Conectar
A novel advanced synthetic bioactive glass matrix was studied in patients with non-healing diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). Bioactive glasses can be constructed to be biocompatible, with water-soluble materials in multiple geometries including fibre scaffolds that mimic the 3D architecture of a fibrin clot. In this trial, chronic, Wagner Grade 1 DFUs were randomised to receive borate-based bioactive glass Fibre Matrix (BBGFM) plus standard of care (SOC) therapy for 12 weeks or SOC alone. The primary study endpoint was the proportion of subjects that obtained complete wound closure at 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints included time to achieve complete wound closure at 12 weeks. In the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) analysis, 48% (32/67) treated with BBGFM plus SOC healed at 12 weeks compared to 24% (16/66) with SOC alone (p = 0.007). In the per protocol (PP) population, 73% (32/44) of subjects treated with BBGFM plus SOC healed versus 42% (16/38) in the SOC group (p = 0.007). Based on the success of this trial, BBGFM demonstrates faster healing of DFUs compared to SOC and should be considered in the treatment armamentarium for Wagner Grade 1 DFUs. Future trials should investigate the use of BBGFM for healing deeper chronic DFUs, other wound aetiologies, or complex surgical wounds.
This study aimed to compare the 3-year recurrence rates of diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) and the rate of endovascular reintervention for chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) to recurrence rates of advanced-stage cancers. We systematically collected original data reporting 3-year DFU recurrence from studies published through 2024 and calculated a pooled mean. These findings were compared to recurrence rates for advanced breast, prostate, colorectal, and lung cancers using contemporary sources from the National Cancer Institute and American Cancer Society. CLTI reintervention data were drawn from the BEST-CLI trial. The pooled 3-year DFU recurrence rate was 58%, while the CLTI reintervention rate was 50%—comparable to cancer recurrence rates: breast (25%–40%), prostate (30%–40%), colorectal (30%–50%), and lung (60%–80%). Despite these comparable risks, DFU and CLTI remain underrecognized in terms of their recurrent burden on individuals, families, and health systems. The data presented here underscore the need to reframe healed DFU and post-intervention CLTI not as an endpoint but as a remission—a state requiring structured surveillance and proactive management, much like in oncology. Developing interdisciplinary survivorship care plans for individuals with DFU and CLTI, modelled on those used in cancer care, may improve communication, enhance secondary prevention, and foster more ulcer-free, hospital-free, and activity-rich days.
Diabetes related foot ulcers (DFUs) are complex and costly to manage, with the prevalence of non-healing wounds steadily increasing across the globe. Non-healing wounds can occur when clinicians fail to undertake an appropriate assessment, fail to recognise the importance of systemic or local complications, or provide the optimal treatment. The aetiological causes behind non-healing wounds are multifactorial; however, the purpose of this article is to focus on the role of oxygen in non-healing wounds and to introduce readers to advances in the delivery of topical oxygen therapy (TOT) via a haemoglobin spray. Importantly, this article incorporates a clinical decision support tool (CDST) to help clinicians identify the most appropriate individuals for whom topical haemoglobin may be most beneficial and the most appropriate time for introducing the intervention to improve wound healing outcomes.
As the incidence of diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) increases, better treatments that improve healing should reduce complications of these ulcers including infections and amputations. We conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing outcomes between a novel purified reconstituted bilayer membrane (PRBM) to the standard of care (SOC) in the treatment of non-healing DFUs. This study included 105 patients who were randomized to either of two treatment groups (n = 54 PRBM; n = 51 SOC) in the intent to treat (ITT) group and 80 who completed the study per protocol (PP) (n = 47 PRBM; n = 33 SOC). The primary endpoint was the percentage of wounds closed after 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included percent area reduction, time to healing, quality of life, and cost to closure. The DFUs that had been treated with PRBM healed at a higher rate than those treated with SOC (ITT: 83% vs. 45%, p = 0.00004, PP: 92% vs. 67%, p = 0.005). Wounds treated with PRBM also healed significantly faster than those treated with SOC with a mean of 42 versus 62 days for SOC (p = 0.00074) and achieved a mean wound area reduction within 12 weeks of 94% versus 51% for SOC (p = 0.0023). There were no adverse events or serious adverse events that were related to either the PRBM or the SOC. In comparison to the SOC, DFUs healed faster when treated with PRBM. Thus, the use of this PRBM is an effective option for the treatment of chronic DFUs.
This Phase 1b study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pravibismane, a novel broad-spectrum topical anti-infective, in managing moderate or severe chronic diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) infections. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study consisted of 39 individuals undergoing pravibismane treatment and 13 individuals in the placebo group. Assessment of safety parameters included clinical observations of tolerability and pharmacokinetics from whole blood samples. Pravibismane was well-tolerated and exhibited minimal systemic absorption, as confirmed by blood concentrations that were below the lower limit of quantitation (0.5 ng/mL) or in the low nanomolar range, which is orders of magnitude below the threshold of pharmacological relevance for pravibismane. Pravibismane treated subjects showed approximately 3-fold decrease in ulcer size compared to the placebo group (85% vs. 30%, p = 0.27). Furthermore, the incidence of ulcer-related lower limb amputations was approximately 6-fold lower (2.6%) in the pooled pravibismane group versus 15.4% in the placebo group (p = 0.15). There were no treatment emergent or serious adverse events related to study drug. The initial findings indicate that topical pravibismane was safe and potentially effective treatment for improving recovery from infected chronic ulcers by reducing ulcer size and facilitating wound healing in infected DFUs (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02723539).
A novel autologous heterogeneous skin construct (AHSC) was previously shown to be effective versus standard of care (SOC) treatment in facilitating complete wound healing of Wagner 1 diabetic foot ulcers in an interim analysis of 50 patients previously published. We now report the final analysis of 100 patients (50 per group), which further supports the interim analysis findings. Forty-five subjects in the AHSC treatment group received only one application of the autologous heterogeneous skin construct, and five received two applications. For the primary endpoint at 12 weeks, there were significantly more diabetic wounds closed in the AHSC treatment group (35/50, 70%) than in the SOC control group (17/50, 34%) (p = 0.00032). A significant difference in percentage area reduction between groups was also demonstrated over 8 weeks (p = 0.009). Forty-nine subjects experienced 148 adverse events: 66 occurred in 21 subjects (42%) in the AHSC treatment group versus 82 in 28 SOC control group subjects (56.0%). Eight subjects were withdrawn due to serious adverse events. Autologous heterogeneous skin construct was shown to be an effective adjunctive therapy for healing Wagner 1 diabetic foot ulcers.
The inaugural expert consensus and guidance for Nutrition Interventions in Adults with Diabetic Foot Ulcers (DFU) have been welcomed by clinicians internationally. This short report aimed to determine how the macronutrient and micronutrient status of individuals living with DFU compared to the American Limb Preservation Society Nutrition Interventions in Adults with DFU expert consensus and guidance. Descriptive analysis was conducted as a secondary analysis of an existing dataset. Mean (SD) dietary intake, the proportion meeting the nutrition recommendations and the proportion exceeding the upper limit (UL) for specific vitamins and minerals were reported. Most individuals with DFU do not meet current consensus guidelines for optimal dietary intake for wound healing, with inadequacies evident for fibre, zinc, protein, vitamin E and vitamin A. Future iterations of the consensus guideline should consider using evidence-informed recommendations for clinical practice, with the inclusion of all nutrients that are essential for wound healing in DFU.
FreshRSS 