Conectar
Chronic wounds represent a major global health and economic burden. Smart wound dressings integrate biosensing and stimuli-responsive materials to monitor and modulate biological parameters within the wound microenvironment. This scoping review maps the biological parameters monitored by smart wound dressings, an area not previously synthesized across preclinical and clinical contexts. Following Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and PRISMA-ScR frameworks, five databases were searched in March 2025. Studies published between 2008 and 2025 reporting biosensing or responding technologies in wound dressings were included. A total of 179 studies met the inclusion criteria, most being preclinical (in vitro or in vivo rodent models), with few human investigations. The most frequently monitored parameters were pH, temperature, oxygenation, moisture, bacterial burden, and protease activity (particularly MMP-9). Preclinical data showed enhanced collagen deposition, angiogenesis, and infection control compared with conventional dressings, whereas human studies mainly assessed feasibility and biocompatibility. Smart dressings demonstrate strong technical and biological performance, but clinical validation and standardized outcome reporting remain limited. Future interdisciplinary research should prioritize well-designed clinical trials to confirm therapeutic and economic benefits and enable translation into personalized wound care.
Person-centred care (PCC) has been increasingly promoted in wound management, yet its theoretical foundations and practical application remain unclear. This scoping review aimed to map and synthesise how PCC frameworks, concepts and outcome measures have been used in wound care. Following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a systematic search was conducted across major databases for studies published between 2020 and 2025. Eligible sources included empirical research, reviews and conceptual papers addressing PCC in adults with chronic wounds. Data were extracted and analysed descriptively across conceptual and evaluative domains. Fourteen publications met inclusion criteria. Only one explicit framework of person-centred wound care was identified. Most studies referred to patient-centred rather than person-centred approaches and applied principles such as empowerment, shared decision-making and communication without consistent theoretical grounding. Outcome assessment focuses mainly on clinical or functional indicators, with limited attention to relational or experience-based dimensions of care. Some studies used the term person-centred as an unreflected keyword. Person-centred wound management remains conceptually fragmented, methodologically heterogeneous and sometimes unreflected. Greater theoretical precision, consensus on terminology and development of validated frameworks and measurement tools are required to translate person-centred principles into consistent, evidence-based clinical practice.
FreshRSS 