Conectar
To examine the information needs of breast cancer patients during the initial phase of treatment and to analyse the factors that influenced these needs.
Providing comprehensive and timely information during early breast cancer treatment is crucial for informed decision-making and effective coping. Healthcare providers must address these needs to enhance patient support and improve outcomes.
A cross-sectional study was reported following the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines.
A total of 123 post-mastectomy patients were selected through purposive sampling and completed the Thai version of the Sri Lankan Information Needs Assessment Questionnaire-BC (SINAQ-BC). Direct associations between demographic data and information needs were analysed descriptively, while bivariate analysis and linear regression were used to identify significant predictors of information needs.
The findings revealed that patients exhibited high overall information needs (224.7/260.0), with the greatest demand focused on physical care, treatment and diagnosis. In contrast, needs related to disease specifics and psychosocial care were less prominent. A total of 94 respondents (76.4%) expressed a particularly high demand for information regarding physical care. Education level was identified as an influencing factor, accounting for 7.7% of the variance in information needs among women with breast cancer.
Patients with higher education levels had significantly greater information needs. Nursing staff should provide customised information packages that are tailored to the participants' education levels. Further testing of the Thai version of the SLINQ-BC would also be warranted.
Patients are increasingly expected to manage their own care even as medical treatment grows more complex and technical. Nursing staff can contribute to the care of patients by being ready to evaluate, monitor and address breast cancer patient's individual information needs in the early stage of treatment based on factors such as educational level.
No patient or public contribution because the nature of the study's design, data analysis and writing did not require patient or public contribution.
To examine the influence of clinical and demographic factors on self-care behaviour and hospitalization rates among patients with coronary heart disease awaiting coronary artery bypass grafting.
Appropriate self-care behaviour can improve the management of patients with coronary heart disease and reduce hospitalization rates among those awaiting coronary artery bypass graft surgery. However, little is known about the influence of clinical and demographic factors on self-care or hospitalizations in this population.
A cross-sectional study.
A convenience sample of 99 participants diagnosed with coronary heart disease awaiting coronary artery bypass grafting surgery were recruited from an outpatient clinic of a public tertiary hospital in southern Thailand. Data were collected on clinical (left ventricular ejection fraction, symptom severity and comorbid disease) and demographic (age, education level and marital status) factors, self-care behaviour and hospitalization rates. Path analysis using LISREL was performed to examine the influence of self-care on hospitalizations, with clinical and demographic factors as moderators.
Path analysis showed that clinical and demographic factors accounted for nearly half of the variance (46%) in self-care, and that self-care accounted for nearly half of the variance (48%) in hospitalization rates.
Our findings demonstrate that clinical and demographic factors play an important role in self-care behaviour, and in turn hospitalization rates of pre-coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients. It is suggested that the period pre-surgery is an ideal time to introduce programmes designed to bolster self-care and minimize uncertainty among this patient population and that nurses are well-positioned to do so.
Study methods and results reported in adherence to the STROBE checklist.
Patients contributed their consent, time and data to the study.
To investigate the real-world experiences of nurses' using smart glasses to triage patients in an urgent care centre.
A parallel convergent mixed-method design.
We collected data through twelve in-depth interviews with nurses using the device and a survey. Recruitment continued until no new themes emerged. We coded the data using a deductive-thematic approach. Qualitative and survey data were coded and then mapped to the most dominant dimension of the sociotechnical framework. Both the qualitative and quantitative findings were triangulated within each dimension of the framework to gain a comprehensive understanding of user experiences.
Overall, nurses were satisfied with using smart glasses in urgent care and would recommend them to others. Nurses rated the device highly on ease of use, facilitation of training and development, nursing empowerment and communication. Qualitatively, nurses generally felt the device improved workflows and saved staff time. Conversely, technological challenges limited its use, and users questioned its sustainability if inadequate staffing could not be resolved.
Smart glasses enhanced urgent care practices by improving workflows, fostering staff communication, and empowering healthcare professionals, notably providing development opportunities for nurses. While smart glasses offered transformative benefits in the urgent care setting, challenges, including technological constraints and insufficient organisational support, were barriers to sustained integration.
These real-world insights encompass both the benefits and challenges of smart glass utilisation in the context of urgent care. The findings will help inform greater workflow optimisation and future technological developments. Moreover, by sharing these experiences, other healthcare institutions looking to implement smart glass technology can learn from the successes and barriers encountered, facilitating smoother adoption, and maximising the potential benefits for patient care.
COREQ checklist (consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research).
No patient or public contribution.
FreshRSS 