Conectar
Nursing students are the primary reserve force for hospital nurses. With the shrinking of nurse human resources and the increase in turnover rates, understanding the job preferences of nursing students is crucial for attracting nursing students.
To systematically review published studies on discrete choice experiments involving nursing students.
Ten databases were systematically searched from their inception to January 15, 2025. Two researchers independently used the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research checklist to evaluate the quality of the included studies. Thematic analysis was used to classify the attributes into broad categories and corresponding subcategories. The frequency, significance, relative importance, and willingness-to-pay of each attribute in the included studies were analyzed.
Fifteen studies spanning 12 countries were included, with a total of 102 individual attributes extracted and divided into two broad categories and six subcategories. Non-financial attributes were the most frequently reported broad category. The subgroup analyses indicated that nursing students from high-income countries valued income and were highly concerned about the working atmosphere.
Linking Evidence to Action:
The results of this systematic review provide important evidence for developing incentive policies to attract nursing students to the nursing profession.
Globally, doctorally-prepared nurses have pursued career paths centered on research and academic leadership. In the United States, alongside the PhD in nursing, there exists a distinct educational pathway, the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP), which emphasizes clinical practice. However, the actual career trajectories of individuals from both groups often diverge from these traditional expectations, prompting questions about how their roles are integrated within academic and clinical environments.
This systematic review aims to critically examine the career pathways of nurses with doctoral degrees, with a focus on the intersection of research and clinical practice.
Following the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of five databases (PROQUEST Nursing, Scopus, EBSCO, EMBASE, and PubMed) was conducted on October 14, 2024. We identified 6003 references, with 23 studies ultimately meeting inclusion criteria. Thematic analysis was used to synthesize findings.
PhD and DNP nurses in the US exhibit overlapping yet nontraditional career paths, with PhDs taking on clinical leadership and DNPs entering academia. Globally, PhD nurses often hold hybrid roles in research, education, and limited clinical practice. Across contexts, both groups face role misalignment and identity challenges, including marginalization and limited institutional support.
The findings highlight the blurring of traditional boundaries between PhD and DNP career paths, underscoring the need for flexible career models that combine academic and clinical practice as a viable option to address these challenges.
The review was registered in PROSPERO (Registration Number)
The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated burnout, isolation, and disconnection among healthcare workers, leading to national calls to address workplace mental health. Storytelling has emerged as an effective strategy to build belonging, resilience, and connection. In response, a pediatric healthcare system launched an evidence-based storytelling initiative rooted in narrative medicine and visual symbolism.
To strengthen workplace culture by fostering connection, psychological safety, and meaning through structured storytelling.
Developed in partnership with Dear World, the intervention integrated guided reflection, peer sharing, and professional photography. Initially focused on staff, the initiative expanded to include adolescent and young adult patients. Implementation included phased rollout, train-the-trainer models, onboarding integration, and multimedia engagement. Evaluation methods included pre- and post-surveys and organizational metrics, with the Connection During Conversations Scale (CDCS) used to assess effectiveness across different session formats.
Over 2 years, 1818 participants attended 60 events. Significant improvements in perceived connection and belonging were observed (p < 0.001), with 94% reporting stronger connections to colleagues and 93% to organizational values. CDCS analysis of Year 2 participants (n = 148) demonstrated comparable effectiveness between full and abbreviated session formats, with slightly stronger outcomes in full sessions. As part of broader workforce engagement efforts, nurse turnover declined from 21% to 13%, contributing to $2.3 million in projected cost avoidance.
This scalable, low-cost initiative offers a sustainable model for rehumanizing healthcare. Its integration into orientation, leadership development, and wellness programs underscores its value in fostering connection, resilience, and retention across high-stress care settings.
The handover process is a critical component of patient safety, enabling effective communication and the transfer of responsibility among nurses. However, despite their critical role, it is often compromised by interruptions, lack of standardization, and variability in practice, which may reduce quality and nurse satisfaction. Existing tools primarily measure information transfer and efficiency but rarely incorporate nurses' perspectives on safety and satisfaction. This gap underscores the need for a validated instrument that comprehensively assesses handover quality from both a professional and safety perspective.
To develop and validate the Handover Quality Questionnaire (HAND-Q), a tool assessing nurses' satisfaction with handovers and their perceived impact on patient safety.
HAND-Q development included a conceptualization phase (literature review, expert discussions) and a validation phase (pilot and large-scale testing). Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses (EFA, CFA) assessed psychometric properties.
EFA revealed four factors: Satisfaction, Patient Safety, Care Pathway Safety, and Handover Content. CFA confirmed good model fit. Inter-factor correlations showed strong links between handover quality and safety, alongside discrepancies between satisfaction and objective standards.
The HAND-Q offers a practical tool to assess handover quality, support standardization, enhance patient safety, and inform training and digital solutions.
Although some research supports the maintenance of positive outcomes from cardiac rehabilitation Phase II (CR II) up to 12 months, the barriers to maintaining physical activity and risk factor management during CR maintenance (CR III) are well known.
To investigate participants' ability to sustain clinical, quality-of-life (QOL), and behavioral outcomes and share their experiences 6 months after CR II completion.
Longitudinal explanatory sequential pre-CR/post-CR study in a community hospital within a large health system. A convenience sample of 155 participants completed a reassessment of health outcomes. Participants also completed an online survey about barriers and facilitators during and after CR II. Analysis methods included MANOVA and summative content analysis.
The sample was mostly male, white, non-Hispanic, and college educated, with a mean age of 67.9 years. CR II participants sustained most behavioral outcomes, but not all clinical outcomes. Outcomes that improved/maintained were physical activity, tobacco status, diet, and QOL. Outcomes that worsened/returned to pre-CR II were weight, blood pressure, and depression. Participants described their motivation for staying healthy, top concerns, goals, barriers, and strengths/resources. Common responses included exercise, weight, diet, quality of life, family, and friends.
Our findings suggest the need for the implementation of innovative strategies during CR II that may extend past discharge into CR III. These include the introduction of digital technology and eHealth to provide value-added service to patients and a solid foundation for future maintenance and a structured, behavioral weight loss intervention. Establishing these tools, in addition to developing a support system will help patients to initiate maintenance care before program completion.
The global prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) has continued to rise over time. Pharmacological therapy is the mainstay of conventional CKD treatment; however, many CKD patients find it difficult to adhere to their medication regimen.
To systematically evaluate and compare the effects of various self-management support strategies for patients with CKD.
We searched PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus to identify quasi-randomized and RCTs comparing the effectiveness of different self-management support strategies in CKD patients, The search spanned from database inception to June 24, 2025. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted information, assessed the quality of studies, and we performed analysis using RevMan 5.0 and STATA 14.0 software.
Eighty-one studies were included, examining 10 strategies. Compared to conventional interventions, face-to-face combined tele-guidance, group visits, tele-guidance, and multi-component structured interventions significantly improved patients' self-efficacy. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) of different self-management support strategies influencing self-efficacy ranked in the top three were face-to-face combined tele-guidance, group visits and tele-guidance. Empowerment interventions, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and tele-guidance enhanced quality of life compared to conventional interventions. The SUCRA for quality of life ranked highest for empowerment, CBT and face-to-face combined tele-guidance. Additionally, we found that these strategies were beneficial in improving patients' blood pressure, IDWG, renal disease knowledge, and self-management.
The study offers evidence on effective self-management support strategies for CKD patients, highlighting face-to-face combined tele-guidance might be the most effective intervention for increasing self-efficacy, while empowerment might be the most effective intervention for increasing quality of life in CKD patients. These findings can help healthcare providers design better programs to improve patient outcomes. However, more high-quality RCTs are needed to confirm findings.
PROSPERO: CRD42024596581
The research-to-practice gap often occurs when evidence-based practice (EBP) is inadequately implemented into clinical practice. Nurses are critical to bridging the gap in EBP implementation (EBPI) and identifying effective strategies to promote its use in practice; however, they need a supportive work environment to develop the necessary research capacity/culture (RCC).
The purpose of this study was to examine relationships between nurses' perceptions of individual RCC and EBPI, team RCC and EBPI, and health care organization RCC and EBPI, adjusting for educational background, health care organization setting, and health care organization type.
Survey data were collected from 175 nurses across the United States using a prospective cross-sectional study design. The Research Capacity in Context (RCC) tool and EBPI scale were used to measure nurses' perception of RCC and nurses' EBPI, respectively. Simple linear regression was used to assess the relationship between organizational, team, and individual RCC and EBPI. Multiple linear regression was used to adjust for pertinent participant demographics.
The results of this study indicated that organization (R 2 = 0.033, p = 0.016), team (R 2 = 0.064, p < 0.001), and individual (R 2 = 0.155, p < 0.001) RCC were significantly associated with nurse EBPI. Moreover, findings remained significant after adjusting for educational background, health care organization setting, and type. The regression model suggested that education significantly predicted EBPI (R 2 = 0.142, p < 0.001).
These results emphasize the importance of building RCC in health care organizations, as it can be an effective strategy to increase nurses' EBPI, which has been shown to impact patient outcomes directly. Future research should identify strategies to assist organizations and leadership in building RCC among nurses.
The translation of evidence-based practice (EBP) into routine nursing practice remains a persistent challenge.
To evaluate the impact of a structured EBP Mentor Nurse Training Program, developed using the Johns Hopkins EBP model as a process guide and conceptually grounded in the ARCC (Advancing Research and Clinical Practice through Close Collaboration) model, which emphasizes the development of EBP mentors to enhance implementation and competency.
This quasi-experiment used a pretest-posttest design with equivalent control and intervention groups (n = 52; intervention group = 26, control group = 26). The intervention consisted of a blended training program (16 h face-to-face, 3 h online) covering EBP, mentoring, and communication skills. The control group received no intervention. Data were collected using the Nurse Information Form, the Evidence-Based Practice Evaluation Competency Scale, and the Mentoring Scale. The TREND statement guided reporting.
Post-test results indicated significant improvements in the intervention group's EBP knowledge sub-dimension and total competency scores. Statistically significant gains were also observed in the coaching, role modeling, counseling, acceptance and approval, and friendship sub-dimensions of the Mentoring Scale. Effect sizes ranged from d = 0.5 (coaching) to d = 0.8 (EBP knowledge), indicating moderate to large practical significance.
Structured EBP mentorship programs effectively enhance nurses' knowledge, EBP competencies, and mentoring abilities. These outcomes align with the ARCC model, supporting the cultivation of EBP mentors as a sustainable strategy for EBP integration. Incorporating blended learning and active mentorship in nursing education can foster a culture of collaboration, improve clinical decision-making, and promote better patient outcomes.
The interaction between dementia and changes in health status accelerates the progression of dementia and health deterioration. Although health indicators exist for older adults, comprehensive ones for dementia are lacking.
To (1) establish core health indicators for older adults with dementia, (2) develop an integrated health assessment toolkit for older adults with dementia, and (3) test the feasibility and applicability of the integrated health assessment toolkit.
This study involved two phases. In the first phase, using the Delphi method, opinions from 10 experts were synthesized to establish core health indicators for older adults with dementia. In the second phase, with a descriptive research approach, an integrated health assessment toolkit was developed, evaluated by 10 daycare case managers for feasibility, and then pilot tested with 50 older adults with dementia across three daycare centers.
The core health indicators for older adults with dementia covered 18 indicators in five domains: (1) cognitive and behavioral impairment, (2) sensory and perceptual impairment, (3) disease and dysfunction, (4) functional fitness deterioration, and (5) social isolation. After two rounds of assessments, experts rated the criteria's importance and clarity at 0.94 and 0.89 on the scale-level content validity index/universal agreement (S-CVI/UA), respectively. In the second phase, the integrated health assessment toolkit was developed, which integrated five observational assessment scales and six physical function measures. The average applicability scores ranged from 7.80 to 9.90 out of 10. In the pilot test, the assessment process proceeded smoothly without any adverse events. However, 10 participants did not comply with wearing the actigraphy device.
The core health indicators and the corresponding health assessment toolkit are feasible to assess the health of older adults with dementia that could provide valuable insights and guide future interventions to enhance their well-being.
Nursing well-being is foundational to the specialties workforce and broader healthcare industry worldwide. Despite frequent reports and descriptions of activities that support nurses' well-being, most reports describe singular activities and programs that lack science-based structures contextualized within academic healthcare systems (AHS) with validated impact.
To evaluate and synthesize the existing national and international literature on nurse well-being initiatives offered in AHS.
Over 18 months, an 8-member interprofessional team conducted a scoping review adhering to PRISMA-ScR reporting guidelines. Five databases were searched, and results were screened in a multistep process by researcher pairs. Discrepancies were resolved by a third team member's review. Citations were reviewed uniquely three times to ensure methodological rigor. A final set of 54 articles was extracted for key data elements pertinent to the research question describing setting, population, study design, intervention, and other subsidiary fields. Reviewers additionally analyzed publication quality indicators and trends for additional implications for research and practice.
Among the 54 eligible articles, 72% were research and 28% were evidence-based practice, quality improvement, or doctoral dissertations. The concepts studied were psychosocial (e.g., resiliency) and physical (e.g., sleep). The number of instruments used per study ranged from 1 to 11. Thirty percent of studies utilized a framework from various disciplines that included nursing, social and behavioral sciences, and safety science principles. Nurses were included as authors 67% of the time, and 35% received funding from either the public or private sector.
Work wellbeing, also known as workplace wellbeing, is a global concern for nurses, particularly because excessive stress and exhaustion contribute to burnout.
The Caring Science International Collaborative (CSIC), an international research network, empirically investigates nurse work wellbeing using the Profile of Caring, a psychometrically validated and reliable instrument.
The CSIC framework defines wellbeing intrinsically—as caring and clarity—and extrinsically—as the social and technical resources needed to work efficiently and effectively. The Profile of Caring explains 80% of work wellbeing in nursing without bias across 10 countries.
This research protocol describes an international multicenter observational study that measures nurse work wellbeing using the Profile of Caring and other concepts and outcomes measures.
Evidence-based practice (EBP) is essential for clinical decision-making, integrating the best available evidence, clinical expertise, and stakeholder values. In Italy, interest in EBP is growing, and a key step in its promotion is adopting tools to assess nurses' beliefs and behaviors toward EBP. While the EBP Beliefs Scale has been translated and validated in multiple languages, it has yet to be adapted for the Italian context.
This study aims to adapt EBP measurement tools for the Italian context and evaluate their psychometric properties.
This study used an observational cross-sectional design. The process of cross-cultural translation, adaptation, and validation was adopted. A panel of experts culturally adapted the Beliefs Scales (long and short version) through the item and scale content validity (I-CVI, S-CVI). To test the psychometric properties, 409 nurses were asked to complete the two scales. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to validate the factor structure within the Italian context. Convergent validity between the long and short versions of the scale was assessed using the correlation coefficient (r), and the reliability was assessed by computing Cronbach's alpha.
The I-CVI and S-CVI for the long and short version ranged from 0.75 to 1.00. The CFA model performed for the long and short version reported a good fit without the need for further refinements. The Cronbach's alpha was higher than 0.80 for both scales. The correlation of 0.615 (p < 0.01) indicated a moderate to strong positive relationship supporting the convergent validity of the short version in relation to the long version.
In time-constrained settings, the short scale should be utilized for efficient assessments and longitudinal tracking of changes. The long version serves as a complementary tool for in-depth analysis, facilitating a deeper understanding of underlying factors and informing targeted interventions to address specific barriers.
FreshRSS 