Conectar
To justify the use of focus group interviews with patients and healthcare professionals within a phenomenological-hermeneutic approach inspired by the theory of the French philosopher Paul Gustave Ricoeur.
Methodological guidance and discussion grounded in Ricoeur's theory on narrative, dialogue, threefold mimesis and interpretation.
This phenomenological-hermeneutical approach to focus group interviews yields significant, in-depth understandings of lived experiences from both patients and healthcare professionals.
Ricoeur-inspired phenomenological-hermeneutical focus group interviews with patients and healthcare professionals offer a promising approach for exploring and generating new, valuable insights into the complexities of clinical nursing practice. Thus, this paper argues for an integration of focus group interviews and a phenomenological-hermeneutical approach within nursing science.
The approach has significant implications for nursing practice. By incorporating Ricoeur-inspired dialogue-based collective voices of patients and healthcare professionals in focus group interviews, nursing practices can be refined, leading to improved patient care and more effective clinical interventions. Thus, this approach advocates for a broader adoption of Ricoeur-inspired focus group interviews in nursing research and in health research in general to enhance the understanding and development of clinical models.
No available EQUATOR guidelines were applicable to this methodological paper, as no new data were created or analysed.
As this is a methodological paper, no new patient or public contributions are included.
The aim of this paper is twofold: (1) to introduce a phenomenological-hermeneutic approach and discuss its application within the context of WSs in the field of health science, (2) To present a method and a practical guide when conducting WSs in the field of health science.
Epistemological and methodological discussions based on workshops as a self-standing research method.
The epistemological and methodological discussions show that workshops conducted in health science are a self-standing research methods and align with a phenomenological-hermeneutical approach. Examples of research studies within this framework are provided to illustrate how workshops can be conducted in health science within this epistemological approach.
The phenomenological-hermeneutical approach embraces workshops as a research method as it includes individual experiences through self-reflection and shared contributions through interpretation. Furthermore, a systematic approach with regard to planning, conduction, data collection, and data analysis leads to reliable findings, enhancing the transparency of the research method and thus creating scientific knowledge. This paper argues that the systematic approach of “the how” to conduct workshops with “the why” enhances the transparency and trustworthiness of the research.
Workshops are a way to involve and engage users in co-design processes that aim to develop solutions in clinical practice. User involvement has become an important part in academia and is essential in all aspects of the research process. However, we need solid systematic methods to create valid knowledge. Workshops are a self-standing research method, and a phenomenological-hermeneutical approach allows for an understanding of the phenomena as they unfold, emphasising subjective perceptions and meanings, which will finally lead to the development of a suitable solution for clinical practice.
This paper contributes theoretical knowledge about the use of workshops as a research method. It combines “the how” to conduct a workshop with “the why” and highlights the relevance of a phenomenological-hermeneutical approach. The main argument is that workshops are a self-standing research method; hence, this paper adds value in the academic field as it provides a scientific framework. The paper presents a method and a practical guide for researchers who plan to conduct workshops in the field of health science.
No available EQUATOR guidelines were applicable to this methodological paper because no new data was created or analysed.
This is a methodological paper, and thus, there was no direct patient or public involvement.
FreshRSS 