Conectar
To explore the views and perspectives of British South Asian (BSA) women and Positive Health Programme (PHP) facilitators on the usefulness and experiences of the PHP intervention for managing postnatal depression (PND) in primary care settings.
Qualitative study with semi-structured interviews to explore perceptions of acceptability and implementation. A patient and public involvement group provided their insights and feedback on study topic guides, analysis and outcomes.
We sampled trial participants from the PHP intervention database to ensure variation in geographic setting, age, socioeconomic status and ethnicity. PHP facilitators involved in the trial were also invited to participate in an interview.
Interviews with study participants were conducted at participants’ homes, and community centres, or via phone. Interviews with PHP facilitators were conducted via phone or online. Interview recordings were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis and subsequently the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) was applied. Recruitment took place between February 2017 and March 2020.
Thirty interviews were conducted—19 trial participants and 11 PHP facilitators. The PHP intervention was viewed positively, with appreciation of its therapeutic content and components such as childcare and refreshments that facilitated engagement. Participants reported improved confidence and well-being and supported their needs. Participants understood the intervention’s purpose. Both intervention participants and facilitators noted strengthened self-efficacy.
Some participants experienced difficulties balancing childcare and attendance, implying a need for logistical assistance. Stigma about mental health in the BSA community was viewed as persistent, recommending future programmes efforts on strategies to reduce stigma and develop supportive environment.
This study demonstrates the possibility of PHP intervention being integrated into routine care by providing culturally tailored support for BSA women with PND, primarily through family engagement and facilitator support. Future research on scalability, alongside community engagement efforts, will strengthen its acceptability and broader applicability.
To explore the perceptions and experiences of students raising concerns during pre-registration health and/or social care training in England.
Systematic review.
MEDLINE, CINAHL, ERIC, PsycINFO and Education Research Complete were systematically searched for studies published between September 2015 and August 2024. Grey literature searches were conducted using Google Scholar and ETHOS British Library. Reference lists from included studies were hand searched.
Joanna Briggs Institute methodological guidance for the conduct of systematic review informed conduct and the convergent integrated approach. Mixed methods appraisal tool was used for quality appraisal.
Eleven studies were included. Synthesis of findings generated three themes: (1) conflicting needs of self and others, (2) navigating the professional workspace and, (3) ‘choice to voice’.
Speaking up and raising concerns as a pre-registration student is a complex, multi-faceted and non-linear social phenomenon. Experiences and perceptions are impacted by the novice student position alongside individual, interpersonal and organisational factors. Open cultures within teams and organisations, leadership, support and feedback may enable students overcome barriers to raising concerns.
Raising concerns may reduce avoidable harm. Pre-registration students offer a ‘fresh pair of eyes’; however, they face barriers related to their student position. Synthesis of speaking-up experiences and perceptions of students in English settings can inform the design of learning environments which equip pre-registration students with the knowledge and skills required to cultivate safety behaviours. These skills contribute positively to safety culture and support learning and improvement in complex systems such as health and social care.
The review followed PRISMA reporting guidelines.
The conceptualisation of this project was informed by engagement events with higher education staff, students and Freedom to Speak Up Guardians.
First post-contrAst SubtracTed (FAST) MRI, an abbreviated breast MRI scan, has high sensitivity for sub-centimetre aggressive breast cancer and short acquisition and interpretation times. These attributes promise effective supplemental screening. Until now, FAST MRI research has focused on women above population-risk of breast cancer (high mammographic density or personal history). DYAMOND aims to define the population within the population-risk NHS Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP) likely to benefit from FAST MRI. The study population is the 40% of screening clients aged 50–52 who have average mammographic density (BI-RADS (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System) B) on their first screening mammogram. DYAMOND will answer whether sufficient numbers of breast cancers, missed by mammography, can be detected by FAST MRI to justify the inclusion of this group in a future randomised controlled trial.
Prospective, multicentre, diagnostic yield, single-arm study with an embedded qualitative sub-study: all recruited participants undergo a FAST MRI. An internal pilot will assess the willingness of sites and screening clients to participate in the study. Screening clients aged 50–52, with a clear first NHSBSP mammogram and BI-RADS B mammographic density (by automated measurement) will be invited to participate (recruitment target: 1000). The primary outcome is the number of additional cancers detected by FAST MRI (missed by screening mammography). A Fleming’s two-stage design will be used as this allows for early stopping after stage 1, to save participants, funding costs and time continuing to the end of the study if the question can be answered earlier.
The NHSBSP Research and Innovation Development Advisory Committee and the Yorkshire and Humber–Sheffield Research Ethics Committee (23/YH/0268, study ID (IRAS): 330059) approved this research protocol. Participation involves a two-stage informed consent process, enabling screening for eligibility through automated mammographic density measurement. Patients with breast cancer helped shape the study design and co-produced participant-facing documents. They will disseminate the results to the public in a clear and meaningful way. Results will be published with open access in international peer-reviewed scientific journals.
Emergency Departments face increasing pressure due to rising patient demand, complex presentations, and resource constraints, resulting in long waits and extended stays. Nurse-initiated protocols enable nurses to commence investigations and treatments based on clinical guidelines, improving care and efficiency. Despite evidence supporting their effectiveness, few nurse-initiated protocol implementation strategies are grounded in behaviour change theory. This gap may contribute to limited uptake, as many initiatives fail to address the complex factors influencing clinician behaviour.
To develop a behaviour change theory-informed implementation strategy to enhance the uptake of nurse-initiated protocols in the emergency department.
A framework-based intervention design was used.
The Behaviour Change Wheel and Theoretical Domains Framework guided the development of the implementation strategy. Barriers and enablers identified through prior research in 2023 using surveys and focus groups were mapped to relevant intervention functions. Behaviour change techniques were selected based on their potential to address barriers or strengthen enablers. The APEASE criteria (Affordability, Practicability, Effectiveness, Acceptability, Side effects, and Equity) were applied to optimise feasibility.
Nine barriers and ten enablers to nurse-initiated protocols use were identified and categorised using the COM-B (Capability, Opportunity and Motivation) framework and mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework. Eight intervention functions were selected and mapped to 24 behaviour change techniques and 23 delivery modes. The key implementation strategies are education, clinical champions, documentation changes, audit and feedback, and leadership engagement. Stakeholders confirmed the feasibility of the selected strategies.
Theory-informed, context-specific strategies are essential for implementing nurse-initiated protocols in emergency departments. This approach enables the design of targeted, feasible interventions that directly respond to identified barriers and enablers. Future research should test context-specific implementation strategies, assess their long-term impact on healthcare outcomes, and evaluate their scalability across diverse healthcare settings.
By targeting the behavioural determinants of clinician practice, this study fills a critical gap in implementation science within emergency nursing. This study identified 24 behaviour change techniques across eight intervention functions to support nurse-initiated protocol uptake. Strategies such as education, clinical champions, and audit provide a practical, replicable framework to overcome barriers, enhance autonomy, and reduce care delays. Findings support sustainable implementation in emergency settings, with future research needed on long-term impact and scalability.
There is no EQUATOR guideline available for this study.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
Many cancer treatments can result in reduced fertility, impacting survivors’ opportunities for biological parenthood. Fertility preservation (FP) methods for boys and young men, such as cryopreservation of testicular tissue or sperm, offer hope but are currently underused among young male patients with cancer. Despite guidelines recommending early discussion of fertility implications, many newly diagnosed males do not receive FP counselling or referral to fertility services. Male cancer survivors face a higher likelihood of infertility than their peers, yet focused FP decision-making support is lacking. This study aims to address this gap by developing and evaluating the first dedicated patient decision aid (PtDA) for boys and young male patients with cancer aged 11–25 years old, to help them make informed FP decisions before receiving cancer treatment.
The current study follows a multistage process: developing the PtDA, alpha testing for acceptability with former patients, parents and healthcare professionals, and beta testing in clinical settings to ensure effective integration into routine care. Using a combination of interviews and questionnaire data, this research will assess the PtDA’s acceptability and impact on decision-making.
This study has been prospectively registered on the Research Registry (10273). Ethics approval has been obtained from Leeds Beckett University and the National Health Service/Health Research Authority before undertaking data collection. The final resource will be disseminated widely and made freely available online via our dedicated Cancer, Fertility and Me website, for use in clinical and research practice.
Paediatric major trauma patients with more severe injuries and physiological or biochemical abnormalities as a result of the injury are more likely to require invasive management in the form of an operation/interventional radiology (IR). Adverse psychological outcomes, such as post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, depression and adjustment disorder, are frequently observed in paediatric patients with major trauma. Similarly, it is recognised that children and adolescents who have invasive management are also at an increased risk of adverse psychological outcomes. However, it is not known to what extent major trauma patients requiring invasive management are at risk of adverse psychological outcomes compared with those managed conservatively. This study aims to determine whether paediatric major trauma patients who require an operation/IR have increased odds of having an adverse psychological outcome compared with those who are managed conservatively.
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines will be used to construct this review. The databases Medline (via Ovid), Embase (via Ovid), PsycInfo (via Ebscohost) and Cinahl (via Ebscohost) will be searched from inception to February 2025. Both title and abstract screening and full-text screening will be done by two reviewers, with an adjudicating third reviewer. For randomised controlled trials, the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool will be employed, while for non-randomised studies, the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale will be used. We will assess bias using contoured funnel plots (with p set at 0.01, 0.05 and 0.10), non-parametric trim-fill analysis, leave-one-out analysis and Galbraith plotting. We will execute formal (Egger) testing for funnel plot asymmetry and also calculate prediction intervals if sufficient study N of 10 is accrued. Certainty and confidence in cumulative evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.
Ethical review is not required as no original data will be collected. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and at academic conferences.
CRD42025643459.
FreshRSS 