly high-quality studies published between 2011 and 2024 met inclusion criteria. Structural vulnerability was consistently defined through two interrelated dimensions: as a social positionality (characterised by constrained resilience, limited agency and imposed risks rooted in systemic discrimination and social hierarchies) and as a critical analytic framework for examining structural determinants of health. Quantitative studies predominantly used individual-level indicators (e.g., income, housing) and cross-sectional designs. Qualitative studies focused on experiences of structural vulnerability in relation to health outcomes and infrequently translated findings into structural interventions. The most frequently studied outcomes were infectious disease, substance use and mental health.
Structural vulnerability, as a conceptual and empirical lens, reveals how systems produce—and can potentially reduce—health risks. Findings underscore the need for geographically diverse and longitudinal studies, as well as multidimensional measures. Advancing health equity demands critiquing systemic causes of inequities and pursuing justice-oriented interventions.
Nursing, positioned at the intersection of public health, social sciences and policy, is uniquely equipped to engage structural vulnerability as a critical analytic tool to address health inequities, design interventions and advocate for policy reform.
What problem did the study address? This study addressed a lack of clarity in the definition and operationalization of structural vulnerability in health research.
What were the main findings? The definition of structural vulnerability is consistent across quantitative and qualitative studies, but there are marked variations in its operationalization. Quantitative studies predominantly rely on individual-level indicators, while qualitative studies use it as a theoretical framework to guide analysis, interpret findings and examine structural determinants of health.
Where and on whom will the research have an impact? This review offers a clear framing for integrating structural vulnerability in health research in efforts to advance health equity.
PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) reporting guideline.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
This qualitative study aimed to understand how dyads of parental donors and adolescent young adult recipients make sense of living donor liver transplantation from donation to adolescence.
This qualitative study used a focused ethnographic design.
Twelve dyads of parental liver donors and their adolescent young adults were interviewed together using a semi-structured interview guide. Data was collected from April 16 to July 30, 2019. All of the interviews were audiotaped and transcribed. The theoretical framework of sensemaking was implemented. Thematic analysis was used, concepts were categorised, connections were made and references to the coding were conducted.
Thematic analysis contributed to the emergence of three categories: connections, reflections and life transitions, and the overarching theme of gratitude for being given or giving the gift of life.
The dyads' gratitude increased over time through the social process of sensemaking.
As living donor liver transplantation in the paediatric population enters its third decade, understanding how it shapes relationships in dyads of parental donors and adolescent young recipients over time can provide new insights for nurses who work in paediatric transplantation.
This study's findings address the current gap in the literature on the long-term impact of living donor liver transplant dyads and highlight the role of nurses who provide care and guidance at the time of evaluation and surgery to the ongoing support during the years that follow.
This qualitative study followed EQUATOR guidelines and adhered to the COREQ checklist for qualitative studies.
No patient or public contribution.
To explore healthcare professionals' experiences of providing compassionate care and identify care situations considered challenging, with attention to the factors that contribute to these challenges.
A cross-sectional qualitative study was conducted involving 878 healthcare professionals in New Zealand who completed an anonymous online survey between February and May 2022. Of these, 115 participants provided detailed narrative responses describing patient care situations that challenged the provision of compassionate care. These qualitative responses were analysed using content analysis, guided by the Transactional Model of Physician Compassion and reported following the COREQ qualitative reporting guidelines.
Three major themes emerged: (1) fragmented services, resource constraints, and compartmentalisation of care; (2) clinician compassion needs and motivations; and (3) patient-related challenges impacting compassionate care. Over 90% of narratives described barriers to compassionate care that were linked to interconnected patient, clinician, clinical, and systemic factors—rather than being focused on individual patient influences alone.
Challenges to compassionate care are rarely attributable to individual patient characteristics alone. Instead, they reflect complex interactions among patient, provider, clinical, and systemic factors, underscoring the need for multilevel interventions to foster equitable, compassionate care.
This study highlights that barriers to compassionate care are embedded in complex systemic, clinician, and patient domains. Findings underscore the need for interprofessional collaboration, resilience-building strategies, and integrated approaches to enhance compassionate and equitable healthcare delivery.
None.
To systematically review and synthesise qualitative research on nurses' experiences of speaking up in various contexts and to identify factors facilitating or impeding such a behaviour.
This review was conducted as a qualitative metasynthesis, utilising the qualitative meta-ethnography approach.
A total of 6250 articles were screened. Two reviewers screened titles, abstracts and full texts. A total of 15 studies were included in this review. Researchers conducted a quality appraisal using the JBI critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research. An a priori protocol was created and registered on the Open Science Framework.
Literature searches were conducted in five international bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global) and five Korean databases (RISS, KISS, DBpia, KCI and NDSL).
Three main themes were identified from the 15 studies used in the metasynthesis: (1) decisional complexity of speaking up, (2) motivators for speaking up and (3) barriers to speaking up. Nurses experienced challenges in speaking up. They were, and continue to be, concerned about negative responses. Hierarchy structure and poor work environment were identified as barriers to speaking up; professional responsibility and a supportive atmosphere were identified as facilitators for speaking up.
This review synthesised nurses' experiences of speaking up and influencing factors. Speaking up is crucial for nurses to improve patient safety, as frontline nurses are ideally positioned to observe early indicators of unsafe conditions in healthcare delivery.
Identified motivators and barriers of nurses' speaking-up behaviour offer considerations and opportunities for healthcare leaders and managers. This could lead to improvement in patient safety through the establishment of a safety culture that facilitates nurses' speaking-up behaviour.
The review adhered to the ENTREQ guideline.
No patient or public contribution has been made in this review.
Incontinence-associated dermatitis poses a significant risk for sacral pressure injuries, infection and morbidity in healthcare settings. Despite the availability of best practice guidelines, implementation remains a challenge.
To outline the implementation of a hospital-wide programme using the Integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services framework to prevent and manage incontinence-associated dermatitis and improve hospital-acquired pressure injuries.
This is an empirical research study using mixed methods.
The study, conducted across surgical, medical and critical care wards between June and October 2023, aimed to address knowledge gaps, enhance clinical practice and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions. The implementation strategy included education modules, engagement of staff through focus groups and targeted interventions such as individualised toileting plans and structured skin care regimens. Data collection involved audits, incident reporting and clinician knowledge surveys.
Findings indicate a reduction in hospital-acquired incontinence-associated dermatitis and pressure injuries postimplementation, with observed improvements in clinician knowledge. However, challenges including workload, skill mix and resource limitations were identified as barriers to implementation. The sustainability and scalability of the programme were emphasised, with ongoing monitoring and evaluation essential for long-term success.
This study underscores the importance of evidence-based interventions, interdisciplinary collaboration and leadership support in improving patient outcomes and reducing healthcare costs associated with preventable skin injuries. Further research is needed to assess implementation in community settings and scale up interventions across healthcare networks.
Analysing a hospital-wide programme using the Integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Service framework to prevent and manage incontinence-associated dermatitis and improve hospital-acquired pressure injuries, could help identify the challenges for delivering patient-centred care.
No patient or public involvement.
To describe the implementation study, we referred to the StaRI Guideline.
Trial Registration: This intervention study was applied to the whole population and was therefore not a trial and did not require trial registration. The study was considered low risk and the Human Research Ethics Application (HREA) was approved
To facilitate the delivery of appropriate care, the aim was to test if a tailored, multifaceted de-implementation strategy (RENEW) (1) would lead to less low-value nursing care and (2) was acceptable, implementable, cost effective and scalable in the home-based nursing care context.
A mixed-methods design.
The RENEW strategy with components on education, persuasion, enablement, incentives and training was introduced in seven teams from two organisations in the Netherlands. To estimate the effect size, data were collected at baseline (T0) and follow-up measurement (T1), on the volume of care in both frequency and time in minutes per week and independent samples t-tests were performed. A qualitative evaluation was conducted to understand feasibility aspects, see how the strategy works and identify influencing factors and used document analyses and semi-structured interviews. Deductive coding was used to analyse the results.
The time spent on low-value nursing care (mean, minutes per week per client) in seven teams for 210 clients in T1 compared to 222 clients in T0 reduced statistically significant. The difference between T0 and T1 equals 17.94%. The frequency of delivered low-value nursing care (mean per week) reduced but not statistically significant. From the transcripts of eight semi-structured interviews and documents, a list of 79 influencing factors were identified. Practical implementation tools, workplace coaching and sharing experiences within and between teams were considered as the most contributing elements.
The results showed that for the seven home-healthcare teams in this study, the RENEW strategy (1) leads to a reduction in low-value care and (2) is—conditional upon minor modifications—acceptable, implementable, cost effective and scalable.
Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) guidelines.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
To explore levers and barriers to providing culturally responsive care for general practice nurses (GPNs) using normalization process theory.
A self-administered online cross-sectional survey.
A participatory co-designed adapted version of the normalization of complex interventions measure (NoMAD) validated tool was distributed to a convenience sample of GPNs between December 2022 and February 2023. The sample comprised of GPNs working in general practice services in Ireland (n = 122). Data were analysed using descriptive and analytical statistics (Pearson correlations) and principles of content analysis. This study was conducted and reported in line with the Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS).
GPNs in this study indicated their familiarity with, acknowledged the importance of and were committed to, providing culturally responsive care. However, implementing culturally responsive care in daily practice was problematic due to insufficient education and training, scarcity of resources and supports and a lack of organizational leadership. Subsequently, GPNs experience difficulties adapting everyday practices to respond appropriately to the care needs of culturally and linguistically diverse (CaLD) patients.
This analysis highlights the necessity of exploring the intricacies of factors that influence capabilities and capacity for providing culturally responsive care. Despite demonstrating awareness of the importance of providing nursing care that responds to the needs of CaLD patients, GPNs do not have full confidence or capacity to integrate culturally responsive care into their daily work practices.
Using normalization process theory, this study elucidates for the first time how GPNs in Ireland make sense of, legitimize, enact and sustain culturally responsive care as a routine way of working. It illuminates the multitude of micro-level (individual), meso-level (organizational) and macro-level (structural) factors that require attention for normalizing culturally responsive care in general practice services.
The study question was identified in a participatory research prioritization for Irish research about migrant health that involved migrants in the process.
FreshRSS 