FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerWorldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing

A Nurse‐Led Educational Intervention for Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring

ABSTRACT

Background

The primary barrier to maximizing the benefits of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) is low scan frequency. Higher daily scan frequency correlates with better glycemic control.

Aim

To evaluate the effect of a nurse-led educational intervention on scan frequency and behavioral change in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) showing low scanning frequency.

Methods

In this 12-week quasi-experimental study, adults with T1D using isCGM and low scan frequency participated in a single, individualized, direct education session led by a diabetes nurse educator. The intervention focused on increasing daily scan frequency and supporting patient engagement in self-management.

Results

Thirty-four patients using isCGM participated. Mean daily scan frequency increased from 3.1 to 6.1 scans/day following the intervention. This rise was associated with an 8.0% improvement in TIR. A positive correlation was observed between scan frequency and TIR, with each additional daily scan associated with a 0.51% increase in TIR.

Linking Evidence to Action

A single, targeted educational session can significantly improve isCGM adherence and glycemic control in adults with T1D and low adherence, supporting its value as a practical strategy in routine clinical care.

Trial Registration

The protocol was publicly registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05570162)

Factors Influencing Intention to Leave Among Nurse Managers: A Cross‐Sectional Study

ABSTRACT

Aims

To estimate the proportion of Italian nurse managers (NMs) intending to leave (ITL) their positions and to identify associated socio-demographic, job-related, and psychosocial factors.

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Methods

Between September and November 2023, 464 NMs from 19 public hospitals completed a case-report form and the short version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire II (COPSOQ II). Latent Class Analysis (LCA) identified ITL profiles, and multiple logistic regression assessed factors associated with ITL.

Results

284 NMs (61.2%; 95% CI 57–66) reported an intention to leave within 12 months. LCA identified two classes: (1) Low-ITL (54%)—mainly outpatient NMs from Central regions with strong relationships with management, good support, work–life balance, and autonomy (55.9% probability of being unlikely to leave). (2) High-ITL (46%)—mainly surgical or critical-care NMs, often from Northern regions, marked by poor management relations, low support and high work–family conflict (80.9% probability of being likely to leave). Multiple regression confirmed that stronger management relations reduced ITL (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.46–0.79) whereas high job demands and work–health conflict increased it (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.19–2.04). Northern location also predicted higher ITL (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.03–2.44). Demographics, education, and clinical setting were not significantly associated.

Linking Evidence to Action

These findings suggest that healthcare organizations should prioritize managerial and organizational strategies targeting modifiable work-related factors to reduce nurse managers' intention to leave. Interventions aimed at improving organizational support, work environment, and job satisfaction may contribute to workforce retention at the managerial level. Future research should evaluate the effectiveness of targeted organizational interventions in sustaining nurse manager retention.

Transforming Hospital Care: Impact of an Evidence‐Based Practice Course on Healthcare Professionals' Competencies in a Randomized Clinical Trial

ABSTRACT

Introduction

Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) is essential to healthcare quality and safety, integrating scientific evidence with clinical expertise and patient preferences. Despite its importance, EBP implementation still faces major challenges. Educational interventions have proven effective in strengthening EBP competencies among healthcare.

Main

To evaluate the impact of a personalized educational intervention on EBP competencies among healthcare professionals. Working at a private tertiary general hospital, comparing performance before and after the intervention.

Methods

A randomized controlled trial involving healthcare professionals was conducted. Eligible and consented participants were randomly assigned to either an Intervention Group (IG) receiving an Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) course or a Control Group (CG) not receiving the course, stratified by job level, role, and work shift. From the completers, 18 participants were randomly selected for the IG, and all 7 available CG participants were included in the final sample for analysis. All study participants completed two validated instruments: the Assessing Competencies in Evidence-Based Medicine (ACE) and the Fresno Test. The educational intervention consisted of a seven-week course with weekly three-hour sessions, for a total of 21 h. Comparative analyses were conducted using a Linear Mixed Model, adjusted for educational level, job level, time working at the hospital, and weekly workload.

Results

A statistically significant increase in general EBP knowledge was observed in the IG following the intervention, with a mean gain of 19.1%. Separate analysis showed improvements of 10.8% in ACE and 24.2% in Fresno Test scores. No statistically significant changes were observed in the CG. Furthermore, after the intervention, the IG outperformed the CG for both general EBP knowledge and Fresno Test scores on both pre- and post-intervention comparisons.

Conclusion

The educational intervention had a positive statistically significant impact on EBP knowledge and skills among healthcare professionals in the IG compared to the CG. These findings underscore the potential of structured educational initiatives to enhance the quality of clinical practice through improved EBP competencies.

Trial Registration

UTN U1111-1322-8443

Publication Dynamics Where Evidence Is Missing: Mapping Empty Reviews in Nursing

ABSTRACT

Introduction

The production of science is characterized by socio-political and technological forces that influence what knowledge is produced. In this context, empty reviews have received little attention, with debate ranging over the pros and cons of their publication. However, their dissemination may improve the ability to recognize and prioritize research gaps. The main aim of the study was to map empty reviews published in nursing science.

Materials and Methods

A scoping review in accordance with Arksey and O'Malley, Joanna Briggs Institute and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews. The review protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework database in April 2025. Four databases and grey literature were searched; there were eligible scoping or systematic reviews defined as “empty” in the field of nursing. A modified framework of Patterns, Advances, Gaps, Evidence for practice, and Research recommendations was used to summarize the extracted data.

Results

Fifteen empty reviews were identified. In terms of Patterns, the empty reviews were mainly published in high-income countries over the last 10 years and related to clinical practise and outcomes, education and training, organizational and human resources, and approaches to maternity care, mental health, and nursing education. In general, reporting guidelines were used, while funding was not documented. In terms of Recommendations, more primary studies, the development of tools and the strategic use of empty reviews to inform the funding and research agenda were suggested.

Linking Evidence to Action

Empty reviews in nursing may indicate neglected or emerging areas that can help orient research agendas to ensure equity-oriented priorities and reduce the marginalization of under-investigated topics. Recognizing empty reviews as legitimate scholarly outputs supports transparent mapping of knowledge gaps, helping funders, institutions, and research programs direct resources to under-investigated areas. Dedicated registries that publicly report empty reviews, establish minimum reporting standards, and require explicit keywords in titles and abstracts would improve transparency and accessibility, and stimulate targeted primary research that can turn “empty” areas into active inquiry. From this perspective, empty reviews may attract research investment rather than be seen as methodological failures.

Technologies in Intensive Care Therapy and the Obstacles in Nursing Practice: Systematic Review

ABSTRACT

Aim

To identify obstacles faced by nurses when using health technologies in Intensive Care Units (ICUs).

Design

Systematic review following PRISMA and registered in PROSPERO.

Methods

Six databases were searched. Two reviewers independently screened studies and appraised methodological quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute tool. Data were synthesized narratively.

Results

Eight studies met eligibility criteria. Barriers clustered around limited training and technical competence, shorter professional experience, increased workload with multiple devices, organizational culture, and reduced direct patient contact, which may undermine patient-centered care. Heterogeneity of study designs precluded meta-analysis.

Conclusions

Obstacles to technology use in ICUs arise from individual and organizational factors. Addressing these barriers requires structured education, mentoring for novice nurses, workload management, and supportive policies that integrate technology without displacing bedside care.

Linking Evidence to Action

Nursing leaders and educators should implement ongoing, ICU-specific technology training and mentoring. Managers and policymakers must ensure adequate staffing and promote Health Technology Assessment to align device implementation with clinical needs, safeguarding patient safety and the human dimensions of care.

Italian EBP Implementation Scales: A Psychometric Validation Study

ABSTRACT

Background

Evidence-based practice (EBP) is widely endorsed as a cornerstone for high-quality, patient-centered care. However, its integration into daily clinical routines remains inconsistent, particularly in settings where cultural, educational, and organizational challenges persist. Reliable, contextually adapted tools are essential to measure EBP implementation and guide improvement efforts.

Aims

This study aimed to validate the Italian versions of the EBP Implementation Scale and its short-form (3-item) version.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey design was adopted. Both versions of the EBP Implementation Scale were translated and culturally adapted in accordance with internationally recognized guidelines. Data were gathered from a national sample of 405 nurses through a combination of convenience and snowball sampling. Psychometric assessment encompassed confirmatory and Bayesian factor analyses, evaluation of internal consistency and test–retest reliability, and measurement invariance testing. All analyses were performed in R Studio.

Results

Confirmatory factor analyses confirmed that both versions (long and short) of the scale measure a single underlying construct. The instruments demonstrated high reliability (ω = 0.96 and 0.87 respectively). Measurement invariance across educational groups was partially established, as the partial scalar invariance model demonstrated acceptable fit (CFI = 0.991, RMSEA = 0.045), suggesting consistent interpretation of the scale across different levels of EBP training. Latent profile analysis revealed distinct subgroups of EBP implementers, with notable differences in latent means (p < 0.001) associated with previous education in evidence-based practice.

Discussion

The Italian EBP Implementation Scales are valid and reliable tools for assessing EBP implementation behaviors. They can support education planning, monitor practice changes over time, and inform interventions aimed at enhancing evidence-based care.

Comparing Evidence‐Based Practice Competencies, Adoption, Barriers, and Predictors Among Nurses and Other Healthcare Professionals Across the Eastern Mediterranean Region

ABSTRACT

Background

Current research lacks a comprehensive understanding of evidence-based practice (EBP) adoption and its predictors across diverse healthcare professionals (HCPs) in the Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR), particularly with a direct comparison between nurses and other professional groups.

Objectives

This study aims to evaluate the EBP competencies, adoption levels, identified barriers, and associated predictors among nurses and other healthcare professionals (HCPs) within the EMR.

Methods

A cross-sectional, correlational, and comparative design was used. An electronic survey was distributed (April 27th–August 17th, 2023) via convenience/snowball sampling, inviting nurses, physicians, physiotherapists, dentists, and pharmacists across the EMR to complete the survey. Multivariate regression analysis and structural equation modeling (SEM) were used to identify predictors of EBP adoption.

Results

A total of 4673 HCPs participated and reported several barriers to EBP adoption, including time constraints, difficulties in interpreting statistics, lack of authority to change practices, and insufficient equipment. Nurses had fewer postgraduate degrees but more work experience and full-time employment than other HCPs. Despite reporting more workplace EBP support, nurses read less research, had lower EBP scores and adoption propensity, and perceived greater barriers than other HCPs (p < 0.002). Multivariate regression showed the highest barrier scores in Syria/Tunisia and the lowest in the United Arab Emirates. Nurses reported significantly higher barriers compared to other HCPs (p < 0.001). Fear of Change was not a primary barrier overall, but was elevated in specific subgroups of nurses. SEM showed good fit: RMSEA = 0.077, SRMR = 0.053, CFI = 0.80, χ 2(df) = 917, p < 0.001. SEM showed that EBP adoption propensity and fear of change significantly mediate the relationship between HCPs' characteristics and EBP scores.

Linking Evidence to Action

Despite having a positive attitude and propensity towards EBP, nurses lack the necessary knowledge and support to adopt it, and they face more barriers than other healthcare professionals. Nurses require greater support from healthcare leaders to enhance their EBP competencies and address the reported barriers. Policymakers and organizations should prioritize tailored, role-specific training and supportive structures and environments to ensure equitable and effective EBP implementation for improving patient outcomes across the EMR.

Achieving Quality Through Evidence‐Based Practice and Process Improvement Synergy: The EQUiPP Framework

ABSTRACT

Background

Quality improvement is a well-known and commonly utilized approach to improving care and outcomes that is built on process improvement methods but not practice improvement methods. Because quality care includes both process and practice elements, process improvement alone cannot ensure quality outcomes will be achieved. This calls for a new approach.

Purpose

To share an innovative, synergistic, and collaborative quality framework: Evidence-based Quality in Practice and Process: The EQUiPP Framework.

Importance/Relevance to Healthcare Quality

The EQUiPP Framework's intent is to provide structure for collaborative efforts to effectively identify best practices/processes, implement and sustain change, and improve outcomes. The framework provides guidance to decrease the frequency of implementing ineffective changes by deriving effective solutions … the first time, every time.

Methods

A team of experts used a consensus approach to develop the framework.

Framework Development

A precursor to this framework, the Practice and Process Improvement = Quality (PPQ) Model, was evaluated by individual expert review and a two-day beta test workshop. Feedback was obtained during the workshop when participants applied the model in activities reflecting real-world healthcare scenarios. When used in both DNP student work and real-world health systems, fundamental flaws were identified which resulted in the necessity to develop a different conceptualization. The framework described here is a new approach to improving quality care.

Conclusion

The EQUiPP Framework is a tool that provides the synergistic integration of both practice improvement (EBP) and process improvement methodologies to successfully implement and sustain best practices to achieve and sustain quality outcomes.

Implications for Practice

The EQUiPP Framework aligns EBP and process improvement, allowing clinicians and students to work collaboratively to identify and effectively, as well as efficiently, implement and sustain best practices to deliver quality outcomes.

Our Stories, Our Strength: An Evidence‐Based Practice Initiative to Enhance Healthcare Culture Through Storytelling

ABSTRACT

Background and/or Rationale

The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated burnout, isolation, and disconnection among healthcare workers, leading to national calls to address workplace mental health. Storytelling has emerged as an effective strategy to build belonging, resilience, and connection. In response, a pediatric healthcare system launched an evidence-based storytelling initiative rooted in narrative medicine and visual symbolism.

Aim

To strengthen workplace culture by fostering connection, psychological safety, and meaning through structured storytelling.

Implementation

Developed in partnership with Dear World, the intervention integrated guided reflection, peer sharing, and professional photography. Initially focused on staff, the initiative expanded to include adolescent and young adult patients. Implementation included phased rollout, train-the-trainer models, onboarding integration, and multimedia engagement. Evaluation methods included pre- and post-surveys and organizational metrics, with the Connection During Conversations Scale (CDCS) used to assess effectiveness across different session formats.

Outcomes

Over 2 years, 1818 participants attended 60 events. Significant improvements in perceived connection and belonging were observed (p < 0.001), with 94% reporting stronger connections to colleagues and 93% to organizational values. CDCS analysis of Year 2 participants (n = 148) demonstrated comparable effectiveness between full and abbreviated session formats, with slightly stronger outcomes in full sessions. As part of broader workforce engagement efforts, nurse turnover declined from 21% to 13%, contributing to $2.3 million in projected cost avoidance.

Linking Evidence to Action

This scalable, low-cost initiative offers a sustainable model for rehumanizing healthcare. Its integration into orientation, leadership development, and wellness programs underscores its value in fostering connection, resilience, and retention across high-stress care settings.

The Evidence‐Based Practice Mentor: Findings From a Role Delineation Study to Support the Role's Needed Knowledge and Skills

ABSTRACT

Background

The role of the interprofessional evidence-based practice (EBP) mentor is critical to integrate best practices into healthcare and academic environments to improve outcomes and reduce costs for patients, families, providers, students, and faculty. This study aimed to validate the knowledge, skills, and attitudes/beliefs (KSAs) needed for the EBP mentor. This role delineation study (RDS) assessed knowledge about the EBP mentor role and tasks as related to the steps and competencies of EBP.

Methods

Interprofessional EBP experts participated in an advisory panel. Focus groups were conducted with the advisory panel members to identify the KSAs needed for expert EBP mentors. The steps of EBP were broken into 11 domains to align with the processes and strategies needed for EBP methodology. The focus group data were analyzed to identify the KSAs for each domain. A role delineation survey was developed. Interprofessional experts were invited to complete the survey to validate the KSAs needed for the EBP mentor role. The online survey included demographic information and 11 sections that aligned with the steps of EBP and the 107 KSA items needing to be validated.

Results

A total of 251 interprofessional EBP experts completed the survey (232 nurses, 19 interprofessionals). Healthcare providers comprised 82.5% of the sample, academic/researchers 15.5%, and “worked in both settings” 2%. The results reported strong inter-rater reliability (ranging from 0.836 to 0.955) and strong validity for each of the 11 domains and KSAs.

Linking Evidence to Action

Findings from this study support the EBP mentor role and will guide interprofessional EBP education and EBP mentor positions in healthcare systems. The study showed that the tasks of the EBP mentor were consistent across settings, educational degrees, and professional roles. Validity for the tasks/role for an interprofessional Evidence-based Practice Certification was clear and outlined expectations for the EBP mentor role.

Systematic Review and Network Meta‐Analysis of the Comparative Effectiveness of Self‐Management Support Strategies for Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease

ABSTRACT

Background

The global prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) has continued to rise over time. Pharmacological therapy is the mainstay of conventional CKD treatment; however, many CKD patients find it difficult to adhere to their medication regimen.

Objective

To systematically evaluate and compare the effects of various self-management support strategies for patients with CKD.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus to identify quasi-randomized and RCTs comparing the effectiveness of different self-management support strategies in CKD patients, The search spanned from database inception to June 24, 2025. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted information, assessed the quality of studies, and we performed analysis using RevMan 5.0 and STATA 14.0 software.

Results

Eighty-one studies were included, examining 10 strategies. Compared to conventional interventions, face-to-face combined tele-guidance, group visits, tele-guidance, and multi-component structured interventions significantly improved patients' self-efficacy. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) of different self-management support strategies influencing self-efficacy ranked in the top three were face-to-face combined tele-guidance, group visits and tele-guidance. Empowerment interventions, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and tele-guidance enhanced quality of life compared to conventional interventions. The SUCRA for quality of life ranked highest for empowerment, CBT and face-to-face combined tele-guidance. Additionally, we found that these strategies were beneficial in improving patients' blood pressure, IDWG, renal disease knowledge, and self-management.

Linking Evidence to Action

The study offers evidence on effective self-management support strategies for CKD patients, highlighting face-to-face combined tele-guidance might be the most effective intervention for increasing self-efficacy, while empowerment might be the most effective intervention for increasing quality of life in CKD patients. These findings can help healthcare providers design better programs to improve patient outcomes. However, more high-quality RCTs are needed to confirm findings.

Trial Registration

PROSPERO: CRD42024596581

Maternity Nurses' Work Instability, Job Satisfaction, and Perinatal Missed Care During Labor and Birth: The Mediating Roles of Practice Environment and Burnout

ABSTRACT

Background

Nurses' burnout, work instability (WI), and job satisfaction (JS) in their practice environment (PE) are well established in the literature. However, perinatal missed care (PMC), a subset of missed nursing care, remains underreported among maternity nurses.

Aim

To examine the mediating role of PE and burnout in the associations of WI, JS, and PMC among maternity nurses.

Methods

A cross-sectional and correlational study employed consecutive sampling to recruit maternity nurses (n = 312) from five hospitals in Saudi Arabia (three government and two private hospitals in Hail and Makkah regions, respectively). Maternity staff nurses, regardless of their sex, years of professional nursing experience, or nationality, who met inclusion criteria were included in this study. Data was collected from July to September 2024 using four standardized self-report scales. Structural equation modeling was utilized for statistical analyses.

Results

Maternity nurses' WI negatively influenced PE (β = −0.23, p = 0.014), while positively affected PMC (β = 0.15, p = 0.031). The PE positively affected JS (β = 0.24, p = 0.034) but had a negative effect on burnout (β = −0.24, p = 0.007) and PMC (β = −0.21, p = 0.038). Burnout negatively affected JS (β = −0.25, p = 0.028), while positively associated with PMC (β = 0.20, p = 0.022). PE mediated the associations between WI and burnout (β = 0.05, p = 0.019), JS (β = −0.07, p = 0.020), and PMC (β = −0.06, p = 0.008). Meanwhile, burnout mediated between PE and JS (β = 0.05, p = 0.030) and PMC (β = −0.04, p = 0.023).

Linking Evidence to Action

Understanding the relationships among maternity nurses' burnout, JS, PE, and PMC is key to improving the quality of perinatal care and ensuring the patients' well-being. By focusing on strategies to enhance the PE (e.g., adequate staffing and resources, improved nurse–patient ratio), reduce burnout (e.g., meditation and mindfulness programs, coping intervention programs), and improve JS (e.g., work schedule flexibility, facilitate work-life balance, staff professional development), healthcare organizations can mitigate the occurrence of PMC.

Research Capacity and Culture on Nurses' Evidence‐Based Practice Implementation

ABSTRACT

Background

The research-to-practice gap often occurs when evidence-based practice (EBP) is inadequately implemented into clinical practice. Nurses are critical to bridging the gap in EBP implementation (EBPI) and identifying effective strategies to promote its use in practice; however, they need a supportive work environment to develop the necessary research capacity/culture (RCC).

Aims

The purpose of this study was to examine relationships between nurses' perceptions of individual RCC and EBPI, team RCC and EBPI, and health care organization RCC and EBPI, adjusting for educational background, health care organization setting, and health care organization type.

Methods

Survey data were collected from 175 nurses across the United States using a prospective cross-sectional study design. The Research Capacity in Context (RCC) tool and EBPI scale were used to measure nurses' perception of RCC and nurses' EBPI, respectively. Simple linear regression was used to assess the relationship between organizational, team, and individual RCC and EBPI. Multiple linear regression was used to adjust for pertinent participant demographics.

Results

The results of this study indicated that organization (R 2 = 0.033, p = 0.016), team (R 2 = 0.064, p < 0.001), and individual (R 2 = 0.155, p < 0.001) RCC were significantly associated with nurse EBPI. Moreover, findings remained significant after adjusting for educational background, health care organization setting, and type. The regression model suggested that education significantly predicted EBPI (R 2 = 0.142, p < 0.001).

Linking Evidence to Action

These results emphasize the importance of building RCC in health care organizations, as it can be an effective strategy to increase nurses' EBPI, which has been shown to impact patient outcomes directly. Future research should identify strategies to assist organizations and leadership in building RCC among nurses.

Defining and Measuring Opiophobia: A Systematic Review

ABSTRACT

Background

“Opiophobia” lacks a clear definition and measurement, but it is commonly used by researchers and healthcare professionals in pain management to describe the underutilization of opioids by patients, caregivers, prescribers, and other healthcare professionals. This inconsistency complicates research and clinical interventions.

Objective

This systematic review aimed to comprehensively evaluate the conceptualization and operationalization of opiophobia across quantitative studies involving adult populations.

Methods

Peer-reviewed articles published before July 2024 were retrieved from four bibliographic databases (CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, and Scopus) and systematically reviewed. Included studies defined and/or measured opiophobia or opioid stigma among adult patients, family caregivers, and healthcare professionals. The review was conducted in two phases: the first phase provided a comprehensive understanding of study characteristics, while the second phase evaluated the conceptualization and measurement of opiophobia.

Results

Thirty-six articles met inclusion criteria. Studies focused on healthcare professionals (n = 23, 64%); adult patients (n = 13, 33%), including 7 studies involving patients with cancer (19%); healthcare professionals and patients (n = 2, 5%); and family caregivers (n = 1, 3%). Among the studies that defined opiophobia (n = 20, 67%), common definitions included fear, prejudice, reluctance, addiction, exaggeration, underutilization, and inappropriate attitudes/beliefs, respectively. Limitations included the predominance of observational designs (n = 32, 89%) and the use of investigator-developed instruments (n = 27, 73%).

Linking Evidence to Action

Instruments measuring opiophobia focused on opioid-related fears and behaviors. Instrument items that measured opiophobia primarily focused on fears and behaviors resulting from these fears. It remains unclear whether opiophobia is solely fear-based or also includes poor adherence to prescribed opioids. The wide variations in definitions and the use of mostly investigator-developed measures led to inconsistencies among studies. Further research is needed to design specific interventions and determine delivery times.

Impact of the Diabetes Conversation MapTM Program on Knowledge Retention, Self‐Management, and Self‐Efficacy Among Diabetic Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

ABSTRACT

Background

Diabetes mellitus is a growing global health concern, with a high prevalence in Egypt. Type 2 diabetes imposes substantial health and economic challenges. Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) programs, such as the Diabetes Conversation Map, have demonstrated promise in enhancing patient knowledge, self-management, and self-efficacy. However, evidence regarding their direct impact remains scarce, necessitating further investigation.

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Diabetes Conversation Map program in improving knowledge retention, self-management, and self-efficacy among type 2 diabetes patients in Egypt.

Methods

A prospective, parallel, two-arm randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Damanhour Health Insurance Outpatient Diabetic Clinic in Egypt. A total of 120 adult patients with type 2 diabetes were randomized into a control group (n = 60), receiving standard diabetes education, and an intervention group (n = 60), attending 8 weekly interactive sessions using the Diabetes Conversation Map. Primary outcomes were assessed using validated questionnaires at baseline, post-intervention, and 3 months later.

Results

The intervention group exhibited significant improvements in knowledge, self-management, and self-efficacy compared to the control group (p < 0.001). Additionally, positive correlations between these outcomes were observed post-intervention, replacing negative correlations observed at baseline.

Linking Evidence to Action

The Diabetes Conversation Map program effectively enhances patient knowledge, self-management, and self-efficacy, supporting its integration into routine diabetes education. Healthcare providers should implement structured, interactive educational interventions to empower patients in managing their condition. Regular follow-ups and reinforcement strategies are necessary to sustain long-term self-efficacy improvements. Policymakers should consider incorporating evidence-based diabetes education into national healthcare programs. Future research should explore digital adaptations of the program to enhance accessibility and engagement.

Trial Registration

Registration No: R000061691, Trial ID: UMIN000054044

Exploring Psychosocial Variables and Professional Well‐Being in Nurse Leaders: A Predictive Correlational Study

ABSTRACT

Background

Nurse leaders at every level are needed to help organizations achieve strategic goals and deliver safe patient care. Nurse leaders can find fulfillment in their roles; however, they are often prone to poor work-life balance due to the complexity and demands of their jobs. Professional well-being, consisting of an individual's overall health and the perception of good work-related quality of life, is at risk for being compromised in these nurses. Research exploring variables associated with psychosocial well-being in nurse leaders is limited.

Aims

To describe variables related to psychological well-being in nurse leaders, explore associations among these variables, and identify potential demographic and psychosocial predictors of resilience and burnout.

Methods

Participants were a convenience sample of nurse leaders from two hospitals located in the southwestern United States. We used a prospective observational design to describe the incidence of and relationships between self-compassion, satisfaction with life, resilience, perceived stress, and burnout. We then sought to identify predictors of disengagement and exhaustion (subscales of burnout) and resilience.

Results

Participants (n = 105) were mostly female (82.7%) and white (57.7%), while one-third were charge nurses. Most reported normal to high levels of satisfaction with life (86%), self-compassion (90%), and resilience (93.3%) and 72.4% reported high stress levels. Moderately high levels of disengagement (46.4%) and exhaustion (59.1%) were also present. Higher self-compassion levels predicted higher levels of resilience. Lower satisfaction with life and self-compassion together predicted high disengagement scores, while lower self-compassion scores predicted high exhaustion scores.

Linking Evidence to Action

When disengagement, exhaustion, and perceived stress are elevated, nurse leaders are at risk for low professional well-being and may be more prone to resignation ideation or turnover. Evidence-based interventions designed specifically for nurse leaders promoting professional well-being and emphasizing self-compassion skills are needed along with high-quality research on program outcomes.

Attitudes to Evidence‐Based Interventions and Individual Readiness to Change in Maternity and Child Health Care: A Cross‐Sectional Study Among Midwives and Public Health Nurses

ABSTRACT

Background

Integrating evidence-based interventions in services by midwives and public health nurses (PHNs) has the potential to improve public health. Attitudes and individual readiness to change can influence the implementation of evidence-based interventions, but there is limited research in community nursing and maternity and child health care services (MCHCs).

Aims

To examine attitudes toward evidence-based practice and readiness to change in midwives and PHNs in MCHCs before implementing the “Mamma Mia” intervention (an evidence-based intervention to improve maternal mental health).

Methods

A survey-based, multisite cross-sectional study following the STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guideline. Data were collected from 190 midwives and PHNs from 42 MCHCs across 33 municipalities in Norway (2021–2022). Six subscales of the Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS) assessed attitudes toward evidence-based practice, and the Brief Individual Readiness for Change Scale (BIRCS) measured individual readiness. Descriptive and inferential statistics using frequency tables, Pearson correlation coefficient, and linear regression were used for data analysis. Open-ended responses were analyzed using content analysis.

Results

Sixty-five midwives and 125 PHNs completed the baseline survey (mean age 46.8, all female). Mean EBPAS subscales scores were 2.99 to 3.58 (SD = 0.46–0.77) mean BIRCS score was 3.16 (SD = 0.49) (possible range 0–4). Scores were slightly higher than typically reported in clinical settings, with no significant differences based on demographics (all p-values ≥ 0.166). EBPAS subscores and the BIRCS score showed a moderate positive association. The most frequently reported positive factors influencing readiness were “enhanced care and positive gain” (42.6%), “organizational support” (26.3%), and “receiving training and implementation support” (23.2%). Negative factors included “time constraints and workload” (58.4%), and “research participation and implementation demands” (27.9%).

Linking Evidence to Action

Midwives and PHNs showed positive attitudes toward EBP and a high degree of individual readiness. Our findings align with previous research highlighting barriers such as time constraints and workload, offering insights to inform strategies for more effective EBP adoption and implementation. These results can guide nurse managers, administrators, policymakers, professional associations, implementers, and intervention developers in enhancing EBP integration into practice.

A Scoping Review on the Development, Implementation, and Evaluation of Nurse Well‐Being Initiatives in Academic Health Systems

ABSTRACT

Background

Nursing well-being is foundational to the specialties workforce and broader healthcare industry worldwide. Despite frequent reports and descriptions of activities that support nurses' well-being, most reports describe singular activities and programs that lack science-based structures contextualized within academic healthcare systems (AHS) with validated impact.

Aims

To evaluate and synthesize the existing national and international literature on nurse well-being initiatives offered in AHS.

Methods

Over 18 months, an 8-member interprofessional team conducted a scoping review adhering to PRISMA-ScR reporting guidelines. Five databases were searched, and results were screened in a multistep process by researcher pairs. Discrepancies were resolved by a third team member's review. Citations were reviewed uniquely three times to ensure methodological rigor. A final set of 54 articles was extracted for key data elements pertinent to the research question describing setting, population, study design, intervention, and other subsidiary fields. Reviewers additionally analyzed publication quality indicators and trends for additional implications for research and practice.

Results

Among the 54 eligible articles, 72% were research and 28% were evidence-based practice, quality improvement, or doctoral dissertations. The concepts studied were psychosocial (e.g., resiliency) and physical (e.g., sleep). The number of instruments used per study ranged from 1 to 11. Thirty percent of studies utilized a framework from various disciplines that included nursing, social and behavioral sciences, and safety science principles. Nurses were included as authors 67% of the time, and 35% received funding from either the public or private sector.

Mapping Implementation Strategies and Outcomes When Using Evidence Based Practice Implementation Models in Nursing Settings: A Scoping Review

ABSTRACT

Background

Evidence-based practice (EBP) should be implemented in clinical settings and practiced by registered nurses as it improves healthcare quality, safety, costs, and patient outcomes. For this to occur, nurses need to be skilled and acculturated. An EBP culture needs to be developed and sustained, both in initial academic programs and in clinical settings. Implementation models already exist and are being used, but outcomes are not consistently measured.

Aims

The aim of this scoping review was to gather and map the use of EBP implementation models as well as their implementation strategies and outcomes.

Method

The methodology for the JBI Scoping Reviews was applied. The databases queried were PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, EMCARE, AMED, BNI, HMIC, PsycInfo. Inclusion criteria were as follows: Any primary study that describes the implementation of EBP in nursing, clinical, or academic settings. Studies using the following EBP implementation models were included: the ARCC Model, ARCC-E Model, IOWA Model, Stetler Model, Johns Hopkins Nursing EBP Model, ACE Star Model as well as PARIHS and i-PARIHS. They must have used Proctor's taxonomy for implementation outcomes as well as described implementation strategies according to the ERIC classification. Data extraction was performed by four independent reviewers in February 2024. There was no language or date limitation. Three independent reviewers performed an initial selection on titles and abstracts. Reading of the full texts was carried out by two independent reviewers using the JBI SUMARI.

Results

A total of 2244 articles were retrieved. After removing duplicates and applying the inclusion criteria, 26 articles were reviewed, and data extracted. The most used implementation model was the PARiHS or i-PARiHS model followed by the IOWA model, the ARCC model combined with the JHNEBP model and the Stetler model. Nearly all studies used the implementation strategy domain “Use evaluative and iterative strategies” of ERIC classification. Overall, the selected studies used between 1 and 2 outcomes from Proctor's eight available.

Linking Evidence to Action

The underuse of existing taxonomies (Proctor, ERIC) prevents an exhaustive mapping of the use of implementation models. The vocabulary used is too vague, and the implementation strategies are sometimes poorly described. An effort needs to be made to report on all work done to transfer the results to other settings and thus improve health care practices.

❌