Conectar
This paper aims to synthesise the current, global evidence on addressing psychological concerns of women presenting with domestic and family violence within the ED and suggest avenues for future research.
This discursive paper draws on clinical experience and research of the authors and critical synthesis of current literature on management of victim-survivors of DFV presenting with psychological symptoms in ED.
Academic databases and grey literature were systematically searched to identify relevant sources, and findings were narratively synthesised.
DFV victim-survivors often present with mental health symptoms in ED; however, many health professionals in EDs fail to correctly identify the underlying trauma and offer support to address DFV. The most reported barriers to DFV screening/identification include time constraints, privacy issues, and lack of education/training about DFV and its support mechanisms. As a result, only mental health symptoms are being treated, ignoring the broader psychosocial needs of DFV victim-survivors. Use of trauma-informed support models is recommended to address the mental and psychosocial needs of DFV victim-survivors visiting the ED.
DFV victim-survivors visiting the ED are often treated for their mental health symptoms without addressing their underlying trauma and risk of future victimisation. To address the ongoing adverse impact of DFV, it is necessary to ensure holistic and continual support from ED professionals for victims.
The importance of not only education but the implementation of sustained education and training programs surrounding DFV identification, screening, and cannot be understood. DFV is a global problem whereby many victim-survivors become healthcare patients. It would be poor decision making for clinicians to not prioritise appropriate responses to this societal problem within their clinical practice.
This systematic review explored the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) among nurses in emergency departments (EDs) and critical care units (CCUs).
Systematic review.
A systematic review was performed using both qualitative and quantitative studies from five databases (CINAHL, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus and PubMed). The literature search was conducted in May 2024. The PRISMA framework was used to guide the review process. Findings were subject to a narrative, thematic analysis and critical appraisal.
Eighteen studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria, yielding three themes related to barriers and facilitators of guideline implementation: individual-level, guideline-level and organisational-level. Key barriers included lack of awareness of guidelines, lack of knowledge and skills, attitudes towards guidelines, resource limitations, lack of perceived support, complexity of guidelines and lack of training. Facilitators to guideline use included colleague support, adequate training, effective leadership and refinement of guidelines to ensure relevance, local adaptation and user-friendly content.
Numerous barriers to nurse implementation of CPGs exist in ED and CCU settings, reflecting a complex interplay of individual, CPG-related and organisational factors. To facilitate CPG implementation, it is important for staff to be educated and trained in their use, supported to implement (including resource allocation) and that CPGs are designed to be easily implemented in practice.
This systematic review highlights risk factors for poor CPG implementation and highlights the importance of addressing awareness, knowledge, resources and support for CPG use through targeted training, leadership and CPG design.
An analysis of barriers and facilitators to CPG implementation among nurses in ED and CCU settings provides an important opportunity to address a gap in the literature, facilitating the development of strategies to promote CPG use and enhance care quality among nurses in these specific contexts.
FreshRSS 