To explore how chronically ill patients, family members and nurses perceive and experience patient participation in nursing care within a Chinese hospital context.
Focused ethnography.
The study was conducted in a Chinese public hospital over 8 months between February and September 2021. Data were generated through 90 h of participant observation and 30 semi-structured interviews, including individual and dyadic interviews with 10 nurses, 17 patients and 7 family members. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis through an inductive and iterative process.
An overarching theme ‘participation as relational, holistic and dynamic’ was developed, comprising three themes: (1) participation as fulfilling individual responsibility, (2) family members as co-participants and (3) participation as an evolving multidimensional practice. These themes suggest that participation was understood as a relational responsibility enacted through everyday interactions. Family members were actively involved in care processes, and participation extended across physical, intellectual and emotional dimensions. Digital information and technologies further reshaped participation, creating new opportunities and tensions in everyday care.
Patient participation in nursing care extends beyond autonomy-based models and is shaped by relational responsibilities, family involvement and evolving digital healthcare contexts.
To promote patient participation, policies and practices should recognise relational and family-based dimensions of care. Healthcare organisations should foster environments that support collaborative participation among patients, families and nurses. Training and education should be developed to promote nurses' digital literacy, cultural competence, ethical sensitivity and relational communication to support participation in contemporary care contexts.
This study broadens prevailing autonomy-centred understandings of patient participation by demonstrating how participation is co-constructed through relational responsibilities and family involvement. The findings offer insights for nursing practice and policy in culturally diverse and increasingly digital healthcare environments.
COREQ.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
To explore patient participation in decision-making during nursing care experienced by patients with chronic diseases, family members and nurses.
Focused ethnography.
This study included an 8-month fieldwork in a Chinese hospital. Fieldnotes from 90 h of participant observation and 30 semi-structured interviews (10 nurses, 13 patients, three family members, and four with both patients and family members present) were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
Patient participation in decision-making was facilitated in the form of co-determination, which respected patients' relational autonomy. However, participation required further development or was challenged in the form of unilateral determination, constraining relational autonomy. Interpersonal relationships among nurses, patients and family members played a significant role in promoting patient participation in decision-making.
A relational autonomy framework was identified to understand patient participation in decision-making within nursing care. While patient participation is encouraged and autonomy is respected in some situations, paternalistic approaches still persist in clinical practice.
Enhancing nurses' awareness of involving patients and family members in decision-making is needed. The findings highlight the need for better integration and implementation of existing guidelines to support healthcare staff, patients and family members. They also point to the importance of developing culturally relevant frameworks to promote patient participation in decision-making in nursing care.
This research provided insight into the experiences of chronically ill patients, family members and nurses regarding patient participation in decision-making during inpatient nursing care within a non-Western context. Interpersonal dynamics are highlighted as a key element influencing patient participation.
The study is reported using the COREQ checklist.
No patient or public contribution.