Conectar
Understanding the patient perspective is crucial for enhancing healthcare delivery and outcomes for chronic conditions like diabetic foot ulcers. This qualitative study examined the perspectives of patients with diabetic foot ulcers to inform clinical strategies for both physicians and current patients to enhance care and prevent lower extremity amputations. Fifteen patients with a history of diabetes and diabetic foot ulcers and/or amputations participated in semi-structured interviews which explored their lived experiences and advice for both physicians and fellow patients to improve diabetic foot ulcer related care. Interview transcriptions were analysed to identify recurring themes. Advice for physicians emphasised increasing patient education, initiating preventive foot care at the time of diabetes diagnosis, providing instructions for managing diabetic ulcers early and demonstrating empathetic bedside manner. Advice for fellow patients focused on adopting healthy lifestyle practices, regular foot self-examinations, consistent blood glucose monitoring, medication adherence and seeking prompt medical attention for new or worsening foot lesions. Participants also stressed the importance of routine check-ups with providers to support prevention and management efforts. This qualitative study highlights the value of incorporating patient perspectives to improve our understanding of diabetic foot ulcer onset, care and outcomes and thereby reduce the risk of lower extremity complications.
Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) compounded by diabetic foot ulceration remains a leading precursor to major lower-extremity amputation. Transverse tibial transport (TTT) can improve perfusion but requires corticotomy and bulky external fixation. We report what is, to our knowledge, the first application of fully automated tibial periosteal distraction (PD) for limb preservation. A 65-year-old man with recurrent forefoot gangrene underwent tibial PD using a miniaturised, programmable motor to gradually elevate the periosteum. Through a 1 cm incision, a low-profile subperiosteal plate was implanted and linked to the motor, which advanced 0.031 mm hourly (0.75 mm/day) up to 10 mm. Distraction was completed uneventfully over 13 days, and the device was removed at the bedside on Day 21. Skin temperature increased by 2°C, and digital systolic (toe) pressure rose from 22 to 50 mmHg. The wound progressed to healing without complication. Automated PD may offer a minimally invasive, biologically driven alternative for high-risk CLTI patients, eliminating the need for patient-adjusted screws and standardising adherence. Prospective studies are required to validate its safety, durability, optimal distraction parameters and cost-effectiveness.
Biofilms are a key driver of chronicity and treatment failure in diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), yet clinical evidence quantifying their impact and management remains fragmented. This systematic narrative review synthesised recent evidence (2015–2025) on the prevalence, diagnostics, and management of biofilm in DFUs. A Systematic Review of the Literature (SRL) was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines across PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Library and ScienceDirect. Eligible studies included adults with DFUs reporting biofilm/bioburden metrics or interventions aimed at biofilm disruption. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 for randomised trials and ROBINS-I for non-randomised studies. Data were narratively synthesised by evidence tier (Tier 1 = clinical; Tier 2 = preclinical/mechanistic). Of 600 records screened, 25 studies met inclusion criteria (Tier 1 n = 9; Tier 2 n = 5; reviews n = 11). Over half of bacterial isolates in DFUs were biofilm producers, with multidrug resistance exceeding 90% in several cohorts. Fungi were detected in 31% of ulcers by qPCR but only 9% by culture. Tier 1 clinical evidence supports standard care components—debridement, antiseptics, and negative-pressure wound therapy—for improved healing, though direct antibiofilm outcomes remain limited. Emerging strategies (enzymatic agents, peptides, cold plasma, smart dressings) show promise in vitro but lack clinical translation. Evidence for direct antibiofilm efficacy in DFUs remains scarce. Current data justify maintaining guideline-based care while prioritising trials that integrate validated biofilm endpoints, standardised microbiological methods, and antifungal components. Distinguishing established from experimental approaches is essential to advancing safe, evidence-based biofilm management in DFUs.
There is an urgent need for effective interventions to aid diabetes-related foot ulcer (DFU) healing. This study aimed to test the deliverability of a proposed trial of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) for DFU healing. A pilot double-blinded randomised controlled trial. Patients with a DFU present for ≥ 4 weeks were randomised to high dose (500 shocks/cm2), low dose (100 shocks/cm2) or sham (0 shocks/cm2) ESWT, plus standard care. Follow-up was for 24 weeks. Primary outcome was deliverability of the trial. Secondary outcomes were healing, quality of life and healthcare resource use. One-hundred and forty-one (15.6%) screened patients were eligible and 74 (52.5%) patients were recruited. Follow-up attendance was 97.3% (72/74), 93.2% (69/74) and 87.8% (65/74) at 6, 12 and 24 weeks. The median DFU healing time was high dose: 54.0 (IQR 119.0), low dose: 78.5 (IQR 61.0) and sham: 83.0 (IQR 85.0) days. The mean EQ-5D-5L utility value at 24 weeks was high dose: 0.621 (95% CI 0.438–0.804), low dose: 0.779 (95% CI 0.683–0.876) and sham: 0.806 (95% CI 0.717–0.895). Healthcare resource use was lowest in the low-dose ESWT arm. The pilot trial has demonstrated that patients with a DFU are willing to engage in the proposed trial and suggest the optimal way to deliver the definitive trial.
FreshRSS 