Conectar
To identify healthcare professionals' experiences of innovation competence and the factors associated with it; and to examine the instruments developed to assess innovation competence and its associated factors among healthcare professionals.
A mixed-methods systematic review.
Researchers independently screened original studies by title and abstract (n = 2996) and then full text (n = 189). Eighteen studies were included: 16 quantitative and two qualitative. Qualitative data were analysed using inductive content analysis, and quantitative data were tabulated and synthesised narratively.
The review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute Mixed Methods Systematic Review methodology. Searches were conducted in Scopus, CINAHL, Ovid Medline, ProQuest, Web of Science, PsycArticles, and Medic. Articles published in English or Finnish with no date restrictions were included. The search covered records from database inception to August 2024.
From qualitative studies, we identified three categories describing experiences of innovation competence: Competences for Innovation in Healthcare, Application and Impact of Innovation in Healthcare, and Challenges and Strategies for Implementing Innovation. Quantitative studies identified three conceptual domains: Individual Capacities in Innovation, Innovation-related Competence Behaviours, and Social and Organisational Enablers. Four categories of factors associated with innovation competence emerged: sociodemographic, career-related, organisational, and academic factors.
Healthcare professionals' innovation competence is a multifaceted construct encompassing individual abilities, behavioural expressions, and social and organisational engagement. A systematic and multilevel approach that targets both personal attributes and organisational enablers is needed to strengthen competence. Enhancing innovation competence can improve the healthcare sector's ability to respond to complex challenges and sustain innovation capacity.
Findings inform the development of education programmes and leadership strategies to enhance innovation competence among healthcare professionals, supporting innovation implementation in healthcare organisations.
No patient or public involvement was included in this study.
PROSPERO: CRD42024614551
To evaluate whether information about patients' poor sense of security in hypothetical vignette scenarios increases nurses' projected intent to report safety events.
Quantitative, cross-sectional factorial survey vignette experiment administered online.
A convenience sample of 60 nurses from adult inpatient hospital units at a Midwest academic medical center participated in February 2025. Participants responded to demographic questions and eight factorial vignettes, each describing a patient-reported safety breach and incorporating four patient-related factors. Four vignettes included information that the patient had a poor sense of security, and four did not, presented in random order. Following each vignette, participants rated their level of concern about the patient's report, perceived harm to the patient, and likelihood of reporting the patient's concern. A linear mixed-effects modelling approach, accounting for clustering within participants, was used to estimate the effects of the sense of security information factor on nurses' responses.
The sense of security information was associated with higher ratings of (a) degree of concern, (b) perceived harm to the patient, and (c) intent to report the patient's concern, after adjusting for vignette- and participant-level covariates. The vignette patient's perception of physical harm was positively associated with all three ratings. Nurses' greater hospital experience was associated with lower ratings across outcomes.
Obtaining information that the patient felt insecure was associated with heightened concern about the safety event, greater perceived harm, and increased intent to report the concern.
Sense of security assessment may be a risk-agnostic, patient-centered intervention that nurses can routinely perform, regardless of the safety event circumstances.
Although a system of evidence-based practices within a safety culture is essential to hospital safety efforts, nurses' judgements of and responses to patient safety concerns play a critical role and should not be overlooked.
STROBE guidelines.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
Robotic rehabilitation on locomotion is a new approach in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and previous studies showed its feasibility. In this study, we aim to evaluate safety, patient’s experience and efficacy of a gait training programme with the Atalante exoskeleton, compared with usual care, on walking ability, functional capacity and other symptoms associated with ALS.
EXALS is a monocentric, prospective, interventional, open trial. 20 slowly progressing patients with gait deficits will be recruited. The study is conducted in three phases, each lasting 6 weeks, following the ABA procedure. Phase B represents the intervention phase, during which patients practise their gait training at a rhythm of three sessions/week, as an add-on to usual care. In the two phases A, patients receive usual care with no additional treatment. An evaluation is planned before, in the middle and at the end of each phase. The primary outcome of the study is safety and tolerability of the Atalante exoskeleton. Secondary outcomes include: participants’ subjective impact and experience, attitude and motivation, efficacy and interactivity of the exoskeleton, walking ability, functional capacity, spasticity, balance, postural stability, lower limb muscle strength, quality of life, pain, fatigue, anxiety and depression. Statistical analyses will include descriptive methods for all variables and adverse events. Quantitative outcomes are analysed using repeated-measures ANOVA (analysis of variance) across the seven visits, with post hoc tests applied when appropriate. Nominal outcomes are evaluated using Cochran’s Q test with McNemar pairwise comparisons when significant. Associations between variables are examined using Spearman correlation coefficients. Missing data will be replaced using linear interpolation, and sensitivity analyses will be planned. Qualitative interview data are analysed using thematic analysis.
This study was approved by the French ethics committee CPP Nord-Ouest I (no. 23.02378.000201). Participant data are anonymised and securely stored in the laboratory’s database, accessible only to the research team. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and conferences.
This study examines the mediating roles of distress, burden and social support, as well as the moderating effect of social support, in the relationship between the risk of prolonged grief and psychopathology in bereaved family caregivers of palliative care patients.
A cross-sectional study was conducted with 125 bereaved family caregivers. Validated assessment tools and the PROCESS macro in SPSS were used for mediation and moderation analyses.
Emotional burden mediated the relationship between prolonged grief risk and psychopathology, while distress and physical burden did not. Instrumental social support was a key mediator, highlighting the protective role of practical assistance, whereas emotional social support did not show significant mediation. Both types of social support moderated the relationship, buffering the negative impact on mental health.
Findings underscore the complex interactions between bereavement risk factors and psychopathology. Addressing emotional burden and enhancing social support may help reduce mental health risks in bereaved caregivers.
Healthcare professionals in palliative care should implement targeted interventions to reduce burden and strengthen support systems for bereaved caregivers. Nursing-led initiatives focused on emotional burden reduction may mitigate psychopathology risks.
Findings are relevant for healthcare professionals in palliative care and those designing interventions for bereaved caregivers. Emotional burden mediated the relationship between prolonged grief and psychopathology, while instrumental and emotional social support moderated its effects.
This study adhered to STROBE guidelines for cross-sectional research.
Beyond caregiver participation in data collection, patients and healthcare professionals contributed to study design, protocol development and dissemination.
Nurse practitioner-sensitive outcomes (NPSOs) are critical indicators of the quality and effectiveness of nursing care provided to older adults. These outcomes, which include metrics such as falls, pressure ulcers, infection rates, frailty, delirium, length of stay, hospital readmissions, and quality of life (QoL), are essential for assessing the impact of nurse practitioners (NPs) and enhancing patient safety. Despite their importance, the current literature on NPSOs in services for older adults remains limited. This scoping review aims to address this gap by systematically mapping the existing research, identifying key themes, and uncovering areas needing further exploration. By doing so, the authors seek to provide a comprehensive overview that will inform future research directions and contribute to the enhancement of clinical practice in older person services (OPS). This review is important for healthcare providers, policymakers, and researchers who are committed to improving the quality of nursing care and outcomes for older people.
The aim of this scoping review is to map the existing research on NPSOs in services for older adults. This review seeks to identify key themes and gaps in the current literature to guide future research and enhance clinical practice in this area.
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines were utilised to structure this scoping review.
From initial screening of 3593 manuscripts drawn from seven databases, 66 were deemed eligible for full screen. Five studies met the inclusion criteria and were ultimately selected for data extraction and analysis. The most common outcome measures reported were complications and comorbidities, and QoL.
This review highlights that the reporting of NPSOs in older person care is lacking and requires further attention.
To examine practical, ethical, and organisational implications of the use of a key technology deployed in the care of hospitalised people with dementia—visual identifiers—through a comparative analysis with parallel interventions in other spheres of healthcare and social activity.
Discursive paper.
We contrast visual identification systems used for hospitalised patients with dementia with other, ostensibly similar, systems to understand how they differ in key characteristics: what they disclose, to whom and with what intended consequence.
Certain distinctive features of the ways identifier systems are used to improve dementia care appear particularly consequential for their impact. Given how much is expected of such identifiers, they are likely to fail at least a proportion of patients.
We argue that it is important to critically evaluate the interests served by visual identifiers, identifying the dimensions of quality they can enhance and those that may be negatively impacted.
Visual identifiers for people with dementia can contribute to the ‘taskification’ of nursing care, implying that achieving person-centred care is a matter of following defined protocols rather than an emergent, relational, time-consuming process. Staff may end up prioritising risk avoidance and hospital routines (tasks that are measurable and auditable) rather than embracing the unpredictability of developing relationships with patients.
Visual identifiers are a part of well-established strategies to improve hospital care for those with cognitive impairment. While these identifiers aim to prompt healthcare professionals to deliver individually tailored care, research suggests that they are unable to consistently ensure the desirable quality of care. Understanding influences on how they are deployed can help reshape the expectations placed on such low-tech interventions and inform more reflective use.
Patients and public were not directly involved in the development of this discursive paper.
Research and evidence-based practice in nursing have a direct impact on the quality of care to patients. Its enactment in daily practice remains challenging, with nurses' insufficient research capacity and capability being one challenge, and the limited current state of knowledge another.
To map the knowledge landscape around capacity-building programmes aiming to increase evidence-based nursing practice and research activity in acutecare hospitals.
Scoping review using Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and PRISMA-ScR reporting guidelines.
Articles from 2013 to 2023 were searched on PubMed, CINAHL, Medline/OVID, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, Scopus and Web of Science. Two researchers screened their eligibility independently. To be eligible, studies needed to focus on nursing/midwifery in acute care settings, address research capacity-building practices and be either an empirical, review or theoretical publication. Data were extracted in a structured format and synthesised narratively.
Twenty-four articles were included, consisting of 12 empirical, 6 reviews and 6 non-data-based articles. Our analysis identified two dimensions of research capacity: (1) individual research capability and (2) organisational research capacity, each influenced by various determinants. Findings suggest that four key elements are required to build a research capacity programme: (1) context assessment, (2) multilevel leadership and management engagement, (3) programme tailored to context and (4) clear outcome indicators. We found nursing research capacity programmes lacked clear definitions and a consensus on a conceptual framework.
This review systematically synthesised the knowledge landscape on nursing research capacity building programmes in acute care hospitals, bringing clarity regarding concepts, dimensions, determinants and structural key elements.
The conceptual model developed through this review encourages comprehensive and comparable research capacity-building programmes, which can accelerate enhancement of research skills, literacy, activities and evidence-based practice among nurses, thereby improving quality of care and patient outcomes.
No patient or public contribution.
To synthesise current evidence on the development and implementation of quality care metrics for nurses working in general practice.
A Scoping review guided by Arksey and O'Malley's framework and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).
Articles included peer-reviewed primary research, published in English between 1989 and 2024, reporting on the development, implementation and evaluation of quality care nursing metrics in general practice settings. EndNote was used for citation management, while Covidence facilitated screening and data extraction by four reviewers. The Donabedian model of quality care assessment (2005) and the WHO tool for primary care nurse competencies (2020) were used to synthesise the findings.
A systematic search of PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE and Web of Science databases was conducted between June 2022 and June 2024. The search strategy was developed using Population, Concept and Context criteria, with keywords including ‘Nurse’, ‘General Practice’, ‘Metric’ and ‘Indicator.’
Eleven studies conducted between 2005 and 2024 met the inclusion criteria. Five studies focused on quality care indicators or measures, and six examined nurse competencies or standards of care.
Quality care metrics are underutilised in general practice. There is ambiguity in metric terminology and nursing roles, education and primary care systems. Quality care metrics must align with nursing values, with digital technology and leadership as core enablers.
Adoption of nursing metrics in general practice provides insights into nursing contributions to patient care. Standardising the definitions of nursing care metrics will enable valid and reliable comparisons.
Quality care nursing metrics will enable the nurse's role to be manifested in general practice settings in relation to patient outcomes.
PRISMA reporting guidelines have been adhered to.
Understanding of the role of the nurse in general practice will support improved quality, safety, policy and governance in general practice settings.
No patient or public contribution.
To develop and validate decision trees using conditional probabilities to identify the predictors of mortality and morbidity deterioration in trauma patients.
A quasi-experimental longitudinal study conducted at a Level 1 Trauma Center in São Paulo, Brazil.
The study analysed 201 patient records using standardised nursing documentation (NANDA International and Nursing Outcomes Classification). Decision trees were constructed using the chi-squared automatic interaction detection (CHAID) algorithm and validated through K-fold cross-validation to ensure model reliability.
Decision trees identified key predictors of survival and mobility deterioration. Patients who did not require (NOC 0414) Cardiopulmonary Status but required (NOC 0210) Transfer Performance had a 97.4% survival rate. Conversely, those requiring (NOC 0414) Cardiopulmonary Status had a 25% risk of worsening mobility, compared to 9% for those who did not. K-fold cross-validation confirmed the model's predictive accuracy, reinforcing the robustness of the decision tree approach (Value).
Decision trees demonstrated strong predictive capabilities for mobility outcomes and mortality risk, offering a structured, data-driven framework for clinical decision-making. These findings underscore the importance of early mobilisation, tailored rehabilitation interventions and assistive devices in improving patient recovery. This study is among the first to apply decision trees in this context, highlighting its novelty and potential to enhance trauma critical care practices.
This study highlights the potential of decision trees, a supervised machine learning method, in nursing practice by providing clear, evidence-based guidance for clinical decision-making. By enabling early identification of high-risk patients, decision trees facilitate timely interventions, reduce complications and support personalised rehabilitation strategies that enhance patient safety and recovery.
This research addresses the challenge of improving outcomes for critically ill and trauma patients with impaired mobility by identifying effective strategies for early mobilisation and rehabilitation. The integration of artificial intelligence-driven decision trees strengthens evidence-based nursing practice, enhances patient education and informs scalable interventions that reduce trauma-related complications. These findings have implications for healthcare providers, rehabilitation specialists and policymakers seeking to optimise trauma care and improve long-term patient outcomes.
Patients provided authorisation for the collection of their clinical data from medical records during hospitalisation.
To explore nurses' experiences with power structures in hospital care and to develop policy recommendations for transforming disempowering structures.
A three-phased critical ethnographic design.
Data were collected in a general teaching hospital in the Netherlands between December 2022 and June 2024 through (1) ethnographic diaries kept by nurses, (2) semi-structured interviews, (3) partial participant observations, (4) one focus group discussion with only nurses and (5) one multistakeholder focus group. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes.
Twenty-eight nurses of thirteen different departments and nine stakeholders participated. Four themes emerged from the analysis: (1) power in cooperation, (2) hierarchical relationships, (3) aggression and (4) insufficient decision-making power in hospital policies. The first theme was experienced as an empowering structural condition, while the last three were identified as disempowering structures.
Job satisfaction and quality of care among nurses are at risk and elicit feelings of burnout because of nurse–doctor hierarchies, aggression and insufficient decision-making power in hospital policies. Therefore, improving interprofessional cooperation and including nurses in decision-making is crucial to structurally empower nurses.
Hospital administrators need to create empowering conditions for nurses by furthering inclusion in policy making and setting department goals, implementing interprofessional education for effective collaboration, increasing nurse representation throughout hospital management layers and ensuring strong support systems. These interventions are important in addressing aggression, hierarchies, nurse turnover and burnout.
COREQ guidelines were used for reporting qualitative studies.
None.
To assess the impact of a nurse-led remote secondary cardiovascular prevention programme versus usual follow-up in patients who have suffered an acute coronary syndrome in terms of major adverse clinical events (MACE), diet, physical exercise, smoking, emotional state, adherence to medical treatment, cardiometabolic profile and anthropometric parameters within one year of discharge.
Prospective, randomised, open-label, evaluator-blinded, multicentre trial.
Between October 17, 2017, and February 5, 2023, patients were randomly assigned to either a usual follow-up of two cardiology visits over 12 months or the nurse-led remote secondary cardiovascular prevention programme, which also included 5 nursing visits (one face-to-face and four remote).
At 12 months, the nurse-led remote prevention programme group (interventional group) had lower smoking rates, greater adherence to medication, greater adherence to the Mediterranean diet, more physical activity, and better perceived health status compared to the usual follow-up group. The interventional group demonstrated a reduction in major adverse clinical events (20.7%) compared to the usual follow-up group (12.4%). This reduction was observed particularly in Acute Coronary Syndrome recurrence, all-cause hospitalisation, and hospitalisation for cardiovascular causes.
Patients randomised to the nurse-led remote prevention programme showed a significant reduction of the MACE, improved lifestyle, and medication adherence at 12 months compared to the usual follow-up group.
This study illustrates the feasibility and efficacy of a remote secondary cardiovascular prevention programme led by advanced practice nurses in patients who have suffered an Acute Coronary Syndrome.
CONSORT.
None.
The study was prospectively registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03234023
To investigate factors affecting the quality of life of parents of children with spina bifida and examine how family resilience mediates between parental depression and quality of life.
Cross–sectional study.
Secondary data analysis was performed using first-year data from a five-year spina bifida cohort project (2022–2026) in South Korea. The study included 162 parents of children aged 4–12 years with spina bifida. Data were collected using the Korean version of the Family Resiliency Scale, the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, and the WHO Quality of Life Scale.
Factors were found to have a statistically significant influence on the quality of life of parents of children with spina bifida: the child's need for enemas, parental stress, parental depression, and family resilience. Baron & Kenny's mediation analysis and bootstrap analysis in SPSS further confirmed that family resilience plays a mediating role between parental depression and quality of life. The indirect effect of parental depression on quality of life through family resilience was statistically significant, with a 95% confidence interval of [−0.2615, −0.0516].
The quality of life of parents with children with spina bifida is significantly influenced by both their child's daily symptom management and their psychological health. Family resilience plays a positive mediating role between parental depression and quality of life.
These findings support a two-track approach to family resilience building programs and the development of core intervention strategies to enhance the quality of life in spina bifida families.
This study adhered to Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines.
There was no direct patient involvement in the study design, data collection, or analysis.
To explore how classmate ‘ambassadors’ experienced and engaged in social interaction while visiting a hospitalised peer undergoing cancer treatment.
A phenomenological-hermeneutic inspired exploratory study.
Using on-the-go semi-structured interviews and participant observations from January to December 2023 in Denmark, we included 27 school-aged ambassadors aged 6–18 years old; 18 participated in pre- and post-visit interviews, while all 27 took part in observations during 19 visits. Van Manen's phenomenological-hermeneutic approach guided thematic analysis.
Six themes emerged: (1) visiting the hospital, (2) being supportive, (3) aligning expectations, (4) being unsure, (5) safeguarding the relationship and (6) leaving the hospital. Ambassadors were eager to visit, seeking to be good friends by offering social, emotional and physical support. They were mindful of the information shared to prevent the hospitalised children from feeling excluded. Social interactions often involved allowing the hospitalised children to take on decision-making roles, recognising their well-being as a priority.
Ambassadors found hospital visits meaningful as they wanted to make a difference and sought to support their hospitalised peers. Their role was shaped by their understanding of friendship and the disease trajectory. Social interactions were largely conflict-free due to the pre-visit alignment of expectations.
Classmates found visits meaningful and wished to make a difference. Healthcare professionals should facilitate visits to strengthen social connections between the hospitalised child and their surroundings as a part of family-centred care within paediatric oncology.
Problem: Cancer treatment often causes social disruption for children with cancer, making the transition to everyday life more difficult post-treatment.
Classmates were eager to visit hospitalised peers, demonstrating awareness of cancer and a desire to support them.
Facilitating classmate visits may enhance classmates' understanding of cancer and aid hospitalised children's reintegration into everyday life.
The COREQ checklist was used.
Ambassadors contributed to designing the interview guides.
Enhances knowledge of supporting social relationships between hospitalised children and their classmates during cancer treatment. However, the RESPECT study is rooted in the Danish cultural context, where it is common to attend local volunteer activities after school. Although getting diagnosed with a life-threatening illness such as cancer may be difficult to talk about with peers and even a taboo in some countries, we do expect that interventions with structured possibilities for social interactions are an important step towards normalisation of communicating about childhood cancer.
To determine the prevalence of burnout and back pain in homecare workers in Switzerland and assess their associations with psychosocial work environment factors.
National multicentre cross-sectional study.
Using paper-pencil questionnaires, data were collected from January 2021 to September 2021 from employees of 88 homecare agencies across Switzerland. Respondents who identified themselves as administrators, apprentices, or trainees, who were in leadership positions, or who were not involved in the provision of care or housekeeping were excluded from this analysis. Burnout was assessed with the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory Scale (possible score range 0–100) and back pain with a single item from the Federal Statistical Office's Swiss Health Survey. Multilevel regression analyses were used to assess burnout and back pain's associations with psychosocial work environment factors.
We included 2514 homecare workers. More than two-thirds (68.6%) reported back pain in the past 4 weeks. The overall mean burnout score was 36.0 (SD 18.3). Poorer work-life balance, higher perceived workload and verbal aggression from clients were positively associated with both outcomes. Better leadership and social support from colleagues were negatively associated with burnout. Higher role conflict levels correlated with higher burnout levels.
Our findings indicate that the psychosocial work environment should be considered when designing interventions to reduce the prevalence of burnout and back pain among homecare workers.
The high reported burnout and back pain prevalences among homecare workers highlight an urgent need to design and implement psychosocial work environment-improving interventions. In addition to contributing to homecare employees' long-term attraction and retention, protecting and promoting their health and well-being will likely not only benefit them, but also contribute to patient safety, quality of care and homecare sustainability.
The study reports the prevalence of burnout and back pain among homecare workers and their associations with psychosocial work environment factors. The results indicate that six psychosocial work environment factors—work-life balance, perceived workload, leadership quality, levels of social support from colleagues, role conflict levels, and verbal aggression from clients—all correlate with burnout and/or back pain in homecare workers. For policy makers, researchers, healthcare managers, and homecare agencies, this study's findings will inform the development of interventions to enhance homecare work environments, leading to improvements both in workers' health and in the quality of their care.
We have adhered to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting checklist for cross-sectional studies.
Our stakeholder group included patient representatives, policy makers, researchers, clinicians and representatives of professional associations. Throughout the study, all provided support and input on topics including questionnaire development, result interpretation and the design of strategies to improve response rates.
To describe and enhance the understanding of healthcare professionals' perceptions of future leadership in digital healthcare.
A qualitative descriptive study.
The data were collected remotely between February and November 2022 through semi-structured interviews. A total of 26 healthcare professionals were interviewed individually or in focus group interviews at the university hospital and university in Finland. The data were analysed using inductive content analysis.
Results revealed seven main categories that described the professionals' perceptions of future leadership in digital healthcare: building a future-oriented healthcare, strengthening a digitally minded organisational culture, being interactive in a digital environment, leading sustainably in digital healthcare, leading expertise in digital healthcare, leading collaboratively in digital healthcare and using artificial intelligence in leadership in digital healthcare.
Future leadership in digital healthcare will be about leading people in a humane way. Leaders will be at the forefront of digital solutions, sharing their expertise and enabling stakeholders' engagement. Through collaboration, future leaders will be building a future-led digital health system.
Digital healthcare is improving due to the implementation of new digital solutions and the possibility of artificial intelligence. Thus, leaders' competencies in digital healthcare need to be further developed through education and guided by policy to meet the expectations of future professionals, nurses and customers.
No patient or public contribution.
The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist was used in the reporting.
To verify the efficacy of virtual reality compared to tablet games for pain and anxiety management in children undergoing percutaneous bone pin and/or suture removal procedures.
Randomised clinical trial using two parallel groups: (1) virtual reality or (2) tablet game.
Three-center, randomised pragmatic clinical trial, using a parallel design with two groups (experimental group: immersive virtual reality; active comparator: tablet games). Children aged 6–17 requiring percutaneous pins and/or sutures were recruited between 2020 and 2022 from three outpatient orthopaedic clinics in paediatric hospitals. Pain was measured with the Numerical Rating Scale and anxiety with the Child Fear Scale before and immediately after the procedure.
A total of 188 participants were assigned to either the virtual reality group (96 participants) or the tablet group (92 participants). At the first assessment, there was no noticeable difference between the two groups in terms of pain or anxiety levels. However, further analysis revealed that participants aged 13 and older in the virtual reality group experienced significantly lower anxiety.
Virtual reality was not more efficacious than games on a tablet for pain and anxiety of children undergoing removal of bone pins or sutures. However, virtual reality demonstrated a benefit in reducing anxiety for teenagers, particularly those aged 13-older.
Virtual reality games provide an immersive, non-pharmacological alternative of for anxiety management of teenagers during pins and/or sutures removal.
This study showed that a virtual reality game may help reduce anxiety during pins and/or sutures removal procedures in patients aged 13 years and older.
We adhered to the CONSORT checklist for reporting results.
A patient partner reviewed the study design, methods and final manuscript.
NCT03680625
To synthesise and critically analyse existing reviews of evidence on mentorship in nursing and midwifery, providing a comprehensive overview of current knowledge.
A scoping meta-review.
The review was conducted using the scoping meta-review framework outlined by Sarrami-Foroushani et al. (2015), alongside the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to ensure rigour and transparency. The following steps were included: (i) defining the problem, (ii) literature search and criteria, (iii) study selection and data extraction, (iv) data synthesis, (v) presentation of results and (vi) interpretation and recommendations.
A comprehensive search strategy was designed, utilising Boolean operators, truncation and predefined keywords across seven databases including MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, Epistemonikos, ERIC and Google Scholar.
Following double-blind screening of 269 papers, 14 literature reviews were included. The findings provided a detailed overview of mentorship programme types (formal and informal), outcome measures used to evaluate mentorship effectiveness and recommendations for future programmes. Identified themes included skill development, job satisfaction, career progression and retention outcomes, together with challenges including time constraints and balancing clinical responsibilities with mentorship roles. Formal mentorship programmes that are adequately supported and integrated into the organisational culture can improve healthcare systems, workforce stability and patient outcomes. Informal mentorship continues to offer valuable, flexible support, particularly when used alongside formal structures. Implementation challenges exist, such as time constraints, limited organisational support, and mismatched mentor-mentee pairings.
This review highlights the critical role of mentorship in nursing and midwifery, offering insights into effective practices, challenges and potential areas for further research. The findings suggest that formal, structured mentorship programmes produce consistent benefits, including enhanced clinical skills, confidence and satisfaction among mentees, as well as leadership development and professional fulfilment for mentors, while positively impacting organisational efficiency and patient outcomes. Successful mentorship programmes require organisational commitment, with protected time, resources, and ongoing mentor training.
Mentorship programmes in nursing and midwifery enhance professional development, job satisfaction, and retention, enabling a stable healthcare workforce. Mentorship for mentors and mentees is linked to increased confidence, competency and readiness for advanced roles among nurses and midwives. Fostering mentorship in healthcare can lead to improved quality and continuity of care as mentees grow into more competent and confident practitioners.
Formal mentorship programmes that are adequately supported and integrated into the organisational culture can improve healthcare systems, workforce stability and patient outcomes. Policymakers responsible for healthcare workforce development can use these findings to advocate for mentorship as a strategic investment, potentially influencing policies related to nurse retention, professional development and funding allocations for mentorship initiatives. Structured mentorship improves job satisfaction, reduces turnover and fosters professional growth, thus reducing costs associated with recruitment and training.
The findings are reported in line with the PRISMA guidelines (Page et al., 2021) and through a narrative synthesis, summarising and analysing the results of various reviews to present a cohesive understanding of mentorship practices in nursing and midwifery. This method allowed for the integration of qualitative and quantitative findings and the identification of common themes and patterns across studies.
Patients or members of the public did not directly contribute to this review. However, by focusing on mentorship practices that support nurses and midwives, the study indirectly addresses public interests, as improved mentoring contributes to the quality of patient care. Future studies could benefit from patient or public feedback on desired qualities in care providers, further informing the development of mentorship programmes aligned with patient-centred care outcomes.
(1) To analyse individual and institutional-level factors associated with urinary incontinence in older adults living in nursing homes; (2) to estimate the prevalence of urinary, faecal and double incontinence in nursing home residents.
Cross-sectional study.
Residents aged 65+ living in 22 nursing homes in Catalonia (Spain) were included. Descriptive, bivariate, and multilevel analyses were performed.
The final sample comprised 452 residents (75.9% female, mean age of 87.0 years). The prevalence of urinary, faecal and double incontinence was 77.5%, 46.1% and 45.7%, respectively. Urinary incontinence was statistically significantly associated with neurological conditions, moderate cognitive impairment, moderate dementia, severe cognitive impairment, very severe cognitive impairment and age.
Approximately three out of four nursing home residents suffered from urinary incontinence and almost half of the sample from faecal or double incontinence. Individual-level factors (cognition, neurological conditions and age) played a more important role than institutional-level factors for urinary incontinence.
The findings of this study highlight the importance of individual-level interventions to prevent and manage urinary incontinence in nursing homes.
In Catalonian nursing homes, individual factors such as cognitive impairment and neurological conditions were more strongly associated with urinary incontinence than institutional factors. This has implications for improving care provided to older adults, particularly those with dementia and neurological conditions.
STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines.
Nursing home residents were not involved in this study.
The Cancer Behaviour Inventory–Brief Version was designed to assess cancer-coping self-efficacy in clinical and research settings where minimising patient burden is essential. However, there is no evidence of its longitudinal validity. Although widely used in cancer research, the lack of evidence for longitudinal invariance significantly undermines its validity in studies spanning multiple time points. Establishing longitudinal invariance enables valid comparisons over time, enhancing our confidence in applying it in longitudinal research.
To examine the factor structure of the measurement and test its longitudinal invariance across four time points in cancer patients experiencing moderate-to-high symptoms during curative cancer treatment.
A longitudinal psychometric evaluation.
This is a secondary data analysis of a randomised controlled trial in patients with moderate-to-high symptoms undergoing cancer treatment (N = 534). We conducted longitudinal invariance tests for the measurement using four time points. Other psychometric tests included confirmatory factor analysis, reliability analyses and correlations.
Our confirmatory factor analysis supported the four-factor, 12-item structure for the Cancer Behaviour Inventory–Brief Version. Items 1 and 6 were found to be moderately correlated. The resulting 12-item measure demonstrated good internal consistency, with convergent and divergent validity supported by correlations with selected instruments. Finally, longitudinal invariance was tested, which revealed strict measurement invariance across four time points (CFI = 0.930, RMSEA = 0.045, SRMA = 0.056).
We found that the factor structure of the Cancer Behaviour Inventory–Brief Version remained stable over four time points in a sample of patients having moderate to high symptoms under cancer treatment. This supports its accountability for examining the changes in cancer-coping self-efficacy among cancer patients over time in longitudinal studies.
This study confirms that Cancer Behaviour Inventory–Brief Version has adequate internal consistency and demonstrated evidence of construct validity. Our conclusion of strict longitudinal invariance supports its credibility for continuous assessment of cancer-coping self-efficacy to evaluate patient outcomes and intervention processes over time in clinical and research settings.
No patient or public contribution.
To explore current evidence regarding the provision of palliative care for individuals with very severe to extreme behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) in a hospital setting.
Scoping review.
The PRISMA-ScR reporting guideline.
The JBI guidelines for scoping reviews were followed. A data extraction form assisted in the identification of key findings via a process of content analysis.
Studies were obtained from bibliographic databases of PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO.
This review included six articles, and nine categories emerged from the findings. Symptom assessment and management, pain assessment challenges, atypical presentation of end-stage dementia, complex prescribing and treatment practices, principles of person-centred care, collaboration; training for health care professionals; emotional impact on staff; and family and caregivers.
This scoping review highlighted a significant gap in the literature regarding palliative care for people living with very severe to extreme BPSD in hospital settings. This review highlighted key differences in the presentation of people with BPSD needing palliative care. There is a need for tailored models of care, specialised training and education for health professionals, families, and carers, and recognition of dementia as a terminal illness.
The results of this review provide valuable insights into the level of understanding about the unique palliative care needs for people experiencing very severe to extreme BPSD, making an important contribution to the planning and development of future models of care.
Mapping the available literature highlights a paucity of research in palliative care for people with very severe to extreme BPSD in hospital settings. There is a need for rigorous research studies and models of care developed and informed by the evidence for this small population necessitating unique care needs.
No patient or public contribution.
FreshRSS 