Z-Coding for Social Contributors to Health in Colorado Federally Qualified Health Centers

Background Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHC) provide services to individuals facing systemic barriers to health equity and are disproportionately affected by adverse social determinants of health. To better align healthcare services with the needs of those individuals experiencing health inequities, it is essential to screen for and document problematic social contributors to health in electronic health records, which health systems have been mandated to document by 2026. Objectives The aims of this study were to 1) determine the prevalence of documented social contributors to health Z-codes among patients receiving care through Colorado nurse-led FQHCs across urban, rural, and frontier settings; and 2) estimate healthcare utilization and expenditures associated with the presence of documented social contributors to health Z-codes compared to a matched sample of patients without that Z-code documentation. Methods We conducted a secondary analysis of the Colorado All Payers Claim Database. Social contributor of health ICD-10 Z-codes, reflecting problematic social structural circumstances as defined by Healthy People 2030, were extracted from patients receiving care in FQHCs. Social contributor of health-related charges were computed using propensity matching to compare individuals with and without documented social contributors of health. Results Documentation of social contributors of health Z-codes was notably low. Housing instability was the most common Z-code documented. Chronic pulmonary disease, diabetes, and heart disease were the most prevalent comorbidities among those with identified social contributors of health. The majority of patients with social contributors of health Z-codes were insured through Medicaid and lived in rural areas. Persons with documented social contributors of health had significantly higher predicted annual medical expenditures compared to those without documentation. Discussion The low prevalence of social contributors of health coding aligns with previous studies and represents a missed opportunity to provide targeted interventions for populations experiencing adverse social contributors. These findings underscore the need for strategizing and implementing plans to identify and code social contributors of health, especially in facilities serving those experiencing health inequities. Improved documentation of social contributors to health can facilitate data-driven resource allocation and tailored interventions to address adverse social determinants and promote health equity.

Worse Nursing-Sensitive Indicators in Black-Serving Hospitals

Background In hospitals that serve disproportionately patients of Black race, here termed Black-serving hospitals (BSH), nurse staffing is worse, mortality rates are higher, and nursing-sensitive indicators may be worse than in other hospitals, but this evidence has not been compiled. Objective The study objective was to examine whether nursing-sensitive indicators, which measure changes in patient health status directly affected by nursing care, differ in hospitals where Black patients predominantly access their care, as compared to other hospitals. Methods To fulfill the objective, a cross-sectional design using publicly available 2019 to 2022 Hospital Compare, 2019 Medicare Provider Analysis and Review (MEDPAR), and case mix index (CMI) file databases were used. Four nursing-sensitive indicators were evaluated: pressure ulcer, postoperative sepsis, perioperative pulmonary embolus/deep vein thrombosis, and death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications (“failure to rescue”) in hospitals classified into high, medium, and low BSHs according to the percentage of patients of Black race in the MEDPAR data. Mean outcome differences across BSH categories were assessed through analyses of variance and regression models, which controlled for hospital CMI. Results The 3,101 hospitals were predominantly urban nonteaching hospitals in metropolitan areas. Although 12% of hospitals had Magnet designation, BSHs were disproportionately Magnet (14%). The outcome rates were 0.59 for pressure ulcers, 3.38 for perioperative pulmonary embolus/deep vein thrombosis, 143.58 for failure to rescue, and 4.12 for sepsis. Rates were significantly higher for pressure ulcers, perioperative pulmonary embolus/deep vein thrombosis, and sepsis in high BSHs. The mean failure to rescue rate was similar across low-to-high BSHs and did not show significant differences. These results were unchanged in models adjusting for CMI. Discussion The evidence suggests that several nursing-sensitive indicators are worse in high BSHs. Research linking nursing-sensitive indicators to nursing resources such as staffing is needed to explicate the mechanism underlying these findings. Poorer nursing-sensitive indicators in combination with poorer nurse staffing in high BSHs presents a priority for policy and management intervention.

Study Protocol Evaluating Breastfeeding for Mother–Infant Dyads Experiencing Infant Ankyloglossia

Background Tongue-tie is associated with nipple pain and early breastfeeding cessation. To date, research has been limited by small sample sizes and a dearth of evidence on the effects of tongue-tie on infant feeding symptoms and physiologic breastfeeding mechanics. Objectives In this article, we describe the protocol for our study exploring infant feeding, negative breastfeeding symptoms, maternal anatomy, and physiologic sucking data between infants with and without tongue-tie. Methods A prospective cohort study design is being employed. Over 8 weeks, three visits will be conducted with a sample of mothers and their infants without tongue-tie and a sample of mothers and their infants diagnosed with tongue-tie undergoing treatment via frenotomy. The aims of the study were to compare breastfeeding symptoms, breast anatomy, infant feeding symptoms, feeding efficiency, and nutritive sucking parameters between infants with and without tongue-tie, further comparing these metrics pretreatment and posttreatment via frenotomy with the non-tongue-tied age-matched counterparts. Results This study is currently ongoing. Discussion Tongue-tie is an everyday problem; clear guidelines are needed to decide whether to treat it. This novel, innovative, and multidisciplinary research study aims to fill critical gaps in understanding the physiological and functional effects of tongue-tie on breastfeeding, offering evidence to inform better clinical decisions and support effective interventions.

Poorer Nurse Staffing in Black-Serving Hospitals

Background Patients in hospitals that serve disproportionately patients of Black race have worse outcomes than patients in other hospitals, but the modifiable nursing factors that may contribute to such disparities have not been explored. Objective The study objective was to examine whether nurse staffing differs in hospitals that serve predominantly patients of Black race (Black-serving hospitals) as compared to other hospitals. Methods A cross-sectional correlational design using a nurse survey in a national hospital sample was used to fulfill the study objective. Nurse staffing was measured as the maximum number of patients cared for on the last shift from the 2015 annual registered nurse survey conducted in National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators hospitals. Hospitals were classified into subgroups of low, medium, and high percentages of patients of Black race using the 2019 Medicare Provider Analysis and Review database. Results In survey data from 179,336 registered nurses in 574 hospitals, nurse staffing was significantly worse in high-Black-serving hospitals as compared to medium- and low-Black-serving hospitals. In Poisson regression models that adjusted for nursing unit type and hospital characteristics, nurses in high-Black-serving hospitals and medium-Black-serving hospitals had more patients-per-nurse than did nurses in low-Black-serving hospitals. Discussion Small, statistically significant differences in nurse staffing that are worse in hospitals where Black patients disproportionately access their care were found using nurse survey data accounting for nursing unit type. The poorer nurse staffing in Black-serving hospitals may compromise the care and outcomes of the seven in 10 hospitalized Black older adults who receive care in Black-serving hospitals. The consequences for patient outcome disparities of poorer nurse staffing in Black-serving hospitals deserve investigation. Policies to increase nurse staffing in hospitals serving a higher proportion of patients of Black race are needed to contribute to efforts to reduce health disparities.

Reliability and Validity of Measures Commonly Utilized to Assess Nurse Well-Being

Background A healthy nursing workforce is vital to ensuring that patients are provided quality care. Assessing nurses' well-being and related factors requires routine evaluations from health system leaders that leverage brief psychometrically sound measures. To date, measures used to assess nurses' well-being have primarily been psychometrically tested among other clinicians or nurses working in specific clinical practice settings rather than in large, representative, heterogeneous samples of nurses. Objectives This study aimed to psychometrically test measures frequently used to evaluate factors linked to nurse well-being in a heterogeneous sample of nurses within a large academic health system. Methods This cross-sectional, survey-based study used a convenience sample of nurses working across acute care practice settings. A total of 177 nurses completed measures, which included the Professional Quality of Life, the short form of the Professional Quality of Life measure, the two-item Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale, the five-item World Health Organization Well-Being Index, the Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale, and the single-item Mini-Z. Internal reliability and convergent validity were assessed for each measure. Results All the measures were found to be reliable. Brief measures used to assess domains of well-being demonstrated validity with longer measures, as evident by significant correlation coefficients. Discussion This study provides support for the reliability and validity of measures commonly used to assess well-being in a diverse sample of nurses working across acute care settings. Data from routine assessments of the nursing workforce hold the potential to guide the implementation and evaluation of interventions capable of promoting workplace well-being. Assessments should include psychometrically sound, low-burden measures, such as those evaluated in this study.

Chronic Pain and Pain Management in Older Adults: Protocol and Pilot Results

Background Chronic pain occurs in 30% of older adults. This prevalence rate is expected to increase, given the growth in the older adult population and the associated growth of chronic conditions contributing to pain. No population-based studies have provided detailed, longitudinal information on the experience of chronic pain in older adults; the pharmacological and nonpharmacological strategies that older adults use to manage their chronic pain; and the effect of chronic pain on patient-reported outcomes. Objectives This article aims to describe the protocol for a population-based, longitudinal study focused on understanding the experience of chronic pain in older adults. The objectives are to determine the prevalence and characteristics of chronic pain; identify the pharmacological and nonpharmacological pain treatments used; evaluate for longitudinal differences in biopsychosocial factors; and examine how pain types and pain trajectories affect important patient-reported outcomes. Also included are the results of a pilot study. Methods A population-based sample of approximately 1,888 older adults will be recruited from the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago’s AmeriSpeak Panel to complete surveys at three waves: enrollment (Wave 1), 6 months (Wave 2), and 12 months (Wave 3). To determine the feasibility, a pilot test of the enrollment survey was conducted among 123 older adults. Results In the pilot study, older adults with chronic pain reported a range of pain conditions, with osteoarthritis being the most common. Participants reported an array of pharmacological and nonpharmacological pain strategies. Compared to participants without chronic pain, those with chronic pain reported lower physical and cognitive function and poorer quality of life. Data collection for the primary, longitudinal study is ongoing. Discussion This project will be the first longitudinal population-based study to examine the experience and overall effect of chronic pain in older adults. Pilot study results provide evidence of the feasibility of study methods. Ultimately, this work will inform the development of tailored interventions for older patients targeted to decrease pain and improve function and quality of life.

Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Effectiveness of a Sleep Intervention in Adults at Risk for Metabolic Syndrome With Short Sleep Duration

Background The prevalence of short sleep duration is rising and is linked to chronic comorbidities, such as metabolic syndrome (MetS). Sleep extension interventions in adults with MetS comorbidities and short sleep duration are limited and vary widely in terms of approach and duration. Objectives This pilot study aimed to test the feasibility and acceptability of a personalized 12-week systematic sleep time extension intervention on post-intervention sleep outcomes in middle-aged adults at risk for MetS with actigraphy-estimated short sleep duration. Methods A single-arm, 12-week, 12-session systematic sleep time extension intervention was delivered weekly via videoconferencing. Feasibility and acceptability were assessed using retention rates and mean sleep diary completions. Sleep was estimated for 14 consecutive days prior to and immediately following the 12-week intervention using wrist actigraphy. Daytime sleepiness was assessed using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Paired sample t-tests modeled changes in study outcomes. Results Study participants (N = 41) had a mean age of 52 years and were mostly female and White; 86% attended >80% of sessions, and mean sleep diary completion was 6.7 diaries/week. Significant improvements in sleep from pre- to post-intervention included increased total sleep time, earlier sleep onsets, more regular sleep onsets, a higher sleep regularity index, and reduced daytime sleepiness. Extending sleep, as well as improving sleep timing and regularity in middle-aged adults with actigraphy-estimated short sleep duration and at risk for MetS, is feasible and acceptable. Discussion Behavioral sleep characteristics may be modifiable and present a novel behavioral paradigm for mitigating MetS risk. This pilot study provides a proof of concept for the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of a systematic sleep time extension for middle-aged adults at risk for MetS with actigraphy-estimated short sleep duration.

Health Social Networks of Black Women With Hypertension

Background The prevalence of hypertension is 55% among African American/Black women, who have a higher risk for poor health outcomes compared to women from other racial and ethnic groups, in part because of uncontrolled blood pressure. Previous research results suggest that peers may positively influence self-management of chronic conditions like hypertension. However, few studies have described the personal characteristics of peers in the health social networks of Black women. Objective This substudy aimed to examine health social networks and describe the peers’ characteristics, as reported by a convenience sample of Black women with hypertension. Methods In this analysis of data from a larger study, 94 Black women with hypertension attending a church conference participated in a cross-sectional, descriptive study. Their mean age was 59 years, and their mean systolic blood pressure was 143 mm Hg. All participants completed a survey to gather data about (a) the characteristics of individuals they discussed health matters with (their peers or health social network) and (b) their perceptions about hypertension status and knowledge of hypertension among the peers in their health social network. Results Collectively, participants from the larger study named a total of 658 peers who were part of their health social networks; the mean health social network size was six peers. The peers were mostly women, Black, family members, and, on average, 54 years old. The participants discussed hypertension with 71% of the peers, reported that 36% had hypertension, and felt that 67% were somewhat or very knowledgeable about the condition. A small, positive correlation existed between the participants’ health social network size (number of peers named) and their systolic blood pressure levels. Discussion The health social network peers were similar to those in the larger study, with most of the same gender, race, and age. The findings of this analysis may be used to help practitioners and scientists guide patients in building health social networks for support in self-managing hypertension and conducting future studies to examine the best strategies for developing and using health social networks to improve health outcomes and reduce health disparities.

Methodology for Analyzing Qualitative Data in Multiple Languages

Background Translation strategies are commonly used for qualitative interview data to bridge language barriers. Inconsistent translation of interviews can lead to conceptual inequivalence, where meanings of participants' experiences are distorted, threatening scientific rigor. Objectives Our objective is to describe a systematic method developed to analyze multilingual, qualitative interview data while maintaining the original language of the transcripts. Methods A literature review of translation strategies, cross-language, and multilingual qualitative research was conducted. Combined with criteria for qualitative content analysis and trustworthiness, the methodology was developed and used for a qualitative descriptive study. Results The study had interview data in both English and Spanish. The research team consisted of both native Spanish and English speakers, who were grouped based on language. Verbatim transcription of data occurred in the original languages. All codes were kept in English, allowing the research team to view the data set as a whole. Two researchers within each group coded each transcript independently before reaching a consensus. The entire research team discussed all transcripts, and finally, major themes were determined. Participants' quotes remained in the original language for publication, with an English translation included when needed. Discussion Analyzing transcripts in the original language brought forth cultural themes that otherwise may have been overlooked. This methodology promotes conceptual equivalence and trustworthiness that is paramount in cultural, linguistic, and social determinants of health research to advance health equity.