This study aimed to (1) evaluate the effectiveness of e-health interventions in improving physical activity and associated health outcomes during pregnancy, (2) compare the e-health functions employed across interventions and (3) systematically identify the behaviour change techniques (BCTs) used and examine their interrelationships.
A systematic review and meta-analysis following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines.
Randomised controlled trials were included. Meta-analyses and subgroup analyses were performed using RevMan 5.3. Social network analysis was conducted to determine the most central BCTs within the intervention landscape.
Ten databases were searched, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, ProQuest, Scopus, SinoMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang and the China Science and Technology Journal Database, from inception to April 22, 2024.
Thirty-five studies were included. Pooled analyses indicated that e-health interventions significantly improved both total (SMD: 0.19; 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.27; I 2 = 55%) and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (SMD: 0.16, 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.26; I 2 = 53%) in pregnant women. Subgroup analyses revealed that interventions based on theoretical frameworks and those not specifically targeting overweight or obese women demonstrated greater effectiveness. Additionally, e-health interventions were associated with significant reductions in both total and weekly gestational weight gain. Six of the twelve e-health functions were utilised, with ‘client education and behaviour change communication’ being the most prevalent. Thirty unique BCTs were identified; among them, ‘instruction on how to perform the behaviour’, ‘self-monitoring’, ‘problem solving’, and ‘goal setting’ showed the highest degree of interconnectedness.
E-health interventions are effective in enhancing physical activity and reducing gestational weight gain during pregnancy. Incorporating theoretical frameworks and well-integrated BCTs is recommended to optimise intervention outcomes.
Integrating e-health interventions into existing perinatal care models holds promise for enhancing physical activity among pregnant women and improving maternal health outcomes.
This study adhered to the PRISMA checklist.
No patient or public involvement.
The study protocol was preregistered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42024518740)
Pregnancy can cause stress for couples, potentially leading to anxiety. However, most studies on antepartum anxiety focus on expectant mothers, ignoring the expectant fathers and the stress transmission between couples. We aim to examine the mediation of dyadic coping between antepartum anxiety and stress in expectant mothers and fathers.
We implemented a cross-sectional study in Guangzhou, China, from October 2023 to January 2024.
Three-hundred and twenty-nine Chinese pregnant couples completed the Perceived Stress Scale, the Dyadic Coping Inventory, and the State–Trait Anxiety Inventory. The actor-partner interdependence mediation model was used for data analysis.
Expectant mothers experienced antepartum anxiety symptoms at a rate of 42.6%, while the rate for expectant fathers was 32.5%. Regarding the actor effects, stress was positively associated with antepartum anxiety in expectant mothers (β = 0.66, 95% confidence interval CI [0.56, 0.74]) and fathers (β = 0.58, 95% CI [0.42, 0.70]), with dyadic coping acting as a mediator (expectant mothers: β = 0.08, 95% CI [0.03, 0.14]; fathers: β = 0.11, 95% CI [0.04, 0.19]). Regarding the partner effects, maternal dyadic coping was positively associated with paternal stress (β = 0.10, 95% CI [0.01, 0.19]).
The study highlights the interplay of stress, dyadic coping, and antepartum anxiety in expectant mothers and fathers, emphasizing the need to assess their antepartum anxiety and implement couple-centered interventions to enhance their psychological well-being during the first trimester of pregnancy.
This study highlights the importance of assessing antepartum anxiety in both expectant mothers and fathers, emphasizing the mediation of dyadic coping in reducing stress and anxiety. The findings support the integration of couple-centered mental health interventions into routine antepartum care to enhance psychological well-being during pregnancy.