There is limited research exploring the age-related difference in communication when describing pain experiences. This project aimed to identify key differences between adolescents’, young adults’ and adults’ (i) preferred communication method, (ii) language content and (iii) lexical amount and variety when discussing their persistent pain experience using chatbot technology.

An exploratory concurrent nested mixed-methods design using a comparative analysis.

Participants were recruited through a convenience sampling strategy from two tertiary multidisciplinary pain centres in Australia.

20 adolescents, 20 young adults and 20 adults completed a pain history assessment using the Dolores application. The inclusion criteria for this study were (i) persistent non-cancer pain for at least 3 months, (ii) 10 years of age and over and (iii) adequate expressive and receptive language skills to complete the required tasks in English, as determined by clinicians in the treating team.

Drawn, voice and typed responses provided by participants during the chatbot interaction were analysed using content analysis. Fisher’s exact tests and ² tests were used to examine differences between age groups. Strong effect size estimates generated from comparative analyses suggested that adolescents were the most likely age group to utilise drawing (p=0.153, Cramer’s V=0.268), preferred typing over speaking (p==0.007, Cramer’s V=0.433). Young adults used the greatest number and variety of words in response to chatbot questions including evaluative language (p=0.097, Cramer’s V=0.296). Adults tended to use more metaphors (p=0.085, Cramer’s V=0.305) and had a strong preference for speaking over typing (p=

The results of this study provide insights into age-related differences in communication and preferences when using technology to communicate about persistent pain. Future research exploring individualised age-related approaches to pain assessment, supported by the findings of this study, in comparison to current standardised assessments administered by clinicians are warranted.

This study aims to develop a robust, targeted measure of patient experiences of person-centred care (PCC), informed by the lived experiences of patients with chronic illness using the psychometric theory of Rasch measurement.

The Rasch measurement model was used to analyse the psychometric functioning of 57 candidate items and select appropriate items for a targeted measure.

Participants were recruited from Prolific.com, having experience of both chronic or long-term illness and first-hand experience of primary or secondary care in the UK healthcare setting and completed a survey containing PCC items and descriptors of healthcare experience.

Data from 501 adult persons (49.5% men and 49.7% women) with different types of long-term conditions recruited from the prolific web panel.

For an initial analysis of all 57 candidate items, there were several indicators of misfit, such as signs of local dependence and multidimensionality. The response options worked as intended according to threshold ordering. After removal of misfitting items and refinement for the best spread of locations, a 14-item solution showed good fit to the Rasch model in this UK sample.

The results support a unidimensional measurement of patients’ experiences of PCC, once the local dependency was accommodated. The present work thus offers a 14-item measure of PCC experience. The present work also contains a robust item bank for the further development of dynamic computerised adaptive testing.

The UK Health Security Agency and the National Health Service England (NHSE) led a hepatitis C virus (HCV) patient re-engagement exercise beginning in 2018, which entailed sharing public health surveillance data with NHSE Operational Delivery Networks (ODNs) in England. The ODNs used the data to contact and offer testing and treatment to people historically diagnosed with HCV, but who did not have evidence of successfully clearing the virus. A quantitative evaluation found that of 55 329 individuals whose details were shared with ODNs, around 13% had treatment after the exercise commenced. This qualitative evaluation aims to identify the barriers and facilitators to the re-engagement exercise as reported by ODN staff.

Semistructured interviews. The topic guide and analysis were guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework, using a combined deductive framework and inductive thematic analysis approach.

21 staff from 13 ODNs. The sampling frame was designed to capture participants from all regions of England and with varied outcomes from the re-engagement exercise.

Interviewees reported the most barriers in environmental context and resources (including staffing limitations, interruptions during COVID-19, restricted laboratory access), and social influences (with limited responses from general practitioners and patients). Interviewees discussed whether it was appropriate for ODNs and individual staff to be assigned the data validation work and reported some stress and memory/attention barriers due to the volume of the exercise. They had varied beliefs about the consequences of the exercise, with most believing it was worthwhile due to treatment yield, lessons learnt and confirmation that some people had cleared the virus. Further facilitators included the ODN goals fitting with the exercise, and regional resources such as patient databases. Interviewees also reported adaptations to the exercise that facilitated patient contact, and their ongoing work to re-engage patients emphasised outreach partnerships and peer support.

The evaluation revealed insights into methods for re-engaging patients and of sharing and using public health data to support clinical practice. Government support and funding provision for regionally tailored holistic re-engagement approaches, alongside enhancements to health surveillance data, could enable barriers to re-engagement to be overcome.

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a heterogeneous psychiatric disorder, with symptom variation between patients.

We describe clinical and demographic characteristics of patients with PTSD based on real-world data.

This non-interventional, retrospective cohort study analysed de-identified electronic health records of patients from the Holmusk NeuroBlu database in the USA. Patients with ≥2 PTSD diagnoses captured in the database within 30 days between 2001 and 2020 were included. The index date was defined as the date of the first recorded PTSD diagnosis. In patients who were aged ≥18 years, demographic and clinical characteristics at baseline (index date ±14 days), in the 6 months prior to baseline and 12 months after baseline were described. Patients were stratified into four mutually exclusive subgroups according to treatment received: psychotherapy only, pharmacotherapy only, psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy, and untreated. Natural language processing models were used to derive PTSD symptoms from unstructured clinician-documented mental state examination data. Data were analysed descriptively.

A total of 37,449 patients had ≥2 PTSD diagnoses within 30 days between 2001 and 2020; 32,875 patients received care at clinical sites with both inpatient/outpatient units; 25,507 patients received psychotherapy and/or pharmacotherapy as per further prespecified criteria, and 17,234 were ≥18 years old and included in this analysis. Most patients (84.9%) received psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy or both during the first year post-baseline. Mean age (SD) was 37.7 (12.4) years, 73.4% of patients were female and 59.6% were White. At baseline, 98% of patients had ≥1 psychiatric comorbidity; major depressive disorder (42.2%), substance use disorder (35%) and anxiety disorder (30.7%) were most frequently reported. Reported suicidal ideation/attempts were most frequent in the pharmacotherapy only group compared with other subgroups at baseline. The most frequently prescribed drug classes were antidepressants (51.8%), second-generation antipsychotics (29.9%) and anxiolytics (23.3%) at baseline. Trazodone, clonazepam, quetiapine and sertraline were the most frequently prescribed medications.

In the overall study population, most patients were female, with a high prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities. Demographic and clinical characteristics observed in this study varied across treatment subgroups. These insights may support patient-specific treatment planning and inform health-economic decision models in PTSD.

Rheumatological diseases represent a widespread heterogeneous group of disorders, united by chronic musculoskeletal inflammatory processes. Despite the increasing effectiveness of new therapies, the lack of adequate treatments for certain conditions and the occurrence of adverse drug reactions have led to the need for alternative strategies, including food supplements. These products are perceived by the patient as a valuable aid without adverse effects. However, adverse reactions to food supplements have been reported, although their incidence cannot be established due to the lack of consumption data. In this context, the IntegraRE project aims at collecting information on the use of food supplements in rheumatology, considering both physicians and patients.

A survey-based cross-sectional study has been designed into two consecutive phases: Phase 1 aims to investigate rheumatologists’ knowledge, attitudes and recommendations to patients regarding food supplements, while Phase 2 focuses on estimating patients’ intake of food supplements, including the specific products used, unit consumed and reasons for their consumption. Questionnaires will be collected from at least 287 rheumatologists and 2000 patients, geographically distributed in proportion to the Italian population. These will gather information on sociodemographic variables, lifestyle factors, knowledge, clinical practices and supplement consumption.

The study protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Italian National Institute of Health (approval no. AOO 0032395 on 24 July 2024). The results, which will be widely disseminated through conference presentations, peer-reviewed publications and dedicated project webpage, will provide an understanding of the use of food supplements in rheumatology and allow guidelines to be drawn up on their correct use in the clinical practice of rheumatological diseases. Overall, this survey will increase people’s awareness of the effects of food supplements and encourage their safe and conscious use.

Testing rates for hepatitis C virus (HCV) of new prison entrants vary considerably between prisons, with particularly low rates in category B male remand prisons. Improvement in testing rates will require an understanding of the underlying reasons.

To investigate the rates and uptake of testing for HCV in new entrants to three category B prisons in England and to use an implementation science framework to analyse the facilitators and barriers to meeting national standards for HCV testing in a prison healthcare environment.

This mixed-methods non-interventional study collated three data sets: anti-HCV testing uptake in prisons, plus data on the prior location of each individual (transfer from another prison or community) and their length of stay; a questionnaire designed to identify reasons for decline of a test administered to people in prison (PIP) who refused testing; qualitative interviews with key stakeholders in the process of prison HCV testing, with analysis based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to enable identification of barriers and facilitators to testing.

This study was conducted in the East Midlands region of England.

Data were obtained from three category B male remand prisons.

Primary outcome measures: This descriptive study sought to understand factors that influence anti-HCV test uptake in three English remand prisons. The selected prisons serve a combined population of 2.3 million and have the capacity to accommodate a total of 2030 prisoners. The testing rates within 4 weeks of arrival in the three prisons over a 12-month study period (March 2022–March 2023) were 17.2%, 28.3% and 42.5%. PIP were more likely to be tested if they arrived from the community compared with interprison transfer (39.13% vs 29.5%). Testing uptake rates increased with length of prison stay (12.4%, 33.6% and 40.7% for stays of 0–7, 15–21 and >28 days, respectively). The most common reasons for not accepting a test were a lack of interest and not wanting to be retested. 13 semistructured interviews revealed 21 barriers and 9 facilitators to testing, summarised in 5 overarching themes: misunderstanding of the concept of opt-out testing; nurses not meeting performance targets due to competing priorities; prison regime hampering healthcare delivery; absence of a specifically appointed co-ordinator who is held to account; incentivising nurses to test and PIP to accept testing.

The rates of testing for HCV in three category B male remand prisons were far below national standards. Key recommendations to improve testing rates, based on the CFIR analysis are (1) to appoint a dedicated senior healthcare staff member who combines responsibility, accountability and authority to proactively oversee testing and ongoing referral processes; (2) to reintroduce an education programme for prison healthcare teams to teach about HCV, cirrhosis and how to deliver ‘opt-out’ conversations and respond to typical responses and (3) to adopt more widely the strategy already shown to be successful in increasing test uptake by the Hepatitis C Trust HITT programme and offer simple incentives.

To explore participants’ experiences of potential adverse effects of the Informed Health Choices secondary school intervention across three trial sites and to revise a framework of potential adverse effects of interventions to improve critical thinking about health choices.

This was a qualitative study. We extracted and analysed relevant data from separate process evaluations in each country. Data came from surveying teachers, observing lessons and group and individual interviews with students, teachers and other stakeholders. We modified and applied framework analysis, including five stages: (1) development of an initial framework of potential adverse effects, (2) familiarisation with the data, (3) indexing, (4) abstraction and synthesis and (5) revising the framework. We applied reflexive strategies individually and as a team.

Lower secondary school in five randomly sampled subcounties of Kisumu County in Kenya, districts representing all five provinces in Rwanda, and six districts in the central region of Uganda, between 2022 and 2024.

Students and teachers in the intervention arms of the trials, parents of students in the intervention arms and administrators at intervention schools, as well as curriculum developers and policy-makers.

The intervention involved providing teachers with a 2–3-day training workshop, and digital classroom resources, including lesson plans for 10 lessons to be delivered over the course of one semester.

We generated findings about potential increases in adverse misunderstandings, anxiety related to transfer of learning, adversely experienced cognitive dissonance, work or schoolwork-related stress, inequity, conflicts and waste. The revised framework includes the same categories of potential adverse effects as our initial framework: decision-making harms, psychological harms, equity harms, group and social harms, waste and other harms. We revised other elements of the framework, including definitions of the categories and its structure.

This study provides insight into the potential adverse effects of interventions to improve critical thinking about health choices. The findings complement those of the trials and country-level process evaluations.

Mental disorders are among the leading causes of the global burden of disease and are often associated with severe functional impairment and high societal costs. Psychotherapeutic, psychopharmacological and internet-based mental health interventions have proven to be helpful, but challenges remain, including only moderate response rates, high relapse rates and barriers to accessing mental healthcare. Much of the existing evidence stems from studies conducted in controlled, often standardised settings that only partially reflect real-world conditions, contributing to a ‘scientist-practitioner gap’. Moreover, the mechanisms of change, such as the interaction between treatment intensity, common factors (eg, the therapeutic relationship) and specific intervention techniques, have not been sufficiently investigated. In particular, the relationship of changes in personality functioning (PF) with mental and physical health has not yet been extensively researched.

The PSYMPACT (Psychological Impact Factors of Mental Health Treatments) study will use a longitudinal study design with a naturalistic sample (N 3000) to examine changes in psychopathology, PF and allostatic load in psychotherapeutic, psychopharmacological and internet-based treatments. The aim is to identify factors contributing to improvements and deteriorations in mental and physical health across different settings, including common and specific factors. Additionally, to provide patient perspectives, qualitative interviews will be conducted with individuals with varying levels of severity of mental health problems. Allostatic load will be assessed using repeated hair cortisol measurements. Furthermore, ecological momentary assessment will be used to examine the diurnal variability of PF as well as its more momentary correlates and longer-term outcomes. The central research questions and aims include (1) the assessment of common factors across different treatment settings, (2) associations of specific and common factors with improvements in mental health, including PF, (3 and 4) the importance of treatment intensity and interaction effects with common and specific factors, (5) the association of changes in psychopathology with changes in allostatic load, (6) the trait and state variability of PF, (7) the identification of patients who deteriorate under specific treatments and (8) patients’ perspectives on the effectiveness of different treatment modalities.

Approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Department of Education and Psychology at the Freie Universität Berlin, Germany. Results will be submitted to peer-reviewed specialised journals and presented at national and international conferences.

Before data collection started in November 2024, the study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (https://www.drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00035560).

Cardiac rehabilitation has traditionally been administered through face-to-face consultations with a specialised team of nurses, medical doctors and physiotherapists. However, the healthcare system is undergoing a significant digital transformation, which may lead to telemedicine (TM) becoming a cornerstone of healthcare. However, successful TM requires digital competencies among both patients and health professionals. This trial will examine the best methods of onboarding patients to TM by way of a co-designed cardiac telerehabilitation model with a family-focused approach.

The aim is to investigate how patients and family members could benefit from using TM, including video consultations and home monitoring, for cardiac rehabilitation. We ask how patients’ health literacy, digital health literacy, health-related quality of life and family support would be affected by a shift to TM.

The primary outcome is the Health Literacy Questionnaire, and secondary outcomes are the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire, European Quality of Life—Five Dimensions Scale, and the Iceland—Family Perceived Support Questionnaire. The sample size is 73 patients in each group. Data will be analysed with ² or Fisher’s exact tests, a t-test or a Wilcoxon signed-rank test, depending on the distribution.

Approval for this trial was obtained from the Danish Data Protection Agency (P-2023-65) and the National Committee on Health Research Ethics (F-23075094). The trial will be conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The trial results—whether positive, neutral or negative—will be submitted for publication. The trial has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06320652).

(NCT06320652).

First post-contrAst SubtracTed (FAST) MRI, an abbreviated breast MRI scan, has high sensitivity for sub-centimetre aggressive breast cancer and short acquisition and interpretation times. These attributes promise effective supplemental screening. Until now, FAST MRI research has focused on women above population-risk of breast cancer (high mammographic density or personal history). DYAMOND aims to define the population within the population-risk NHS Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP) likely to benefit from FAST MRI. The study population is the 40% of screening clients aged 50–52 who have average mammographic density (BI-RADS (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System) B) on their first screening mammogram. DYAMOND will answer whether sufficient numbers of breast cancers, missed by mammography, can be detected by FAST MRI to justify the inclusion of this group in a future randomised controlled trial.

Prospective, multicentre, diagnostic yield, single-arm study with an embedded qualitative sub-study: all recruited participants undergo a FAST MRI. An internal pilot will assess the willingness of sites and screening clients to participate in the study. Screening clients aged 50–52, with a clear first NHSBSP mammogram and BI-RADS B mammographic density (by automated measurement) will be invited to participate (recruitment target: 1000). The primary outcome is the number of additional cancers detected by FAST MRI (missed by screening mammography). A Fleming’s two-stage design will be used as this allows for early stopping after stage 1, to save participants, funding costs and time continuing to the end of the study if the question can be answered earlier.

The NHSBSP Research and Innovation Development Advisory Committee and the Yorkshire and Humber–Sheffield Research Ethics Committee (23/YH/0268, study ID (IRAS): 330059) approved this research protocol. Participation involves a two-stage informed consent process, enabling screening for eligibility through automated mammographic density measurement. Patients with breast cancer helped shape the study design and co-produced participant-facing documents. They will disseminate the results to the public in a clear and meaningful way. Results will be published with open access in international peer-reviewed scientific journals.

ISRCTN74193022

Radiological imaging is a central facet of the multidisciplinary evaluation of suspected child physical abuse. Current guidelines for the imaging of suspected child physical abuse are often unclear, incomplete and highly variable regarding recommendations on critical questions, thereby risking clinical heterogeneity, unstructured decision-making and missed diagnoses. We, therefore, aim to develop and report an evidence-based and consensus-derived international guideline for the radiological investigation of index and contact children in the context of suspected physical abuse and to ascertain areas of scientific uncertainty to inform future research priorities.

The international guidelines for the imaging investigation of suspected child physical abuse (IGISPA) consensus group includes formal representation from 127 recognised experts across 14 subspecialties, six continents and 32 national and/or international organisations. Participants will be divided into five longitudinal subgroups (indications for imaging, skeletal imaging, visceral imaging, neuroimaging and postmortem imaging) with three cross-cutting themes (radiography, genetics and adaptations for low- and lower-middle-income countries). Each subgroup will develop preliminary consensus statements via integration of current evidence-based guidelines, systematic literature review and the clinical expertise of a multinational group of experts. Statements will then undergo anonymised voting in a modified e-Delphi process and iterative revision until consensus (≥80% agreement) is achieved. Final statements will undergo both internal and external peer review prior to endorsement.

As an anonymous survey of consenting healthcare professionals, this study did not require ethical approval. Experts provided written informed consent to participate prior to commencement of the modified Delphi process. The IGISPA consensus statement and any subsequent guidance will be published open access in peer-reviewed medical journals.

The only supportive therapy for patients with severe acute kidney injury (AKI), a common complication among the critically ill, is dialysis. Based on the literature and current guidelines, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) with a total effluent dose of 20–25 mL/kg/hour and adjustments to ensure such dose is delivered despite down time (eg, due to surgical procedures) is recommended. However, experimental and clinical studies suggest that azotaemia, which can be induced by lowering the effluent dose, may accelerate renal recovery. This clinical study investigates whether a lower effluent dose (10–15 mL/kg/hour) for a maximum of 7 days or until successful (>24 hours) liberation of CRRT in critically ill patients with a dialysis-dependent AKI accelerates renal recovery and reduces time on CRRT compared with guideline-directed standard dose (25–30 mL/kg/hour).

The Ketzerei trial is an international, multicentre randomised, controlled trial, designed to investigate if a lower effluent dose (10–15 mL/kg/hour) accelerates renal recovery and reduces the time on CRRT compared with the guideline directed standard effluent dose (25–30 mL/kg/hour). The study aims to enrol 150 critically ill patients with a dialysis-dependent AKI. Eligible patients will be randomised to receive either a standard effluent dose (control group, 25–30 mL/kg/hour) or lower effluent dose (interventional group, 10–15 mL/kg/hour). The primary endpoint is the number of days free from CRRT and alive (from randomisation through day 28). Key secondary endpoints include the number of (serious) adverse events due to potential uremia, the duration of RRT and intensive care unit survival.

The Ketzerei trial has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Chamber of Physicians Westfalen-Lippe (2023–343 f-s), the University of Muenster and subsequently by the corresponding Ethics Committee of the participating sites. Results will be disseminated widely and published in peer-reviewed journals, presented at conferences and will guide patient care and further research.

clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06021288).

This study examined the patterns and persistence of SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity among college students from March to November 2020. Using data from a sample of students at Indiana University, we assessed (1) the duration and seropositivity following reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR)-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and (2) persistence of seropositivity over 10 weeks between two laboratory antibody test visits.

The longitudinal study was conducted at Indiana University from September to November 2020, with two laboratory antibody tests, and included self-reported RT-PCR results before the observational period from as early as 20 March 2020. This 6–9 month period contributes to our understanding of seropositivity dynamics. The study included 172 college students who had previously tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 and measured their seropositivity.

Our results showed a notable decline (66.7%) in antibody positivity over the observed period. Additionally, 12 weeks postinfection, most students with a SARS-CoV-2 infection history (75%) were no longer seropositive.

These findings reveal a nuanced picture of antibody dynamics, highlighting the complex interplay of factors among college students. The study underscores the need for continued research on antibody levels among young adults to better understand the drivers of variations in antibody persistence.

#NCT04620798.

The COVID-19 pandemic has made long-standing nursing workforce challenges apparent on an international scale. Decision-makers must develop multi-pronged approaches to foster the development and maintenance of a strong nursing workforce to support health systems. These approaches require attendance to recruitment and retention initiatives that show promise for stabilising the nursing workforce now and into the future.

Searches were conducted across MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Scopus from January 2014 up to 11 March 2024. This rapid umbrella review protocol is guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology and adheres to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines. The research question guiding this review is: what structures have healthcare systems put in place to stabilise, support and sustain the nursing workforce? This review will include existing reviews of nursing workforce initiatives with outcomes that impact nursing recruitment and retention. Results will support local health transformation including the development of a jurisdictional nursing workforce stabilisation strategy. Findings from this review will be relevant for the design, refinement and implementation of nursing workforce sustainability strategies in countries around the globe and may apply to strategies for other healthcare workers.

Institutional research ethics board exemption was received. The research team is supported by an advisory group that includes provider and patient partners. The results from this study will inform the Nursing Workforce Strategy for the province of Nova Scotia as part of a larger Canadian Institutes of Health Research-funded project. They will also inform broader planning and strategy in Canada through integration with other evidence-generation activities such as comparative policy analyses and workforce planning exercises. Finally, the results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Registered through Open Science Framework: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/CUJYK