Conectar
To explore mothers' specific discharge preparation needs for preterm infants born before 32 gestational weeks, providing a foundation for developing effective discharge education programmes.
A qualitative descriptive design.
A semi-structured interview was conducted of 16 mothers of preterm infants less than 32 weeks gestation within 1 week post-discharge in March–June 2024. Directed content analysis was conducted using the Integrated Theory of Health Behaviour Change framework to code, categorise, and identify themes within the interview data.
Mothers provided rich, practical, experience-driven feedback regarding discharge preparedness needs. The interview resulted in three emergent themes related to the theory's constructs: maternal needs for knowledge acquisition, multifaceted social support, and adjusting learning strategies. These encompass sub-themes such as observing infant behaviour and health status, basic care knowledge, complex medical care guidance; support from medical staff, family members, fellow parents, community healthcare providers, and Wechat platform tools; learning time arrangement, and preferred learning approaches.
This study explored the discharge preparation needs of mothers with premature infants less than 32 weeks gestation. A nurse-led multidisciplinary team should tailor education programmes, emphasising care knowledge, multifaceted social support, and flexible learning. Future research should assess programme effectiveness on maternal and infant outcomes.
The study's results provided targeted guidance for clinical nursing education, enhancing mothers' readiness for preterm infant discharge and facilitating a smoother NICU-to-home transition.
These findings provide important guidance for nurse-led tailored discharge education and preparation services, thereby promoting improvements in clinical nursing practice and the development of nursing education.
The COREQ checklist was used for reporting.
Four mothers of premature infants (< 32 weeks gestation) provided feedback on the interview guide in the design phase, refining it for the target population, without joining the main study.
This study aimed to develop and preliminarily validate the KAP scale for pain management in older adults with dementia among nursing assistants.
A cross-sectional study.
An initial item pool was constructed through literature reviews, semi-structured interviews and team discussions. Items were screened and optimised through two rounds of Delphi expert consultations, a pilot survey and item analysis, yielding a draft version of the scale. Psychometric evaluation was conducted to refine the scale into its final form.
The final KAP scale developed in this study comprised 31 items. The scale exhibited good content validity, with item-level content validity index (I-CVI) values ranging from 0.83 to 1.00. Exploratory factor analysis revealed that the scale extracted five factors, which accounted for 65.732% of the cumulative variance, and all items demonstrated rotated factor loadings > 0.5, indicating good construct validity. The Cronbach's α coefficients for the knowledge, attitudes and practices dimensions were 0.877, 0.915 and 0.935, respectively, and the split-half reliability coefficients were 0.909, 0.886 and 0.864.
The KAP scale for pain care in older adults with dementia developed in this study possesses good reliability and validity and can be used to assess the knowledge, attitudes and behavioural levels of nursing assistants in pain care.
This study developed and psychometrically validated a KAP scale specifically designed to assess pain care for older adults with dementia among nursing assistants. Clinical managers can utilise this tool to systematically identify deficiencies in staff members' knowledge, attitudes or practices, thereby providing scientific evidence for the development of targeted pain care training programs and pain management strategies. This contributes to enhancing nursing assistants' pain care competence, ultimately alleviating the pain burden of older adults with dementia and improving their quality of life.
The STROBE checklist was used as a guideline.
No patient or public involvement.
FreshRSS 