Conectar
To investigate the level of humanistic care ability of oncology nurses, its association with empathy and emotional intelligence, and the mediative role of emotional intelligence on empathy and humanistic caring ability.
This was a cross-sectional study conducted in a cancer hospital in China.
We enrolled a total of 1189 oncology nurses from several cancer hospitals from December 2023 to January 2024. All participants completed three general questionnaires: the Caring Ability Inventory, the Jefferson Scale of Empathy-Health Professionals and the Emotional Intelligence Scale.
The overall scores for the three scales were 202.35 ± 23.89, 112.38 ± 18.85 and 137.49 ± 17.81, respectively. A positive correlation was detected between caring ability, empathy and emotional intelligence (r = 0.741, p < 0.001; r = 0.577, p < 0.001). And emotional intelligence mediates the association between empathy and caring ability in oncology nurses (0.233, p < 0.001). The total and direct effect were also significant (0.825, p < 0.001; 0.592, p < 0.001).
The study findings indicated that oncology nurses exhibit a moderate level of caring ability. Emotional intelligence mediates the relationship between empathy and caring ability, at least in part. Therefore, an increase in the level of emotional intelligence in oncology nurses could improve their caring ability.
When designing training to improve humanistic care, we recommend the integration of specific training relating to empathy and emotional intelligence into the training system.
Oncology patients experience multiple forms of distress and require high-quality humanistic care. This study identified a moderate association between empathy and emotional intelligence. Our findings provide further recommendations for nurse leaders in medical institutions relating to how the humanistic care ability of oncology nurses can be improved by specific training in empathy and emotional intelligence.
This study was reported using the STROBE Checklist for cross-sectional studies.
Nurse leaders organised this survey in their own hospital.
To explain how government policies affected decision-making on Nurse Practitioner and Physician Assistant employment and training within Dutch healthcare organisations, and how organisational and sectoral circumstances were influential.
An online, cross-sectional survey study.
A literature- and interview-based program theory was tested using surveys. Respondents from hospital care, (nursing) home care, primary care, and intellectual disability services were recruited using convenience sampling. Data analysis used descriptive statistics and inferential tests. Open-ended responses were analysed using thematic synthesis techniques. Survey results were clustered to assess verification, falsification, or refinement of program theory elements.
A total of 568 experts in hiring and training healthcare professionals participated. Respondents indicated that most government policies promoted employment and training. Organisational and sectoral circumstances caused significant variations in Nurse Practitioner and Physician Assistant deployment across healthcare sectors, shaping how decision-makers interpreted and acted on government policies. Specific circumstances within primary care hampered deployment.
Government policies stimulated training and employment by: (1) removing practice restrictions (scope of practice expansion, legal acknowledgment), (2) facilitating cost-effective training and deployment (training grants, billing options), (3) providing sectoral knowledge on deployment, training, and healthcare outcomes (funding research and a sectoral knowledge center), and (4) establishing sectoral agreements (on apprenticeships). Organisational and sectoral circumstances significantly influenced outcomes. Key circumstances included flanking policies, stakeholder support, labor market capacity, healthcare demand, organisational resources and aims, and type of decision-makers (medical doctor or manager/director). Familiarity with the professions stimulated deployment.
The refined and verified program theory supports designing effective skill-mix policies and facilitating Nurse Practitioner and Physician Assistant employment and training. Tailoring skill-mix policies can optimise outcomes. This offers opportunities for governments, healthcare funders, organisations, and professionals to contribute to healthcare quality, cost efficiency, and patient satisfaction.
Healthcare professionals were part of the study population.
To examine the association between nurse–patient mutuality (i.e., a good quality of the relationship between the nurse and the patient) and nurse professional quality of life.
A cross-sectional, multi-centre study was conducted across four tertiary hospitals in Italy.
Data collection took place from November 2023 to June 2024, enrolling 517 nurses. Both medical and surgical departments, as well as inpatients and outpatients departments were included. Data were collected on nurses caring for patients with chronic illness. Mutuality was measured with the Nurse–Patient Mutuality in Chronic Illness scale, which includes three dimensions: Developing and Going Beyond, Being a Point of Reference, Deciding and Sharing Care; Professional Quality of Life was measured with the Professional Quality of Life version 5, which includes three dimensions: Compassion Satisfaction, Secondary Traumatic Stress, Burnout. A Bayesian path analysis was employed to evaluate the contribution of mutuality dimensions to the dimensions of professional quality of life.
Nurses' sample consisted of 517 participants. The three dimensions of mutuality showed different associations with the three dimensions of professional quality of life. Specifically, Being a Point of Reference, along with Deciding and Sharing Care, was significantly associated with Compassion Satisfaction. The dimensions Developing and Going Beyond and Deciding and Sharing Care were significantly and negatively associated with Secondary Traumatic Stress. Additionally, Deciding and Sharing Care was significantly and negatively associated with Burnout.
As all the dimensions of mutuality were significantly associated with different aspects of professional quality of life, future interventions to improve nurses' professional quality of life may also consider nurse–patient mutuality.
Nurse–patient mutuality may be a novel area of research to enhance nurses' professional quality of life, with implications for clinical practice and organisational development.
Nurse–patient mutuality is a key indicator of a high-quality relationship, enabling shared goals and shared decision-making. Nurses' professional quality of life is one of the most important factors that influence their intention to leave. Little is known about the association between nurse–patient mutuality and nurses' professional quality of life. Mutuality influences nurses' and patients' outcomes. Understanding mutuality could enhance the professional quality of life for nurses, improving their compassion satisfaction and reducing their burnout.
We adhered to STROBE guidelines.
Patients were not included in the sample. Health workers were involved in the study.
Health research aims to improve people’s health by understanding the best ways to diagnose and treat conditions, and understand people’s responses to health problems and health promotion initiatives. Quantitative research, and more specifically randomised controlled trials (RCTs), aims to establish if an intervention works, for example testing the effectiveness of a new drug, using statistical analysis. In contrast, qualitative research focuses on understanding a situation, for example people’s experiences, perspectives and behaviours. Qualitative research can enhance RCTs by ensuring a more complete understanding of the factors that influence the acceptability of a new intervention and how it might be implemented in practice. A previous article in this series outlined how process evaluation embedded within RCTs can help understand how and why an intervention works.
Interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) is a widely recognised and well-established method of qualitative inquiry designed to explore personal experience in detail, focusing on participants’ understandings and sense-making.
IPA was developed in the mid-1990s by Jonathan Smith and emerged out of health psychology, and since the early 2000s has increasingly been adopted by nursing and health researchers more generally. At the time of writing, a Google Scholar search of the terms ‘interpretative phenomenological analysis’ and ‘nursing’ yielded more than 35 000 results. IPA is primarily interested in undertaking...
To explore why there is variation in implementation of multifactorial falls prevention practices that are recommended to reduce falls risks for older patients in hospital.
Mixed method, realist evaluation.
Three older persons and three orthopaedic wards in acute hospitals in England.
Healthcare professionals, including nurses, therapists and doctors (n=40), and patients aged 65 and over, and carers (n=31).
We examined mechanisms hypothesised to underpin the implementation of multifactorial falls risk assessment and multidomain, personalised prevention plans.
We developed an explanation detailing that how contextual factors supported or constrained implementation of recommended falls prevention practices.
Nurses led delivery of falls risk assessment and prevention planning using their organisation’s electronic health records (EHR) to guide and document these practices. Implementation of recommended practices was influenced by (1) organisational EHR systems that differed in falls risk assessment items they included, (2) competing priorities on nurse time that could reduce falls risk assessment to a tick box exercise, encourage ‘blanket’ rather than tailored interventions and that constrained nurse time with patients to personalise prevention plans and (3) established but not recommended falls prevention practices, such as risk screening, that focused multidisciplinary communication on patients screened as at high risk of falls and that emphasised nursing, rather than Multidisciplinary Team (MDT), responsibility for preventing falls through constant patient supervision.
To promote consistent delivery of multifactorial falls prevention practices, and to help ease the nursing burden, organisations should consider how electronic systems and established ward-based practices can be reconfigured to support greater multidisciplinary staff and patient and carer involvement in modification of individual falls risks.
The sustainable employability of healthcare workers is associated with quality of care and vice versa, but how both interact remains largely unknown. This study aims to better understand the underlying mechanisms that explain the interconnectedness between healthcare workers’ sustainable employability and quality of care by examining organisational practices in two hospital teams that work on improving specific clinical processes.
A qualitative study was conducted, where team leaders, department managers and healthcare teams were observed and interviewed about their experiences with, and perspectives on, the (organisation of the) respective clinical process and daily (quality improvement) work. Transcripts and field notes were analysed in accordance with reflexive thematic analysis.
The emergency room and operating room of a recently merged Dutch hospital.
A total of 49 hours of observations and 10 interviews were conducted with team leaders, department managers, (scrub) nurses, physicians and other allied health professionals. Interviewees were purposively recruited when they were involved in, or considered knowledgeable about, the clinical processes.
This study identified three mechanisms as a result of different organisational practices that affected healthcare workers’ sustainable employability and quality of care separately and set in motion their interconnectedness: routinely overburdened staff, prolonged perceived distance between staff and regular disregard of raised concerns by staff. Over time, as these mechanisms remained unaddressed, undertows of slumbering sentiments—discontent, distrust and inertia—emerged. These sentiments proved hard to bring to the surface and to resolve and, in turn, may further compromise sustainable employability of healthcare workers and quality of care.
In this study, we show how the relationship between the sustainable employability of healthcare workers and quality of care is set in motion by seemingly unrelated organisational practices. To benefit both healthcare workers and patients, leadership and healthcare teams are urged to prevent (undertows of) slumbering sentiments by recognising sentiments as important signals of dysfunctional circumstances and by effectively organising participatory practices that enable healthcare workers’ voice and input.
To pilot and evaluate the implementation of a structured Evidence-Based Rounds (EBR) education model in critical care.
A mixed data type design was used to evaluate Evidence-Based Rounds in a critical care setting. Structured observational data were captured and open-ended survey responses were submitted by attendees. Content analysis and descriptive statistics were used to analyse survey findings.
Seventeen rounds were completed between March 2023 and January 2024 with a total of n = 83 clinical staff members. From these, n = 55 staff completed and submitted evaluation surveys. Rounds were most frequently attended by nurses of all bandings including senior clinical nurses, support workers and student nurses. Evidence-Based Rounds were globally perceived as a positive and useful education strategy and staff were very willing to attend future sessions. Patient outcomes were not directly assessed and rounds specifically facilitated three outcomes: (1) helping staff apply evidence to practice, (2) building staff confidence in presenting clinical information and (3) supporting staff in identifying local improvements to patient care.
Evidence-Based Rounds are an adaptable effective model of bedside education within critical care. In our setting, staff perceived that this model facilitated the application of evidence in clinical practice and positively influenced feelings of confidence. Importantly, this education strategy empowered nurses to explore and identify improvements locally to patient care. Whilst this model offers a practical education approach to address some of the key critical care workforce issues, such as an expanding curriculum and loss of senior staff, it could also be widely adopted to other clinical areas.
Evidence-Based Rounds are perceived by staff as a successful bedside education model that facilitates nurses to apply evidence in practice. It is feasible that this strategy is a potentially sustainable, low-cost model for continuing professional development centred around routine clinical work.
No patient or public contribution.
Persistent somatic symptoms and functional disorders are conditions requiring a biopsychosocial approach to care, often from multiple professionals. The fragmentation of care common in most health systems results in unsatisfactory and challenging care experiences. Collaborative care networks form an important route towards improving outcomes and the overall experience of care for patients and professionals. While we have a good idea of what such collaborative care networks can look like, we lack knowledge on the practicalities of implementing change in such networks.
The core objective of this study is to implement change in a collaborative care network for persistent somatic symptoms and functional disorders care. Our questions were twofold: first, what are examples of realistic action processes to improve such collaborative care networks? Second, what are, in our experience, conditions for an effective change process in such a collaborative care network?
Participatory action research approach embedded within an active regional network between May 2023 and May 2024. The process was led by an action group who selected objectives and related actions with the aim of improving the network, leading to better care for people with persistent somatic symptoms and functional disorders as well as improving satisfaction among professionals.
ALK Netwerk Salland, a regional network of professionals and experts-by-experience, focused on care of persistent somatic symptoms. This network is based in the Salland region in the east of the Netherlands, centred around the city of Deventer.
The action group was made up of local stakeholders including experts-by-experience and health and social care professionals, facilitated by a researcher-in-residence. Other participants included members of the regional network who provided input towards the different objectives.
Over the course of a year, three objectives were selected and enacted, including assessing the resources of the network, improving knowledge of treatment options and improving the shared vision of care. The process faced some challenges, such as changes in action group members and a lack of resources and time to enact changes. However, by having a trusted and engaged team, working with an active network, we were able to enact significant changes to the network, which may be sustained and built on through the ongoing action group.
Future participatory action research studies would benefit from a trusted and embedded researcher-in-residence, meaningful involvement early in the process of experts-by-experience, and serious consideration of realistic outcome measures to monitor for evaluation of changes made.
This study evaluates how participants experienced and assessed a three-round Delphi study on the terminology of developmental language disorders in childhood. It compares participants who completed all rounds (completers) with those who withdrew early (dropouts) and aims to derive methodological quality criteria for future Delphi studies.
The evaluation is based on a Delphi study conducted in 2021/2022 across five German-speaking countries. After the final round, n=179 experts (40% response rate) completed a standardised survey assessing their expertise, motivation, reasons for discontinuation, time commitment and perceptions of questionnaire and feedback design. Responses from completers (n=156) and dropouts (n=23) were analysed descriptively.
Most participants had no prior experience with Delphi methods but rated the study positively and considered the topic highly relevant. Completers reported their subjective time commitment to be lower and rated the handling of the questionnaire more positively than dropouts. Feedback was used by nearly half of all experts and was more actively considered by completers. Lack of time was the most common reason for discontinuation.
The findings confirm the feasibility and acceptance of the Delphi method in interdisciplinary health research. In addition to established methodological principles, topic relevance, clear communication and time commitment emerged as key areas for expert motivation and engagement.
To examine clinical nurses' attitudes towards and self-reported experiences of family nursing in Japan following the relaxation of COVID-19 visitation restrictions. Particular attention is paid to early career nurses whose formative training occurred during visitation bans. The study focused on nurses' negative perceptions and emotional burdens associated with family involvement.
A quantitative-dominant mixed-methods cross-sectional study reported in accordance with the STROBE guideline.
Using a convenience sampling approach, a self-administered, paper-based questionnaire was distributed to clinical nurses in four general hospitals in Japan between January and May 2024. The questionnaire consisted of four parts: demographic and professional background, learning methods related to family nursing, 17 items including negatively valenced statements adapted from the Families' Importance in Nursing Care–Nurses' Attitudes (FINC-NA) scale, and one open-ended question. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and t-tests, and qualitative responses were thematically analysed.
Of 1921 nurses invited, 957 responded (response rate: 49.8%), and data from 892 valid responses were analysed. Overall, the nurses demonstrated positive recognition of family nursing as a professional value but also reported lingering emotional burdens and practical challenges when interacting with families. Early-career nurses who began practice during the pandemic showed greater uncertainty and lower affective engagement. Thematic analysis revealed five key themes: relational disruption, emotional stress, moral conflict, reappraisal of family engagement and ongoing barriers.
The findings underscore the need to structurally and educationally reintegrate families into nursing care. Simulation-based training, clear institutional policies and hybrid communication models are essential to rebuild relational continuity and support nurses' emotional and ethical capacity for family nursing.
The findings highlight the need to structurally and educationally reintegrate families into clinical care to address the emotional burden and ambivalence reported by nurses. Organisational support—such as clear visitation policies, simulation-based education and reflective opportunities—can help rebuild nurses' relational competence and confidence in engaging with families. Creating supportive learning environments, including on-the-job mentoring and team-based reflection, may further facilitate the restoration of family nursing.
This study addressed how prolonged COVID-19 visitation restrictions disrupted family nursing practice in Japan, created generational differences in nurses' competencies, and shaped nurses' perceptions of family involvement. Nurses reported emotional strain, feelings of being monitored and lack of time when families were present. Early career nurses showed lower relational engagement, while experienced nurses expressed moral distress. ‘Latent indifference’ was also noted. The findings provide valuable insights for healthcare organisations, nurse educators and policymakers by informing strategies to reintegrate families into patient care, improve discharge planning and strengthen training models.
The STROBE checklist.
No patient or public contribution.
To examine the relationship between nurse managers' empowering leadership, nurses' resilience and organisational learning from incidents.
Cross-sectional observational study.
Secondary data from a study conducted in June–July 2022 was used. The sample included 1049 nurses working in three special-functioning hospitals. The self-administered questionnaires assessed nurse managers' empowering behaviours, nurses' resilience and attitudes and behaviours fostering organisational learning from incidents. The analysis employed multilevel analysis with hierarchical linear modelling.
Nurse managers' empowering behaviours and nurses' resilience were significantly positively associated with attitudes and behaviours fostering organisational learning from the following incident subscales: make efforts to identify the problem, discuss safety in the workplace, identify and give feedback to address the at-risk behaviour. The interaction of empowering behaviours and resilience was not significant.
Nurse managers' empowering behaviours and nurses' resilience can contribute to attitudes and behaviours that foster organisational learning, even when nurses face stressful incidents.
Fostering empowering leadership in nurse managers and resilience in nurses enhances organisational learning and improves safety and care quality.
The reporting is based on the STROBE guidelines.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
To explore nurses' experiences of the adoption, implementation, and use of digital technologies during the Covid-19 pandemic in the UK.
A qualitative descriptive study.
A qualitative study using two data sources: qualitative responses from 55 respondents to an online survey, and data from in-depth interviews with 21 individuals. The NASSS framework was used to guide data collection and analysis. Data were analysed using framework analysis.
Respondents reported using a variety of technologies including video conferencing applications, telemonitoring, systems to support care management and telecommunication systems. The analysis identified a range of reasons why technology had been introduced into services, and a recognition of its value in a situation where otherwise care may not have been able to continue. During the pandemic nurses were expected to change their work practices very rapidly, and we identified situations where organisational infrastructure either supported this effectively or created additional burdens for the nurses' work.
Nurses had to adapt to new ways of working rapidly, with digital technology being one of the primary means through which communication and care were delivered. The Covid-19 pandemic provided a unique set of circumstances where layers of governance and many of the existing barriers to technology introduction were reduced.
It is important to learn from these experiences, to understand how to sustain innovations that have proved to be successful, as well as the factors that enable nurses to work effectively in this new environment.
This study adheres to the guidance for publishing qualitative research in informatics.
A public contributor was involved from the beginning of the study conceptualization. They had input into the study approach, were part of the team that acquired the funding for the study and gave input at various stages into the processes for data collection, analysis and writing up the findings. The public contributor is a co-author on this paper and has been involved in the writing and editing of this report.
To investigate the current status of workplace spirituality and moral resilience among clinical nurses and to explore the relationship between these two factors, thereby providing a reference for developing strategies to enhance nurses' moral resilience.
A cross-sectional survey design.
From February to April 2025, a convenience sampling method was used to select 1680 nurses from ten hospitals in the Pingliang area of China. Data were collected using the general data questionnaire, Workplace Spirituality Scale(WSS). Furthermore, the relationship between workplace spirituality and moral resilience was analyzed.
A total of 1657 valid questionnaires were ultimately recovered, yielding an effective response rate of 98.63%. The mean score for workplace spirituality was 102.36 ± 21.65, and the mean score for moral resilience was 41.76 ± 6.31, both indicating a moderate level. A significant positive correlation was found between the two variables (r = 0.231, p < 0.05). Multivariate linear stepwise regression analysis revealed that monthly income, department, monthly night shifts, and workplace spirituality scores were significant predictors of moral resilience (p < 0.05).
The moral resilience of clinical nurses is at a moderate level. Enhancing workplace spirituality can contribute to improving their moral resilience.
To identify enablers and barriers for scaling up non-communicable disease (NCD) interventions across diverse global contexts and to map these factors to the WHO’s health system building blocks.
A multi-method qualitative study applying the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to analyse data from multiple projects nearing or completing scale-up.
Global Alliance for Chronic Diseases-funded implementation research projects conducted across 18 low- and middle-income countries and high-income settings.
Data was derived from documents (n=77) including peer-reviewed publications, policy briefs, and reports and interviews with stakeholders (n=18) (eg, principal investigators, medical professionals, public health workers).
Various context-specific interventions targeting sustainable scale-up of NCD (eg, diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease) interventions at the community, primary care or policy levels.
The primary outcome was identifying contextual enablers and barriers to intervention scale-up. Secondary outcomes included exploring how these factors aligned with health system building blocks (eg, leadership/governance, healthcare workforce).
Twenty enablers (eg, intervention adaptability, strong stakeholder engagement, local empowerment) and 25 barriers (eg, resource limitations, intervention complexity, stakeholder burnout) were identified. Contextual alignment, supportive governance and capacity building were critical for sustainability, while cultural misalignment and socio-political instability frequently hampered scaling efforts.
Tailoring interventions to local health systems, ensuring stakeholder co-ownership and incorporating strategies to mitigate stakeholder burn-out are essential to achieving sustainable, scalable NCD solutions. Future research should focus on integrating systematic cultural adaptation, sustainable financing and workforce capacity building into scale-up planning.
Selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) is one of the treatment options available for spasticity management in ambulatory children and young people with cerebral palsy (CYPwCP). Although improvements in gross motor function one to two years after surgery have been established, evidence of longer-term benefit requires further investigation. Given the irreversible nature of SDR and the increased rehabilitation commitments required from families and clinicians, providing evidence of longer-term benefits is essential to support their decision-making. This study aims to investigate medium (3–5 years) and long-term (6–10 years) SDR outcomes in ambulatory children with CP and how SDR affects families’ lives over time.
This is a convergent parallel mixed-methods study using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as a theoretical framework. The study aims to recruit 90 CYPwCP participants, who had SDR at a tertiary hospital in the UK when aged between 3 and 14 years. Participants (parents and CYPwCP) will be invited to complete an online survey and attend the hospital for one follow-up visit 3 or more years after SDR. Comparisons will be made with existing data on objective measures and parent-reported outcomes collected in clinical practice at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months to understand the trajectory of changes. Semistructured interviews will be conducted with 18–20 parents/carers and 25–30 CYPwCP to understand their perspectives on the outcomes of SDR compared with their prior expectations. The Framework Method will be used to analyse qualitative data both inductively and deductively. Qualitative and quantitative study data will be integrated using joint displays.
Ethical approval has been obtained through the Coventry and Warwick Research and Ethics Committee (24/WM/0078). Findings will be shared through international conferences, peer-reviewed journals, social media and dissemination events for families and CYP.
Unfinished care—also referred to as care left undone, missed care or implicit rationing—has been widely studied in nursing but remains poorly defined and underexplored in the medical profession. Physicians play a central role in diagnosis, treatment and coordination of care, yet little is known about the extent, determinants and consequences of unfinished care in their daily work.
To systematically map and synthesise existing evidence on how unfinished care among physicians in acute care hospitals has been conceptualised, measured and empirically studied.
Original, peer-reviewed studies on physicians working in acute care hospital settings that explicitly addressed unfinished care, care left undone, missed care, suboptimal care or closely related constructs at the microlevel of clinical work. Exclusions: primary care, allied professions, adherence to guidelines, underuse at the population level, explicit macrolevel rationing, non-original reports, non-English, no full text available.
Five bibliographical databases PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, SCOPUS and CINAHL were searched in June 2024 to identify relevant studies.
Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts and full texts against prespecified criteria defined following the population, concept, context framework, with consensus resolution. Data were charted on study characteristics, terminology/definitions, measurement approach and findings. Methodological quality was appraised by the authors and an external independent expert using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Qualitative and quantitative findings were charted, then synthesised via a descriptive and thematic analysis.
Using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, 1971 potentially relevant titles and abstracts were identified and subsequently screened. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising three quantitative, three qualitative, one mixed methods and one quantitative non-randomised study. Only one study explicitly defined and measured ‘care left undone’, reporting that 78.3% of surveyed physicians had omitted at least one necessary care activity during their most recent shift. The terminology and clarity of concepts varied significantly across the studies (eg, ‘shortcuts’, ‘missed opportunities’, ‘suboptimal care’). Identified drivers emerged at both organisational (eg, high workload, poor communication) and individual (eg, burnout, fatigue) levels. While two studies connected care left undone to adverse patient outcomes (eg, readmissions) and worse physician well-being, the overall evidence on its prevalence and consequences remains limited. Overall methodological quality of the included studies was moderate, but conceptual and theoretical development remained limited.
This scoping review reveals major conceptual and empirical gaps in the study of unfinished care among physicians. Terminology is inconsistent, theoretical grounding is weak, and validated measurement tools are lacking. Evidence on prevalence, determinants and consequences remains scarce and largely descriptive. To advance the field, future research must establish conceptual clarity, achieve terminological consensus and develop robust, validated instruments to capture how unfinished care manifests within complex clinical systems.
To synthesise the perspectives of healthcare professionals and patients/residents of hospitals/nursing homes about determinants of inappropriate indwelling urinary catheter (IUC) use and strategies for reduction.
Qualitative evidence synthesis.
We searched MEDLINE, Scopus and CINAHL for studies published between 1 January 2000 and 23 May 2025.
Studies were eligible if they used qualitative methods to explore the perceptions and experiences of healthcare professionals and patients/residents of hospitals/nursing homes or their family members regarding the determinants of IUC use and reduction. Included studies focused on behavioural drivers or strategies to reduce inappropriate IUC use.
Two independent authors reviewed the search results, extracted and coded data, and assessed methodological strengths and limitations of studies. We used a thematic synthesis approach following the Cochrane–Campbell Handbook for Qualitative Evidence Synthesis and applied the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation–Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research approach to assess confidence in the findings.
We synthesised 24 studies. Perceived determinants of inappropriate IUC use included non-adherence to guidelines due to vague indications for initial IUC insertion, differing perspectives on benefits and risks, low priority given to the topic, limited accessibility or perceived unsuitability of alternatives, high nurse workload and staff shortages (moderate confidence). Ineffective nurse–physician communication, documentation difficulties and lack of training were also assumed to be linked to inappropriate IUC use (low confidence). Mentioned strategies for the reduction of inappropriate IUC use included additional training for healthcare professionals, clinician reminders to review or remove catheters, improved electronic documentation systems, increased staffing and greater use of IUC alternatives.
Key drivers of inappropriate IUC use are vague indications and routine decisions, lack of suitable and available alternatives, staff shortages and perceived lack of importance of the topic. Addressing these barriers is important for deimplementing inappropriate IUC use, and multifaceted strategies appear to be the most promising approach to address the multiple factors that drive current IUC misuse.
CRD42024531522.
To contextualise an existing suicide prevention programme, and to assess the effectiveness, feasibility and acceptability of the contextualised suicide prevention programme among secondary school students in eastern Nepal.
A multi-method study is planned across four phases. The study will be informed by the Socio-Ecological Model. The first phase is a systematic review to identify available suicide prevention programmes, their effects and their contextualisation status. The second phase will be a descriptive qualitative study to contextualise the safeTALK suicide prevention programme for use among adolescents in a public school of Eastern Nepal, involving adolescents, teachers, parents, healthcare providers and policymakers. The third phase will be a single-group pre-post-test design to test the preliminary effects of the contextualised safeTALK programme among 110 adolescents at the public school. Outcomes measured in the third study will be suicidal ideation and help-seeking behaviours, using the Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale, and General Help-Seeking Questionnaire. The final phase will evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the safeTALK suicide prevention programme through in-depth interviews with adolescents, teachers, parents, healthcare providers and policymakers. Quantitative and qualitative data will be analysed using the Statistical Package of Social Sciences v.30 and NVivo v.14 respectively.
Ethical approval has been obtained from the Western Sydney University Human Research Ethics Committee and the Nepal Health Research Council. The findings will be disseminated via conference presentations and peer-reviewed publications.
There are no reported structured suicide prevention programmes for adolescents in low-middle-income countries, including Nepal. This study is expected to assist in mitigating the shortfall of contextualised adolescent suicide prevention programmes in low-middle-income countries. Additionally, evidence will be added to the global nursing literature, helping to contribute to evidence-based nursing practice.
Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): 12624000634572
This study aimed to explore and describe the experiences and perceptions of mothers of children with leukaemia regarding the transition of care from hospital to home.
A qualitative content analysis with a conventional approach was employed, and this report follows the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist.
Thirteen mothers of children with leukaemia were recruited using purposive sampling from two Iranian paediatric hospitals. Data were collected through in-depth, semi-structured interviews conducted between 2023 and 2024 and analysed using conventional qualitative content analysis.
Drowning in the Vortex of Fear and Doubt emerged as the central theme, encapsulating the shared experiences of mothers of children with leukaemia. This overarching theme comprised five categories: (1) Fear of Unpredictable and Life-Threatening Complications, (2) Paradoxical Concerns About Discharge, (3) Doubts and Hopelessness About Treatment Effectiveness, (4) Stress Regarding the Child's Future Life Trajectory and (5) Sense of Helplessness in Alleviating the Child's Suffering.
The findings underscore the need to provide comprehensive supportive services for parents of children with leukaemia. Policymakers and healthcare teams should prioritise initiatives that enhance parental awareness, deliver psychosocial support and empower families to navigate the arduous path of care and treatment with greater trust and confidence.
Ensuring the well-being and comfort of both the child with cancer and the parents throughout the treatment process is essential for improving care outcomes.
The study is reported according to the COREQ.
Mothers of children with leukaemia participated as interviewees and contributed to ensuring the rigour of the study through data validation.
FreshRSS 