FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Which way? Group-based smoking and vaping cessation support for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women: protocol for a non-randomised type 1 hybrid implementation study

Por: Booth · K. · Bryant · J. · Maddox · R. · Ridgeway · T. · Maidment · S. · Martiniuk · A. L. · Chamberlain · C. · Eades · S. J. · Burchill · L. J. · Belfrage · M. · Bennett · J. · Doran · C. · Collis · F. · Mills · Z. · Foster · J. · Mersha · A. G. · Roberts-Barker · K. · Oldmeadow · C. · Lo
Introduction

Tobacco use is the most significant modifiable risk factor for adverse health outcomes, and early research indicates there are also significant harms associated with vaping. National targets aim to reduce smoking and vaping during pregnancy for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. While most Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people want to quit, cessation is frequently attempted without support, increasing the chance of relapse. Group-based smoking cessation programmes increase quit success by 50%–130% in the general population; however, they have never been evaluated in Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander communities.

Methods and analysis

The Gulibaa study is an Indigenous-led and community-embedded project that will co-design, implement and evaluate a group-based model of care to support Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women to be smoke- and vape-free. Staff of Health Services in New South Wales, Australia, will receive training to deliver a face-to-face group-based smoking and vaping cessation intervention. Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people who identify as a woman or non-binary, are pregnant or of reproductive age (16 to 49 years), currently smoke or vape at least once per day and are willing to attend the programme are eligible to participate. Up to 500 participants will be recruited. A mixed method evaluation approach will be implemented guided by the RE-AIM framework. Outcomes will include intervention reach, intervention effectiveness (determined primarily by self-reported 7-day point prevalence abstinence at 6 months follow-up), acceptability and feasibility of the intervention, programme fidelity and maintenance and cost effectiveness.

Ethics and dissemination

Embedding culturally safe support to quit during pregnancy can result in improved outcomes for both mother and child and immediately improve intergenerational health and well-being. Ethics approval has been provided by the Aboriginal Health and Medical Research Council and the University of Newcastle. Study findings will be disseminated to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities in ways that are meaningful to them, as well as through Aboriginal health services, key national bodies, relevant state and federal government departments.

Trial registration number

ACTRN12625001050448.

Developing ecolabels to encourage sustainable eating in restaurants: A randomized experiment

by Cristina J. Y. Lee, Joshua Petimar, Amanda B. Zeitlin, Caroline Collis, Lauren Cleveland, Aviva A. Musicus, Anna H. Grummon

Restaurants are increasingly adopting ecolabels to highlight environmentally friendly menu offerings. However, it remains unclear which ecolabel design is the most effective at encouraging consumers to select these items. This study aimed to determine which of 4 common ecolabel formats are perceived as most effective at encouraging selection of environmentally sustainable foods. We conducted an online experiment with 2,169 US adults in August 2023. Participants were randomized to 1 of 5 label formats, including a control format (e.g., QR code) and 4 ecolabel formats: text-plus-icon, text-only, icon-only, or numeric ecolabels. Participants viewed 3 label variations of their randomly assigned label format. Participants rated each label variation on perceived effectiveness for encouraging environmentally sustainable food choices (primary outcome) and other label reactions (e.g., thinking about environmental impacts; secondary outcomes) on 5-point scales. All ecolabels were perceived as more effective at encouraging environmentally sustainable food choices than the control labels (range of average differential effects [ADEs]=.26 to .82, ps 
❌