Over the past 20 years, virtual reality (VR) has emerged in culture and healthcare providing a virtual world with audio and visual stimuli that can be immersive or non-immersive. Immersive VR has headsets with motion detectors that enable a multidimensional environmental experience with sensory feedback. Non-immersive VR provides a one-dimensional digital environment observed...

People living with Long Covid often find the complexity of navigating health services difficult. The nurse’s role is to support patients in this context. This includes ensuring they are sufficiently informed about what Long Covid is. The specialist nurses recommended the British Heart Foundation’s online resource - Long Covid: Symptoms, tests and treatments: https://www.bhf.org.uk/informationsupport/heart-matters-magazine/news/coronavirus-and-your-health/long-covid%23whatdoesfatiguefeel.

Information about Long Covid is also available via Long Covid Physio: https://longcovid.physio/

Every person...

Tobacco consumption is a significant preventable cause of death worldwide. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and associated factors of tobacco consumption among Cambodian individuals aged 15–49, utilising data from the 2021–2022 Cambodia Demographic and Health Survey (CDHS).

Cross-sectional study based on secondary analysis of the 2021–2022 CDHS.

Nationwide household survey conducted across urban and rural areas of Cambodia.

A total of 28 321 respondents aged 15–49 years were included in the analysis.

Tobacco consumption categorised as no use, smoking tobacco, smokeless tobacco and dual use. Descriptive statistics, ² tests and multinomial logistic regression were used to assess associations between background characteristics and tobacco consumption, with ‘no consumption’ as the reference category. Statistical significance was set at p

Among the 28 321 respondents (68.8% female), 91.8% were non-users of tobacco (reference group), while 6.9% reported smoking (predominantly males; adjusted relative risk ratios (ARRR)=39.29, 95% CI 29.70 to 51.96, p

While Cambodia has made notable progress in reducing tobacco consumption, the persistent challenges highlighted by the prevalence of smoking, particularly among specific demographics, indicate the need for targeted public health interventions.

The ‘time-limited trial’ for patients with critical illness is a collaborative plan made by clinicians, patients and families to use life-sustaining therapies for a defined duration. After this period, the patient’s response to therapy informs decisions about continuing recovery-focused care or transitioning to comfort-focused care. The promise of time-limited trials to help navigate the uncertain limits and benefits of life-sustaining therapies has been extensively discussed in the palliative and critical care literature, leading to their dissemination into clinical practice. However, we have little evidence to guide clinicians in how to conduct time-limited trials, leading to substantial variation in how and why they are currently used. The overall purpose of this study is to characterise the features of an optimal time-limited trial through a rich understanding of how they are currently shaping critical care delivery.

We are conducting an observational, multicentre, focused ethnography of time-limited trials in patients with acute respiratory failure receiving invasive mechanical ventilation in six intensive care units (ICUs) within five hospitals across the US. Study participants include patients, their surrogate decision makers and ICU clinicians. We are pursuing two complementary analyses of this rich data set using the open-ended, inductive approach of constructivist grounded theory and, in parallel, the structured, deductive methods of systems engineering. This cross-disciplinary, tailored approach intentionally preserves the tension between time-limited trials’ conceptual formulation and their heterogeneous, real-world use.

This study has been reviewed and approved by the University of Wisconsin Institutional Review Board (IRB) as the single IRB (ID: 2022-1681; initial approval date 23 January 2023). Our findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication, conference presentations, and summaries for the public.

NCT06042621.

To explore why there is variation in implementation of multifactorial falls prevention practices that are recommended to reduce falls risks for older patients in hospital.

Mixed method, realist evaluation.

Three older persons and three orthopaedic wards in acute hospitals in England.

Healthcare professionals, including nurses, therapists and doctors (n=40), and patients aged 65 and over, and carers (n=31).

We examined mechanisms hypothesised to underpin the implementation of multifactorial falls risk assessment and multidomain, personalised prevention plans.

We developed an explanation detailing that how contextual factors supported or constrained implementation of recommended falls prevention practices.

Nurses led delivery of falls risk assessment and prevention planning using their organisation’s electronic health records (EHR) to guide and document these practices. Implementation of recommended practices was influenced by (1) organisational EHR systems that differed in falls risk assessment items they included, (2) competing priorities on nurse time that could reduce falls risk assessment to a tick box exercise, encourage ‘blanket’ rather than tailored interventions and that constrained nurse time with patients to personalise prevention plans and (3) established but not recommended falls prevention practices, such as risk screening, that focused multidisciplinary communication on patients screened as at high risk of falls and that emphasised nursing, rather than Multidisciplinary Team (MDT), responsibility for preventing falls through constant patient supervision.

To promote consistent delivery of multifactorial falls prevention practices, and to help ease the nursing burden, organisations should consider how electronic systems and established ward-based practices can be reconfigured to support greater multidisciplinary staff and patient and carer involvement in modification of individual falls risks.

This proof-of-concept study explored the feasibility and acceptability of research cafés as a community-based model to engage racially minoritised communities in health research, with a focus on mental health.

Adopting a community peer research approach, a research team led by researchers from racially minoritised backgrounds, partnered with four voluntary organisations to conduct four research cafés. A mixed-methods feasibility design combined descriptive quantitative questionnaire data with thematic analysis of discussion notes to evaluate the impact of these cafés in South West London.

The study took place in Wandsworth, Kingston, Croydon and Sutton, in community venues provided by the voluntary organisations.

A total of 75 participants from racially minoritised backgrounds attended the sessions. Participants were intentionally selected based on age, ethnicity, location, mental well-being experiences and willingness to engage in mental health research.

Quantitative data were collected on participant attendance, demographics and feedback. Qualitative data captured participant perceptions and experiences related to healthcare and research.

The study took place between October 2023 and March 2024. Out of the 112 individuals who registered, 75 people attended with 74 contributing to the analysis (excluding one on the day sign-up). Participants were predominantly Asian/Asian British (62%) and Black/Black British (31%). All participants reported feeling comfortable and respected. Understanding of research improved for 96% and 95% expressed interest in further research involvement, most commonly the idea of joining a peer research network (64%). Participants also highlighted a need for training in research methods and communication skills for ongoing involvement. Five main themes emerged from the café discussions: (1) systemic barriers to accessing safe healthcare and mistrust of UK healthcare systems; (2) the need for cultural competence and sensitivity in healthcare and research; (3) research as a positive step for change; (4) barriers to research participation and (5) the importance of incentives and feedback for research participation.

Preliminary findings suggest that diverse and inclusive community-based partnerships are the basis for developing research cafés as a feasible and acceptable model for engaging racially minoritised communities in health research. They complement existing participatory approaches by creating inclusive, peer-facilitated spaces that build trust, improve awareness and generate high intention for future involvement and participation. Future studies are needed to test the model’s scalability across different geographic and demographic contexts and evaluate its long-term impact on research literacy, participation and equity.

The sustainable employability of healthcare workers is associated with quality of care and vice versa, but how both interact remains largely unknown. This study aims to better understand the underlying mechanisms that explain the interconnectedness between healthcare workers’ sustainable employability and quality of care by examining organisational practices in two hospital teams that work on improving specific clinical processes.

A qualitative study was conducted, where team leaders, department managers and healthcare teams were observed and interviewed about their experiences with, and perspectives on, the (organisation of the) respective clinical process and daily (quality improvement) work. Transcripts and field notes were analysed in accordance with reflexive thematic analysis.

The emergency room and operating room of a recently merged Dutch hospital.

A total of 49 hours of observations and 10 interviews were conducted with team leaders, department managers, (scrub) nurses, physicians and other allied health professionals. Interviewees were purposively recruited when they were involved in, or considered knowledgeable about, the clinical processes.

This study identified three mechanisms as a result of different organisational practices that affected healthcare workers’ sustainable employability and quality of care separately and set in motion their interconnectedness: routinely overburdened staff, prolonged perceived distance between staff and regular disregard of raised concerns by staff. Over time, as these mechanisms remained unaddressed, undertows of slumbering sentiments—discontent, distrust and inertia—emerged. These sentiments proved hard to bring to the surface and to resolve and, in turn, may further compromise sustainable employability of healthcare workers and quality of care.

In this study, we show how the relationship between the sustainable employability of healthcare workers and quality of care is set in motion by seemingly unrelated organisational practices. To benefit both healthcare workers and patients, leadership and healthcare teams are urged to prevent (undertows of) slumbering sentiments by recognising sentiments as important signals of dysfunctional circumstances and by effectively organising participatory practices that enable healthcare workers’ voice and input.

Countries face challenges in maternal and newborn care (MNC) regarding costs, workforce and sustainability. Organising integrated care is increasingly seen as a way to address these challenges. The evidence on the optimal organisation of integrated MNC in order to improve outcomes is limited.

(1) To study associations between organisational elements of integrated care and maternal and neonatal health outcomes, experiences of women and professionals, healthcare costs and care processes and (2) to examine how the different dimensions of integrated care, as defined by the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care, are reflected in the literature addressing these organisational elements.

We included 288 papers and identified 23 organisational elements, grouped into 6 categories: personal continuity of care; interventions to improve interdisciplinary collaboration and coordination; care by a midwife; alternative payment models (non-fee-for-service); place of birth outside the obstetric unit and woman-centred care. Personal continuity, care by a midwife and births outside obstetric units were most consistently associated with improved maternal and newborn outcomes, positive experiences for women and professionals and potential cost savings, particularly where well-coordinated multidisciplinary care was established. Positive professional experiences of collaboration depended on clear roles, mutual trust and respectful interdisciplinary behaviour. Evidence on collaboration interventions and alternative payment models was inconclusive. Most studies emphasised clinical and professional aspects rather than organisational integration, with implementation barriers linked to prevailing biomedical system orientations.

Although the literature provides substantial evidence of organisational elements that contribute to improved outcomes, a significant gap remains in understanding how to overcome the barriers in sustainable implementation of these elements within healthcare systems. Interpreted through a systems and transition science lens, these findings suggest that strengthening integrated maternity care requires system-level changes aligning with WHO policy directions towards midwifery models of person-centred care.

To examine how socioeconomic deprivation influences referral pathways to emergency departments (EDs) and to assess how these pathways affect subsequent hospital outcomes.

Retrospective observational study.

Emergency department of a large teaching hospital in the East of England, providing secondary and tertiary care.

482 787 ED attendances by patients aged 16 years and over, recorded between January 2019 and December 2023. Patients were assigned Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) deciles based on residential postcode.

Referral source (general practitioner (GP), National Health Service (NHS) 111, ambulance, self-referral, other), total ED time, 4-hour breach, hospital admission and unplanned return within 72 hours.

Substantial socioeconomic inequalities were observed in referral pathways. Patients from the most deprived areas were significantly less likely to be referred by a GP (4.7%) than those from the least deprived areas (14.7%) and more likely to arrive via ambulance (32% vs 24%). These differences persisted after adjusting for demographic, clinical and contextual variables. Ambulance referrals showed the longest ED stays, ranging from 347 to 351 min across IMD deciles (overall 95% CI 343 to 363) and the highest probability of 4-hour breaches (51%; 95% CI 50% to 53%). Self-referrals had the greatest rates of unplanned returns within 7 days (up to 7.1%; 95% CI 5.5% to 8.7%). In contrast, NHS 111 and GP referrals were associated with shorter stays, lower breach rates and fewer reattendances. Minimal variation in outcomes was observed across deprivation levels once referral source was accounted for.

Inequalities in how patients access emergency care, particularly reduced GP and NHS 111 referrals among more deprived groups, appear to underpin disparities in ED outcomes. Referral source captures important clinical and system-level factors that influence patient experience and resource use. Interventions to improve equitable access to structured referral pathways, particularly in more deprived areas, may enhance both the efficiency and fairness of emergency care delivery. Further research using national data is needed to assess broader policy implications and economic costs associated with differential access.

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) is a minimally invasive technique for surgical removal of tumours of the tonsil and lateral oropharynx. Surgical defects after TORS lateral oropharyngectomy are traditionally left open to heal by secondary intention, resulting in significant postoperative pain and secondarily resulting in delayed swallowing and discharge. Although multimodal analgesia can improve postoperative pain control, no studies to date have assessed the impact of adjunct surgical interventions for reducing postoperative pain after TORS. Buccal fat rotation flap is a regional reconstruction option after TORS lateral oropharyngectomy and provides immediate coverage of the open surgical wound. However, the impact of buccal fat rotation flap reconstruction on postoperative pain and swallowing remains unclear. This trial aims to compare postoperative pain outcomes in patients who undergo TORS lateral oropharyngectomy with and without buccal fat rotation reconstruction.

This protocol outlines a single centre, parallel, unblinded, phase II, randomised control trial. Inclusion criteria include adult patient (≥18 years) undergoing TORS lateral oropharyngectomy for early to intermediate stage tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma (T1-2N0-1 p16+/–) or early to intermediate stage salivary gland tumours of the palatine tonsils. Exclusion criteria include a history of prior head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, prior head and neck radiotherapy, retropharyngeal lymphadenopathy, bilateral lymphadenopathy, need for bilateral neck dissection, baseline trismus, opioid use or drug addiction, need for open surgery (transcervical lateral oropharyngectomy), free tissue transfer, or alternative regional flap, and pregnancy. All patients are planned for a TORS lateral oropharyngectomy. The intervention group will have a buccal fat rotation flap reconstruction, and the control group will be allowed to heal via secondary intention. The allocation sequence will be created using a computer-generated random sequence with a permuted block strategy. The allocation sequence will be concealed until the time of assignment. The primary outcome is postoperative pain intensity during rest and swallowing using the visualised analogue scale. Secondary outcomes include postoperative complications, other adverse events, patient-reported speech and swallowing, opioid usage, length of hospital stay, feeding tube dependence and blood glucose levels. The trial has a target sample size of 40 patients. Statistical analysis of the primary outcome will be analysed in an intention to treat analysis using a linear mixed effects model.

The study was approved by the University Health Network Coordinated Approval Process for Clinical Research. Study number CAPCR ID: 24-5894. All participants will be required to provide written informed consent to participate. Findings will be presented at national conferences and published in medical journals.

NCT06965738.

We aim to use an agent-based model to accurately predict the spread of COVID-19 within multiple US state prisons.

We developed a semistochastic transmission model of COVID-19.

Five regional state-owned prisons within North Carolina.

Several thousand incarcerated individuals.

We measured (1) the observed and simulated average daily infection rate of COVID-19 for each prison studied in 30-day intervals, (2) the observed and simulated average daily recovery rate from COVID-19 for each prison studied in 30-day intervals, (3) the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of each prison’s summary statistics and the simulated results and (4) the parameter estimates of key predictors used in the model.

The COVID-19 pandemic disparately affected incarcerated populations in the USA, with severe morbidity and infection rates across the country. In response, many predictive models were developed to help mitigate risk. However, these models did not feature the systemic factors of prisons, such as vaccination rates, populations and capacities (to determine overcrowding) and design and were not generalisable to other prisons.

An agent-based model that used geospatial contact networks and compartmental transmission dynamics was built to create predictive microsimulations that simulated COVID-19 outbreaks within five North Carolinian regional prisons between July 2020 and June 2021. The model used the characteristics of an outbreak’s initial case size, a given facility’s capacity and its incarcerated vaccination rate as additional parameters alongside traditional susceptible-exposed-infected-recovered transmission dynamics. By fitting the model to each prison’s data using approximate Bayesian computation methods, we derived parameter estimates that reasonably modelled real-world results. These individualised estimates were then averaged to produce generalised parameter estimates for North Carolina state prisons overall.

Our model had a mean average MAPE score of 23.0 across all facilities, meaning that it reasonably forecasted facilities’ average daily positive and recovery rates of COVID-19. Our model estimated an average incarcerated vaccination rate of 54% across all prisons (with a 95% CI of ±0.12). In addition, the prisons of this study were estimated to be operating at 90% of their capacity on average (95% CI ±0.16). Given the high levels of COVID-19 observed in these prisons, which averaged over one-third positive tests on respective 1-day maxima, we conclude that vaccination levels were not sufficient in curbing COVID-19 outbreaks, and high occupancy levels likely exacerbated the spread of COVID-19 within prisons.

In addition, data gaps in facilities without recorded daily testing resulted in poor spread predictions, demonstrating how important consistent data release practices are in incarcerated settings for accurate tracking and prediction of outbreaks.

The findings of this study better quantify how spatial contact networks and facility-level characteristics unique to congregate living facilities can be used to predict infectious disease spread. Our approach also highlights the need for increased vaccination efforts and potential capacity reductions to mitigate COVID-19 transmission in prisons.