The development of effective vaccines targeting human papillomavirus (HPV) has significantly contributed to disease prevention, highly relevant in immunosuppressed patients who have higher incidence of HPV-related cancers than their non-immunosuppressed counterparts. However, the acceptance and uptake of the HPV vaccine among immunosuppressed individuals pose unique challenges. Immunocompromised patients’ acceptance of the HPV vaccine is influenced by multifaceted factors, including concerns about safety and effectiveness, interactions with immunosuppressive medications and uncertainties due to their compromised immunity. This systematic review aims to identify the main factors influencing HPV vaccine acceptance among immunosuppressed patients.

A comprehensive search strategy will be executed across databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and Cochrane Database. The review will encompass the three WHO-endorsed HPV vaccines (quadrivalent, bivalent and nonavalent) and will consider studies related to HPV vaccines and their administration. The scope includes study focusing on immunosuppressed patients who received organ transplants, cancer treatments or are HIV-positive. No temporal restrictions will be applied, and searches will be conducted until December 2025. Observational studies, including retrospective/prospective cohorts, case–control and cross-sectional studies, reporting factors influencing HPV vaccination in immunosuppressed populations will be included. Studies with overlapping patient populations will be excluded. Data extraction will include study details, demographics, vaccine type, risk/protective factors, outcomes and medical history. Validation and cross-verification will ensure data accuracy. Risk of bias will be assessed using ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions), and GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) will rate evidence certainty. Meta-analysis, guided by Cochrane and PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, will employ fixed/random-effects models, assessing heterogeneity using I² statistics.

This research will analyse previously published data, so ethical approval is not required. The results of the systematic review will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

CRD42023452537.

Young-onset type 2 diabetes (YOD), diagnosed before 40 years of age, entails a high disease burden and potential for early dependence on disability benefits. The risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D) varies with socio-economic status and ethnic background, yet the relationship between these factors and age at diagnosis is insufficiently explored. We aimed to study associations between YOD and living on disability benefits, educational level and country background.

Cross-sectional data on 8640 individuals with T2D, linked to data on educational level and country background, were compared with population data from the same residential areas. Similar comparisons were made for data on disability benefits among 3854 individuals of working age (

The risk of being dependent on disability benefits was three times higher in YOD (adjusted incidence rate ratio, aIRR (95% CI) 3.1 (2.7 to 3.5)) and twice as high in later-onset T2D (1.9 (1.8 to 2.1)) as in the general population. People of Norwegian background with low educational levels had threefold higher YOD risk (3.3 (2.4 to 4.4)) than those with a tertiary degree, while people of non-Western backgrounds with low educational levels had a smaller increase in YOD risk (1.5 (1.1 to 2.1)). People of non-Western backgrounds had higher YOD risk than those of Norwegian background (4.2 (3.5 to 5.0)), while people of south Asian background had an even greater relative YOD risk (9.0 (7.3 to 11.0)), threefold higher than for later-onset T2D (3.2 (2.8 to 3.7)).

Lifetime risk of being dependent on disability benefits was substantially higher for individuals with YOD than in later onset T2D. Non-Western and particularly south Asian backgrounds were associated with increased YOD risk. Low education was an important YOD risk factor only for people with Norwegian background.

Various psychological, cognitive, behavioural, medication and neurostimulation treatments can improve the outcomes of people with depressive and anxiety disorders. However, in usual practice, there is large variability in treatment delivery and treatments are poorly characterised. The effectiveness and quality of mental health services in the community are not accurately monitored and are poorly understood. At present, healthcare organisations, payers and policy makers know little about the quality of care they support. Similarly, patients and families have limited information on quality to guide choice of provider or organisation. It will be necessary to implement monitoring of treatment quality so that treatment and outcomes can be improved. This study develops, tests and validates a new, transdiagnostic outcome-focused mental health quality measure. This measure is based on routine, regular patient reports of their symptoms. It is designed to be aggregated at the provider, clinic, organisation or plan level; inform choice of provider; and be used to improve routine delivery of services and quality of care among patients with common psychiatric disorders.

The project analyses existing data with responses to a wide variety of items that are known to assess depression or anxiety and empirically selects symptom items for a transdiagnostic outcome-focused quality measure. The project informs risk adjustment and benchmarking of the quality measure by studying how patient, provider and practice factors, including health-related social needs, baseline symptom severity and diagnoses, affect outcomes. Drawing on these, the project specifies an outcome-focused quality measure that includes risk adjustment and benchmarks for improvement; and studies, at practices nationally, its feasibility and psychometric properties, the effect of treatment characteristics on the quality of care, and the effect of quality on health-related quality of life.

Results will be published. The quality measure is designed to be broadly relevant across community settings and populations and to be submitted for endorsement by regulatory and governing bodies.

Surgical oncology patients often experience doubts and uncertainties in the preoperative and postoperative periods, which can be addressed remotely through telenursing. Expanding telenursing services could contribute to more comprehensive perioperative care. We conducted a scoping review to characterise these telenursing services, identify their outcome indicators and examine the content of the care delivered.

A scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) recommendations.

MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, CINAHL, SCOPUS, Web of Science and Virtual Health Library (VHL), with searches performed up to 5 May 2025.

We included studies that implemented telenursing interventions in the preoperative or postoperative period in adult oncology patients.

Two independent reviewers used a standardised search to select and extract data from the included studies. Study characteristics were presented descriptively using absolute and relative frequencies, and the content of telenursing interventions was organised into a circular thematic matrix.

A total of 37 studies were included, published between 1996 and 2024, conducted in 12 countries and primarily focused on postoperative telenursing via telephone or video calls. Preoperative care focused on psychosocial support and guidance related to surgical preparation. Postoperative topics included surgical wound care; handling of devices such as drains, ostomy bags and catheters; instructions for returning to work and support groups for financial and social assistance. Outcome indicators were primarily related to care, including levels of anxiety, stress, depression and quality of life.

Oncologic surgical telenursing remains primarily focused on postoperative care and the delivery of personalised support. Reporting on the protocols used, frequency and duration of sessions, nurse training and profiles, integration with in-person care workflows and operational cost data could strengthen the knowledge base for perioperative telenursing in oncology.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurs when a blood clot forms in a vein. It is comprised of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism and can be potentially life-threatening. Patients undergoing surgery are at increased risk of developing VTE within hospital admission and 90 days after hospital discharge are collectively known as hospital-acquired thrombosis (HAT). Without the use of thromboprophylaxis, the untreated risk of VTE is reported to be as high as 40–60% in those undergoing major orthopaedic procedures and around 15–40% in the general surgical population.

HAT accounts for around 12 000 deaths per year in the UK. For patients undergoing surgery, there is good evidence for the use of thromboprophylaxis to prevent VTE.

Thromboprophylaxis is available in both pharmacological and mechanical forms. While there is a huge body of evidence demonstrating that pharmacological thromboprophylaxis significantly reduces VTE by 30–65%, the benefit of graduated compression stockings (GCS) has been called into question. The GRACE study (Graduated Compression stocking as an adjunct to Extended duration pharmacological thromboprophylaxis for venous thromboembolism prevention) aims to evaluate the adjuvant benefit of GCS in addition to extended duration pharmacological thromboprophylaxis (EDPTP) for elective surgical patients at highest risk of VTE.

GRACE is a pragmatic, multicentre randomised trial of adults undergoing surgery who are at high risk of VTE. Participants are randomised into a 1:1 ratio to either EDPTP and compression stockings (control arm) or EDPTP (intervention arm). Following randomisation, participants will undergo surgery and be followed up centrally at 7, 21–35 and 90 days after their procedure. All participants will be offered a bilateral full lower limb duplex scan at 21–35 days post procedure to capture any asymptomatic DVT.

The trial aims to randomise 8608 participants from around 50 National Health Service (NHS) and non-NHS sites in the UK over a 24-month period. The primary endpoint is any imaging-confirmed incidence of VTE within 90 days of surgery.

On 20 December 2023, GRACE received favourable ethical approval from the Wales Research Ethics Committee 3 Cardiff (23/WA/0350) and the Health Research Authority (IRAS 333539). The results of the study will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications, presentation at national and international conferences and to study participants via electronic newsletter and social media channels.

ISRCTN11667770.