Risk of emergency cesarean section when giving birth in Sweden: A nationwide cohort study comparing women born in countries practicing female genital mutilation, with Swedish-born women

by Bita Eshraghi, Jonas Hermansson, Lena Marions

Introduction

The impact of female genital mutilation (FGM) on obstetric outcomes in high-income countries remains unclear and is an area of ongoing research. This nationwide study aimed to examine the risk of emergency cesarean section among primiparous women from countries where FGM is practiced, in comparison to Swedish-born women. Additionally, the study explored whether a confirmed diagnosis of FGM contributes to this potential risk.

Materials and methods

A Swedish nationwide cohort study including primiparous singleton term deliveries (≥37 + 0–  Results

Women born in FGM-practicing countries (n = 13 246) had a significantly increased risk of emergency cesarean section (aOR 1.28, 95% CI: 1.21–1.35) compared to Swedish-born women (n = 199 914). Including FGM diagnosis as a covariate did not alter the result. When excluding women born in FGM-practicing countries outside Sub-Saharan Africa the aOR was amplified (aOR 1.58, 95% CI: 1.47–1.69). To further isolate the effect of FGM itself, we restricted the analysis to women born in FGM-practicing countries and compared those with a recorded FGM diagnosis to those without. This analysis showed no significant association between FGM diagnosis and emergency cesarean section (aOR 1.05, 95% CI: 0.90–1.23).

Conclusions

Primiparous women from FGM-practicing countries have an increased risk of emergency CS compared to Swedish-born women, when giving birth in Sweden. The presence of FGM diagnosis did not contribute to this risk. Further research is needed to understand the underlying mechanisms for this to be able to improve obstetric care for migrant populations.

Midlife and old-age cardiovascular risk factors, educational attainment, and cognition at 90-years – population-based study with 48-years of follow-up

by Anni Varjonen, Toni Saari, Sari Aaltonen, Teemu Palviainen, Mia Urjansson, Paula Iso-Markku, Jaakko Kaprio, Eero Vuoksimaa

We examined the associations of midlife and old-age cardiovascular risk factors, education, and midlife dementia risk scores with cognition at 90 + years, using data from a population-based study with 48 years of follow-up. Participants were 96 individuals aged 90–97 from the older Finnish Twin Cohort study. Individual cardiovascular risk factors assessed via questionnaires in 1975, 1981, 1990, and 2021–2023 included blood pressure, body mass index, physical activity, and cholesterol, and self-reported educational attainment. The Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging, and Dementia (CAIDE) score and an educational-occupational attainment score were used as midlife dementia risk scores. Cognitive assessments included semantic fluency, immediate and delayed recall from a 10-word list learning task, and a composite cognitive score. Regression analyses were conducted with dementia risk factors predicting cognition at 90 + years, adjusting for age, sex, education, follow-up time, and apolipoprotein E genotype (ε4-carrier vs non-carriers). Results showed that higher education and higher educational-occupational score were associated with better cognitive performance in all cognitive measures. Those with high midlife blood pressure scored significantly higher in all cognitive tests than those with normal blood pressure. Conversely, those with high old-age blood pressure scored lower in semantic fluency and composite cognitive score, but not in immediate or delayed recall. Other cardiovascular risk factors and the CAIDE score did not show consistent associations with cognition. Education appears to have a long-lasting protective effect in cognitive aging, whereas midlife and old-age cardiovascular risk factors were not significantly associated with cognition at 90 + years.