Conectar
To explore the familial, emotional, social and school-related challenges experienced by school-aged siblings of children with cancer, focusing on how these challenges intersect across hospital, home and school in their everyday lives.
Qualitative, two-phase, multi-site study.
Fieldwork was conducted at two distinct paediatric oncology wards, followed by semi-structured interviews with 11 siblings (aged 7–19 years) and 20 parents, recruited through criterion-based sampling. The data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
Analysis showed that siblings were often marginalised in hospital life due to (1) family logistics; (2) hospital-induced restrictions, rules and physical spaces and (3) perceptions of their presence as ‘problematic’, ultimately limiting their access. In family life, siblings experienced peripheral roles because (1) they were cared for by others, (2) had their needs subordinated and (3) faced shifting expectations. At school, siblings encountered (1) limited understanding from classmates and teachers and (2) insufficient support resources.
Siblings of children with cancer face significant, interconnected challenges, often amplified by the structural frameworks of healthcare, family and school contexts.
Siblings of children with cancer are often marginalised in their own lives. In healthcare, a family-centred approach to care should formally and actively include siblings. Nurses are well-positioned to promote this, ensuring whole-family support. Siblings would benefit from coordinated support bridging hospital, home and school.
This study adheres to the SRQR Checklist.
Parents helped shape the study focus by discussing preliminary observations and potential support needs.
To explore siblings' and parents' experiences of, and perceived impacts of, a nurse-led school-based intervention (SUPREME) for siblings of children with cancer in Denmark.
A qualitative process evaluation.
Fifteen siblings (aged 6–14 years) and 16 parents were recruited through criterion-based sampling following siblings' participation in the SUPREME intervention. Data consisted of semi-structured interviews and open-ended responses from an evaluation form, and were analysed thematically. Data were collected between May 2024 and February 2025.
The intervention created a sense of normality for siblings by providing age-appropriate and credible information in the familiar school context, thereby strengthening the understanding of the family's cancer journey. The SUPREME nurse played a key role in easing the communication burden on siblings and parents, while also promoting recognition of siblings within the hospital setting as active participants in the family's cancer journey. Additionally, the intervention was perceived to accommodate varying levels of support needs across families.
The SUPREME intervention benefited siblings—and, by extension, their families—by equipping siblings with essential information, guiding their class communities on how to offer appropriate support and fostering siblings' inclusion in the family's cancer journey. The SUPREME intervention constitutes a new strategy for accessible, universal sibling support.
The healthcare system should formally ensure that professionals working with families affected by severe paediatric conditions provide family-centred care that actively includes siblings.
What problem did the study address? The position of siblings of children with cancer is often complex, as they may simultaneously serve as visible front figures of the family while remaining overlooked. This study explored how parents and siblings of children with cancer experienced participating in a new sibling support intervention.
What were the main findings? Nurses play a central role in supporting siblings of children with cancer by bridging family, hospital and school contexts.
Where and on whom will the research have an impact? Nurse-led, cross-sectoral interventions such as SUPREME may help normalise siblings' everyday lives and promote their inclusion in the family's cancer journey.
This study followed the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist.
No patients, participants, or members of the public were involved in the design of this specific study.
FreshRSS 