Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a significant public health problem that requires effective preventive and conservative methods to limit morbidity and death.
This study aims to give clinical practice an evidence-based basis for the clinical practice of healthcare professionals by methodically looking for the best available data on conservative strategies and CKD prevention in high-risk and early-stage patients.
The 6S evidence resource model was followed and states that evidence retrieval was done top-down, gathering necessary studies from January 2014 to July 30, 2024. Databases searched included BMJ Best Practice, DynaMed, NICE, GIN, SIGN, JBI Evidence Synthesis, JBI Evidence Implementation, Cochrane Library, and PubMed. Following the JBI grade of evidence and recommendation methodology, two reviewers independently examined and assessed the literature, extracting and summarizing evidence.
Seventy-nine publications were identified: 18 guidelines, 1 randomized controlled trial, 2 expert consensus statements, 36 evidence summaries, and 22 systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Key findings were summarized across eight aspects: risk assessment and early detection, risk factors and prevention of genetic factors, management of diabetic nephrology, impact of bariatric surgery on preventing CKD, screening and diagnosis, treatment and prevention strategies, lifestyle modifications, and CKD prevention.
This study summarized the best evidence for preventing CKD from eight aspects, which can help clinical or community medical professionals develop and apply CKD preventive strategies for high-risk groups and early-stage patients. By using these evidence-based strategies, healthcare professionals can reduce the incidence and progression of CKD, leading to fewer hospitalizations, improved kidney function preservation, and enhanced long-term survival and quality of life for patients. Future research should address identified gaps and explore the implementation of these strategies in diverse clinical settings.
Women with overweight or obesity tend to engage in low levels of exercise and face challenges in initiating and maintaining exercise throughout pregnancy.
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a peer-led walking and mobile health (mHealth) app intervention on self-efficacy and change in exercise behavior stage, based on the transtheoretical model (TTM), of women with overweight or obesity from pregnancy to one month postpartum.
The study was a randomized controlled trial with an experimental design. A total of 114 pregnant women (BMI ≥ 24 kg/m2 and gestation < 16 weeks) were recruited from prenatal clinics in Taiwan from July 2021 to May 2022. The intervention group (IG) received the peer-led walking program with mHealth support, while the control group (CG) received standard antenatal care. Follow-ups were conducted at 24–28 weeks (T2), 36–40 weeks (T3), and one month postpartum (T4).
The IG had significantly higher exercise self-efficacy scores from T1 to T3 compared to the CG. IG participants showed notable progress in exercise behavior stages, transitioning from the contemplation stage at T1 to preparation and action stages at T2 (χ 2 = 13.208, p < 0.01), with some reaching the maintenance stage by T3 (20.9%, χ 2 = 9.49, p < 0.05). In contrast, most of the CG participants remained at the contemplation stage throughout pregnancy to early postpartum.
The peer-led walking intervention with mHealth has the potential to enhance self-efficacy and promote sustained exercise behavior of women with overweight or obesity during and after pregnancy and is a valuable approach to establishing long-term exercise behavior.
ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT 05022680
Patients undergoing abdominal surgeries have a chance to experience surgical-related anxiety. But the most effective non-pharmacological interventions in managing this anxiety have not yet been identified.
To examine the effectiveness of different types of non-pharmacological interventions, and identify the effective components on pre- and postoperative anxiety management among patients undergoing abdominal surgeries.
A systematic search of randomized control trials (RCTs) examined the effects of non-pharmacological interventions on preoperative and/or postoperative anxiety (Primary outcomes) among patients undergoing abdominal surgery was conducted across MEDLINE, Ovid Nursing, AMED, PsycINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, HyRead, and WANFANG DATA from 1987 to March 1, 2024. Secondary outcomes including postoperative pain, postoperative analgesics consumption, resumption of postoperative bowel movements, and length of hospital stay were also examined. Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (version 2.0) was used for quality assessment. Meta-analysis was performed to synthesize the findings. Narrative summaries were provided for the studies that could not be included in the meta-analysis.
This review included 35 RCTs. The interventions of included studies were categorized as prehabilitation, sensory stimulation, preoperative counseling, information provision, and psychological interventions. Meta-analysis revealed that preoperative counseling was beneficial in managing preoperative anxiety (SMD = −1.36; 95% CI = −1.96, −0.76), postoperative anxiety (SMD = −1.30; 95% CI = −1.62, −0.98), and postoperative pain (SMD = −0.84; 95% CI = −1.21, −0.47). Meanwhile, psychological interventions adopting relaxation exercises had potential effects in reducing postoperative opioid consumption and shortening time to postoperative bowel movement.
Adopting preoperative counseling is suggested for the management of pre- and postoperative anxiety and postoperative pain among patients undergoing elective abdominal surgeries. A one-off lasting for 20–45 min preoperative counseling including individualized information about the coming surgery and perioperative process, and a discussion addressing patients' concerns is recommended. Future research is needed to explore the effects of relaxation exercise on important patients' outcomes such as postoperative analgesics consumption and time to resume bowel movement among patients undergoing abdominal surgery.
PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023359484
Mindfulness-Based Interventions (MBIs) have gained traction in various healthcare settings, particularly for stress reduction among healthcare professionals. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of MBIs on reducing stress and depression in obstetrical nurses.
A comprehensive literature search was done across multiple databases, including Cochrane Library, PsycINFO/PsycNet, PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The risk of bias for each included study was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Subgroup analyses were done according to intervention time (less than 8 weeks, 8 weeks, more than 8 weeks) and population. Meta-analysis was done using random-effects models. Effect sizes were calculated using standardized mean differences (SMD). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I 2 statistic.
The sample size in 55 studies was 4612 nurses and midwives (2904 in the intervention group and 1708 in the control group). The meta-analysis showed a significant overall effect of MBIs on reducing stress levels (SMD = −0.71; 95% CI [−0.97, −0.44]; p < 0.001), and depression (SMD = −0.74; 95% CI [−1.35, −0.13]; p < 0.001) among midwives and nurses. Subgroup analysis showed that the effects of intervention duration on reducing stress (X 2 = 3.01, p = 0.220) was not significant, but its effect on depression (X 2 = 61.46, p = 0.000) was significant.
Healthcare organizations should integrate structured MBIs into staff wellness initiatives to promote mental well-being. Nursing education programs can include mindfulness components to strengthen coping skills. Future work should also examine combined mindfulness–CBT programs (e.g., MINDBODYSTRONG) and address organizational factors contributing to burnout for a more comprehensive approach.
To identify obstacles faced by nurses when using health technologies in Intensive Care Units (ICUs).
Systematic review following PRISMA and registered in PROSPERO.
Six databases were searched. Two reviewers independently screened studies and appraised methodological quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute tool. Data were synthesized narratively.
Eight studies met eligibility criteria. Barriers clustered around limited training and technical competence, shorter professional experience, increased workload with multiple devices, organizational culture, and reduced direct patient contact, which may undermine patient-centered care. Heterogeneity of study designs precluded meta-analysis.
Obstacles to technology use in ICUs arise from individual and organizational factors. Addressing these barriers requires structured education, mentoring for novice nurses, workload management, and supportive policies that integrate technology without displacing bedside care.
Nursing leaders and educators should implement ongoing, ICU-specific technology training and mentoring. Managers and policymakers must ensure adequate staffing and promote Health Technology Assessment to align device implementation with clinical needs, safeguarding patient safety and the human dimensions of care.
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a major contributor to several preventable cancers. Although the HPV vaccine is recognized by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as safe and effective, uptake among U.S. adolescents remains below optimal levels. Disparities in vaccination rates are shaped by both individual characteristics and social determinants of health (SDOH).
To systematically review and synthesize the literature examining individual factors and social determinants of health associated with HPV vaccine initiation and completion among adolescents aged 9–18 years in the U.S.
A systematic search was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, yielding 37 eligible studies from an initial pool of 2092 articles. The STROBE checklist was used to assess methodological quality, and the Levels of Evidence framework by Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt guided appraisal of study strength.
Across included studies, initiation and completion rates averaged 47% and 40%, respectively. Key predictors of higher vaccine uptake included provider recommendation, health insurance coverage, urban residence, older age, and higher parental education. Disparities were most evident among adolescents living in rural areas and those from minority or low-income backgrounds. Barriers reported in several studies included parental safety concerns and logistical challenges. Evidence regarding parental knowledge and attitudes was mixed: smaller studies suggested an influence, whereas the largest population-based study reported no significant effect.
Addressing HPV vaccination disparities requires a multifaceted approach, including improving healthcare access in underserved regions, strengthening provider–parent communication, and implementing policy interventions such as school-based vaccination programs and state mandates. Normalizing HPV vaccination as part of routine adolescent care is essential for reducing HPV-related cancer morbidity and mortality. These findings also have implications for catch-up vaccination in young adults aged 15–26 and shared clinical decision-making up to age 45, which remain important strategies for increasing protection across the lifespan.
Older adults face growing risks of depression and anxiety, yet stigma, comorbidities, cost, and limited access impede receipt of conventional care. Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs), including immersive virtual reality (VR), exergaming, and mobile apps, may reduce these barriers.
To evaluate the efficacy of DMHIs in reducing depressive and anxiety symptoms among adults aged ≥ 50 years.
We conducted a PRISMA adherent systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Interventions included immersive VR, exergaming/physical digital platforms, mobile applications, and digital cognitive training. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) were pooled with random effects models; heterogeneity was assessed with I 2.
Nineteen RCTs (n = 718; mean ages 50.9–84.7 years) met inclusion criteria. Across studies, DMHIs significantly reduced depressive symptoms (SMD = −0.656, 95% CI = −0.932 to −0.380; p < 0.001) and anxiety symptoms (SMD = −0.559, 95% CI = −0.740 to −0.380; p < 0.0001). Immersive and physically engaging modalities (e.g., VR, exergaming) outperformed app-based approaches. Heterogeneity ranged from moderate to high (I 2 ≈ 69.6%–97%).
Offer DMHIs: especially VR or exergaming when access to in-person therapy is limited or as an adjunct to usual care. Provide brief onboarding and, when feasible, caregiver support to boost adherence and confidence with technology. Select or configure age-friendly interfaces (e.g., large fonts, simple navigation) to address common usability barriers. Integrate DMHIs into stepped-care or rehabilitation pathways and monitor outcomes with validated tools (e.g., GDS, STAI). Address equity by supplying devices/connectivity solutions and consider cost-effectiveness and long-term engagement in implementation plans.
Trial Registration: PROSPERO ID: CRD420250655153
Loneliness and social isolation are prevalent and persistent in cancer patients, affecting their psychosocial adjustment. Non-pharmacological interventions have been shown to be effective in previous studies; however, the most effective types of non-pharmacological interventions for this population remain unclear.
The aim of this systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) was to synthesize the existing evidence and compare the effectiveness of different types of non-pharmacological interventions in treating loneliness and social isolation among cancer patients.
A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and MEDLINE databases from their inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating non-pharmacological interventions targeting loneliness and social isolation in cancer patients were included. NMA was performed using Stata 17.0 software under a frequentist framework.
A total of 13 RCTs were included, including 9 non-pharmacological interventions and 1151 cancer patients. In order of probability, group logotherapy (SUCRA: 99.9%, SMD: −1.62, 95% CI: −2.23 to −1.01) was the most effective intervention for alleviating loneliness and social isolation, followed by psychoeducational therapy (SUCRA: 76.9%, SMD: −0.62, 95% CI: −1.16 to −0.07) and supportive expressive group therapy (SUCRA: 65.7%, SMD: −0.40, 95% CI: −0.75 to −0.05).
The NMA suggests that, in terms of short-term efficacy, group logotherapy may be considered the optimal choice for reducing loneliness and social isolation levels in cancer patients. Healthcare professionals could regularly conduct group logotherapy among cancer patients to promote their psychosocial adaptation.
PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42024616937
Evidence-based practice (EBP) has been in existence for more than 30 years and is recognized as the standard to achieve high quality care.
To examine EBP beliefs, competence, implementation self-efficacy, organizational culture and readiness, access to mentors and assess relationships between nurse characteristics and EBP variables in a large healthcare system in six U.S. states.
A cross-sectional descriptive correlational design was used to conduct a web-based anonymous survey of registered nurses in a large multistate healthcare system throughout the western US. Measures included: EBP Competency Self-Assessment Scale, the EBP Mentoring Scale, and the Short forms of the EBP Beliefs Scale, EBP Implementation Scale, the Organizational Culture and Readiness Scale for System-Wide Integration of Evidence-Based Practice.
A total of 1468 nurses completed the survey from 36 hospitals in six U.S. states. Overall, participants rated themselves competent in only one competency (asks clinical questions). EBP beliefs followed by implementation self-efficacy scores were highest. Total scores for EBP implementation showed the strongest positive correlation with EBP competency followed by beliefs and mentorship with culture and readiness, the least strong relationship. EBP competency, beliefs, and implementation increased with educational attainment. EBP mentorship scores were low across the system.
The study continues to demonstrate nurses' low perceptions of their EBP competency. Compared to previous studies, nurses in this sample reported their EBP competency higher; however, they still rated themselves above competence in only one statement. This underscores an urgent need for comprehensive education and robust support mechanisms. It is imperative that healthcare organizations establish access to experienced mentors and cultivate organizational structures to empower nurses to master EBP, thereby enhancing patient outcomes and advancing overall quality of care.
Cancer survivors often receive inadequate pain management, leading to impaired quality of life. Despite their importance, evidence on the global prevalence of chronic pain in cancer survivors remains insufficiently clear.
The systematic review and proportional meta-analysis aimed to estimate the pooled global prevalence of chronic pain among cancer survivors and to explore heterogeneity stratified by geographic region, cancer type, pain duration, and pain assessment tool.
Five databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure) were searched up to September 2024 for studies in English or Chinese. The review followed MOOSE and PRISMA guidelines with PROSPERO registration (CRDxx). Studies were included if they reported chronic pain prevalence in cancer survivors using validated instruments or solely reported chronic pain. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed quality using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies. Pooled prevalence and 95% prediction intervals were calculated using a random-effects model with Freeman–Tukey double arcsine transformation. Subgroup analysis was used to explore heterogeneity. Leave-one-out analysis explored robustness. Funnel plot and Egger's test were used to examine publication bias.
In total, 36 studies involving 39,806 participants were included. The pooled prevalence of chronic pain among cancer survivors was 41% (95% CI: 34%–49%) after testing robustness, with significant heterogeneity (I 2 = 99.32%). Subgroup analysis indicated significant group differences in prevalence rates by geographic region, cancer type, and pain duration (all p < 0.001).
These findings stress the need for more extensive and tailored chronic pain management in current clinical practice. Additional research on chronic pain outcomes among pediatric cancer survivors, cancer populations within Africa and South America, and those with cancer types other than breast cancer is needed.
PROSPERO Registration: CRD42024597090.
The cause of medical errors and adverse events in healthcare is multifactorial and includes faulty systems, processes, and conditions that can lead individuals to make mistakes. These mistakes are estimated to cause between 210,000 and 400,000 preventable deaths each year in the United States and are often caused by ineffective communication and teamwork failures among interdisciplinary team members. Effective communication is crucial, especially during critical events as this impacts health care quality and patient safety.
The project's aim was to implement the identified best practice of Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety (TeamSTEPPS) 3.0 to improve communication and teamwork during critical events on a perinatal unit.
This was an evidence-based practice project consisting of 2 h of TeamSTEPPS didactic and interactive instruction followed by using the TeamSTEPPS concepts during 2 h of critical event simulation training to assess the perception of communication and teamwork of a multidisciplinary team on a perinatal unit. The multidisciplinary team members included labor and delivery nurses, mother/baby nurses, hospital aides, ward clerks, obstetrical technicians, obstetricians, and midwives.
Using the TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Perception Questionnaire (T-TPQ), the perception of communication and teamwork was compared pre- and post-implementation. Communication and teamwork mean scores from pre to post increased by 61% and 56%, respectively. The mean posttest scores improved for each of the T-TPQ measures, indicating the intervention had an impact on each of the dimensions of the TeamSTEPPS approach, including team function, team leadership, situational monitoring, mutual support, and communication (p < 0.01) and Cohen's d z , of 0.82–1.32 provided evidence of a large effect.
This evidence-based practice project provided clear and specific guidance for communicating and strengthening teamwork during perinatal critical events. Implementing TeamSTEPPS strategies can provide a safe environment for patients and a positive work environment where teamwork and communication are encouraged.
This study aimed to evaluate and rank the effectiveness of various acupoint stimulation therapies in alleviating cancer-related fatigue (CRF), a pervasive and distressing symptom among cancer patients.
CRF severely compromises patients' quality of life across treatment and survivorship stages. Despite growing interest in nonpharmacological interventions, comparative evidence on the efficacy of acupoint stimulation therapies remains limited.
A systematic review and network meta-analysis of 28 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 2370 participants was conducted. Databases searched included MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Airiti Library. Interventions included acupuncture, acupressure, oil acupressure, moxibustion, and transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS). Standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve (SUCRA) was used to rank therapies.
Oil acupressure (SUCRA: 73.6%), relaxing acupressure (73.4%), and acupuncture (72.7%) were the most effective interventions. Both professionally administered and self-administered therapies significantly reduced CRF, with no major differences in efficacy. Subgroup analyses revealed consistent effectiveness across cancer types, particularly breast and lung cancer, and treatment stages.
Acupoint stimulation therapies, especially acupressure and acupuncture, effectively reduce CRF and are suitable for integration into routine cancer care. Self-administered acupressure offers a practical, low-cost alternative, especially in resource-limited settings. Standardization of protocols and long-term studies are warranted to guide clinical implementation.
The review protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO: CRD42024556455)
The incidence of cancer continues to increase, and cancer patients still suffer from a range of burdens, leading to decreased quality of life. AI has been increasingly studied in the field of cancer care, demonstrating its enormous potential. However, most AI applications in cancer care are still in the developmental stage, and the strength of evidence from randomized controlled trials is not yet sufficient.
To evaluate the effects of AI-enhanced interventions in randomized controlled trials conducted in clinical settings and the impact of AI-enhanced interventions on the health outcomes of adult cancer patients.
Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Nine databases (MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP, and Sinomed) were systematically searched, and metadata analysis was performed using R software and R Studio. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB2) and the GRADE approach. The process was independently completed by two authors. The intervention effect was estimated by calculating the standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) using a random-effects model.
A total of ten articles were included. Meta-analysis results showed that AI-enhanced interventions can significantly improve the quality of life (SMD 0.89, 95% CI 0.06–1.73), symptom burden (SMD −0.81, 95% CI −1.44 to −0.18), anxiety (SMD −0.20, 95% CI −0.32 to −0.07), and self-efficacy (SMD 0.55, 95% CI 0.06 to 1.03) of cancer patients. The type of AI application and the duration of the intervention had an impact on the quality of life of cancer patients: the effect of algorithm recommendations (SMD 1.49, 95% CI 0.04–2.93) was better than that of risk alerts (SMD 0.33, 95% CI 0.03–0.63), and the effect of short-term interventions (< 3 months) (SMD 1.49, 95% CI 0.04–2.93) was better than that of long-term interventions (≥ 3 months) (SMD 0.19, 95% CI −0.04 to 0.43). Sensitivity analysis showed that the results of this study were stable and reliable.
AI-enhanced interventions are effective tools for improving patient outcomes. When integrating AI into clinical practice for cancer patients, priority should be given to the type of technology involved, ensuring its acceptability by enhancing perceived usefulness. AI technology should be adopted to relieve clinical nurses from documentation and low-complexity tasks, thereby addressing concerns about the loss of “humanistic care.” We recommend the formal integration of AI literacy frameworks, such as N.U.R.S.E.S., into nursing education and practice.
Trial Registration: PROSPERO (registration number: CRD420251040938).
Although research and evidence-based practice are widely regarded as foundational to high quality patient care, little is known about the evidence-based practice and research competencies of ambulatory care nurses.
The aim of this study was to measure the self-perceived evidence-based practice and research competencies and learning needs of ambulatory care nurses.
In 2024, a national sample of 2790 ambulatory care nurses participated in an online cross-sectional structured survey measuring evidence-based practice and research competencies. Respondents rated their competency using the EBP Capability Beliefs Scale and the Application of Knowledge and Skills subscale from the Research Competencies Assessment Instrument for Nurses (RCAIN). Results were compared across practice settings, job roles, and subspecialties.
Higher education levels correlated with higher scores in both evidence-based practice and research competencies. After controlling for education level, nurses from specialty or procedural areas scored higher in evidence-based practice competencies than nurses from all other work environments. Direct care nurses scored lower than nurses in all other roles in research competencies. Statistically significant correlations were also found between evidence-based practice competencies and the type of organization where a nurse worked.
Findings indicate EBP and research competencies must be increased among ambulatory care nurses. Leadership support and resource allocation are critical for EBP development. Among ambulatory care nurses, those in direct care roles may have the greatest opportunities to develop EBP and research competencies. Nurses with limited exposure to EBP and research should be encouraged to engage in professional development activities on these topics. Education and EBP mentorship for ambulatory care nurses should be tailored to the ambulatory care environment where possible, to make it relatable to learners.
Evidence-based practice (EBP) is widely endorsed as a cornerstone for high-quality, patient-centered care. However, its integration into daily clinical routines remains inconsistent, particularly in settings where cultural, educational, and organizational challenges persist. Reliable, contextually adapted tools are essential to measure EBP implementation and guide improvement efforts.
This study aimed to validate the Italian versions of the EBP Implementation Scale and its short-form (3-item) version.
A cross-sectional survey design was adopted. Both versions of the EBP Implementation Scale were translated and culturally adapted in accordance with internationally recognized guidelines. Data were gathered from a national sample of 405 nurses through a combination of convenience and snowball sampling. Psychometric assessment encompassed confirmatory and Bayesian factor analyses, evaluation of internal consistency and test–retest reliability, and measurement invariance testing. All analyses were performed in R Studio.
Confirmatory factor analyses confirmed that both versions (long and short) of the scale measure a single underlying construct. The instruments demonstrated high reliability (ω = 0.96 and 0.87 respectively). Measurement invariance across educational groups was partially established, as the partial scalar invariance model demonstrated acceptable fit (CFI = 0.991, RMSEA = 0.045), suggesting consistent interpretation of the scale across different levels of EBP training. Latent profile analysis revealed distinct subgroups of EBP implementers, with notable differences in latent means (p < 0.001) associated with previous education in evidence-based practice.
The Italian EBP Implementation Scales are valid and reliable tools for assessing EBP implementation behaviors. They can support education planning, monitor practice changes over time, and inform interventions aimed at enhancing evidence-based care.
Integrating evidence-based practice (EBP) into nursing is critical for improving clinical outcomes, yet adoption remains limited due to ongoing individual and organizational barriers.
The EBP Scholars Program was developed to overcome barriers and foster a culture of evidence-based nursing practice within a pediatric healthcare system.
Launched in 2007 during the organization's Magnet journey, the program is grounded in scientific, educational, and implementation science principles. Selected through a competitive application process, scholars engage in a seven-month structured curriculum grounded in the 8 A's Model of EBP. Learning outcomes are evaluated using pre- and post-program scores on the Evidence-Based Practice Knowledge Assessment Questionnaire (EBP-KAQ).
The program has enrolled 147 participants and graduated 124. On average, participants increased their EBP knowledge by 15.7%. Scholar-led projects have led to over 40 policy updates, new care guidelines, and measurable quality and safety improvements. Graduates have produced 43 posters, 18 podium presentations, and 9 peer-reviewed publications.
The EBP Scholars Program offers a scalable model for embedding EBP in healthcare. Through strategic leadership, interdisciplinary collaboration, and structured mentorship, it has advanced evidence-based care, professional development, and a culture of continuous improvement.
Stroke survivors frequently experience multiple co-occurring symptoms that cluster together, significantly affecting their quality of life and rehabilitation outcomes. However, previous research has predominantly focused on individual symptoms in isolation, limiting the potential to inform more comprehensive, symptom cluster-based approaches to post-stroke care.
This scoping review aimed to synthesize existing evidence on the assessment tools used to evaluate them, the analytical techniques employed to identify them, and the composition of symptom clusters in people with stroke.
A comprehensive literature search was conducted across seven databases (PubMed, EMBASE, APA PsycInfo, CINAHL, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang) for studies published between 2001 and April 2025. Methodological quality was assessed using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklists. Data were extracted on study characteristics, measurement instruments, analytical techniques, and symptom cluster composition.
Fourteen studies comprising 6556 stroke patients were included. A total of 11 assessment tools and six analytical techniques were identified, with exploratory factor analysis being the most commonly used. Seven common symptom clusters were synthesized: pain and fatigue, somatic movement dysfunction, cognitive impairment, affective disturbance, mood and sleep dysregulation, psychological distress, and gastrointestinal symptoms. The most frequently reported symptom cluster was pain and fatigue. Considerable heterogeneity was found across studies in terms of measurement instruments, analytical techniques, and symptom cluster composition.
This review highlights the methodological inconsistencies and diversity in symptom cluster research in stroke populations. The findings underscore the need for standardized, culturally adaptable assessment tools and longitudinal designs to capture the dynamic nature of symptom clusters. This comprehensive review summarizes common symptom clusters in stroke patients and provides clinicians and researchers with valuable insights to help them develop more effective symptom management strategies and ultimately improve patient outcomes.
PROSPERO: CRD420251069463
Nursing students are the primary reserve force for hospital nurses. With the shrinking of nurse human resources and the increase in turnover rates, understanding the job preferences of nursing students is crucial for attracting nursing students.
To systematically review published studies on discrete choice experiments involving nursing students.
Ten databases were systematically searched from their inception to January 15, 2025. Two researchers independently used the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research checklist to evaluate the quality of the included studies. Thematic analysis was used to classify the attributes into broad categories and corresponding subcategories. The frequency, significance, relative importance, and willingness-to-pay of each attribute in the included studies were analyzed.
Fifteen studies spanning 12 countries were included, with a total of 102 individual attributes extracted and divided into two broad categories and six subcategories. Non-financial attributes were the most frequently reported broad category. The subgroup analyses indicated that nursing students from high-income countries valued income and were highly concerned about the working atmosphere.
Linking Evidence to Action:
The results of this systematic review provide important evidence for developing incentive policies to attract nursing students to the nursing profession.
In clinical oncology nursing practice, the preservation of quality of life is an essential component. E-health interventions have been proven effective in improving quality of life in patients with cancer, but the optimal content and delivery format remain undetermined.
To compare the efficacy of e-health interventions with varying contents and delivery formats in improving quality of life in patients with cancer.
Network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Six databases, including Medline, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PsycINFO, were searched from inception to October 25, 2025.
Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. A pairwise meta-analysis and a network meta-analysis were performed sequentially to determine the efficacy of different contents and delivery formats of e-health interventions in improving quality of life in patients with cancer.
A total of 50 studies included e-health interventions with eight contents and five delivery formats. The results identified health education (SUCRA = 82.2%), symptom management (SUCRA = 72.2%), and rehabilitation interventions (SUCRA = 71.1%) as the three most effective e-health intervention contents for improving quality of life in patients with cancer. Among delivery formats, app-based (SUCRA = 82.1%), internet/web-based (SUCRA = 71.5%), and telephone-based e-health interventions (SUCRA = 53.3%) ranked among the top three.
This study explored the efficacy of different contents and delivery formats of e-health interventions in improving quality of life in patients with cancer. These results are expected to provide an evidence-based basis for clinical oncology nursing practice.
PROSPERO number: CRD42025638829
Nurse-led self-care interventions represent a promising approach for chronic pain management. However, a comprehensive synthesis of their efficacy is lacking.
This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the impact of the interventions on four key outcomes in chronic pain patients: pain intensity, quality of life, anxiety levels, and depression severity.
The study was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. An electronic search for relevant articles spanning from inception to November 2024 was carried out across multiple databases, including EMBASE, PubMed, CENTRAL, Web of Science (Core Collection), CINAHL, Scopus, and PsycINFO. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies. The meta-analysis was conducted using Stata 18 and Review Manager 5.4, and a GRADE evidence profile was subsequently generated.
The systematic review and meta-analysis involved 30 studies in total. The results of the data analysis indicated that the interventions alleviated pain intensity (SMD = −0.30, 95% CI: −0.41 to −0.20, Z = 5.57, p < 0.001). They also enhanced quality of life (SMD = 0.28, 95% CI: 0.14 to 0.42, Z = 3.83, p < 0.001), while reducing anxiety (SMD = −0.15, 95% CI: −0.29 to −0.01, Z = 2.11, p = 0.03) and depression symptoms (SMD = −0.27, 95% CI: −0.45 to −0.09, Z = 2.88, p = 0.004).
This systematic review demonstrated that nurse-led self-care interventions benefit chronic pain patients. Future research should conduct more rigorous randomized controlled trials to strengthen the evidence base for using such interventions in chronic pain management.