Conectar
We aimed to assess the quality and reliability of pressure injury-related videos uploaded on YouTube, analyse the sources and contents, and examine the correlation between video parameters. We searched YouTube using two keywords, “pressure ulcer” and “pressure sore”, on August 20, 2022. We sorted the videos according to their number of views and included the top 100 videos for each keyword. The quality of videos was assessed using the Global Quality Scale (GQS), while their reliability was evaluated by the modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) tool. In addition, we evaluated the videos in which content was included, analysed the correlations and differences between GQS, mDISCERN, and video parameters. We initially found a total of 100 videos for each keyword and finally included and analysed 77 videos. The mean scores for the mDISCERN and GQS were 2.35 ± 0.98 and 3.09 ± 0.99, respectively. Both GQS and mDISCERN showed statistically significant correlations with each other (rho = 0.54, p < 0.0001*) and with the length of the videos, respectively (rho = 0.36, p = 0.001*), (rho = 0.29, p = 0.01*). Of the videos created by physicians, 8 (57.1%) included content related to treatment, while of the videos created by nonphysician health personnel, 22 (57.9%) included content related to prevention. Analysing whether there were differences in video parameters based on the sources, we observed significant differences between sources in GQS (p < 0.0001*), mDISCERN (p < 0.0001*), and video length (p = 0.001*). In the post-hoc analysis, videos uploaded by physicians or nonphysician health personnel showed higher quality and reliability than videos uploaded by other sources. Therefore, the results of this study could be useful for healthcare providers, as well as patients and caregivers, to search for high-quality and reliable YouTube videos related to pressure injury.
Management of pressure sores can have various environmental effects; moreover, the COVID-19 pandemic notably affected efforts towards effective management of pressure sores. Some cases of COVID-19 infections require long-term hospitalization in the intensive care unit. Moreover, special protective equipment worn by physicians owing to the pandemic complicate wound management. In this study, we compared the pressure ulcer characteristics between isolated patients with and those without COVID-19 and evaluated the effects of isolation on pressure sores. From November 2022 to February 2023, patients who had pressure sores were included and their medical records were reviewed retrospectively. The experimental group included patients with confirmed COVID-19 infections, who received clinical treatment in an isolated unit. Wound characteristics in each group and associated risk factors were analysed. Fifty-four isolated patients with COVID-19 and 58 control patients were included. The Braden Scale score and Korea patient classification system-1 did not vary significantly between the two groups. However, the number of Grade I pressure sores in the COVID-19 isolation group was significantly lower than those in the control group (p < 0.001), while the number of lesions was significantly higher (p = 0.034). The mortality rate in the COVID-19 isolation group was higher than that in the control group (p = 0.008), and more patients were discharged with unhealed wounds (p = 0.004). A higher treatment effect on pressure sores may be expected if the disease is more actively managed. Moreover, the wound care systems for isolated patients with COVID-19 require further attention.
From previous studies, we have shown that viable colony forming units of bacteria and bacterial biofilms are reduced after sequential treatment with a surfactant-based dressing. Here, we sought to test the impact on visible bacterial pigments and the ultrastructural impact following the sequential treatment of the same surfactant-based dressing. Mature Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms were grown on ex vivo porcine skin explants, and an imaging-based analysis was used to compare the skin with and without a concentrated surfactant. In explants naturally tinted by bacterial chromophores, wiping alone had no effect, while the use of a surfactant-based dressing reduced coloration. Similarly, daily wiping led to increased immunohistochemical staining for P. aeruginosa antigens, but not in the surfactant group. Confocal immunofluorescent imaging revealed limited bacterial penetration and coating of the dermis and loose pieces of sloughing material. Ultrastructural analysis confirmed that the biofilms were masking the extracellular matrix (ECM), but the surfactant could remove them, re-exposing the ECM. The masking of the ECM may provide another non-inflammatory explanation for delayed healing, as the ECM is no longer accessible for wound cell locomotion. The use of a poloxamer-based surfactant appears to be an effective way to remove bacterial chromophores and the biofilm coating the ECM fibres.
FreshRSS 