Conectar
To identify instruments for measuring nurses' well-being at work, evaluate their dimensions, validity, reliability, and determine the most comprehensive of all.
Systematic literature review of measurement properties.
Science Direct, PubMed, ProQuest, EBSCO, Scopus, Sage, and Google Scholar for all periods.
Quantitative research articles that provide information on psychometric testing of instruments for measuring nurses' well-being were analyzed, excluding non-scientific, and non-English sources. The Consensus-based Standards for The Selection of Health Measurement Instrument (COSMIN) was used to identify the risk of bias. Terwee quality criteria were used to assess the quality of the measurement properties. The synthesis process was performed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024532860).
A total of 22 articles, covering 17 instruments developed based on different theories and concepts were identified. The number of items ranges from 5–69, with 1–8 dimensions, where the interpersonal relationship is the most widely used dimension. Only a few instruments assess nurses' well-being in particular units. Validity and reliability were tested through various methods, but none met all COSMIN criteria. GRADE analysis revealed that over half of the instruments had low-quality assessment results.
Instruments varied in structure, including the number of items, scales, and dimensions. The low-quality assessment results of most instruments highlight the need for better instrument development and validation, especially for nurses in specific units by considering their respective work culture and climate.
This study emphasizes the need to develop an instrument to measure nurses' well-being in certain units specifically according to the COSMIN guidelines to improve its validity and reliability. The results of such measurements can help management formulate effective intervention strategies and serve as a basis for further research.
No patient or public contribution.
Palliative and end-of-life care in the intensive care unit (ICU) is crucial for improving the quality of life of critically ill patients. However, no consensus exists on the most effective quality indicators (QIs) for assessing this care. This systematic review aims to identify and analyse the characteristics of QIs used in palliative and end-of-life care for ICU patients.
The Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis 2020 guidelines will conduct this systematic review to ensure methodological transparency and rigour. A comprehensive literature search will be conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Google Scholar, ProQuest, EBSCOhost, ScienceDirect and BASE. Studies published up to 30 March 2025, will be included. The quality of indicators will be assessed using the appraisal of indicators through research and evaluation tool, and the characteristics of QIs will be analysed using the Donabedian model of quality. Data synthesis will include thematic analysis.
Ethical approval is not required as this study does not involve human participants. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.
CRD42024513075.
FreshRSS 