To examine the decision-making processes underlying missed nursing care.
A qualitative study using Critical Incident Debriefing interviews.
Fifteen nurses from inpatient wards in a general hospital participated in semi-structured interviews following their morning shifts. Interviews focused on care prioritisation incidents leading to missed nursing care. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.
Analysis revealed a central theme of emotions as crucial determinants in care prioritisation decisions. Two subthemes emerged: emotions as drivers of care prioritisation decisions and emotions as responses to these decisions. Positive emotions motivated nurses to prioritise care for specific patients, while negative emotions sometimes led to care delays. Successful care completion generated professional satisfaction, while care omissions produced complex emotional responses, including guilt, frustration and helplessness.
The dual emotional processes identified in this study—emotions functioning as both drivers and responses in care decisions—challenge purely structural explanations of missed nursing care. This perspective reframes nurses as emotionally engaged decision-makers who actively navigate care priorities rather than passively react to contextual constraints, offering a more comprehensive framework for understanding the complexity of clinical judgement in real-world settings.
This study positions emotions as legitimate components of clinical decision-making rather than cognitive biases. For nursing practice, this necessitates integrating emotional awareness into professional development. For patient care, recognising emotional underpinnings may promote equitable care distribution through interventions that engage with the emotional realities of nursing work.
This study addressed limited understanding of decision-making in missed nursing care, particularly emotions' role. Findings reveal how emotions influence nurses' prioritisation decisions and wellbeing, with implications for nurses, educators and administrators seeking interventions addressing structural and emotional dimensions.
This study adhered to the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) guidelines (Appendix S1).
No patient or public contribution.
To examine a novel moderated-mediation model, investigating whether personal accountability moderates the link between nurse workload and missed nursing care and whether missed nursing care mediates the association between workload and moral distress.
Nested diary study.
Data spanning from February 2019 to February 2023 were collected from 137 nurses working in various inpatient wards in two medium-sized hospitals. Nurses reported care given to specific patients on three to five occasions across different shifts, establishing nurse-patient dyads. Validated measures of missed nursing care, personal accountability, moral distress and workload were analyzed using mixed linear models to test the nested moderated-mediation model.
Under high workload conditions, nurses with higher personal accountability reported lower frequencies of missed nursing care compared to those with lower personal accountability. In contrast, under low workload conditions, personal accountability did not significantly influence missed nursing care occurrences. Furthermore, the interaction between workload and personal accountability indirectly affected nurses' moral distress through missed nursing care. Specifically, higher personal accountability combined with lower missed nursing care contributed to reduced levels of moral distress among nurses.
The study highlights accountability's dual role—safeguarding against care omissions and influencing nurses' moral distress amid rising workload pressures.
Cultivating a culture of accountability within healthcare settings can serve as a protective factor against the negative effects of workload on patient care quality and nurse psychological distress, highlighting the need for organizational interventions to promote accountability among nursing staff.
By recognizing accountability's pivotal role, organizations can implement targeted interventions fostering accountability among nurses, including training programs focused on enhancing responsibility/ownership in care delivery and creating supportive environments prioritizing accountability to achieve positive patient outcomes.
The study has adhered to STROBE guidelines.
No patient or public contribution.