Conectar
Biofilms are a key driver of chronicity and treatment failure in diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), yet clinical evidence quantifying their impact and management remains fragmented. This systematic narrative review synthesised recent evidence (2015–2025) on the prevalence, diagnostics, and management of biofilm in DFUs. A Systematic Review of the Literature (SRL) was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines across PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Library and ScienceDirect. Eligible studies included adults with DFUs reporting biofilm/bioburden metrics or interventions aimed at biofilm disruption. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 for randomised trials and ROBINS-I for non-randomised studies. Data were narratively synthesised by evidence tier (Tier 1 = clinical; Tier 2 = preclinical/mechanistic). Of 600 records screened, 25 studies met inclusion criteria (Tier 1 n = 9; Tier 2 n = 5; reviews n = 11). Over half of bacterial isolates in DFUs were biofilm producers, with multidrug resistance exceeding 90% in several cohorts. Fungi were detected in 31% of ulcers by qPCR but only 9% by culture. Tier 1 clinical evidence supports standard care components—debridement, antiseptics, and negative-pressure wound therapy—for improved healing, though direct antibiofilm outcomes remain limited. Emerging strategies (enzymatic agents, peptides, cold plasma, smart dressings) show promise in vitro but lack clinical translation. Evidence for direct antibiofilm efficacy in DFUs remains scarce. Current data justify maintaining guideline-based care while prioritising trials that integrate validated biofilm endpoints, standardised microbiological methods, and antifungal components. Distinguishing established from experimental approaches is essential to advancing safe, evidence-based biofilm management in DFUs.
Tobacco use is the most significant modifiable risk factor for adverse health outcomes, and early research indicates there are also significant harms associated with vaping. National targets aim to reduce smoking and vaping during pregnancy for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. While most Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people want to quit, cessation is frequently attempted without support, increasing the chance of relapse. Group-based smoking cessation programmes increase quit success by 50%–130% in the general population; however, they have never been evaluated in Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander communities.
The Gulibaa study is an Indigenous-led and community-embedded project that will co-design, implement and evaluate a group-based model of care to support Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women to be smoke- and vape-free. Staff of Health Services in New South Wales, Australia, will receive training to deliver a face-to-face group-based smoking and vaping cessation intervention. Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people who identify as a woman or non-binary, are pregnant or of reproductive age (16 to 49 years), currently smoke or vape at least once per day and are willing to attend the programme are eligible to participate. Up to 500 participants will be recruited. A mixed method evaluation approach will be implemented guided by the RE-AIM framework. Outcomes will include intervention reach, intervention effectiveness (determined primarily by self-reported 7-day point prevalence abstinence at 6 months follow-up), acceptability and feasibility of the intervention, programme fidelity and maintenance and cost effectiveness.
Embedding culturally safe support to quit during pregnancy can result in improved outcomes for both mother and child and immediately improve intergenerational health and well-being. Ethics approval has been provided by the Aboriginal Health and Medical Research Council and the University of Newcastle. Study findings will be disseminated to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities in ways that are meaningful to them, as well as through Aboriginal health services, key national bodies, relevant state and federal government departments.
ACTRN12625001050448.
Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a major cause of infection, hospitalisation, and amputation. Collagen-based dressings—especially collagen combined with oxidised regenerated cellulose (ORC)—are proposed to improve healing by modulating matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), stabilising the extracellular matrix (ECM), and tempering inflammation; some formulations also include antimicrobial or bioactive adjuncts. We conducted a systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidance. Adults with DFUs were eligible. Interventions included collagen-alone or collagen-combination dressings (e.g., collagen–oxidised regenerated cellulose [collagen–ORC]/silver, collagen–chitosan) versus standard of care (SOC) or alternative dressings. To ensure comparable outcomes, the quantitative synthesis was pre-specified and restricted to complete wound closure (yes/no, intention-to-treat [ITT]) from collagen-combination RCTs with aligned constructs; other outcomes were synthesised narratively. Meta-analyses were performed in Microsoft Excel using Mantel–Haenszel methods for risk ratios (RR) with a fixed-effect primary model and DerSimonian–Laird random-effects sensitivity analysis; heterogeneity was summarised with Cochran's Q, between-study variance (τ 2), and Higgins' I 2 statistic (I 2), and a 95% prediction interval was reported for random-effects. (Protocol not registered). Six studies (five randomized controlled trials and one single-blinded non-randomized comparative study; total n = 314) met inclusion. In a focused meta-analysis of the two collagen-combination RCTs, treatment was associated with a higher probability of complete wound closure versus control (RR 1.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05–2.72; I 2 = 0%). One assessor-blinded RCT of collagen alone reported higher 12-week closure versus a placebo dressing and was not pooled due to heterogeneity. Across studies, signals also favored collagen-based care for earlier area reduction and, in one trial, fewer infection-related withdrawals; mechanistic work showed reductions in MMP-9/TIMP-2. However, most trials were small and single-centre, comparators and adjuncts varied, follow-up was short (~8 days–24 weeks, clinical endpoints typically 4–20 weeks), outcome definitions were non-standardised, and key confounders (off-loading, infection management, vascular status, glycaemic control) were inconsistently addressed. Collagen-based dressings—particularly collagen-combination formulations—appear to improve complete closure when added to the standard of care (SOC) for diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), but the evidence is limited by study size, heterogeneity, and risk of bias. Larger, prospectively registered, multicentre RCTs with standardised outcomes and longer follow-up are needed to define clinical and cost-effectiveness and to identify which patients benefit most. Collagen–ORC dressings show promise as an adjunctive treatment for DFUs by influencing the inflammatory microenvironment and supporting tissue repair. However, the certainty of the current evidence remains limited, highlighting the need for further high-quality randomised studies.
This study aimed to examine the psychosocial impact and identify risk factors for poor psychosocial outcomes in healthcare professionals during the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Cyprus.
Healthcare professionals are in the forefront of the COVID-19 pandemic facing an unprecedented global health crisis, which can have consequences on their psychosocial health. There is a need to identify risk factors for poor psychosocial outcomes to inform the design of tailored psychological interventions.
Cross-sectional online study.
A total of 1071 healthcare professionals completed self-report questionnaires. Measures included sociodemographic information, COVID-19-related characteristics, quality of life (Brief World Health Organization Quality of Life; WHOQOL-Bref), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7; GAD-7), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-8; PHQ-8), occupational burnout (Copenhagen Burnout Inventory; CBI), and coping (Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced; Brief COPE). This article follows the STROBE reporting guidelines.
The prevalence of moderate to severe anxiety and clinically significant depression was 27.6% and 26.8%, respectively. Significant risk factors for poor psychological outcomes included being female, being a nurse or doctor (vs non-medical professional), working in frontline units (inpatient, intensive care), perceptions of inadequate workplace preparation to deal with the pandemic, and using avoidance coping. Depression and occupational burnout were significant risk factors for poor quality of life.
The findings suggest several individual, psychosocial, and organisational risk factors for the adverse psychological outcomes observed in healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic.
This study highlights the urgent need for screening for anxiety and depression and psychological interventions to combat an imminent mental health crisis in healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic. Pandemic response protocols and public health initiatives aiming to improve and prevent mental health problems in healthcare professionals during the current and future health crises, need to account for the various factors at play.
Type 2 diabetes is a prevalent chronic disease, associated with health complications, premature morbidity and significant healthcare costs. Optimal lifestyle behaviour control and patient self-management are crucial for improving diabetes control; however, they are difficult to achieve in primary care. There is limited research on the use of information from wearable devices to encourage behaviour change. This study will examine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a multi-component health behaviour intervention in achieving clinically significant reductions in haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) among general practice patients with type 2 diabetes.
The study uses a cluster-randomised controlled design, with general practices randomly assigned to either the Wearables Integrated Technology (WEAR-IT) intervention (n=15) or usual care (n=15). To achieve a sample size of 375 participants, 12–13 patients per practice will be recruited. Patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes will be eligible to participate if they are aged 18–75 years; have had poorly controlled diabetes (HbA1c≥7.5%), with the cognitive capacity and ability to access the intervention application via an iOS or Android smart device. The WEAR-IT self-management intervention combines information from wearable devices (physical activity, blood glucose and blood pressure) and the electronic medical record, with goal setting and coaching support. The intervention will be primarily delivered by the general practice nurse, with review and confirmation of goals by the general practitioner. Participants attending the usual care practices will receive standard care. Outcome measures, including HbA1c, lipids, blood pressure, quality of life, dietary and exercise behaviours and cost-effectiveness, will be collected at baseline, 6-month (primary endpoint) and 12-month post-randomisation. The primary analysis will compare the change in HbA1c between the intervention and control groups at 6-month follow-up, with long-term outcomes assessed at 12-month post-randomisation.
The study was approved by Bond University (BH00137). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal publications, conference presentations and summaries to participating sites and patients.
Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12624000957594).
The objective of the scoping review was to systematise the existing knowledge about skill mix changes among the healthcare workforce during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Scoping review according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Review.
Five databases including CINAHL Ultimate, Web of Science, Medline, Embase and Scopus were searched in August 2024.
The review encompassed original research studies published from January 2020 to August 2024, on the skill mix of healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Quantitative and qualitative studies were included without geographical or linguistic restrictions.
Data were independently extracted by two researchers, capturing details such as publication year, study title, country, target population, study purpose and methodology, sample size, analysed variables, results and recommendations.
A total of 13 563 records were identified in the databases of which 3962 remained for abstract review. 32 articles were included in the final analysis. 17 of the 32 papers were from Western and Southern Europe. The healthcare professions which were described in the studies were physicians, nurses, midwives, paramedics, pharmacists, physiotherapists, occupational therapists and medical assistants, of which the majority of the studies were conducted among nurses (n=16), pharmacists (n=11) and physicians (n=6). Most studies (n=9) concerned the adding of new tasks/roles and reallocating tasks in combination with teamwork (n=8). Research covered a range of topics, including psychological aspects of work, patient safety, work reorganisation, training and collaboration. Many studies focused on the challenges related to skill mix, such as the blurring of responsibilities and role ambiguity.
The research summarised in this review demonstrates the impact of implementing skill mix changes on healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in the area of mental health. The research highlights the importance of adaptation in response to pressures among healthcare professions and the entire system. Further research is needed to examine the long-term impact of skill mix on healthcare workers across regions and professions in crisis situations.
To explore neonatal survival by type of neonatal complications at birth and referral pattern for these complications by place of delivery.
Bihar, India.
Women aged 15–49 years who had given live birth between July 2020 and June 2021.
Prevalence of neonatal complications at birth, referral pattern by complication and neonatal deaths by type of complication.
Data were available for 6767 (81.8%) newborns including 717 neonatal deaths. The prevalence of at least one neonatal complication at birth was reported for 32.9% (95% CI 32.4 to 33.4) newborns, with the most common complications including difficulty in breathing (21.9%), high fever (20.7%), low birth weight (12.5%) and jaundice (13.2%). A total of 578 (26.6%; 95% CI 25.8 to 27.4) neonates with complications at birth were referred to another health provider, predominantly to private sector (68.1%, 93% and 78.7% from public facility, private facility and home). The complications with high referrals included meconium aspiration syndrome (64.1%; 95% CI: 61.1 to 67.1), inability to pass urine (54.7%; 95% CI: 42.1 to 67.2), difficulty in suckling (49.7%; 95% CI: 46.9 to 52.5), cold to touch (48.5%; 95% CI: 43.5 to 53.6), inability to cry (47.2%; 95% CI: 44.2 to 50.1), pneumonia (45.6%; 95% CI: 42.0 to 49.1), difficulty in breathing (44.0%; 95% CI: 42.5 to 45.6) and lethargy (43.5%; 95% CI: 38.4 to 48.6). Referrals were linked to higher neonatal deaths, in particular, among neonates born at home and referred for complications (84.7%; p
With one-third of the neonates reported to have complications at birth and those referred more likely to die, critical gaps in addressing neonatal complications at birth and improvement in the referral services are urgently needed to reduce neonatal mortality.
Modern healthcare is delivered by an increasingly multidisciplinary team, complicating workforce management. Patient safety inquiries have led to reports such as the Francis and Berwick reports (2013), which consistently emphasise the need for proper staffing to ensure patient safety. While nursing has seen progress with safe staffing guidelines, there remains a significant gap in guidance for medical staff. In the UK, consultants are the senior members of the medical profession who have achieved a Certification of Completion of Training (CCT) and are able to practice independently. The number of required consultants is based on population needs, and future consultant numbers are used to determine the number of doctor training positions. However, this approach often overlooks the specific staffing needs of individual hospitals, particularly regarding patient safety. Although a named consultant is responsible for patient care, the medical workforce that handles day-to-day operations in acute hospitals consists of a diverse group of staff who require varying degrees of supervision based on their competency and seniority. This group includes medical associates, such as physician associates, and resident doctors (formerly known as junior doctors) who themselves are a heterogeneous group needing different levels of oversight. As a result, the previous focus solely on consultant staffing requirements must be broadened to address the realities of patient care. At present, no single resource provides a comprehensive summary of staffing recommendations that includes all groups within the non-consultant medical workforce. This research aims to identify existing guidance for this part of the medical workforce to support healthcare management. The objectives of this study are, therefore, to identify guidance and recommendations for safe staffing levels from a patient safety perspective for non-consultant medical staff in UK acute hospitals.
A scoping literature review was conducted and is reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines.
This used five search strategies: internal website searches, Google Scholar searches, general Google searches, medical database searches via Ovid and a snowballing strategy.
English-language resources published from 2015 to 2024 that provide specific guidance on safe medical staffing levels for National Health Service acute hospitals in the UK.
Thematic analysis was employed to identify patterns in the diverse guidance discovered, using a hybrid approach that combined human and AI methods. The benefits and limitations of this method are discussed.
The review yielded 10 703 resources, of which 10 met all eligibility criteria for analysis. Identified themes include staffing requirements, staffing recommendations and a tiered system approach.
Medical staffing is complex due to the varying roles and competencies involved. While some guidance exists, there is a clear need for more comprehensive recommendations that go beyond specific specialities. Future research should focus on developing a medical safe staffing tool and addressing the barriers to comprehensive guidance, both of which would enhance patient care.
This study aimed to examine (a) changes in coping strategies and vicarious post-traumatic growth (VPTG) across three timepoints of the COVID-19 pandemic among nurses; (b) discrete groups of nurses with unique coping profiles and (c) the association of these coping profiles with VPTG across the timepoints.
Although literature abounds with the negative mental health consequences of the pandemic among healthcare professionals, much less is known about the positive consequences on nurses, the coping strategies that they use, and how these change over time.
This was a cross-sectional web-based survey at three timepoints during the pandemic.
A sample of 429 nurses completed online the Post-Traumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI) and the Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory (COPE) to measure vicarious post-traumatic growth (VPTG) and coping strategies, respectively. The STROBE checklist was used to report the present study.
Significantly higher VPTG scores were observed during the third timepoint. Different coping strategies were employed across the three timepoints. Nurses responded to the pandemic either with an active, an avoidant or a passive coping profile. Significantly higher VPTG levels were reported by the nurses of the active profile compared to those of the passive profile, whereas the difference between active and avoidant profiles was not significant.
Notwithstanding the preponderance of the nurses with the active coping profile in achieving high VPTG, the avoidant copers had more gains (VPTG) than the passive copers, suggesting that doing something to cope with the stressor—let it be trying to avoid it—was better than doing nothing.
The identification of distinct coping profiles among nurses and their association with VPTG is of particular use to policymakers and practitioners in developing tailored prevention and intervention efforts to help the nurses effectively manage the demands of the pandemic.
No patient or public contribution since the study was exclusively conducted by the authors.
Background
Public health nurse home visiting is a promising approach for addressing the complex needs of families at risk of child maltreatment. The Colorado Nurse Support Program advances service provision by using evidence-based practices to provide tailored assessment and intervention to low-income, primiparous, and multiparous families with children under 18 years of age identified as high risk by county human service systems.
Objectives
This study aimed to test the effects of the Nurse Support Program on child protective services case characteristics between Nurse Support Program families and a demographically comparable reference group of families and evaluate changes in parenting outcomes from pre- to postprogram involvement for Nurse Support Program families.
Methods
We used a matched comparison group quasi-experimental design in which families in the Nurse Support Program (n = 48) were compared to families (n = 150) who were identified using administrative data from Colorado’s Comprehensive Child Welfare Information System. Outcomes were child protective case characteristics (child protection referrals, open assessments, founded assessments, open cases, and children’s placement in out-of-home care) and parenting outcomes.
Results
Nurse Support Program families were less likely to have a child protection case opened or have their child placed in out-of-home care. There were no significant between-group differences in child protection referrals, open assessments, or founded assessments. Families in the Nurse Support Program showed improvements in parenting outcomes over time.
Discussion
Findings suggest that the Nurse Support Program is a successful public health nurse home-visiting approach to promote positive parenting and family preservation among families with complex needs. Implementing tailored public health nurse home-visiting programs, such as the Nurse Support Program, should continue to be evaluated and supported to mitigate the public health risk of child maltreatment. Las enfermeras nos planteamos las diferentes formas con las que podemos comunicarnos con nuestros pacientes, pero quizás deberíamos pro-fundizar cuántas veces somos nosotras mismas las que, prejuzgamos situaciones, y acabamos siendo las que ponemos barreras a la comunica-ción. El relato que a continuación describimos es una historia real, donde su protagonista, tras el seudónimo de Serafín, nos muestra cómo en las últimas horas de su vida, ni su mudez ni la gravedad de su enfermedad limitaron su comunicación con la persona que lo cuidaba y que a su vez era quien realmente lo conocía. En una residencia de mayores cuando las personas precisan cuidados paliativos, se trabaja con las ventajas de poder ejercer un cuidado que va más allá del confort y del alivio de síntomas. En este tipo de instituciones los profesionales han convivido durante años con sus pacientes y en muchas ocasiones, tan solo una mirada puede hacer que la persona muera en paz.
FreshRSS 