Conectar
To examine the historical origins of ‘advanced’ nursing as a concept.
Historical analysis using primary source documentation.
Historical analysis of articles published in the American Journal of Nursing by the National League of Nursing Education from 1928 to 1950, supplemented by books and articles addressing nursing specialisation history. Articles were analysed chronologically to trace terminology development and strategic decision-making processes during this foundational period.
‘Advanced’ terminology was first introduced in 1933 by Isabel Stewart to distinguish university-based clinical specialisation from exploitative hospital ‘postgraduate courses’. The term served as a strategic tool for legitimacy and professional differentiation. World War II accelerated development through federal funding and increased specialisation demands. Louise McManus provided the first conceptual framework in 1949, defining ‘advanced’ education as ‘planned forward movement’ requiring new learning experiences beyond basic preparation. Master's degree requirements were established in 1952, creating educational structures that persist today.
The strategic introduction of ‘advanced’ terminology in the 1930s established foundational concepts that continue to influence contemporary advanced practice nursing development internationally.
Understanding these historical origins enables more informed policy development for countries implementing advanced nursing roles and helps resolve ongoing definitional confusion in international nursing practice.
This research addresses the gap in historical understanding of advanced practice nursing terminology origins. Main findings reveal the strategic nature of professional language in nursing's professionalisation. The research impacts international nursing education policy and contemporary advanced nursing role development across diverse healthcare systems.
This study adhered to guidelines for historical research methodology.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
Background
The prevalence of short sleep duration is rising and is linked to chronic comorbidities, such as metabolic syndrome (MetS). Sleep extension interventions in adults with MetS comorbidities and short sleep duration are limited and vary widely in terms of approach and duration.
Objectives
This pilot study aimed to test the feasibility and acceptability of a personalized 12-week systematic sleep time extension intervention on post-intervention sleep outcomes in middle-aged adults at risk for MetS with actigraphy-estimated short sleep duration.
Methods
A single-arm, 12-week, 12-session systematic sleep time extension intervention was delivered weekly via videoconferencing. Feasibility and acceptability were assessed using retention rates and mean sleep diary completions. Sleep was estimated for 14 consecutive days prior to and immediately following the 12-week intervention using wrist actigraphy. Daytime sleepiness was assessed using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Paired sample t-tests modeled changes in study outcomes.
Results
Study participants (N = 41) had a mean age of 52 years and were mostly female and White; 86% attended >80% of sessions, and mean sleep diary completion was 6.7 diaries/week. Significant improvements in sleep from pre- to post-intervention included increased total sleep time, earlier sleep onsets, more regular sleep onsets, a higher sleep regularity index, and reduced daytime sleepiness. Extending sleep, as well as improving sleep timing and regularity in middle-aged adults with actigraphy-estimated short sleep duration and at risk for MetS, is feasible and acceptable.
Discussion
Behavioral sleep characteristics may be modifiable and present a novel behavioral paradigm for mitigating MetS risk. This pilot study provides a proof of concept for the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of a systematic sleep time extension for middle-aged adults at risk for MetS with actigraphy-estimated short sleep duration. 
FreshRSS 