Conectar
Sleep problems are common among primary care nurses and are closely associated with psychological stress and maladaptive cognitive processing. Understanding the complex interplay among these psychological factors is critical for improving health outcomes and care quality.
This study aimed to examine the relationships between perceived stress, rumination (both positive and negative), and sleep quality in primary care nurses using a network analysis approach.
A cross-sectional study was conducted among 316 primary care nurses in public primary healthcare institutions in Shapingba District, Chongqing, China. Participants completed standardized self-report measures assessing perceived stress, rumination tendencies, and sleep quality. Network analysis was used to model the associations between these variables and to identify the most influential components.
Approximately 64.6% of participants reported poor sleep quality. Network analysis revealed that sleep latency and perceived tension were the most central nodes within the network. Sense of tension and enjoy happiness showed the highest bridge strength, indicating their roles in connecting different psychological domains. Negative rumination—particularly suppression of positive emotions and negative attribution—showed strong links to sleep-related variables, suggesting its importance in the network structure.
Perceived stress and negative rumination were closely related to sleep problems among primary care nurses. The findings suggest that stress reduction and cognitive-emotional interventions targeting maladaptive rumination may be effective strategies to improve sleep quality and overall well-being in this population.
No patient or public contribution.
To explore the association between psychological capital and psychological distress in stroke patient–spouse dyads and examine the mediating effect of relationship satisfaction in this association.
A population of 207 stroke patient-spouse dyads completed the Positive Psychological Capital Questionnaire, Quality of Relationship Index, and Kessler Psychological Distress Scale. A dyadic analysis was conducted using the actor-partner interdependence mediation model.
In stroke-affected couples, a noteworthy interaction exists between moderately elevated levels of psychological capital (p < 0.01). Patients exhibit significantly diminished psychological capital and heightened psychological distress compared to their spouses (t = −5.429, p < 0.001; t = 2.536, p < 0.05). Conversely, there is no significant variance in relationship satisfaction between patients and the partners (t = −0.920, p > 0.05). Patient relationship satisfaction acts as a mediator in the correlation between dyadic psychological capital and patient psychological distress (β = −0.020, p < 0.05; β = −0.011, p < 0.05). Similarly, spousal relationship satisfaction serves as a mediator in the connection between dyadic psychological capital and spousal psychological distress (β = −0.011, p < 0.05; β = −0.020, p < 0.05).
Psychological distress was reduced when psychological capital or relationship satisfaction in stroke dyads was promoted, and relationship satisfaction is an important mediator of the impact of psychological capital on psychological distress in the dyads. Healthcare providers should pay equal attention to spouses and implement dyadic psychological capital interventions centered on stroke couples to enhance relationship satisfaction and reduce psychological distress.
FreshRSS 