Conectar
Women with overweight or obesity tend to engage in low levels of exercise and face challenges in initiating and maintaining exercise throughout pregnancy.
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a peer-led walking and mobile health (mHealth) app intervention on self-efficacy and change in exercise behavior stage, based on the transtheoretical model (TTM), of women with overweight or obesity from pregnancy to one month postpartum.
The study was a randomized controlled trial with an experimental design. A total of 114 pregnant women (BMI ≥ 24 kg/m2 and gestation < 16 weeks) were recruited from prenatal clinics in Taiwan from July 2021 to May 2022. The intervention group (IG) received the peer-led walking program with mHealth support, while the control group (CG) received standard antenatal care. Follow-ups were conducted at 24–28 weeks (T2), 36–40 weeks (T3), and one month postpartum (T4).
The IG had significantly higher exercise self-efficacy scores from T1 to T3 compared to the CG. IG participants showed notable progress in exercise behavior stages, transitioning from the contemplation stage at T1 to preparation and action stages at T2 (χ 2 = 13.208, p < 0.01), with some reaching the maintenance stage by T3 (20.9%, χ 2 = 9.49, p < 0.05). In contrast, most of the CG participants remained at the contemplation stage throughout pregnancy to early postpartum.
The peer-led walking intervention with mHealth has the potential to enhance self-efficacy and promote sustained exercise behavior of women with overweight or obesity during and after pregnancy and is a valuable approach to establishing long-term exercise behavior.
ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT 05022680
Patients undergoing abdominal surgeries have a chance to experience surgical-related anxiety. But the most effective non-pharmacological interventions in managing this anxiety have not yet been identified.
To examine the effectiveness of different types of non-pharmacological interventions, and identify the effective components on pre- and postoperative anxiety management among patients undergoing abdominal surgeries.
A systematic search of randomized control trials (RCTs) examined the effects of non-pharmacological interventions on preoperative and/or postoperative anxiety (Primary outcomes) among patients undergoing abdominal surgery was conducted across MEDLINE, Ovid Nursing, AMED, PsycINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, HyRead, and WANFANG DATA from 1987 to March 1, 2024. Secondary outcomes including postoperative pain, postoperative analgesics consumption, resumption of postoperative bowel movements, and length of hospital stay were also examined. Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (version 2.0) was used for quality assessment. Meta-analysis was performed to synthesize the findings. Narrative summaries were provided for the studies that could not be included in the meta-analysis.
This review included 35 RCTs. The interventions of included studies were categorized as prehabilitation, sensory stimulation, preoperative counseling, information provision, and psychological interventions. Meta-analysis revealed that preoperative counseling was beneficial in managing preoperative anxiety (SMD = −1.36; 95% CI = −1.96, −0.76), postoperative anxiety (SMD = −1.30; 95% CI = −1.62, −0.98), and postoperative pain (SMD = −0.84; 95% CI = −1.21, −0.47). Meanwhile, psychological interventions adopting relaxation exercises had potential effects in reducing postoperative opioid consumption and shortening time to postoperative bowel movement.
Adopting preoperative counseling is suggested for the management of pre- and postoperative anxiety and postoperative pain among patients undergoing elective abdominal surgeries. A one-off lasting for 20–45 min preoperative counseling including individualized information about the coming surgery and perioperative process, and a discussion addressing patients' concerns is recommended. Future research is needed to explore the effects of relaxation exercise on important patients' outcomes such as postoperative analgesics consumption and time to resume bowel movement among patients undergoing abdominal surgery.
PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023359484
Although research and evidence-based practice are widely regarded as foundational to high quality patient care, little is known about the evidence-based practice and research competencies of ambulatory care nurses.
The aim of this study was to measure the self-perceived evidence-based practice and research competencies and learning needs of ambulatory care nurses.
In 2024, a national sample of 2790 ambulatory care nurses participated in an online cross-sectional structured survey measuring evidence-based practice and research competencies. Respondents rated their competency using the EBP Capability Beliefs Scale and the Application of Knowledge and Skills subscale from the Research Competencies Assessment Instrument for Nurses (RCAIN). Results were compared across practice settings, job roles, and subspecialties.
Higher education levels correlated with higher scores in both evidence-based practice and research competencies. After controlling for education level, nurses from specialty or procedural areas scored higher in evidence-based practice competencies than nurses from all other work environments. Direct care nurses scored lower than nurses in all other roles in research competencies. Statistically significant correlations were also found between evidence-based practice competencies and the type of organization where a nurse worked.
Findings indicate EBP and research competencies must be increased among ambulatory care nurses. Leadership support and resource allocation are critical for EBP development. Among ambulatory care nurses, those in direct care roles may have the greatest opportunities to develop EBP and research competencies. Nurses with limited exposure to EBP and research should be encouraged to engage in professional development activities on these topics. Education and EBP mentorship for ambulatory care nurses should be tailored to the ambulatory care environment where possible, to make it relatable to learners.
Fear of childbirth is common among pregnant women. Mindfulness-based interventions have been used widely in obstetrics. However, the evidence of the effects on fear of childbirth is controversial.
To evaluate the effects of mindfulness-based interventions on fear of childbirth, pain catastrophising, labour pain intensity, use of pain relief medication, mode of delivery and duration of labour among pregnant women planned for normal delivery.
In this systematic review, 10 databases were searched from inception to 7 November 2024. Randomized controlled trials implementing mindfulness-based interventions for fear of childbirth or related outcomes were included. Two reviewers assessed the methodological quality and certainty of evidence independently. Standardized mean difference (SMD), risk ratio (RR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to evaluate effect sizes.
A total of 16 studies from 15 trials were included. Based on very low to moderate certainty of evidence, mindfulness-based interventions were effective in decreasing fear of childbirth both immediately post-intervention and within 6-week postpartum (SMD: −0.72; 95% CI −0.89, −0.55; SMD: −0.63; 95% CI −0.91, −0.35, respectively), labour pain intensity (SMD: −1.22; 95% CI −2.07, −0.37), caesarean section rate (RR: 0.58; 95% CI 0.36, 0.93), and total duration of labour (SMD: −1.03; 95% CI −1.34, −0.72), and improving mindfulness level both immediately post-intervention and within six-week postpartum (SMD: 0.48; 95% CI 0.31, 0.66; SMD: 0.50; 95% CI 0.27, 0.73, respectively), but had no significant effect on pain catastrophising (SMD: −0.36; 95% CI −0.72, 0.01) and epidural analgesia use rate (RR: 0.77; 95% CI 0.57, 1.03).
Mindfulness-based interventions have potential effects on reducing fear of childbirth and promoting labour-related outcomes. These interventions might be an effective approach in obstetrics clinical practice to enhance the pregnancy and labour experiences among pregnant women.
PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024610793
Integrating evidence-based practice (EBP) into nursing is critical for improving clinical outcomes, yet adoption remains limited due to ongoing individual and organizational barriers.
The EBP Scholars Program was developed to overcome barriers and foster a culture of evidence-based nursing practice within a pediatric healthcare system.
Launched in 2007 during the organization's Magnet journey, the program is grounded in scientific, educational, and implementation science principles. Selected through a competitive application process, scholars engage in a seven-month structured curriculum grounded in the 8 A's Model of EBP. Learning outcomes are evaluated using pre- and post-program scores on the Evidence-Based Practice Knowledge Assessment Questionnaire (EBP-KAQ).
The program has enrolled 147 participants and graduated 124. On average, participants increased their EBP knowledge by 15.7%. Scholar-led projects have led to over 40 policy updates, new care guidelines, and measurable quality and safety improvements. Graduates have produced 43 posters, 18 podium presentations, and 9 peer-reviewed publications.
The EBP Scholars Program offers a scalable model for embedding EBP in healthcare. Through strategic leadership, interdisciplinary collaboration, and structured mentorship, it has advanced evidence-based care, professional development, and a culture of continuous improvement.
Quality improvement is a well-known and commonly utilized approach to improving care and outcomes that is built on process improvement methods but not practice improvement methods. Because quality care includes both process and practice elements, process improvement alone cannot ensure quality outcomes will be achieved. This calls for a new approach.
To share an innovative, synergistic, and collaborative quality framework: Evidence-based Quality in Practice and Process: The EQUiPP Framework.
The EQUiPP Framework's intent is to provide structure for collaborative efforts to effectively identify best practices/processes, implement and sustain change, and improve outcomes. The framework provides guidance to decrease the frequency of implementing ineffective changes by deriving effective solutions … the first time, every time.
A team of experts used a consensus approach to develop the framework.
A precursor to this framework, the Practice and Process Improvement = Quality (PPQ) Model, was evaluated by individual expert review and a two-day beta test workshop. Feedback was obtained during the workshop when participants applied the model in activities reflecting real-world healthcare scenarios. When used in both DNP student work and real-world health systems, fundamental flaws were identified which resulted in the necessity to develop a different conceptualization. The framework described here is a new approach to improving quality care.
The EQUiPP Framework is a tool that provides the synergistic integration of both practice improvement (EBP) and process improvement methodologies to successfully implement and sustain best practices to achieve and sustain quality outcomes.
The EQUiPP Framework aligns EBP and process improvement, allowing clinicians and students to work collaboratively to identify and effectively, as well as efficiently, implement and sustain best practices to deliver quality outcomes.
The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated burnout, isolation, and disconnection among healthcare workers, leading to national calls to address workplace mental health. Storytelling has emerged as an effective strategy to build belonging, resilience, and connection. In response, a pediatric healthcare system launched an evidence-based storytelling initiative rooted in narrative medicine and visual symbolism.
To strengthen workplace culture by fostering connection, psychological safety, and meaning through structured storytelling.
Developed in partnership with Dear World, the intervention integrated guided reflection, peer sharing, and professional photography. Initially focused on staff, the initiative expanded to include adolescent and young adult patients. Implementation included phased rollout, train-the-trainer models, onboarding integration, and multimedia engagement. Evaluation methods included pre- and post-surveys and organizational metrics, with the Connection During Conversations Scale (CDCS) used to assess effectiveness across different session formats.
Over 2 years, 1818 participants attended 60 events. Significant improvements in perceived connection and belonging were observed (p < 0.001), with 94% reporting stronger connections to colleagues and 93% to organizational values. CDCS analysis of Year 2 participants (n = 148) demonstrated comparable effectiveness between full and abbreviated session formats, with slightly stronger outcomes in full sessions. As part of broader workforce engagement efforts, nurse turnover declined from 21% to 13%, contributing to $2.3 million in projected cost avoidance.
This scalable, low-cost initiative offers a sustainable model for rehumanizing healthcare. Its integration into orientation, leadership development, and wellness programs underscores its value in fostering connection, resilience, and retention across high-stress care settings.
Technology-assisted interventions offer a promising alternative to conventional cardiac rehabilitation. However, there is limited evidence on their effectiveness, particularly in non-Western settings with emphasis on exercise self-efficacy.
To evaluate the effects of a 12-week, technology-assisted hybrid cardiac rehabilitation (TecHCR) program on physical, physiological, and psychological outcomes of patients with coronary heart disease.
A two-arm parallel randomized controlled trial including 160 participants was randomly assigned to either TecHCR or usual care. TecHCR was underpinned by the Health Belief Model, consisting of three supervised exercise training and occupational therapy sessions, a fitness watch for exercise self-monitoring, six audio-visual educational videos, and a weekly video call follow-up. Data were collected at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and at 24 weeks post-intervention.
Participants in TecHCR demonstrated significantly greater improvement in exercise self-efficacy (β = 5.909, 95% CI [3.146, 8.672]; p < 0.001), health-promoting behaviors (β = 9.058, 95% CI [5.524, 12.591]; p < 0.001), and perceived anxiety levels (β = −1.255, 95% CI [−1.893, −0.616]; p < 0.001) at immediate post-intervention and (β = 8.506, 95% CI [4.951, 12.061]; p < 0.001, β = 14.563, 95% CI [8.809, 20.317]; p < 0.001, β = −1.145, 95% CI [−1.975, −0.315]; p = 0.007, respectively) 24 weeks post-intervention when compared with the control group. No statistically significant improvements were observed in perceived depression and cardiovascular risk factors.
The TecHCR program, combining supervised sessions with technology-assisted components, is an effective approach for significantly improving exercise self-efficacy, health-promoting behaviors, and anxiety in patients with coronary heart disease. Healthcare institutions should consider implementing hybrid programs to overcome barriers to traditional cardiac rehabilitation, leveraging technology to extend support and maintain patient engagement beyond supervised sessions.
clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04862351
Exploring the potential relationships among moral distress (MD), general health (GH) levels, secondary traumatic stress (STS) and levels of empathy within nursing personnel is of specific interest.
This study aimed to investigate the occurrence of MD and its associations with GH, STS, and empathy levels among nurses employed in eight public hospitals across the Attica Basin in Greece.
Between January and March 2020, a cross-sectional study was conducted among nursing staff working in surgical, medical, and psychiatric units of 6 public hospitals and 2 psychiatric institutions in the Attica Basin. Respondents completed the validated Greek versions of the Moral Distress Scale–Revised, the Jefferson Scale of Empathy for Health Professionals, the 28-item General Health Questionnaire, and the Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale. Participants were asked to complete a paper-pencil data sheet consisting of 27 sociodemographic questions.
A total of 267 out of 350 distributed questionnaires were completed and returned, corresponding to a response rate of 76.3%. The findings showed that nurses experienced moderate MD in both frequency and intensity, moderate-to-high GH and empathy, and moderate levels of STS. Psychiatric nurses reported lower STS and better GH than their counterparts in general hospital settings. Multivariate analysis demonstrated a statistically significant association between increased STS and deterioration in GH. A rise in the frequency of MD is significantly linked to an increase in its intensity.
Incorporating proven screening methods, programs that build resilience, supportive workplace cultures, ongoing evaluations over time, and peer support systems creates a complete approach to lowering moral distress and secondary traumatic stress, improving nurse well-being, maintaining work efficiency, and enhancing the overall safety and quality of healthcare services.
Nurses' burnout, work instability (WI), and job satisfaction (JS) in their practice environment (PE) are well established in the literature. However, perinatal missed care (PMC), a subset of missed nursing care, remains underreported among maternity nurses.
To examine the mediating role of PE and burnout in the associations of WI, JS, and PMC among maternity nurses.
A cross-sectional and correlational study employed consecutive sampling to recruit maternity nurses (n = 312) from five hospitals in Saudi Arabia (three government and two private hospitals in Hail and Makkah regions, respectively). Maternity staff nurses, regardless of their sex, years of professional nursing experience, or nationality, who met inclusion criteria were included in this study. Data was collected from July to September 2024 using four standardized self-report scales. Structural equation modeling was utilized for statistical analyses.
Maternity nurses' WI negatively influenced PE (β = −0.23, p = 0.014), while positively affected PMC (β = 0.15, p = 0.031). The PE positively affected JS (β = 0.24, p = 0.034) but had a negative effect on burnout (β = −0.24, p = 0.007) and PMC (β = −0.21, p = 0.038). Burnout negatively affected JS (β = −0.25, p = 0.028), while positively associated with PMC (β = 0.20, p = 0.022). PE mediated the associations between WI and burnout (β = 0.05, p = 0.019), JS (β = −0.07, p = 0.020), and PMC (β = −0.06, p = 0.008). Meanwhile, burnout mediated between PE and JS (β = 0.05, p = 0.030) and PMC (β = −0.04, p = 0.023).
Understanding the relationships among maternity nurses' burnout, JS, PE, and PMC is key to improving the quality of perinatal care and ensuring the patients' well-being. By focusing on strategies to enhance the PE (e.g., adequate staffing and resources, improved nurse–patient ratio), reduce burnout (e.g., meditation and mindfulness programs, coping intervention programs), and improve JS (e.g., work schedule flexibility, facilitate work-life balance, staff professional development), healthcare organizations can mitigate the occurrence of PMC.
Nurse-led telephone-based follow-up interventions play a role in patient follow-up, but at present, no meta-analysis has been found to assess the effectiveness of nurse-led, telephone follow-up interventions for patients with acute coronary syndrome.
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of nurse-led telephone-based follow-up interventions on health outcomes in people with acute coronary syndromes.
Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
A comprehensive search of six databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL and Scopus was conducted from the inception of the databases to 30 September 2023. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the included randomized controlled studies. Review Manager 5.4 and Stata 16.0 were used to conduct statistical analysis.
A total of 12 studies were included. Nurse-led telephone-based follow-up interventions may reduce systolic and diastolic blood pressure (MD = −2.55, 95% CI [−4.16, −0.94]) (MD = −2.15, 95% CI [−3.18, −1.12]) and low-density lipoprotein (MD = −9.06, 95% CI [−14.33, −3.79]) in patients with acute coronary syndrome. However, its effectiveness in controlling high-density lipoprotein (MD = 1.65, 95% CI [−4.30, 7.61]) and reducing total cholesterol (MD = −2.72, 95% CI [−7.57, 2.13]) was uncertain. In addition, the results showed that the nurse-led follow-up intervention did not play a role in improving anxiety (SMD = −0.20, 95% CI [−0.44, 0.04]) and depression (SMD = −0.07, 95% CI [−0.21, 0.06]) in patients with acute coronary syndrome, but it probably improved drug adherence (RR = 1.30, 95% CI [1.05, 1.60]) and smoking cessation (RR = 1.31, 95% CI [1.08, 1.60]).
The findings of this review suggest that nurse-led telephone-based follow-up interventions had a potentially positive effect on controlling blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein levels, as well as improving medication adherence and smoking cessation among patients with acute coronary syndrome, compared to usual care. However, the intervention did not appear to significantly impact high-density lipoprotein, total cholesterol, anxiety, and depression, indicating that further research in these areas will be necessary in the future.
PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews): CRD42023465894
Nurse-led education programs in childcare settings are critical for improving early childhood health outcomes and caregiver practices. Despite their potential, a systematic synthesis of their effectiveness is lacking.
To summarize the characteristics and evaluate the effectiveness of existing nurse-led education programs in childcare settings through a systematic review of experimental studies.
This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A comprehensive search was conducted in five databases from inception to December 9, 2024. Two reviewers independently screened articles, extracted data, and assessed study quality. Due to methodological heterogeneity, a narrative synthesis was performed. The review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024618983).
Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria, involving 900 childcare workers and 920 families. The programs targeted two main areas: prevention of child health issues and management of child health issues. Lectures and group discussions were the most frequently used strategies. Nurses assumed diverse roles, including educators, consultants, and facilitators. The findings revealed several benefits, including reduced rates of upper respiratory illness, improved family health practices—such as appropriate medication use—and enhanced childcare worker competencies in first aid knowledge.
Nurses play a critical role in implementing education programs in childcare settings. Their contributions should be fully integrated into program planning and delivery. Future research should adopt rigorous methodologies to strengthen evidence-based practices and improve child health outcomes and caregiver competencies.
“Opiophobia” lacks a clear definition and measurement, but it is commonly used by researchers and healthcare professionals in pain management to describe the underutilization of opioids by patients, caregivers, prescribers, and other healthcare professionals. This inconsistency complicates research and clinical interventions.
This systematic review aimed to comprehensively evaluate the conceptualization and operationalization of opiophobia across quantitative studies involving adult populations.
Peer-reviewed articles published before July 2024 were retrieved from four bibliographic databases (CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, and Scopus) and systematically reviewed. Included studies defined and/or measured opiophobia or opioid stigma among adult patients, family caregivers, and healthcare professionals. The review was conducted in two phases: the first phase provided a comprehensive understanding of study characteristics, while the second phase evaluated the conceptualization and measurement of opiophobia.
Thirty-six articles met inclusion criteria. Studies focused on healthcare professionals (n = 23, 64%); adult patients (n = 13, 33%), including 7 studies involving patients with cancer (19%); healthcare professionals and patients (n = 2, 5%); and family caregivers (n = 1, 3%). Among the studies that defined opiophobia (n = 20, 67%), common definitions included fear, prejudice, reluctance, addiction, exaggeration, underutilization, and inappropriate attitudes/beliefs, respectively. Limitations included the predominance of observational designs (n = 32, 89%) and the use of investigator-developed instruments (n = 27, 73%).
Instruments measuring opiophobia focused on opioid-related fears and behaviors. Instrument items that measured opiophobia primarily focused on fears and behaviors resulting from these fears. It remains unclear whether opiophobia is solely fear-based or also includes poor adherence to prescribed opioids. The wide variations in definitions and the use of mostly investigator-developed measures led to inconsistencies among studies. Further research is needed to design specific interventions and determine delivery times.
The original jigsaw strategy is a cooperative learning technique that involves small groups of participants working together on a particular task that was initially designed to promote academic performance and foster positive social relations among students across diverse classroom settings. Jigsaw emphasizes teamwork by facilitating collaboration among students or participants to accomplish tasks. It is an efficient and time-saving approach that is particularly applicable when there is a lot of information to review and each individual does not need to learn every detail of the topic.
To develop a strategy to advance EBP in healthcare organizations and build individuals' competence and confidence in the EBP process.
The jigsaw approach was modified to advance evidence-based practice (EBP) through the creation of the “Jigsaw Journal Club for EBP” (JJC-EBP).
The JJC-EBP strategy/approach enhances efforts to advance EBP work in organizations by expediting the critical appraisal step of the EBP process. This strategy/approach also promotes clinician participation in EBP by creating a collaborative approach to several steps of EBP methodology. In addition, this strategy/approach helps individual clinicians build their competence and confidence in several steps of EBP methodology as well.
EBP can be advanced in healthcare organizations through implementation of the Jigsaw journal club strategy. Clinicians can build their EBP competence and confidence through participation in a Jigsaw journal club activity.
Nursing well-being is foundational to the specialties workforce and broader healthcare industry worldwide. Despite frequent reports and descriptions of activities that support nurses' well-being, most reports describe singular activities and programs that lack science-based structures contextualized within academic healthcare systems (AHS) with validated impact.
To evaluate and synthesize the existing national and international literature on nurse well-being initiatives offered in AHS.
Over 18 months, an 8-member interprofessional team conducted a scoping review adhering to PRISMA-ScR reporting guidelines. Five databases were searched, and results were screened in a multistep process by researcher pairs. Discrepancies were resolved by a third team member's review. Citations were reviewed uniquely three times to ensure methodological rigor. A final set of 54 articles was extracted for key data elements pertinent to the research question describing setting, population, study design, intervention, and other subsidiary fields. Reviewers additionally analyzed publication quality indicators and trends for additional implications for research and practice.
Among the 54 eligible articles, 72% were research and 28% were evidence-based practice, quality improvement, or doctoral dissertations. The concepts studied were psychosocial (e.g., resiliency) and physical (e.g., sleep). The number of instruments used per study ranged from 1 to 11. Thirty percent of studies utilized a framework from various disciplines that included nursing, social and behavioral sciences, and safety science principles. Nurses were included as authors 67% of the time, and 35% received funding from either the public or private sector.
A skilled and diverse healthcare workforce is essential in nursing homes, yet recruitment and retention remain a major challenge. Gaining insight into the well-being of different care worker groups and how they perceive their work environment can highlight areas of concern and opportunities for improvement.
To compare the perceived work environment and well-being among different care worker groups in nursing homes.
This descriptive study used cross-sectional survey data from the Flanders Nursing Home (FLANH) project, collected from February–July 2023. A total of 1521 care workers from 25 Flemish nursing homes participated (64.4% response rate), including care assistants (43.7%), registered nurses (20.5%), support staff (15.4%), allied health professionals (14.8%), and team leaders (5.7%). Chi-squared tests were used to compare the percentages of the care worker groups reporting the work environment items and well-being outcomes (job satisfaction, intention to leave, burnout). Post hoc analyses were conducted to identify which groups contributed to the significant differences observed.
Significant differences among care worker groups were found for almost all work environment items and well-being outcomes. Staffing adequacy was perceived least among care assistants and registered nurses. More registered nurses and team leaders perceived high workload and emotional burden compared to the other groups. Work–life interference and involvement were perceived most among team leaders. A person-centered vision, work autonomy, and salary satisfaction were reported most among allied health professionals and team leaders. Skill use and training opportunities were reported least among support staff. Work-related well-being appeared to be experienced most among allied health professionals and least among care assistants.
These findings highlight key differences in work environment perceptions and well-being among care worker groups, offering valuable insights for tailored initiatives to foster a supportive workplace that benefits the well-being of all types of care workers in nursing homes.
Work wellbeing, also known as workplace wellbeing, is a global concern for nurses, particularly because excessive stress and exhaustion contribute to burnout.
The Caring Science International Collaborative (CSIC), an international research network, empirically investigates nurse work wellbeing using the Profile of Caring, a psychometrically validated and reliable instrument.
The CSIC framework defines wellbeing intrinsically—as caring and clarity—and extrinsically—as the social and technical resources needed to work efficiently and effectively. The Profile of Caring explains 80% of work wellbeing in nursing without bias across 10 countries.
This research protocol describes an international multicenter observational study that measures nurse work wellbeing using the Profile of Caring and other concepts and outcomes measures.
FreshRSS 