Conectar
Advance Care Planning (ACP) has the potential to enhance end-of-life care and improve the allocation of healthcare resources for patients with cancer. However, its successful implementation requires considerable effort to overcome challenges and deliver health benefits. Healthcare providers and patients are key players in ACP, and their perceptions of the process must be understood to address implementation challenges effectively.
To identify barriers and facilitators to ACP implementation in Chinese oncology settings, providing a foundation for culturally appropriate healthcare strategies.
A qualitative study guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Semi-structured interviews (n = 30) were conducted between April and August 2022 to synthesise the perspectives of nurses, physicians, patients with cancer and their families who had participated in ACP. Data were analysed using a directed qualitative content analysis approach, and reporting followed the SRQR guidelines.
Twenty implementation determinants were identified across four CFIR domains, including 13 barriers and 7 facilitators. Key barriers included limited adaptability of ACP to local cultural and family norms, high complexity of ACP processes, insufficient knowledge and skills among clinicians, unclear team responsibilities, low organisational readiness, limited resources and poor public awareness. Facilitators included strong team culture, clinician motivation, supportive leadership and alignment with national policies. Two determinants showed mixed influences: the relative advantage of ACP compared to existing practices, and the extent of collaboration with external organisations.
Our study highlights the challenges of implementing ACP in China, as well as the unique and specific barriers to implementation. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of context-specific determinants and offer actionable insights to inform the development of culturally tailored ACP implementation strategies in resource-limited healthcare settings.
To inform the development of implementation strategies to promote ACP in healthcare systems dominated by traditional medicine.
To assess the effectiveness, process, and economic outcomes of integrated care for community-dwelling frail older adults.
A systematic review and meta-analysis.
We searched nine databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, SinoMed, Wanfang, and VIP, three trial registers, grey literature, and reference lists up to April 2024, with an updated search in March 2025.
Randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies of interventions involving integrated care for community-dwelling frail older adults were included. Data analysis was conducted using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software.
This review included 12 studies involving 6819 community-dwelling frail older adults from high-income regions. The results indicated that integrated care had significantly positive effects on frailty and functional ability, but not on social function, hospitalisation, nursing home admission, quality of life, and mortality. Outcomes of caregivers and professionals were rarely reported. The cost-effectiveness of integrated care has not been confirmed by limited evidence. Few studies have adopted a systematic approach to designing and conducting comprehensive process evaluations guided by scientific frameworks.
Integrated care improves frailty and functional ability in community-dwelling frail older adults but lacks consistent benefits for other outcomes. The lack of evidence on cost-effectiveness and the caregiver and professional outcomes highlight critical gaps in current research. The absence of systematic process evaluations underscores the need for future studies to adopt rigorous frameworks to assess them.
This implicates that more research, particularly in underserved regions that lack a high standard of usual medical services, should emphasise the outcomes of caregivers and healthcare professionals, process evaluation, and health economics. Policymakers and practitioners must consider these gaps when implementing integrated care programmes to ensure equitable and sustainable healthcare solutions.
PRISMA 2020 Checklist.
No patient or public contribution.
CRD42024568811
FreshRSS 