To develop a comprehensive and psychometrically validated scale for evaluating the core competencies of community nurses for public health emergencies.
A study of instrument development and validation was conducted.
A total of 1057 community nurses provided valid responses for this study conducted in Shanghai, China. Building upon previous study findings of the adapted core competency model and integrating the World Health Organisation's Framework for Action, this study was conducted in two phases. First, scale items were developed through systematic review, qualitative research, stakeholder meeting, and Delphi survey, refined with cognitive interviews to establish version 1.0 of the scale. Second, item analysis was performed with item-total correlations, Cronbach's alpha, and exploratory factor analysis, resulting in version 2.0. The final scale was produced after assessing the validity (content validity, confirmatory factor analysis, known-groups validity) and reliability (internal consistency, test–retest reliability).
The final scale consisted of 47 items categorised into four competency factors: prevention, preparation, response, and recovery competency. Factor analysis results indicated adequate factor loadings, excellent model fit, and well-established construct validity. The overall scale and its sub-factors exhibited high internal consistency and good test–retest reliability.
The study presents a theoretically grounded and scientifically validated scale measuring the competencies that community nurses need for public health emergency response.
This study enhances the theoretical framework of community nurses' core competencies in public health emergencies, provides a validated assessment tool, and clarifies their role in enhancing preparedness and effectiveness.
The study addressed the need for a standardised tool for assessing community nurse core competency for public health emergencies and will impact policy initiatives to enhance early prevention, emergency response, and integrated recovery practices in crisis management.
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology checklist.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
The study examines the associations between nursing competence, work environment, and health system resilience. It also analyzes how nursing competence and work environment relate to different patterns of health system resilience.
A multiple center cross-sectional study was conducted between December 2023 and January 2024 across 33 hospitals in eastern China, involving 2435 nurses.
Questionnaires measuring nursing competence, work environment resources, nurse disaster resilience, and organizational commitment to resilience were utilised, along with the collection of additional personal demographic data. Structural equation modelling and cluster analysis were performed to explore the underlying mechanisms within the overall model and across multiple groups. Multivariable regression was conducted to identify variables associated with resilience in different subgroups.
Structural equation modelling demonstrated significant influences of nursing competence and work environment support on system resilience. Cluster analysis identified four resilience patterns: strong, marginal, low, and critical vulnerability. Strong resilience correlated with balanced individual-organizational resources, while vulnerable systems relied heavily on environmental support.
Our findings support policymakers and managers in developing systematic strategies with distinct focal points—targeting nurse workforce investment and optimised work environment—to enhance health system resilience across varying levels of public health emergencies.
This study validated the framework connecting individual and organizational resilience, offering evidence-based insights for nurse training and resource allocation to enhance healthcare systems' adaptability during disasters.
The study addressed how nursing competence and work environment significantly influenced resilience during public health emergencies, identified four resilience patterns, and provided insights to guide policymakers and healthcare managers in developing targeted, effective strategies.
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology checklist.
No patient or public contribution.