Conectar
More and more meta-analyses have been conducted to compare the effects of intramedullary fixation (IF) and plate fixation (PF) on the outcome of midshaft clavicle fractures. It can affect the doctors' treatment decisions. A number of studies have been conducted in order to assist surgeons in selecting optimal operative procedures and to recommend operative treatment of clavicle fractures in accordance with the best available research. Our analysis of the IF and PF of clavicle fractures was done through a search for PubMed, Emabase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Two different researchers analysed the research literature for quality of analysis and data extraction. The analysis of the data was done with RevMan 5.3. The 95% CI and OR models have been computed by means of either fixed-dose or randomize. In addition, RCT in 114 references have been reviewed and added for further analysis. It is concluded that the application of plate and intramedullary fixation in the middle clavicle operation has remarkable influence on the outcome of post-operation. There was a lower risk of postoperative wound infection in IF (OR, 5.92; 95% CI, 2.46, 14.27 p < 0.0001), smaller surgical incisions (MD, 6.57; 95% CI, 4.90, 8.25 p < 0.0001), and shorter operative time (MD, 17.09; 95% CI 10.42, 23.77 p < 0.0001), less blood loss (MD, 63.62; 95% CI, 55.84, 71.39 p < 0.0001) and shorter hospital stay (MD, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.84, 1.25 p < 0.0001). However, there is no statistical significance in the incidence of wound dehiscence. Thus, the effect of IF on the incidence of injury is better than that of the inner plate in the middle of the clavicle.
This study aimed to explore the relationship between diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) to provide evidence for the prevention of diabetic complications. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database and Wanfang Data databases were searched from their inception until March 2023 for studies on the relationship between DR and DFU. Two researchers independently screened the literature and extracted data according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.3 software. Eleven articles referring to 10 208 patients were included, of whom 2191 patients had DFU and 8017 patients did not have DFU. The meta-analysis results showed that DR significantly increased the incidence of DFU (47.94% vs. 16.38%; OR, 4.13; 95% CI, 2.33–7.33; p < 0.001). The results of this study suggest that patients with DR have a higher risk of developing DFU, highlighting the importance of regular screening for these two complications to prevent serious adverse outcomes of diabetes. However, further high-quality studies are required to validate the conclusions of the present study.
FreshRSS 