Conectar
This study aims to understand Saudi women's experiences of sexual and relational changes during the menopause transition.
A qualitative, Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis study.
Sixteen Saudi women aged 45–57 who had experienced natural menopause transition were purposively selected and interviewed using semi-structured interviews between December 2022 and March 2023. The interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Participants were recruited from several sites, including hospitals, gender-segregated schools employing female staff, and social media channels. The data were analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.
Three group experiential themes were identified from the data. These included ‘The intimate relationship while going through menopause’, which explores women's experiences of intimate relationships shaped by biological and hormonal changes, cultural and social expectations, and psychological influences; ‘Perceived attractiveness and self-confidence’, which describes how physical signs of ageing impact women's body image and self-confidence; and ‘Managing the sexual changes during the menopause transition’, which highlights varied coping strategies and attitudes toward seeking support for sexual changes during menopause.
Healthcare systems in Saudi Arabia must provide comprehensive menopausal care and train nurses and healthcare providers to consider women's sexual difficulties from a biopsychosocial perspective. Raising Saudi women's awareness of menopausal and sexual issues, as well as mitigating society's stereotypes, is crucial for empowering them to seek help.
Understanding how menopausal women experience sexual and relational changes during their menopause transition is crucial for nurses, as it enables them to provide appropriate care that supports both physical and emotional well-being. As nurses recognise these experiences, they can offer guidance, reduce stigma, and enhance women's quality of life.
The study adhered to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research.
No Patient or Public Involvement.
To explore factors affecting research engagement among Nurses, Midwives and Allied Health Professionals (NMAHPs) in England by examining perceptions of research capacity at organisational, team and individual levels.
Research engagement strongly correlates with improved care quality. However, NMAHPs face persistent participation barriers compared to medical colleagues, limiting the development of a multi-professional research workforce.
National descriptive cross-sectional study using a validated survey tool.
Data from NMAHPs across England were collected using the validated Research Capacity and Culture tool. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively and inferentially; qualitative free-text responses were evaluated thematically.
Perceived capacity was moderate organisationally and in teams. Organisational strengths included promoting evidence-based practice (68.7%) and leadership support (61.6%). Teams offered moderate research opportunities (58.6%) but limited mentorship (47.9%). Individually, participants showed competence in literature review (69.5%) and data collection (63.4%) but required support for funding acquisition (43.8%) and publication (50.0%). Qualitatively, research was a highly valued aspect of professional identity, though participation is severely constrained by structural conditions, including extreme resource pressures, unclear career pathways, and professional inequality.
Despite strong motivation for evidence-based practice, significant structural barriers restrict NMAHP research engagement. Strengthening capacity demands coordinated action across clinical and policy systems, ensuring equitable access to protected time, mentorship, and vital research infrastructure.
Supporting NMAHPs in research enhances evidence-informed decisions and service innovation. Embedding research into everyday clinical work, rather than viewing it as optional, builds a sustainable multi-professional culture.
This survey pinpoints the specific factors most strongly influencing NMAHP research engagement. It provides healthcare leaders actionable insights to build sustainable research infrastructure and inclusive clinical academic pathways.
This study adhered to STROBE guidelines for cross-sectional research.
No patient or public contribution.
FreshRSS 