FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Interventions for Improving Coping Strategies in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

ABSTRACT

Background

Physiological, psychological, and social changes may make older adults more vulnerable to stressors and lead to adverse health outcomes. It remains unclear whether interventions targeting coping strategies in older adults are effective.

Aims

This study aimed to systematically review and summarize existing interventions aimed at improving coping strategies in older adults and analyze intervention effectiveness.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane, CINAHL, PsycINFO, CNKI, SinoMed, VIP, and WanFang databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental studies. Two researchers independently performed literature screening, quality assessment, and data extraction.

Results

A total of 9 studies were included, comprising 7 RCTs and 2 quasi-experimental studies. Meta-analysis revealed that the interventions significantly enhanced the use of problem-focused coping strategies among older adults (SMD = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.12 ~ 0.63, p = 0.005, I 2 = 39%). However, there was no significant effect on emotion-focused coping strategies (SMD = −0.07, 95% CI [−0.62, 0.48], p = 0.80, I 2 = 76%). Moreover, no significant statistical differences were observed between the intervention group and the control group in terms of positive (SMD = 1.49, 95% CI [−0.23, 3.21], p = 0.09, I 2 = 98%) or negative coping strategies (SMD = −0.76, 95% CI [−1.79, 0.28], p = 0.15, I 2 = 96%).

Linking Evidence to Action

Interventions targeting coping strategies can significantly improve the problem-focused coping strategies of older adults. It is crucial to help older adults accurately recognize daily stressors, acquire emotional regulation strategies, and enhance coping skills. More large-scale RCTs are needed to draw more robust conclusions.

Experiences of clinical nurses with medication interruption: A systematic review and qualitative meta‐synthesis

Abstract

Background

Managing medication interruptions is considered one of the biggest dilemmas for nurses in clinical settings. To improve medication safety, it was imperative to conduct a systematic review to get a deeper understanding of nurses' experiences with medication interruptions.

Aims

A systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis aimed to explore clinical nurses' experiences of interruption during medication in hospitals.

Methods

Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Ovid Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library from inception to January 2024. The search strategy included four groups of keywords: (1) qualitative research, (2) nurses, (3) medication interruption, and (4) experience. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme was used to assess the quality of the studies. Meta-ethnography was utilized to synthesize the findings of the included studies.

Results

Nine articles published between 2012 and 2023 were included; the number of participants varied from 5 to 40, aged 20–68 years, and the majority were female. Four synthesized findings were identified as follows: (1) an inevitable part of the routine, (2) a decision-making process, (3) working in a minefield, and (4) coping with interruption.

Linking Evidence to Action

Nurses embraced interruptions as an inherent component of clinical care. Previous experience and nursing culture, encompassing personal and professional aspects, significantly influence nurses' attitudes toward medication interruptions. It is crucial to incorporate the distinctive work experiences of nurses into techniques aimed at efficiently handling interruptions in future research. The registration number in PROSPERO is CRD42023470276.

❌