Delays in cancer diagnosis for patients with non-specific symptoms (NSSs) lead to poorer outcomes. Rapid Diagnostic Clinics (RDCs) expedite care, but most NSS patients do not have cancer, highlighting the need for better risk stratification. This study aimed to develop biomarker-based clinical prediction scores to differentiate high-risk and low-risk NSS patients, enabling more targeted diagnostics.

Retrospective and prospective cohort study.

Secondary care RDC in London.

Adult patients attending an RDC between December 2016 and September 2023 were included. External validation used data from another RDC.

The primary outcome was a cancer diagnosis. Biomarker-based risk scores were developed using Latent Class Analysis (LCA) and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO). Model performance was assessed using logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC) and decision curve analysis.

Among 5821 RDC patients, LCA identified high white cell count, low haemoglobin, low albumin, high serum lambda light chain, high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, high serum kappa light chain (SKLC), high erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), high C-reactive protein (CRP) and high neutrophils as cancer risk markers. LASSO selected high platelets, ESR, CRP, SKLC, alkaline phosphatase and lactate dehydrogenase. Each one-point increase in score predicted higher odds of cancer (LCA: AOR 1.19, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.23; LASSO: AOR 1.29, 95% CI 1.25 to 1.34). Scores ≥2 predicted significantly higher cancer odds (LCA: AOR 3.79, 95% CI 2.91 to 4.95; LASSO: AOR 3.44, 95% CI 2.66 to 4.44). Discrimination was good (AUROC: LCA 0.74; LASSO 0.73). External validation in 573 patients confirmed predicted increases in cancer risk per one-point LASSO score rise (AOR 1.28, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.42), with a borderline increase for LCA (AOR 1.16, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.27).

Biomarker-based scores effectively identified NSS patients at higher cancer risk. LCA captured a broader biomarker range, offering higher sensitivity, while LASSO achieved higher specificity with fewer markers. These scores may also help detect severe benign conditions, improving RDC triage. Further validation is needed before broader clinical implementation.

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of implementing a penicillin allergy assessment pathway (PAAP) versus usual care within the NHS.

A decision tree analysis over a 5-year time-period, informed by a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of PAAP and systematic review. Value of information analysis was also conducted to estimate the value of conducting a new trial.

Model inputs were informed by the ALABAMA RCT participants included in the primary analysis, 811 adults with penicillin allergy labels and recent antibiotic prescriptions, and data from published literature.

Participants in the ALABAMA trial included in the primary analysis: PAAP (n=401) and usual care (n=410).

Costs are presented in GBP (£) at 2022–2023 prices, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, incremental net monetary benefit (INMB), the probability of cost-effectiveness at the £20,000 and £30,000 per QALY threshold, and the cost effectiveness of a new follow-on trial.

PAAP had incremental costs of £–83 (probability of cost saving 47.5%) and incremental QALYs of 0.036 (probability of positive benefits 47.5%). The INMBs (probability of cost-effectiveness) were £806 (48%) and £1167 (48%) under the decision thresholds of £20,000 and £30,000 per QALY, respectively. PAAP was more cost-effective among females, people aged >65 years, and more frequent antibiotic users. A new follow-on trial involving 1267 participants was estimated to cost £2.4 million and, by reducing uncertainty in the evidence, would avoid £19.6 million in costs of incorrect management decisions for eligible patients over the next 10 years.

The PAAP was considered cost-effective, but significant uncertainty remained. Future trials with adequate power and longer follow-up are needed to determine the most cost-effective models for penicillin allergy testing.

ISRCTN20579216.

Global migration has steadily risen, with 16% of the UK population born abroad. Migrants (defined here as foreign-born individuals) face unique health risks, including potential higher rates and delays in diagnosis of infectious and non-communicable diseases, compounded by significant barriers to healthcare. UK Public Health guidelines recommend screening at-risk migrants, but primary care often faces significant challenges in achieving this, exacerbating health disparities. The Health Catch-UP! tool was developed as a novel digital, multidisease screening and catch-up vaccination solution to support primary care to identify at-risk adult migrants and offer individualised care. The tool has been shown to be acceptable and feasible and to increase migrant health screening in previous studies, but to facilitate use in routine care requires the development of an implementation package. This protocol describes the development and optimisation of an implementation package for Health Catch-UP! following the person-based approach (PBA), a participatory intervention development methodology, and evaluates our use of this methodological approach for migrant participants.

Through engagement with both migrants and primary healthcare professionals (approximately 80–100 participants) via participatory workshops, focus groups and think-aloud interviews, the study aims to cocreate a comprehensive Health Catch-UP! implementation package. This package will encompass healthcare professional support materials, patient resources and potential Health Catch-UP! care pathways (delivery models), developed through iterative refinement based on user feedback and behavioural theory. The study will involve three linked phases (1) planning: formation of an academic–community coalition and cocreation of guiding principles, logic model and intervention planning table, (2) intervention development: focus groups and participatory workshops to coproduce prototype implementation materials and (3) intervention optimisation: think-aloud interviews to iteratively refine the final implementation package. An embedded mixed-methods evaluation of how we used the PBA will allow shared learning from the use of this methodology within the migrant health context.

Ethics approval granted by the St George’s University Research Ethics Committee (REC reference: 2024.0191). A community celebration event will be held to recognise contributions and to demonstrate impact.

Multiple well-considered but siloed initiatives and programmes exist in Australia to support ear and hearing screening and assessment for Indigenous children. However, the lack of coordination of these programmes leads to inefficiencies in resource allocation and disrupts opportunities to implement a cost-effective, efficient, and easily navigable system of care. Indigenous children experience high prevalence rates of middle ear disease, as well as earlier onset, increased severity and longer infections compared with non-Indigenous children. The aims of this study are to: (1) Understand current ear and hearing screening programmes in three New South Wales communities and evaluate their strengths and limitations, (2) Strengthen, implement and evaluate ear and hearing screening programmes and (3) Identify the barriers and facilitators for scaling strengthened ear and hearing screening programmes nationally and the importance and feasibility of each factor.

A series of desktop searches and co-design workshops will be completed to achieve aim (1) and (2) and the results will be mapped into work-as-done and work-as-imagined using the Functional Resonance Analysis Method. Strengthened screening programmes will be implemented in communities using the criteria from national and international guidance documents and the Practical, Robust, Implementation and Sustainability Model and evaluated. Finally, workshops will be conducted with key stakeholders to identify the barriers and facilitators for scaling strengthened ear and hearing screening programmes nationally and the importance and feasibility of each factor.

This project has received ethics approval from the Aboriginal Health and Medical Research Council Human Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 2350/24). Results will be disseminated to the community through the CEOs of the Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisations as well as published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences. The findings from data collected will be used to inform the co-production of an enhanced system for ear and hearing care.

Streptococcus pneumoniae serotype 3 (SPN3) remains a significant contributor to invasive pneumococcal disease globally, despite its inclusion in widely administered vaccines. The next generation of pneumococcal vaccines may confer better protection against this serotype, reducing disease burden. We describe an ethically approved protocol for a double-blind randomised controlled trial assessing the impact of VAXNEUVANCE (15-valent pneumococcal conjugated vaccine (PCV15)) and 0.9% saline (placebo) on the acquisition, density and duration of SPN3 carriage using a controlled human infection model.

Healthy adults aged 18–50 years will be randomised 1:1 to receive PCV15 or placebo. Participants will be considered enrolled on the trial at vaccination. One month following vaccination, all participants will be intranasally inoculated with SPN3. Following inoculation, participants will be followed up on days 2, 7, 14 and 28 to monitor safety, SPN3 colonisation status, density and duration, as well as immune responses. The primary endpoint of the study is to assess the rate of SPN3 acquisition between vaccinated and unvaccinated participants defined by classical microbiological methods. Secondary endpoints will determine the density and duration of SPN3 colonisation and compare the immune responses between study groups. An exploratory cohort of 5 participants will be asked to consent to a nasal biopsy procedure during a screening visit and a second nasal biopsy 28 days after PCV15 vaccination. This cohort will only receive PCV15 and will not be challenged. Through this exploratory cohort, we will explore gene expression changes induced by PCV15 vaccination and their visualisation (spatial location) within the nasal tissue.

This protocol has been reviewed by the sponsor, funder and external peer reviewers. The study is approved by the NHS Research and Ethics Committee (Reference: 24/SC/0388) and by the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (Reference: CTA 21584/0485/001-0001).

NCT06731374 – ISRCTN91656864.

Outcome measures used in sciatica research lack standardisation, making it difficult to combine data for analysis. This scoping review identified and categorised Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) employed in randomised controlled trials investigating sciatica interventions, providing a foundation for developing a consensus-based core outcome set.

Scoping review.

A systematic search was conducted across MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Central for research published between 1999 and 2024.

We included randomised controlled trials that involved patients with sciatica and used at least one PROM.

Screening and data extraction were performed independently by at least two reviewers. PROMs were categorised using the OMERACT Filter 2.0 framework, inductively sub-categorised into domains, and then the frequency was counted to identify patterns of use. Collection time points and intervention type were also assessed.

187 studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies employed 69 different PROMs, collected 548 times across all papers. The Visual Analogue Scale for pain (n=115), Oswestry Disability Index (n=109) and Numeric Pain Rating Scale (n=74) were most frequently used. PROMs predominantly addressed the pathophysiological (n=274) and life impact (n=262) domains, with minimal attention to resource use/economic impact (n=12). Injection-based interventions were the most studied treatment approach. Follow-up periods using the same PROMs varied considerably between studies, with trends by intervention type.

This review identified and categorised PROMs from numerous research studies, revealing substantial heterogeneity in outcome measurement for sciatica trials. This demonstrates the need for a standardised core outcome set. The predominance of use of non-sciatica-specific pain and disability measures suggests potential gaps in capturing sciatica-specific outcomes. Inconsistent follow-up durations and administration methods further highlight the requirement for standardisation.

Glucosamine is a commonly used ‘over the counter’ dietary supplement. Previous research has identified an association between glucosamine use and several positive health outcomes. However, a plausible biological mechanism for these associations has not yet been identified, meaning the causality of these relationships remains unclear. A protective effect of glucosamine on the vascular endothelium has been suggested as one such possible mechanism. Albuminuria is an early marker of endothelial dysfunction within the kidney and is associated with progression of kidney disease and adverse cardiovascular outcomes. In order to provide insights into the potential biological mechanisms underlying a protective association of glucosamine use with health outcomes, we evaluated evidence for an association between glucosamine use and albuminuria in UK Biobank (N=436 200).

Univariable and multivariable ordinal logistic regression were performed to evaluate evidence for an association between self-reported glucosamine use and albuminuria (measured as urine albumin creatinine ratio (uACR) categories). As a secondary analysis, we performed Mendelian randomisation (MR) to demonstrate the difficulties in inferring causality in this relationship using currently available data, using summary genetic data from UK Biobank and CDKGen (N=67 452).

We found that people who used glucosamine were more likely to be in a lower uACR group (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.83, px10^–16). This association was robust to sensitivity analyses and was maintained after adjustment for age, sex and measures of obesity. In our MR analysis, we found little evidence for an association of genetically proxied glucosamine use on albuminuria (change in log uACR (mg/g) per SD change in genetic liability=1.11, 95% CI –3.01 to 5.23, p=0.60).

We found that detectable albuminuria was common in UK Biobank participants and we are the first to show that use of glucosamine supplements was associated with lower levels. Though this fits with a plausible biological role of the vascular endothelium in a potential protective effect of glucosamine use on many health outcomes, whether this relationship is causal or confounded remains unclear. We further discuss the inherent difficulties in using genetic instruments to proxy supplement use in MR analyses and highlight the need for a genome-wide association study of measured circulating glucosamine levels.

Radioembolisation (RE) is gaining traction as a robust treatment option for patients with hepatocellular cancer (HCC) across all cancer stages. RE allows the delivery of targeted high-dose radiation directly to tumours, with relative sparing of the surrounding liver tissue. Traditionally, radiation has been delivered using ⁹⁰Yttrium ([⁹⁰Y]Y)-labelled microspheres, either glass or resin. The success of RE is dependent on the dose delivered to the tumour. When using [⁹⁰Y]Y microspheres, dose prediction is calculated through a ^99mTechnitium ([^99mTc]Tc)-macroaggregated albumin (MAA) scan, which allows the calculation of the dose to be administered to the tumour. However, [^99mTc]Tc-MAA is not a true surrogate of [⁹⁰Y]Y microspheres, and this will impact on the final dose delivered. [¹⁶⁶Ho]Ho, like [⁹⁰Y]Y, is a beta emitter but unlike [⁹⁰Y]Y also emits gamma-radiation, allowing for quantitative nuclear imaging. The primary aim of this pilot study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of dosimetry-based individualised ¹⁶⁶Holmium ([¹⁶⁶Ho]Ho-RE) in patients with HCC.

15 eligible participants will be recruited to receive [¹⁶⁶Ho]Ho-RE. The primary objective is to establish the toxicity profile of dosimetry-based individualised [¹⁶⁶Ho]Ho-RE. The secondary objective is to assess efficacy as measured by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (mRECIST) and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) 1.1 criteria. Additional exploratory objectives include quality of life assessment and identification of a radiomic signature of response. The results from this study will be combined with the prospective iHEPAR study to form a larger analysis.

The study has received approval from the East Midlands—Nottingham 1 Research Ethics Committee—approval number 23/EM/0239. The study will be performed in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the principles of Good Clinical Practice. Signed informed consent will be obtained from each patient before study entry. The results will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT06302400.

Studying issues related to stroke medication non-adherence is essential for secondary prevention of stroke. This study aimed to identify the prevalence of medication non-adherence and risk factors among stroke survivors. The reasons behind this are that some patients may not follow stroke medication plans, and potential ways to help patients adhere better to medication plans.

This study employed a cross-sectional patient survey.

The study was conducted in 20 public and private healthcare facilities in a resource-constrained setting, in Punjab, the largest province of Pakistan.

We included 6538 stroke survivors aged 21–75 years with at least a 6 month history of stroke who were prescribed one or more anti-stroke medications and met the inclusion criteria.

The main outcome was medication non-adherence, measured by the Self-Efficacy for Appropriate Medication Scale (SEAMS) and self-reported pill count. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise study variables. chi-square (²)/Fisher’s exact test and independent t-test/ANOVA were employed. A generalised linear model (logit model using multivariable logistic regression shows that several factors are associated with medication non-adherence and adherence. Odds ratio (OR) plots were generated using Seaborn and Matplotlib.

Non-adherence based on pill counts was 49.7%, while the mean SEAMS score (31.3±7.7) showed moderate self-reported adherence. After adjusting for age, gender, marital status, education, income, health insurance, smoking status, comorbidities, stroke type, disease duration, blood pressure control, number of medications, dosing frequency, physiotherapy continuation, perceived side effects and doctor-patient satisfaction, we found that female gender (vs male: AOR 0.31, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.35), lower income (10k–25k PKR vs >100k PKR: AOR 0.31, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.41; 26k–50k PKR vs >100k PKR: AOR 0.57, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.68), primary/secondary education (vs postgraduate: AOR 0.74, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.87), controlled BP (vs uncontrolled: AOR 0.66, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.73), longer disease duration (≥5 years vs

This study addresses the significant issue of medication non-adherence in stroke patients in Pakistan, reflecting global patterns yet remaining under-explored locally. It emphasises the critical role of adherence in managing chronic conditions such as stroke, where consistent use of preventive therapies is vital for reducing recurrence and improving outcomes. While the non-adherence rates are consistent with global trends, there is a notable lack of observational studies and epidemiological data in the Pakistani context. Our findings support a comprehensive approach to enhance medication adherence, taking into account the complex connections among social, behavioural and clinical factors. It also highlights the importance of maintaining detailed records to monitor adherence trends, identify high-risk groups and inform targeted public health interventions.

Palliative and end-of-life care in the intensive care unit (ICU) is crucial for improving the quality of life of critically ill patients. However, no consensus exists on the most effective quality indicators (QIs) for assessing this care. This systematic review aims to identify and analyse the characteristics of QIs used in palliative and end-of-life care for ICU patients.

The Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis 2020 guidelines will conduct this systematic review to ensure methodological transparency and rigour. A comprehensive literature search will be conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Google Scholar, ProQuest, EBSCOhost, ScienceDirect and BASE. Studies published up to 30 March 2025, will be included. The quality of indicators will be assessed using the appraisal of indicators through research and evaluation tool, and the characteristics of QIs will be analysed using the Donabedian model of quality. Data synthesis will include thematic analysis.

Ethical approval is not required as this study does not involve human participants. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.

CRD42024513075.

The WHO Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) can improve patient outcomes through checks and enhancing the safety climate, provided the team engage. Patients are central to that team and may be awake during part or all of many procedures. Their greater inclusion in the SSC process could enhance its checking objectives by using patient knowledge of details relevant to proposed procedures, and its objective of improving culture by emphasising patient identity, seeing patients as individuals rather than items on a production line. We aimed to evaluate SSC use, including clinicians’ and patients’ perspectives, in cardiothoracic operating rooms (CTORs) and cardiac catheterisation laboratories (CCLs), and to identify opportunities to refine its use in these spaces.

We undertook a multimethod study based on positivism and interpretivism, with evaluation of SSC administration and interviews. We evaluated SSC administration during 20 Sign Ins, 20 Time Outs and 20 Sign Outs in CTORs and 20 Time Outs in CCLs (11 coronary angiography and 9 electrophysiology cases) using the WHO Behaviourally Anchored Rating Scale (WHOBARS, 1–7, where higher scores indicate better practice). We additionally interviewed 10 clinicians and 17 patients about their experiences and perceptions of safety and SSC use. We undertook thematic analysis of interview data.

CTORs and CCLs in an Auckland public hospital.

We observed 171 clinicians during 20 cases. We interviewed 10 clinicians (Pakeha/New Zealand/European n=6; male n=5; doctor n=5). We interviewed 17 patients (Pakeha/New Zealand/European n=12; male n=10; age range 45–81 years).

In CTORs, the SSC was used in full: median (IQR) WHOBARS score was 5.9 (5.2, 6.5). In CCLs, its use differed between electrophysiology and angiography CCLs: median (IQR) WHOBARS score was 4.50 (3.2, 5.6). In both CTORs and CCLs, high levels of carefulness and respect between team members were observed. Clinicians described the SSC as valuable and identified context-related reasons for variations in its use. Patients wanted to feel cared for and respected (including culturally). The SSC contributed positively to this. Clinicians expressed reservations about increasing patients’ involvement with the SSC. However, patients’ comments supported their increased engagement in the SSC process (including establishing their preferred names).

The SSC is used at Auckland City Hospital with some variation between services and with high levels of carefulness and respect. The SSC increased patients’ sense of being cared for. With modification (eg, by verifying their preferred name during the Sign In phase), the SSC could enhance patients’ perception of being seen as individuals, their cultural safety and the safety climate in operating and procedure rooms, and hence potentially improve patient outcomes. Our findings reinforce the value of regular evaluation and context-relevant modification of SSC for its effective use.

This study sought to explore decision making among caregivers of children with cancer in Pakistan, one of the largest lower middle-income countries in the world.

Cross-sectional survey study

This study was conducted in Pakistan at Indus Hospital and Health Network in Karachi and Children’s Hospital of Lahore. Children’s Hospital of Lahore is a public sector hospital, and Indus Hospital has a foundation-based funding structure. Both are larger tertiary care centers. Over 2,500 new patients are seen at these centers annually, this accounts for almost 50% of all children with cancer in Pakistan

Eligible participants included bedside caregivers, defined as a parent or family member involved in communication with the medical team, of children with cancer (

Primary outcome measures included caregiver priorities and experiences related to communication including decision-making role, involvement of the paediatric patient and decisional regret.

Participants included 200 caregivers of children

Findings from this study highlight the importance of exploring preferences for decision making and empowering bedside caregivers while respecting cultural norms. In the Pakistani context, it may be specifically important to consider gender roles and the inclusion of extended family members. Future work should investigate paediatric patient involvement in diverse settings.

Cellulitis is a common bacterial skin infection causing significant pain, swelling and impact on daily activities, frequently leading to emergency department presentations and hospital admissions. While antibiotics are the mainstay of treatment, they do not directly address inflammation, often resulting in persisting or worsening symptoms in the initial days. Corticosteroids, with their potent anti-inflammatory effects, have shown benefit in other acute infections but are not currently standard care for patients with cellulitis. This trial aims to determine if adjunctive oral dexamethasone can reduce pain and improve outcomes in adults with cellulitis presenting to UK urgent secondary care settings.

This is a pragmatic, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, parallel group, phase 3 superiority trial, with an internal pilot and parallel health economic evaluation. Adult patients (≥16 years) with a clinical diagnosis of cellulitis (at any body site except the orbit) presenting to urgent secondary care will be screened for eligibility. 450 participants will be randomised (1:1) to receive either two 8 mg doses of oral dexamethasone or matched placebo, administered approximately 24 hours apart, in addition to standard antibiotic therapy. The primary outcome is total pain experienced over the first 3 days postrandomisation, calculated using the standardised area under the curve from pain scores (Numerical Rating Scale 0–10) across up to seven timepoints. Secondary outcomes include health-related quality of life (EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level), patient global impression of improvement, analgesia and antibiotic usage, hospital (re)admissions, complications, unscheduled healthcare use, cellulitis recurrence and cost-effectiveness at 90 days. The primary estimand will apply a treatment policy approach to intercurrent events.

The trial has received ethical approval from South Central—Oxford B Research Ethics Committee (reference: 24/SC/0289) and will be conducted in compliance with Good Clinical Practice and applicable regulations. Informed consent will be obtained from all participants. A model consent form can be seen in . Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations, and to patient groups and relevant clinical guideline committees.

ISRCTN76873478.

Distal radius fractures are the most common fractures seen in the emergency department in children in the USA. However, no established or standardised guidelines exist for the optimal management of completely displaced fractures in younger children. The proposed multicentre randomised trial will compare functional outcomes between children treated with fracture reduction under sedation versus children treated with simple immobilisation.

Participants aged 4–10 years presenting to the emergency department with 100% dorsally translated metaphyseal fractures of the radius less than 5 cm from the distal radial physis will be recruited for the study. Those patients with open fractures, other ipsilateral arm fractures (excluding ulna), pathologic fractures, bone diseases, or neuromuscular or metabolic conditions will be excluded. Participants who agree to enrol in the trial will be randomly assigned via a minimal sufficient balance algorithm to either sedated reduction or in situ immobilisation. A sample size of 167 participants per arm will provide at least 90% power to detect a difference in the primary outcome of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity computer adaptive test scores of 4 points at 1 year from treatment. Primary analyses will employ a linear mixed model to estimate the treatment effect at 1 year. Secondary outcomes include additional measures of perceived pain, complications, radiographic angulation, satisfaction and additional procedures (revisions, refractures, reductions and reoperations).

Ethical approval was obtained from the following local Institutional Review Boards: Advarra, serving as the single Institutional Review Board, approved the study (Pro00062090) in April 2022. The Hospital for Sick Children (Toronto, ON, Canada) did not rely on Advarra and received separate approval from their local Research Ethics Board (REB; REB number: 1000079992) on 19 July 2023. Results will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at international conference meetings.

NCT05131685.