Conectar
To explore intensive care nurses' perceptions of their work environments at the unit and organisational levels according to the American Association of Critical Care Nurses standards, their impact on care quality, national differences, and demographic associations.
Cross-sectional study using a survey design.
Study conducted between January 2021 and April 2022, using a convenience sample of intensive care unit nurses across Cyprus, Spain, Croatia, and Poland, Romania. The Critical Elements of a Healthy Work Environment Scale (CEHWES) developed by the American Association of Critical Care Nurses and cross-culturally adapted by the authors was used, which included four sections, including sociodemographic data and a total of 50 questions. The core section of the tool comprised 16 questions using Likert-type response (1—strongly disagree—4 strongly agree). Perception of fulfilment of healthy work environment standards was calculated using the aforementioned Likert-type scale.
A total of 1183 nurses participated reporting moderate perception of fulfilment of the standards, with mean scores ranging from 2.6 to 2.8. Skilled communication and effective decision making were the highest rated. 56% (n = 662) reported awareness of some standards and while 25.8% (n = 305) reported full or significant implementation in their unit. Significant differences related to the perception of all standards were observed across countries. Implementation of the standards was significantly associated with higher quality of care having better perception when standards were fully implemented.
This study shows moderate perception of healthy work environment standards among intensive care nurses. Country differences highlight the need for more awareness, training, and further implementation of the standards, which is linked to better care quality.
Work environment still need to improve and needs to be prioritised by organisations, considering local and national particularities. Having a measuring tool available in multiple languages facilitates comparisons and getting a global picture.
The questionnaire used is validated in different languages, allowing results to be compared with other countries. Novel data from countries that were poorly investigated is now available. More evidence points out the need to prioritise work environment for maintaining quality in patient care.
The study has been reported following the STROBE checklist.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
To classify Italian home care models based on structural characteristics, process factors and stakeholder perceptions.
This is a secondary analysis of the AIDOMUS-IT multicentre cross-sectional study, conducted in Italy between July 2022 and December 2023.
Data were collected via online surveys completed by 33 Local Health Authority Nursing Directors, home care nurses and patients. Hierarchical cluster analysis was used to classify different organisational models based on structural and process-related factors. Nurses' and patients' perceptions of care were described for each identified cluster.
The analysis identified three distinct organisational home care models: The ‘multidisciplinary model’, in which nurses reported high dissatisfaction due to organisational complexity and excessive workloads. In the ‘nurse-centred model’, characterised by publicly employed nurses, strong leadership, and a supportive work environment, patients reported high levels of satisfaction. The ‘performance-based model’, which operated with a lower nurse-to-patient ratio, reduced service hours, and greater reliance on external professionals. Nurses in this model reported high job satisfaction but also a greater intention to leave, while patient satisfaction was lower.
This study underscores the importance of leadership, resource management, and a supportive work environment in influencing both job satisfaction and patient outcomes in home care settings.
Policymakers could use these findings to refine care models and improve service delivery.
Limited research has examined the organisational structures of home care services, which are important for professionals' organisational well-being, patient safety, and quality of care. This study identified three distinct organisational home care models that could be used to refine care approaches and improve service delivery.
This study respects the EQUATOR guideline for observational studies (STROBE).
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
To investigate the relationship between nursing ethical leadership style, work environment (workload, interpersonal conflicts) and patients' objective nursing-sensitive outcomes (accidental falls, pressure ulcers, nosocomial infections, restraints and deaths).
Nationwide multicentre cross-sectional multilevel survey.
Validated self-report scales were used to assess nurses' perceptions of ethical leadership, workload and interpersonal conflict. Nursing staffing and objective patient' nursing-sensitive outcomes were measured at the ward level. Descriptive and inferential analyses were conducted. Structural equation modelling examined the relationships among these variables based on Donabedian's conceptual framework.
Data from 2349 nurses across 158 wards in 25 Italian acute care hospitals were analysed. The multilevel model showed an excellent fit. Ethical leadership was negatively associated with both workload and interpersonal conflict. Workload was significantly linked to higher rates of pressure ulcers, falls and deaths in patients. Ethical leadership was indirectly associated with improved patient outcomes through reduced workload.
Head nurses' ethical leadership has a pivotal role in shaping the work environment and enhancing nursing-sensitive outcomes by reducing workload and fostering positive interpersonal dynamics. These findings emphasise the need for healthcare organisations to invest in ethical leadership development as a critical strategy for improving care quality and promoting better patient outcomes.
These findings emphasise the need for healthcare organisations to invest in ethical leadership development as a critical strategy for improving care quality and promoting safer, more effective patient outcomes.
The study adhered to The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology checklist.
This study did not include patient or public involvement.
Cultivating moral values and principles in leadership enables leaders to effectively communicate these values to their staff. Addressing unethical behaviours, fostering open dialogue about organisational ethics, and supporting leaders in the ethical decision-making process contribute to a healthier nurses' work environment. Healthcare organisations investing in the development and promotion of ethical leaders improve care quality.
The study was registered in the research registry (www.researchregistry.com) under the record number (researchregistry7418), following a published protocol.
Hospital falls and associated injuries are a global issue associated with harm and significant costs to individuals and society, especially for older adults. Hospital standards specify the minimum level of care required to optimise patient safety, quality and outcomes. Standards are often used during hospital accreditation. This investigation analysed the content and quality of hospital falls standards across the globe.
Hospital standards were located by searching online databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Google Scholar, MEDLINE), ChatGPT, the grey literature via internet search engines, and websites of accreditation agencies, government agencies, and other relevant organisations. We searched for standards from the 60 largest countries by population plus the 60 countries with the highest gross domestic product (n = 82 after accounting for duplicates). For inclusion, hospital standards had to mention ‘fall/s’. Data were analysed using a deductive framework synthesis and content analysis to identify emergent themes.
Forty-one standards used by at least 72 countries were identified from our search. Sixteen were excluded from detailed analysis because they did not mention falls and 3 could not be retrieved. A total of 22 standards were included in the final detailed analysis. Included standards showed wide variations in content and quality. Seven were assessed as high quality, 12 medium quality, and 3 were deemed to be of low quality. Some lacked details on hospital falls screening, assessment, prevention, and management. Consumer engagement in development, implementation, or evaluation was not mentioned in all standards. Procedures for falls data collection and reporting were seldom documented. Hospital standards infrequently referred readers to contemporary research or clinical practice guidelines.
There are variations in the quality and content of standards on hospital falls. International collaboration is recommended to increase the consistency and validity of hospital falls standards across nations, in order to optimise healthcare outcomes.
The findings of this global analysis of hospital falls standards have the potential to impact falls rates and fall-related injuries in hospital patients by providing data to inform the content, evidence base and use of hospital standards to optimise the safety and quality of care delivery. The findings inform the review, design and implementation of hospital accreditation procedures to improve patient outcomes, patient experiences, and service quality.
To report on the unique perspectives of senior nursing leaders on the value proposition of the Clinical Nurse Specialist (CNS) role, their organisational experience and the barriers and facilitators to optimise and promote the long-term sustainability.
A qualitative sub-study of a larger multi-method study focused on informing policy recommendations to optimise the CNS workforce, informed by integrated knowledge translation.
Chief Nursing Officers (CNOs) and other senior leaders in all health authorities in British Columbia, Canada, were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews via video call between August–December 2023. We recruited 13 participants from diverse health regions, including 5 CNOs.
Leaders collectively conveyed a renewed interest in the CNS role to support nursing and multidisciplinary teams to better meet patient and system needs, and a sense of urgency to optimise the role in diverse settings. The overarching theme of “success by design” was supported by three thematic priorities: (1) understanding the CNS role, (2) a role that needs protection and connections and (3) moving forward together. Views were aligned to co-construct implementation-ready policy recommendations to guide provincial strategies.
Senior leaders reported a common understanding of the value-add of the CNS workforce and had a shared experience of barriers to optimisation. Contemporary policy guidance is needed to equip health systems to address this gap.
Across international regions, the role of CNSs is not fully optimised. This is a wasted opportunity to address the pressing need for nursing practice leaders to transform health systems and improve outcomes. This study provides new knowledge about the perspectives of Chief Nursing Officers and other nursing leaders to shape comprehensive and targeted policy recommendations and address enduring and new challenges to realise the full impact of the CNS workforce.
We have adhered to COREQ reporting guidelines (See supplemental file).
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
To translate, culturally adapt and validate the first Spanish version of the Person-centred Practice Inventory-Care (PCPI-C) instrument.
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation.
Two-phase research design: (1) the PCPI-C's translation and cultural adaptation from English to Spanish following the ‘Translation and Cultural Adaptation of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures-Principles Guide of Good Practice’ tool; and (2) a cross-sectional quantitative survey to assess the Spanish version's psychometric properties.
A sample of 200 patients participated to obtain the PCPI-C's Spanish version. No significant issues arose during the translation process or the consulting sessions. No item exhibited an inadequate value following adjustment via the weighted kappa index (−scale-level content validity average of 0.95 for clarity and 0.97 for relevance). Psychometric evaluation revealed acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha from 0.67 to 0.84) and strong construct validity. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a five-dimensional structure consistent with the domain Person-Centred Processes. Fit indices improved after model refinements, achieving CFI = 0.92, SRMR = 0.05 and RMSEA = 0.07. This study's observed psychometric properties confirm that the PCPI-C's Spanish version retains the original instrument's theoretical integrity, while showing strong reliability and validity in the new context.
The PCPI-C's Spanish translation was psychometrically valid when tested with Spanish patients, thus providing a culturally appropriate, psychometrically sound tool to evaluate Spanish-speaking patients' perception of person-centred care.
This study provides a validated instrument that allows for the assessment of person-centred practice in Spanish-speaking clinical environments. It enables healthcare professionals to measure patients' perceptions, track the implementation of person-centred principles and supports international comparative studies, contributing to the development of more ethical and responsive models of care.
Patients participated in cognitive consultations and completed the survey for psychometric testing, ensuring that the translated items were understandable, culturally appropriate and reflective of their experiences of person-centred care.
To explore factors influencing the implementation of a nursing care delivery model in a hospital setting.
A qualitative evidence synthesis with a thematic synthesis was conducted.
The search string consisted of four ‘cluster topics’: (1) nursing, (2) care delivery models, (3) hospital setting, (4) qualitative and mixed methods designs. Four electronic databases were searched from January 2000 until July 2024: MEDLINE (PubMed interface), Embase (embase.com interface), CINAHL (EBSCOhost interface) and Web of Science. A thematic synthesis was conducted consisting of the following steps; the ‘line-by-line’ coding of the text, the development and allocation of ‘descriptive themes’ and the generation of ‘analytical themes’.
In total, 3976 references were screened, of which 25 were included in the qualitative evidence synthesis. Eight analytical themes were generated that influence the implementation of a nursing care delivery model in a hospital setting: shared understanding of the care delivery model, ownership of the change, scope of practice and role clarity, collaboration, communication, responsibility, a double-loop process and aggregated recommendations. The themes were categorised on four different levels: vision, process, interactional factors and contextual factors.
The eight themes identified in this qualitative evidence synthesis showed that during the implementation of a nursing care delivery model, a clear implementation strategy is often missing. It is advised that future implementation processes have a clear guide and goal.
The analytical themes can guide the future implementation of a new nursing care delivery model in a hospital setting. This review can support nurses, researchers, hospital management and policymakers when implementing organisational alternatives to reorganise nursing care in a hospital setting.
The qualitative evidence synthesis was reported according to the enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research (ENTREQ) statement.
No patient or public contribution.
To explore the impact of systems thinking in nursing leadership on healthcare quality, decision-making and resource management.
A systematic review.
A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science for studies published in English and Italian up to 2024.
Studies were selected based on predefined eligibility criteria, focusing on nursing leadership integrating systems thinking. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist was used to assess methodological quality. A narrative synthesis was conducted to identify key themes and patterns.
Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Findings suggest that systems thinking enhances resource management, decision-making and patient safety, while also reducing errors and improving staff collaboration. Adopting a systems approach allows nursing leaders to navigate complex healthcare environments effectively. However, variability in study designs and implementation strategies limits the generalizability of findings.
Integrating systems thinking into nursing leadership promotes a proactive, holistic approach to problem-solving, optimising healthcare outcomes. While evidence supports its benefits, further empirical studies are needed to confirm its effectiveness across diverse healthcare settings.
What problem did the study address? The need for structured systems thinking in nursing leadership. What were the main findings? Improved decision-making, resource optimisation and patient safety through systems-oriented leadership. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? Nurse leaders, healthcare administrators and policymakers in diverse healthcare settings.
Although patients and the public were not directly involved, this study has implications for enhancing patient safety and healthcare efficiency.
To explore women's experiences of vocalisation during childbirth and the interplay with their feelings of shame.
This interpretive, qualitative study is grounded in a social constructionist theory of gender, which provides a lens for examining the role of vocal toning in childbirth.
Between November 2023 and March 2024, 18 women in Germany were interviewed postpartum either at home or virtually. Semi-structured interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
Two themes were generated: ‘the shame of being heard’ and ‘the value of my voice’. The findings demonstrate challenges women faced when vocalising during childbirth due to feelings of shame. Overcoming social norms were key; previous experience with vocalisation was an advantage. Vocal expression was also facilitated by a safe, supportive birth environment.
Shame influences behaviour during childbirth. A key factor appears to be whether women feel safe and uninhibited in their vocal expression, which can be supported through empathic birth companions. Additionally, vocalising with others can contribute to normalising the experience and reducing feelings of shame.
The findings suggest that healthcare professionals can help women overcome shame to use vocalisation as a tool to navigate the challenges of childbirth.
Reporting adhered to the SRQR checklist.
This study did not include client or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
To explore how the legalisation of medical assistance in dying (MAiD) has shaped the discourse of MAiD and its relationship with hospice palliative care (HPC) in Canada.
There is perceived tension in the discourse between the goals of MAiD and HPC, but little literature examines this relationship and the effect it has on healthcare providers such as nurses.
Integrative review following Whittemore and Knafl's and Toronto and Remington's methodology.
A search was conducted to identify literature discussing MAiD and HPC in Canada. Articles were critically appraised for methodological quality. Data from each article were abstracted, thematically analysed, and synthesised.
Initial searches were conducted in CINAHL, PubMed, and professional association and government websites in September 2018 and updated in May 2023.
A total of 457 records were screened for inclusion, and 83 articles were included. Articles included healthcare provider, patient, public, and institutional perspectives. Three themes identified from the data were the relationship between MAiD and HPC, suffering in the context of MAiD, and moral distress and moral uncertainty in providing or not providing MAiD.
The discourse around the relationship between MAiD and HPC is complex and contextual. Personal and professional understandings of end-of-life care differ and influence perspectives on how and whether MAiD and hospice palliative care can be reconciled. More exploration of this topic is recommended, given the changing legislation and beliefs around MAiD.
Findings consider how the concepts of end of life, MAiD, HPC, suffering, and moral distress influence and are influenced by the discourse of dying. This review provides direction for healthcare professionals working in end-of-life care and future ethical and moral areas for consideration.
No patient or public contribution was necessary for this literature review.
To identify latent profiles of insomnia, fatigue, recovery, psychological distress and burnout among hospital nurses; examine variations in personal and work-related characteristics across profiles; investigate associations between profiles and outcomes such as patient care quality, nursing work satisfaction and workplace satisfaction; and assess the moderating role of organisational support on these relationships.
A cross-sectional descriptive study.
This study analysed survey data from 2488 hospital nurses using latent profile analysis, multinomial logistic regression and hierarchical multiple linear regression.
Four well-being profiles emerged: low, average, above-average and high well-being. Profiles differed significantly in personal and work-related characteristics. Nurses in the high well-being profile were associated with better patient safety, care quality and satisfaction. Organisational support moderated the negative associations between low well-being profiles and nursing work and workplace satisfaction.
Tailored interventions addressing factors associated with low well-being and enhancing organisational support may be beneficial for improving nurse well-being, delivering high-quality care and supporting nurse retention in sustainable healthcare environments.
Healthcare organisations should prioritise nurse well-being through targeted interventions, adequate staffing, recovery opportunities and stress management resources to support a resilient and sustainable workforce.
The findings revealed the diversity of well-being patterns among hospital nurses and provided insights for identifying subgroups at higher risk of impaired patient safety, reduced care quality and dissatisfaction with nursing work and the workplace. Greater organisational support was associated with weaker negative relationships between poor well-being and nurse outcomes.
STROBE guidelines.
No direct patient or public contribution.
To explore how factors in the complex aortic surgical care context can affect care provision towards patients' postoperative recovery.
Secondary qualitative analysis.
Results about patients' recovery after complex aortic surgery was presented in focus groups with healthcare professionals in 2022. Reflexive thematic analysis, using the Fundamentals of Care framework, was conducted to explore contextual factors affecting care provision.
Healthcare professionals' descriptions resulted in one main theme: Care provision is challenged by discrepancies in values, goals and norms and unclear responsibilities within the context, and two subthemes: Values, goals and norms determine what care is provided; Taking responsibility for care requires resources, evaluation and feedback.
Healthcare professionals describe care provision as affected by a dynamic integration of contextual factors. Healthcare professionals need to be made aware of their own role in this context. Care provision needs to be guided by feedback from patients and healthcare professionals, and work with patients' resources at both an individual, system and societal level.
The results provide knowledge regarding how contextual factors in dynamic integration can affect care provision in a complex surgical context. Healthcare professionals, leaders and policy makers all have responsibility to focus on patients' values and goals, and empower adequate care through feedback loops and resource management.
The context-of-care dimension of the Fundamentals of Care framework has been scarcely described. Our results illustrate how an integration of factors affects care provision, where values, goals, and norms affect what care is provided, and responsibility for care belongs to everyone in the care system. The results can contribute to the description of the context-of-care dimension within the framework and enable professionals to understand how they, as part of the context, could affect care towards patient recovery.
This study adhered to the Equator research reporting checklist: Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research: a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.
No patient or public contribution.
To describe the factors associated with work engagement in newly graduated nurses.
Systematic review of original quantitative studies according to Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines.
The systematic review utilised PEO inclusion criteria. Original peer-reviewed quantitative studies were identified. Two researchers independently conducted a screening of study eligibility based on title, abstract, and full text. The JBI critical appraisal tool for analytical cross-sectional studies was employed to perform a rigorous methodological quality assessment. The data was extracted, tabulated, and then analysed narratively.
The literature search was conducted in November 2023 by screening four databases: Scopus, CINAHL (Ebsco), ProQuest, and Ovid Medline.
The review included 19 articles, presenting an overview of factors associated with newly graduated nurses' work engagement. Factors were classified into seven categories explaining supportive workplace, transition and orientation to workplace, competence and career development in nursing practice, personal and psychological characteristics, work environment characteristics, stress and challenges in a work environment, and satisfaction with work.
To support newly graduated nurses' work engagement, nurse leaders should provide a supportive working environment and focus on new nurses' effective support systems in the workplace. Their abilities to develop and educate themselves need to be prioritised to enhance their knowledge and skills in nursing. Additionally, organisations should have policies and procedures to ensure quality orientation, and units need to implement transition and mentorship programmes.
This research could be valuable to health care when wanting to develop and improve work engagement, especially among newly graduated nurses. The economic significance of nurses' work engagement is evident, as the cost of nurse turnover is considerable. Reducing nurse turnover and improving retention relies on understanding the factors influencing nurses' decisions to leave the organisation and the profession.
What problem did the study address? The global shortage of nurses, worsened by newly qualified nurses leaving the health sector, necessitates understanding factors influencing their work engagement; The factors associated with newly graduated nurses' work engagement were supportive work environment, transition and orientation to work, success and career development in nursing, personal and psychological characteristics, characteristics of the work environment, stress and challenges in the work environment, and job satisfaction. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? The results can be used by health care organisations to plan the preceptorship/mentoring programmes of new nurses. Identifying and understanding the factors associated with the retention of newly qualified nurses can help to attract and retain nurses and to promote the adaptation and integration of new nurses into healthcare organisations.
The YNEPR author checklist has been completed and implemented during this systematic review process. Also, the Prisma 2020 checklist has been used.
No patient or public contribution: systematic review.
PROSPERO number: CRD42023408705 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/)
To explore the key knowledge, skills, attributes and organisational support that nurses require to optimise their scope of practice when providing care to people experiencing homelessness.
A qualitative descriptive study exploring nurses' scope of practice for addressing health needs of people experiencing homelessness.
Interviews and focus groups were conducted from 2022 to 2024 with 42 people with lived experience of homelessness across two Australian cities. Thematic analysis identified essential skills, attributes and approaches to improve access to care and eliminate stigma. Findings were then presented in focus groups with 11 registered nurses in specialist homeless health services to elicit views on optimising scope of practice. The study follows COREQ reporting guidelines for qualitative research.
Lived-experience participants—ranging from 18 to 84 years, a third living in cars or tents—identified key nursing attributes and practices, including approachability, compassion, non-judgement, flexibility, community embeddedness, trauma-informed and culturally safe practice, plus skills in physical and mental health assessment, medication management and service navigation. Nurse participants agreed with lived-experience participants, and highlighted organisational support needs, including information sharing, clinical supervision, assertive outreach, nurse prescribing and long-term funding for nurse-led programs.
With rising housing instability, preparing nurses to optimise access to care for people experiencing homelessness is critical. Optimal scope of practice includes personal attributes to build rapport and reduce stigma alongside clinical skills. Co-developing educational programs in partnership with people with lived experience of homelessness and homeless health nurses offers a promising approach.
This research informs the scope of practice definitions and the future development of a co-developed nursing education pathway and organisational framework to improve access to care for people experiencing homelessness in Australia.
Limited patient and public involvement was incorporated and focused on providing feedback on interview guides.
To explore women's experience of the period after completion of cancer treatment for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN): a descriptive exploratory study.
A descriptive exploratory qualitative study.
Women diagnosed with the rare pregnancy-related cancer GTN who had completed their treatment participated in semi-structured telephone interviews. Twenty-two interviews were conducted in June 2024 and digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim. The analysis used reflective thematic analysis.
Complex responses to treatment completion were revealed, described by some as a ‘double-edged sword’. The end of treatment routine, coupled with recovery from physical effects, left space for the impact of all they had experienced to ‘hit home’. Multiple concerns and losses were described, including issues relating to pregnancy, self-identity, confidence, fear of recurrence, work and relationships. Gaps in immediate post-treatment support services created challenges for recovery.
The study provides valuable insight into the physical, emotional and social impact of GTN experienced by patients following treatment. The findings highlight the importance of continuing support in the immediate post-treatment period. This study has identified ways in which services can be improved, recognising the need for an individual-tailored approach to reflect the complex responses of patients to treatment completion.
The findings reveal that many women begin to process the implications of their diagnosis and treatment following the completion of their treatment. The end of treatment can be a time when support from healthcare staff is reduced due to fewer routine contacts with healthcare staff. However, these findings suggest the need for nurses to ensure services continue to provide support during the post-treatment recovery phase.
The interview schedule was reviewed by women previously treated for GTN.
To describe and compare attitudes toward hand hygiene and the perceived effectiveness of prevention methods among nursing students and registered nurses at a university and its affiliated university hospital.
A descriptive cross-sectional comparative survey.
A total of 201 first- and final-semester nursing students and registered nurses completed the World Health Organisation's ‘Perceptions Survey for Health-Care Workers’. The survey examined perceptions on hand hygiene, patient safety and the usefulness of improvement measures. Responses were analysed using descriptive statistics.
Nursing students consistently rated the importance of hand hygiene and related interventions higher than registered nurses. Students particularly emphasised the availability of hand disinfectants, ongoing education and supportive leadership. Both groups acknowledged the role of management support, regular feedback and organisational policies in reinforcing optimal hand hygiene.
Differences in attitudes between nursing students and registered nurses underscore the need for ongoing education, strong managerial involvement and supportive policies to sustain adherence. Strengthening these factors can help maintain positive perceptions formed during training and enhance patient safety in clinical practice.
Educational curricula and workplace strategies that prioritise hand hygiene may help lower healthcare-associated infections. Management-led feedback, continuous training and accessible hand hygiene resources offer additional support for safe patient care.
What problem did the study address? Low adherence to hand hygiene is a key driver of preventable infections. What were the main findings? Nursing students rated hand hygiene and improvement measures more highly than registered nurses, highlighting a need for strategies that sustain positive attitudes during the transition from education to clinical practice. Who will benefit? Nurse educators, clinical leaders and healthcare workers can use these findings to improve infection prevention across educational and practice settings.
We adhered to STROBE guidelines for cross-sectional research.
No patients or members of the public were involved in designing or conducting this study, which focused on perceptions of nursing students and registered nurses.
To explore the application of Classic Grounded Theory (GT) methodology in nursing research and critically appraise studies employing Classic GT against the validated framework Guideline for Reporting and Evaluating Grounded Theory (GUREGT) research studies.
Systematic review without meta-analysis
The review followed the PRISMA statement and used the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) guideline for data analysis. The quality of included articles was assessed using the CASP qualitative research appraisal tool, and the GUREGT framework was applied to evaluate adherence to Classic GT guiding principles.
Databases were PUBMED, CINAHL, Nursing and Allied Health Database (ProQuest).
Twenty-nine studies from 2010 to 2024 met the inclusion criteria. Findings revealed inconsistencies in the reporting of Classic GT methodology in nursing research, with frequent omissions of key methodological elements. The GUREGT tool, while user-friendly and practical, highlights gaps in areas such as identifying the main concern, philosophical positioning, and engagement with the literature. These omissions can compromise methodological rigour, suggesting that further refinement of the GUREGT tool is necessary.
The GUREGT tool provides a promising framework for improving the reporting and evaluation of Classic GT studies. However, its current version requires enhancement to fully address the unique demands of Classic GT and ensure rigorous application and reporting of the methodology. Development of a dedicated reporting guideline tailored to Classic GT is critical for advancing the quality of nursing research and supporting researchers in generating robust, theory-driven insights.
Few studies critically appraise Classic GT methodology in health research. This review highlights the need for dedicated reporting guidelines to support methodological rigour and transparency in Classic GT studies.
This review adhered to EQUATOR reporting guidelines.
No patient or public contribution.
To explore how a staff and managers experienced a multi-component and multi-level intervention to influence the psychological safety climate within nursing teams.
Qualitative, to explore the experiences of registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, and managers in a Swedish hospital.
Four focus group discussions were conducted in March 2023 with staff and managers (n = 20). A deductive thematic analysis was conducted, guided by a theoretical model of psychological safety, to examine work climate perceptions and antecedent conditions. An inductive approach was used to explore how participants experienced the intervention.
Participants experienced a shift from a blame-oriented to a more psychologically safe work climate. These developments were enabled by enhanced self-awareness, more supportive interpersonal dynamics, and leaders adopting a more accessible and vulnerable role. The intervention created a safe space to reflect on team dynamics.
Sustained efforts that integrate self-awareness, interpersonal dynamics, and managerial support are important to intentionally develop psychological safety. The creation of safe spaces can serve as a first step to confront unaddressed group beliefs.
Interventions aimed at improving psychology safety can have positive effects if they focus on developing individual trust and vulnerability, targeting group dynamics, and including leaders.
Problem addressed: Inadequate psychological safety among nursing teams, hindering effective collaboration. Main findings: By changing work conditions, the intervention led to improved perceived psychological safety. Research impact: Creating conditions for psychological safety can improve how teams function.
COREQ-checklist.
No PPI patient or public contribution.
The experiences of people from ethnic minority backgrounds living in care homes—A qualitative systematic review.
Despite the increasing need for older people from ethnic minority backgrounds to be able to access good quality, culturally competent care home provision, globally, there is an absence of literature exploring care home residents' perspectives. This study conducted a systematic review, identifying and synthesising qualitative evidence, which explored the experiences of residents', and their families, from ethnic minority backgrounds, who live in care home settings.
A qualitative systematic review.
Nine electronic databases, MEDLINE, Nursing and Allied Health, CINAHL, ASSIA, AMED, Sociological Abstracts, PsycINFO, Web of Science, SCOPUS, were systematically searched for research published after 2005 until 2025.
This systematic review of qualitative studies was conducted in accordance with The PRISMA 2020 (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) statement. Studies were appraised for quality based upon validated critical appraisal tools from the Joanna Briggs Institute. Qualitative data were extracted and synthesised using reflexive thematic analysis.
Sixteen studies were identified from the international literature that explored care home experiences from the resident's and families' perspectives. Three key themes were extrapolated: Patter, which includes how cross-cultural communication skills and language affect care experiences; Place, which includes the care home environment, the multi-ethnic environment, and quality of care; and Person, which encompasses the individual's culture, values, beliefs, food, and family.
There is limited literature from the UK and low-to-middle income countries exploring care home residents' perspectives on care provision. Key components of culturally competent care include culturally sensitive communication, adaptable environments that support residents' chosen lifestyles, and inclusive, family-centred approaches to living well.
For nurses within the adult social care sector, to recognise the need for further research, education, and policy initiatives aimed at enhancing the care home provision for people from ethnic minority groups.
There was no patient or public contribution.
FreshRSS 