Effect of open surgical and percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy on postoperative wound complications in patients: A meta‐analysis

Abstract

Tracheostomy is one of the most common operations. The two main methods of tracheostomy are open surgical tracheostomy (OST) and percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT). In critical cases, the combination of these two approaches is especially crucial, with the possibility of successful outcomes and low complications. Thus, the purpose of this system is to analyse the effects of both methods on the outcome of postoperative wound. In this research, we performed a systematic review of Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science and Embase, to determine all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that are comparable in terms of postoperative injury outcomes. Eleven RCTs were found after screening. This study will take the necessary data from the selected trials and evaluate the documentation for RCTs. PDT was associated with a lower incidence of infection at the wound site than OST (OR, 4.46; 95% CI: 2.84–7.02 p < 0.0001), and PDT decreased blood loss (OR, 2.88; 95% CI: 1.62–5.12 p = 0.0003). But the operation time did not differ significantly in both PDT to OST (MD, 4.65; 95% CI: −1.19–10.48 p = 0.12). The meta-analyses will assist physicians in selecting the best operative procedure for critical cases of tracheostomy. These data can serve as guidelines for clinical management and in the design of future randomized, controlled studies.